The science of opinion ...


Some may find this interesting (it is).

Some may find this threatening (it isn't, it is science).

Some may read it and use it to help them understand the dynamics of internet forums.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078433
atdavid
 "Opinion is the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires no accountability, no understanding."
It is truly unfortunate that some members do not see this forum as being of use to them any longer.
I for one visit to learn and expand my knowledge base.
If someone truly believed there is nothing to be learned from say the analog or tech talk forums then I feel pity for them.

Even these misc audio forums have great value, where else can you see so much of human nature on display both good and bad ( Vegas of course but that's another story!).

Maybe I do not have a life either, but I still believe in the intrinsic value of some sections of this Audiogon forum and I will be darned if I am going to sit back and let it be ruined by some selfish individuals!
What ruins the informational value of a forum more?

  • Unchallenged opinion?
  • Challenging not based on content, but your personal emotional response?




Atdavid
Obviously you have NO CLUE at all as to the reality of my postings of recent times on this thread and what they really appertain to so maybe you should quit while you are ahead.
TBH I am in the wrong for even posting such off topic posts here but they were relevant for people who they concern.
I will cease and desist forthwith as my point has been duly noted by those who need to know.
Good day to all.
Some opinions have littler value than others. Some people believe there actually is a debate. Well, there isn’t. Let’s call it a pretend debate. But if it makes you feel good to think it’s a real debate by all means knock yourself out. 🤪
"...where else can you see so much of human nature on display both good and bad"
Traffic. Although it is mostly bad.
Post removed 
Post removed 
Gee whiz, Lizzie, you act like you care. That’s so sweet! If you think I was kidding you need to go back to whatever backwater school you went to and demand your money back, which probably wasn’t more than 100 dollars anyway. And I’m not joking now either. 🤡
Post removed 
geoff,
You are a man of science. Did you read the article I linked to? You may  like it.

geoffkait,

"...you need to go back to whatever backwater school you went to and demand your money back..."
I am honored to see you are using my ideas in an attempt to be funny when communicating with others.

Maybe you forgot, but many months ago I told you this about getting your money back from school many times.

The only sad part of the comedy is that it does not seem funny when you post it. It is, kind of, old. Still, try some more, practice makes perfect.

If you run out of steam, I can write  a few posts for you so you regain some credibility.
Have I read the article? Three guesses. The first two don’t count. You might think I’m just being funny but comedy is subjective. Why on Earth would I want to read an article about the dynamics of the internet? All of the dynamics of human interaction is right there in front of our noses, all day long, every day. Hel-loo! So cut us some slack. The new pseudo-scientist is the same as the old pseudo-scientist (with apologies to The Who) 😬
geoffkait,

Here you go. Master's words. Frame it.

glupson2,763 posts09-12-2018 10:13amBeing a crystal and a rock is not mutually exclusive.

Rocks and crystals come in various sizes and weights.

Degree of friction does not influence classification into rocks or crystals.

I have not learned about Metallica in elementary school so I cannot comment on that.


Note to geoffkait: Check if the prep school you attended has money back guarantee.

You pretty much cannot go on an audio forum these days without a vocal group yelling "snake oil" "ABX before you can share your opinions" about EVERY single thing in audio.

It's gotten to the point I think these people get offended if people EVER listen to their system for pleasure anymore.

Just gotta ignore them as those cries add nothing to any audio discussion. To them every piece of equipment and every cable sounds the same, nothing makes a difference besides speakers and we are all wasting our time.

That mentality never leads to anything worthwhile as far as audio discussion


Good faith is the only guide for you first, and for others after that...Expertise or others experiments and knowledge from others will correct my way if I am of good faith...

In forum politeness is the supreme manifestation of intelligence and an impersonal intelligence is also at play here, not only a personal one...
History favours the bold, not the polite, though politeness is obviously an admirable goal, but to have politeness, one has to be honest, not only with others but with oneself. That honesty, I find more lacking in forums, than politeness. If we cannot be honest and accept our own limitations, then what value politeness?


I would rather someone call me something to my face and let me defend myself, then treat me with complete politeness, while talking behind my back.


To them every piece of equipment and every cable sounds the same, nothing makes a difference besides speakers and we are all wasting our time.
You are wrong @swanlee597 --- speakers are snake oil to these people too. Why pay money for a brand name speaker, when you can buy same drivers online from China on eBay and build your own cabinets? LOL!!

Oh, the acoustic panels. These morons never question those either (mostly due to their Master, The Dr. Ethan Winer). But again, only 10% of them actually have any acoustic panels, and when they do, it's just thrown out there with no rhyme or reason.
Honesty to the point of being offensive, no. Honesty with tact, yes. Huge difference between the two.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • "These morons never question those either (mostly due to their Master, The Dr. Ethan Winer)."

Perfectly said. Thank you ...

Frank
History favors the bald. The ones who’ve pulled out all their hair trying to get to the bottom of things. History doesn’t favor the armchair pseudo skeptic. Time loves a hero. Tom Waits for no one.
Ethan would be like kryptonite to you geoff, he knows almost everything about a subject to which you know almost nothing :-)  .... serious side: he can be dogmatic and jumps to conclusions without considering all variables, and will fight you, but he does listen. Speaking purely of acoustics at this point.
You’re close. Very close! He’s like a rock to me. And he’s dumber than a box of rocks. Are you Ethan Winer? If so, no offense. 
Post removed 
"History favors the bald."
Is shaving one's head a shortcut to history books? Maybe it is artificial intelligence.
All of these pseudo intellectuals, AES lovers, controlled blind testing obsessives, anti audiophiles, how is one supposed to tell them apart?! I certainly can’t. It’s like some kind of cult. Those guys kill me. And I think it’s funny. I’m tired of pretending it’s not. Comedy is subjective. 🤡

Shaving the messenger’s head, writing the secret message on his bald pate, letting his hair grown back, then sending him to deliver the message was the first use of spread spectrum communications. To read the message you shave the messengers head. Problem solved! Obviously the dude’s wife might not like it too much.
geoff,
Is that a pain in the pocket book you are feeling? You worry about people in the AES ... but I don’t think they worry too much about you, other than "I hope he is all right. Are you sure he doesn't need his medication?"
Yeah, it keeps me up nights worrying about it. 😳 I don’t even know what you’re talking about. Pain in my pocket book? Are you high or something? That’s exactly the kind of dumbass remark Ethan Winer would make. Are you sure you’re not Ethan Winer? I bet you are. It would be just like him to come in as someone else and say what a great guy Ethan Winer is. Give me a break. And stop creeping me out.
Copy / paste from that article (Dr. Ethan Winer, PhD):
------
Most $40 CD players sound exactly the same as $4,000 CD players. If they don't sound the same, one or both of them are defective or poorly designed. 
-----
That's the reason he proudly displays a Walmart DVD player as his "CD player" on his site.

Of course, same holds true for DAC, cables (any cables), Amps, etc. 

And he uses Walmart kiddie stools to hold his bookshelf speakers. When I pointed this out on a FB group, especially with regards how short those stools are, he told me "prove it to me that those stools have any negative impact to his system", then he called me an idiot, threw a graph in my face, etc. etc.
@atdavid, Thanks for the opening link.
I think I’ll stay in neutral, and watch the traffic on the freeway. ;)

@geo, even better link, and more to the point. *G* 

@swanlee597

You pretty much cannot go on an audio forum these days without a vocal group yelling "snake oil" "ABX before you can share your opinions" about EVERY single thing in audio.

It’s gotten to the point I think these people get offended if people EVER listen to their system for pleasure anymore.

Just gotta ignore them as those cries add nothing to any audio discussion. To them every piece of equipment and every cable sounds the same, nothing makes a difference besides speakers and we are all wasting our time.

That mentality never leads to anything worthwhile as far as audio discussion

So true. What always amazes me is the question as to what motivates these people? Why do so many people want to spend their short life telling people that they are buying snake oil and telling them to do double blind tests and repeating this ad infinitum. It is pointless. Why do they do it?
@atdavid is at least trying to do it in an original way here, but it still amounts to the same absolute waste of time. Just...why?

Let me try to help the OP out. 

• Keep an arsenal of scientistic buzzwords at the tip of your tongue. So armed, you can effortlessly explain away even the most firmly acknowledged mysteries with a few impressive phrases and a wave of your hand. For example, the undeniable but incomprehensible facts of animal migration may be definitively ascribed to a "biological spatio-temporal vector-navigation program." Likewise, you may call upon such quasi-substantial conceptual conveniences as "biological clock," "self-organization" and "cellular memory" to deflate any suggestion that orthodox science may lack satisfactory explanations for intractably puzzling phenomena.

• Establish a crusading "Scientific Truth Foundation" staffed and funded by a hive of fawning acolytes. Then purport to offer a million-dollar reward to anyone who can repeatably demonstrate a paranormal phenomenon.  Set the bar for paranormality nowhere in particular. Set the bar for repeatability at a "generous" 98%, safely ensuring that even normal scientific studies that demand a mere preponderance of evidence, or average results above chance, would fail to qualify for the prize. Should someone actually meet or exceed your criteria you can effortlessly dismiss their claim by pointing out that they'd just proven the phenomenon to be perfectly normal!

There are a great many audiophile devices that will surely test the suspicious and intractable mind of the skeptic we haven’t touched on too much here. Dare I even broach the subject? You know what I’m talking about. Things that go bump in the night. Things that absolutely drive skeptics right up the wall.

Mpingo discs and fancy fuses can’t hold a candle to the Icons of Tweakery. Let me give you a few examples. Silver Rainbow Foil. 😛 Red x Pen. 😬 The Intelligent Chip. 😩 Quantum Temple Bell 🤪 Morphic Message Labels. 😲 The Clever Little Clock. New Dark Matter. The Mystery Tweak which, by the way, I’ve decided not to offer for sale because then it wouldn’t be a secret anymore, would it? Lock four physics PhDs 🤓 🤓 🤓 🤓 in a room for a week and they would not be able to figure them out.
Ethan would be like kryptonite to you geoff, he knows almost everything about a subject to which you know almost nothing :-) .... serious side: he can be dogmatic and jumps to conclusions without considering all variables, and will fight you, but he does listen. Speaking purely of acoustics at this point.

Ethan is true pseudo expert. A pencil twiddler of the worst and blind kind. Reminds me of someone here....

His product is crap, his knowledge base is crap. He has threatened to sue people before (individuals, forums, magazines, editorial staff, and experts among them) and been kicked off forums for such behavior. He’s been kicked off more than one forum, for sure.

I and others have gone ’round and ’round with him before, and we have encountered his limited depth to such a large degree that his pattern is well known and well understood. To a point well past nausea. Reminds me of something.....it does....

Are these the marks and talents of a person whom you respect?

Ethan is good with spinning numbers on a calculator or whatnot, but even a dog or horse can be trained to do that.

But knowledgeable about acoustics? yes, maybe... at the generic base level. The rubber stamp simplistic textbook ’by the numbers’ level. Sure. Sort of.

Can he fix REAL problems outside of a simplistic textbook formula?

No.

This means there is little to no mind of capacity or intellect - behind the facade.

Normally, as in the vast number of situations... I would leave this sort of thing alone. But Ethan has surely managed to drum up his own enemies by attacking that which he does not understand, with relentless fervor. And damaging the other given business and people, in the process. Kicking him to the curb is a moment of sanity and reason.
Ethan is in the business of selling a product --- acoustic panels. So of course he will say this and that is snake oil, simply buy my acoustic panels. It's his marketing strategy. As simple as that. Everyone in the business has an agenda. Yes, he says he sold the business, but his name, face, etc. is still in the website, and am pretty sure he is still getting paid from that business in one shape or form or another.
Are you sure you’re not Ethan Winer? I bet you are. It would be just like him to come in as someone else and say what a great guy Ethan Winer is. Give me a break.
Oh... Ethan does this all the time. Especially on Facebook. He has several fake (very fake) accounts that he posts under. It is easy to tell, as often he forgets under which account he is posting, and posts something that the "real" Ethan has already posted before (he is getting old)
All the anti-audiophile master debater pseudo-skeptics come from the same factory. 
Just curious, did one of those fake accounts contain the name David?
I don't remember David. Names of the fake accounts, are typically one of those with first and last names both sounding like first names.
I’m not so sure. Take this little tidbit I picked up in cyberspace, 

So What Happened To The Acoustics Forum? | Stereophile.comI noticed the Acoustics forum "went away" 3 days ago and hasn't returned yet? ... I posted an open letter to Ethan Winer (DavidL) where I called him out for attacking my Acoustic ART System ...
Oh wow! I was not aware this was going on from ten years ago. This is copy/paste:



Quote:
I assume after Ethan was unsuccessful in his attempt to intimidate me he called Stereophile and likewise threatened a lawsuit.

No, he didn't threaten a lawsuit. He did try to go over my head to get his forum posting privileges reinstated, and when that didn't work, canceled all of Real Traps advertising in Stereophile. He then filed a complaint about being harassed on this and other forums by posters like "Michigan J. Frog," with the New Milford, CT police department.

He is now trying to get me to delete the posting in which his being banned was announced: http://forum.stereophile.com/forum/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=82939&Main=82939#Post82939 . I have no intention of deleting this posting.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile


@duckworp- " What always amazes me is the question as to what motivates these people? Why do so many people want to spend their short life telling people that they are buying snake oil and telling them to do double blind tests and repeating this ad infinitum. It is pointless. Why do they do it?"                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           It’s their desperate attempt at being relevant, perhaps?                                                                                                (https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/relevance)                                                                 
I was there for all of that.

The thing about it, is..that..if one actually follows the cutting edge of psychoacoustic research and cutting edge work in acoustics, re scientific articles at places like physorg..

...what one discovers, through doing the hard work of article and research reading and reference sifting...

That the bowls (originally by Franck Tchang) actually DO WORK. AS ADVERTISED.

But, it took years and years to emerge as part of the new knowledge base. It is still filtering and dripping in.

10 years from now, this will all filter down into the average bit of knowledge, for norms in psychoacoustics ,and the fields involved in acoustics. It will be in all the textbooks, to some given degree.

And the people who can't innovate and can only attack things as they are not in the textbooks (dogmatic mindset), those negative proofing mindsets...they’ll be busy attacking the next thing which they don’t understand, things that are emergent and not yet in the textbooks.

And be tossing around the those intellectual flyweight nickel level charlatan and snake oil screams like they were intellectual level manhole covers.

Since, in high end audio, the expectation is the the manufacturers do have the intellectual capacity to bring the new and cutting edge -into the world of audio... it is a given that the dogmatic mindset negative proofing types, they will attack relentlessly. Ad infinitum, as the history of it shows so abundantly.