Thoughts from THE Show, is $29k the new $10k?


Had another enjoyabe brief one day visit to THE Show, Newport Beach last weekend. Great to see so many fellow hobbiests, and great gear. Went in search of speakers; here is a brief and disjointed summary of my impressions:
Many vendors were focusing on the $25-32k range; with most for sale around $29k as an entry point to 'quality'.
Rockport showed their new entry, $29k speaker in the Atrium. Had great balance; was warm, detailed, and engaging. First show presence for dealer; nice guy. My first experience with Rockport; was very impressed.
Eficion: at the Hilton; wow; for $16k I think it gives Wilson a run for its money with the Sophia; its AMT ribbon tweeter had great crystal highs, and its large woofer filled the room with satisfying bass, I enjoyed it.
BMC: nice gear; their $32k speakers had dipole arrangement; with both front and rear firing speakers; very engaging, huge sound stage, and great low end response. Paired up nicely with their amp/dac
YG: brought my own CD; so I was familiar with what was possible; initialy liked their sound;but in the end found it a bit 'dry', and brittle; and not totally enjoyable, this was at at least three different rooms showing their speakers.
Wilson Shasha's in the Brooks-Barden room; always a treat; enjoyed their room treatments, and professionalism, nice analog set up. Warm, detailed, lovely, and engaging.
Ventures: wow, very expensive; and very large...but totally engaging; great integration, warm, detailed, expansive sound stage, great bass, huge open subtle nuance on female voices...
Ayon: liked their Lumen White's better last year, than their own speaker line this year, but great amps and dac.
Found the KEF blades a bit disappointing, surprised at how large they are in person.
Enjoyed the TAD speakers again this year, well balanced, integrated very well.
There was a 'curved' line array speaker; I forget its name that also was quite good, interesting design, but filled the room with great sound; no glare.
The Veloce gear, with its battery source was extremely 'quiet' and detailed, and enjoyable.
Surprised how many room utilized the Synergistic Research ART treatments...hard to tell how it improved things; but can't argue with the results.
Too much to see and listen to in one brief day. Curious to hear from other members their take....I know you don't need to spend so much to get quality sound, but so many vendors showing off their $29k speakers made me want to chuckle; and take out a home loan...also thought the digital and computer audio was getting very close now to the analog rigs.
Love having this showcase in our backyard on the west coast; and will contiue to support and attend. Kudos to Bob Levi; and his team at LA/OC audio society; another great job; and Tierney Sutton singing on Friday night was an extra special treat.
mribob
I think Honeybee2012 is just trying to get a buzz out of us.

On his "over 50", I'd agree with him but then we'd both be wrong.
I also liked Jonathan Tinn's room, both analog and digital rigs. I, too, was impressed with the little Evolution speakers, although they were being pushed by some mighty expensive gear. I don't think anyone mentioned the first floor Hilton room showing Concert Fidelity electronics and Estelon speakers. We are north of the $30K speaker mark here, but I very much liked the Estelon's natural presentation of small ensemble music. The room was huge and the ceiling high, which no doubt helped. Speakers were 3-way design, and I would like to have heard them playing full-on orchestral music, but that was not the fare I heard.
People over 50 were likely involved in much of the design of the speakers, amps, wire, and front end components you hear, the mastering of the music you buy, the conducting and performing of much of the classical, jazz, or whatever stuff you might like, and every other aspect of music reproduction. I'm over 50 and am currently a sought after professional live sound technician/recording engineer (and musician/composer), and my experience when working with many younger (a lot younger) sound mixers is they (not ALL of course) can be completely clueless and have tin ears, to put it mildly. Nothing makes up for experience and taste it would seem...example: Patty Larkin (I name names in case this can somehow get back to the culprit) brought a young dude along to mix for her at a concert venue I had system-designed, mixed, and recorded successfully for many years. A sold out show...This guy had a "degree" in some music related technical field and worked in a studio someplace so I assumed he had a clue...man...No idea how to use trim pots (on a standard pro Mackie board no less) for mic level, no idea how to utilize clean amplification without compression or excessive EQ, a monitor mix nightmare episode, and it all resulted in the ONLY gig where other pro musicians in the crowd, along with some regular audience members, actually said the sound kinda sucked. This happened again for a sold out Janis Ian show (I can't kick out the artist's little mixer friend, can I?) and it was a cringe worthy episode of my having to rescue the hapless "sound chick". Lesson learned: Generally speaking, as far as taste and a refined ability to discern sound quality goes, young people can kiss my ass.
Maybe we should start another thread on this, Wolf-Garcia. That highly touted Shelby Lynne record (at least the audiophile pressing) was recorded by Al Schmidt and produced by Phil Ramone. Neither of those guys is a youngster.
Bryon,

I didn't know the Evolution Acoustic MMMicro Ones were only $2500. I had a quick listen and was really impressed but thought that they were one of the expensive ones due to the quality of the cabinetry. Very impressive sound.

Mribob,

You put those on your short list as well along with the Atohm GT-1s.

All the best,
Nonoise
Whart...no need...at my age it will take me days to recover from such a wordy post.
FWIW, I'd be willing to bet that if someone did a study, there would be a strong correlation between age groups and the kinds of systems that they think sound best or worst. Less so for the ones they think just sound good.
06-13-12: Nonoise
I didn't know the Evolution Acoustic MMMicro Ones were only $2500. I had a quick listen and was really impressed but thought that they were one of the expensive ones due to the quality of the cabinetry.
Hi Nonoise - I've heard the EA micros at two different shows. The first time, I didn't know anything about them. After 5 minutes of listening, I tried to guess how much they cost. The number I came up with $8,000. When Jonathan Tinn told me the price, I was shocked.

Now if only he can get the things shipped. Lots of production delays. Too bad, because this speaker has the potential to raise awareness about EA, which IMO they deserve. Hopefully, they'll work things out.

Bryon

P.S. I have no financial or personal relationship with Jonathan Tinn or Evolution Acoustics.
Hope to attend the upcoming Capital Audiofest in July and hear some new things. Looks like a good lineup worth checking out. I was at the inaugural 2 years ago and that was good. Plus it seems to grow each year.
>>I am 53 and can hear relatively well up to 12 or 13 Khz.

You must be an alien from another planet. I have worked extensively with the House Hearing Institute. They have performed more detailed hearing tests on more human beings than any group in the world. No males over 50 have ever heard over 10.5 KHz. No one. Over 94% cannot hear over 8.2 kHz.

But this is a hobby where Jon Atkinson (the current audio god) claims to hear close to 20 KHz in his fifties. He also hears vast differences in cables, cones, etc. This is all to be expected in a hobby where entry level speakers cost $29K. Audio is largely a Voodoo/Placebo hobby.
High end audio goes back over a hundred years. Edison made a high end phonograph around 1900 that cost $250 when the average wage was about $400/year. That would be comparable to roughly $18k today? So "The American Dream" of wanting more of the best goes back a long way. And like someone said, the trickle down effect is what we all count on. The wealthy get it first and eventually the costs/prices come down to a more affordable level. After all, I could spend 5 bucks at a garage sale today for just about any turntable and easily out perform Edison's 1905 era high end phonograph.
I got to go to a CES in 1989 in Chicago. I spent the entire day across the street at the high end audio exhibition where everyone had to set up in hotel rooms. One of the best days of my life hearing and seeing all types of equipment and music. I still have vivid memories of some of those remarkable demonstrations as well as some of the "snake oil" products. I envy your opportunities on the West Coast to see and hear these shows. It has to be great and of course it is going to showcase some expensive gear. You wouldn't show up to an important interview in scuzzy shorts and a t-shirt would you?
Grege,
I have tested my hearing on various Internet sites with varying results. Can you point us to an online test that we could reliably use to test our hearing?
Grege: you're kidding, right? I just checked again to make sure and I can still hear 16kHz. I'm 54. Up through my late 40s I could still hear 20kHz, if it was loud. That surprised me because back then I expected it to have fallen off by then. It used to be painful for me back in the 70s and 80s to walk into a department store that had a wall of Television sets on display. I could easily hear the 19kHz whistle from the flyback transformer in a TV. An entire wall of TVs whistling was torture. My parents and even my brothers didn't know what I was talking about. My two boys can hear 20kHz, so I know my speakers are working up that high. I'm glad my hearing has dropped off. Those frequencies are annoying. My boys just complained about the high frequency noise when I did this test. I'm not alien, I was born in Indiana and I have a legitimate birth certificate as proof.
I also have my hospital birth certificate with my footprints on it. I wonder if my feet would still match the lines just on a larger scale?
"u must be an alien from another planet. I have worked extensively with the House Hearing Institute. They have performed more detailed hearing tests on more human beings than any group in the world. No males over 50 have ever heard over 10.5 KHz. No one. Over 94% cannot hear over 8.2 kHz. "

Well, I am not from another planet, but I am not familiar with the stats so can't say. My test may not have been perfect and I last did it a couple years back. Can you provide a reference to the research?

Even in the case of 8.2K, you still would hear most of the music produced by most any common instrument according to charts I have seen indicating such things, including a significant portion of the treble/upper midrange. The ability to hear "air" would be diminished even further I suppose.

I would agree that this hobby is snakeoil ridden, but I can also state positively without personal doubt that I am able to hear differences with many subtle tweaks including ICs and power.

I also agree that hearing up to 20khz, as I have measured when young, can be a mixed blessing. A lot of noise occurs there and not a lot of music. That could work to ones detriment in terms of musical enjoyment. I know I enjoy the sound of music more than ever as I get older.

Wouldn't be interesting if audio critics and reviewers had their hearing ability quantitatively certified and published before publishing their opinions? What about also if the general public could similarly if desired? That might help match up like-eared listeners and critics. The landscape of high end audio would probably look a lot different, probably for the better.
Notice how the sensitivity decreases around 1kHz which just happens to be the upper end of the female voice? I think this chart is based on data from married men :)
"Notice how the sensitivity decreases around 1kHz which just happens to be the upper end of the female voice? I think this chart is based on data from married men :)"

"what a piece of work is man..."

Natural Selection at it's finest.
There is a free iPad app from Siemens that makes you delineate similar
sounding sibilant squacks against background noise. I have a tough time
with that one. Not frequency test, per se. There are a bunch of those
available on line.
I was at an ENT dr. last week due to a case of tinnitus I picked up about a month ago from a sinus infection that followed a 10-day Florida trip. Severe ringing in 1 ear for about 3 weeks until the antibiotics and steroids finally started to work.

The dr. did a number of hearing test on both my ears an said I was at about 70% recovered in the tinnitus ear so far, and that my other ear had the sensitivity of that of a 10-year old, which I took to be a pretty good thing(as in 0 hearing loss). I too am bothered by high-pitched sounds that others seem to be oblivious to. That would seem to directly contradict some of the statements above on hearing loss. I am 54 and listen to my system at least 2-3 hours per day.

Sorry to further derail this thread, but thought this input to be of some value to the above discussion.

(this is a cross post from another show thread)

The 2nd Annual T.H.E. Show Newport Beach was pretty fun. I’ve never been to a hi-end show of any kind and being that the event was being held only five miles from my house, it was an easy decision.

Here are my show favorites. -

The MBL room playing an open reel at 15ips. This was by far the best room for me as well as the friend that accompanied me. Unbelievable resolution, wonderful clean lively sound, top to bottom. We first visited the room in the morning and Hugh Masekela was playing Stimela from the album Hope. This amazingly clean, well-produced and mastered material really demonstrated the wonderfulness of the MBL 101s. I have Martin Logan Vantages and so this sound was right up my alley – I know they don’t compare, this is just for your reference. We specifically went back later that evening to hear The Talking Heads – Stop Making Sense and Pink Floyd – Darkside of the Moon. This second session really reinforced to my friend and I that the MBLs are something special. This room was an all MBL setup with the exception of the open reel. The system could be played quite loud and yet no fatigue at all. The louder it got the better it sounded. Really amazing.

I really felt the McIntosh room sounded excellent. I very much liked the floor standing speakers that were driven by a tube pre and the MC452 SS amp. They were also using the MEN220 and their power distribution component. All of these components really played nicely together. I must note that I am a McIntosh fan, though all this equipment is out of my league. This is also my first time to hear the McIntosh speakers and they were a treat. I don’t know what model they were and couldn’t find them on McIntosh’s website.

The IG room was pretty awesome as well. Really nice smooth but dynamic sound. I forget what electronics were used, but the sound was pretty stunning. It was easy to stay in that room for a bit of a rest and enjoyment.
Finally, I thought that the Empirical Audio room sounded pretty nice. Got to meet Steve and chat for a few minutes. The sign outside the door noted that the whole setup in the room retailed for $32,000. The sound was very clean and what I really focused on was the midrange and upper end because I wanted to know what the Offramp was doing. I’m not sure I heard cymbals sound any better at the show. So clear and precise, no fuzz or timing errors. Just really sounded like cymbals. It would have been nice to hear that setup in a larger room.

Like some others commented, there were many systems that were lack luster at best. Many with six-figure pricing. If the folks setting up these rooms didn’t have the skill set to get it done properly, they shouldn’t have misspent the money. For instance, I really wanted to hear several pieces including the Modwright Oppo 105. The only reason I spent anytime in that room was to look at that piece of gear up close. Also, wanted to hear the AtmaSphere tube pre/amp gear. I left that room rather fast after taking a closer look at the pre and amps as well. Just very bland non-stimulating sound. I’ve no doubt both could have performed better based on all the positive comments here on the Gon.

Overall, I thought the show was great. My friend and I are already planning to go again next year.
I was wrong (looked at the official website and had coverage for only two shows). Anyway, it was actually the third annual event.
"The MBL room playing an open reel at 15ips. This was by far the best room for me as well as the friend that accompanied me. Unbelievable resolution, wonderful clean lively sound, top to bottom. We first visited the room in the morning and Hugh Masekela was playing Stimela from the album Hope. This amazingly clean, well-produced and mastered material really demonstrated the wonderfulness of the MBL 101s."

Yes, similar mbl RTR master tape demo at United Home Audio shop near DC is still probably the best and biggest home audio sound I have heard in recent years. Standard phono and CD demos on same rig was still stellar but not to the same level of overall perfection.
Look hard for the companies offering lower cost great equipment: they are there. For speakers, start with Revel, a company that makes superlative speakers below $10k. The fact is, folks pay MUCH more attention to the expensive stuff, then the same folks cry that it's too expensive. If you happen to be into cars, do you go out of the way to see a $15k car? No, but I bet you cross the street to see a Bugatti. Same in Audio. There are lots of great value pieces. And lots of way way way overpriced pieces. But remember, there are some expensive pieces that really perform superlatively, so not all the big boys are ripoffs. Just most of them are!
I work for a small high-end loudspeaker company and I'll tell you that everything is so expensive and really makes one understand why Chinese manufacturing is so popular. First; What should be an 80-250 dollar euro driver which is a magnet frame, spider, and cone is now $600-1,000 each "wholesale" and sounds like an $80.00 to 200 dollar Chinese copy. American craft workers want 35-60.00 per hour we pay $50.00 per hour fine woods and veneers have gone 10 fold in the last 10 years screws to sandpaper is all more $$$..Bottom line is everything truly artisan is about 8-10 times higher.. good thing we are all earning 10 times more LOL!!!
Quad-man,

Welcome to the new world order.

I suppose as more and more Chinese become wealthy and inflation kicks in there accordingly, the next less developed economy out there will come in to pick up the slack when it comes to low paying jobs that help keep cost of goods low.

It just seems like a natural cycle to me. Just like baseball stars price themselves out of the market and then young guys just getting started with similar skills pick up the slack.
ITs funny (or not) how the AMerican way is to encourage more and more buying as a means of keeping the economy going.

What's needed is more and more learning combined with high standards so more people can actually earn more as opposed to just spending and buying more.

Its kinda scary. Thank god there is a global economy at least to help keep the ship overall afloat!

Just for reference, I did hear a number of rooms playing open reel (RTR) but none of them were even close to the MBL room. As mentioned, they were playing Hugh Masekela's record Hope in the MBL room. My friend bought it after the show and shared it with me this last weekend. The Redbook CD is pretty stunning here at home; one of the best mastered CDs I've ever heard. I've got an SACD copy on the way to compare and have been told it is even better. Anyway, source aside, MBL is what I'd have if money weren't an object or it grew on trees. Not all that exciting to look at but surely the most beautiful to listen to.
This is why a loudspeaker MUST be relieving, accurate, and nimble the passive transducer needs to do what she is told..and the electronics tell her what she'll sound like this is loudspeaker 101!!! The transducer is to deliver all the music without any truncation let the electronics fit the sound of the end user. We used beautiful Lamm amplifiers with the Berlin R at the show and sound varied by the recordings some were soft, some had balance some played fast bass some were mushy..It's damn near impossible to quantify the sound of just the loudspeaker as the synergy of the whole which obviously includes the recordings, the genre, and the preference of the listener.

I like very open fast sound with lots of detail open transient bass and I generally dislike the sound of speakers with 10 mile long crossovers, ones without a port or vent and ones with obvious sonic gaps.
Almost all the rooms with UHA RTR sounded really really good. How I missed the MBL room is beyond me but the best one was the room with that German solid state electronics and speakers driven by UHB. The same room where on left there was the Ayon electronics driven by a UHA RTR too (sounded great). And on left rear there was Lamm 2.2 amps.

Except the J-corder room, except those RTR were Modded Technics and really cool looking but driven by OK electronics.

Those RTR are really interesting and worth looking in to.
Whats funny about the discussion about hearing here on this thread, Is the fact I have listened to these speakers of today that go up to 40khz!, and one of the best speakers I have ever heard only went up to 16khz!, and there is nothing wrong with my hearing at all, the 16khz speakers were horn speakers that was incrediblely detailed on the treble, etc.., they just sounded very good, they were 101 sensativity to boot!, cheers!