My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
I saw the below quote on another site (for car audio), and I thought it would be fun for sharing on a Friday - it is a quote from Alan Parsons:
"Audiophiles don’t use their equipment to listen to your music.Audiophiles use your music to listen to their equipment."
Have a great Friday and weekend.
Dave
How about trying the AGD Gran Vivace monoblocks?  AGD offer a money-back in-home trial period, so there's not too much financial downside.
Jay,

Your 'pros and cons' videos are so informational...nobody is as honest and candid as you are. Would love a 'pros and cons' vid on Constellation Audio.
+1 on the AGD Gran Vivace mono blocks. Even the Audions sound great with the Wilson XLF.
-1 on AGD 
Not interested at this time. i appreciate the recommendation and it is always possible that i try it at some point down the road. Right now, my mind is locked in with what I've got going on and what i will be bringing over the next few weeks. 
Hope everyone had a nice weekend. A friend and I were discussing amp traits and descriptors the past few days. Because everyone’s reference points may be different, it seems like adjectives can be used that mean different things to different folks. Especially tricky to characterize an individual component as everything up and downstream can influence the sound. He sent me a link to some useful definitions that could help serve as a basis. I imagine there are other good ones out there. Was informative me for me to read and think about and apply them to my own system.

Jay/others: which amps would you put into the following camps with the above caveats?

DARK: A warm, mellow, excessively rich quality in reproduced sound. The audible effect of a frequency response which is clockwise-tilted across the entire range, so that output diminishes with increasing frequency. (Compare "light" - Lean and tipped-up. The audible effect of a frequency response which is tilted counterclockwise)

WARM: The same as dark, but less tilted. A certain amount of warmth is a normal part of musical sound.

NEUTRAL: Free from coloration.

COOL: Moderately deficient in body and warmth, due to progressive attenuation of frequencies below about 150Hz.

COLD: Same as "cool," only more so. Having somewhat excessive upper-range output and weak lower-range output.

Definitions from: http://www.integracoustics.com/MUG/MUG/bbs/stereophile_audio-glossary.html

zprr,
Reasonable definitions.  Judiciously using an EQ such as my Rane ME 60 has enabled me to change tonalities according to the deficiencies of the speaker, recording, amp.  If the sound is too warm, I lower 200-800 Hz to decrease warmth which is to say increase coolness.  With less flexible tone controls of some preamps this can still be done.  Lowering up to 1000 Hz allows higher freq to be more dominant--this is often a more gentle/tasteful way to achieve more HF brilliance without going over the top with HF boost.

For those closed minded people who disparage EQ, understand that the engineers liberally use EQ in your favorite recordings.  If you don't like their choices, you can do your own EQ to achieve your desired sound.  You may not have to sell your electronics at 50% loss.  Read the glowing latest Stereophile review of the Accuphase DG-68 digital voicing equalizer.  But even the reviewer doesn't fully realize the utility of EQ in different freq ranges and has much to learn.
Wanted to send a shout out to Jay as he graciously sold me his AE.  Smooth transaction and he got it to me in less than a week.  Thanks Jay. 
Entertaining, Jay.  Make recordings of the ocean at various distances, then play them back on your system when you return.  A unique opportunity.
After i released my opinions on pass labs, there was criticism and some people even unsubscribed my YouTube channel. I couldn't quite understand the criticism and hostility associated with being open and raw when one puts his/her sentiments out in the open about a particular product. Well, after reading this article, i can understand things better now. 

https://www.soundstageultra.com/index.php/features-menu/opinion-menu/901-my-most-controversial-revie...
WC,
I think you did a great job in your video of covering the pros/cons of Pass Labs from your perspective.  I think folks who love Pass Labs are accepting of the heat, warmup time, etc, in exchange for the sonics they treasure from Pass Labs.
However, for me, I'm left a little confused as to your description of the Pass Labs sonics, because you generalized across all Pass Lab products.   The reason it's confusing for me is due to your previous time with the Xs amps, which seemed to really impress you.  In your video of the Xs vs the Dan D'Agostino amps, you said the Xs is more the type of sound you prefer, and the Xs was the winner.   You listed the DD's as one of your favorite amp brands, so why would not the Xs be included as well?
I've mentioned this a couple of times now in recent pages, and there's not been any response.   Almost seems like an intentional avoidance of the subject, at least that's how it's hitting me (not necessarily your intention at all :-)
Dave
My opinion of gryphon today is simply what? Amazing and incredible on all counts right? What about 2 years from today when there’s "new blood" of top end amplifiers? Maybe I’ll realize at that point in time what gryphon doesn’t do 100% at this time?
Evolution is a thing... Had i met the Mephisto when i had momentum and xs300? Nope...
The Mephisto would have easily pulverized both. One chassis, monster control, huge speed and dynamics. The clock keeps ticking and time isn’t meant to stand still.
I used to love the 2002 Camaro SS but then the Camaro ZL1 came out...guess which one i think is better?
Back in 1998 I owned a 1995 mustang gt (which i loved) and then i hopped in a 2004 Z06... I never looked back...
Do you all follow a guy by the name "Doug demuro"? He reviews cars then gives them a grade for each car. As he reviews new cars, he begins to take down the grade of vehicles he reviewed because he has to grade new vehicles.
If i were to say pass labs xs300 was a 99% out of 100% back when i owned it, then where do I place boulder 2150 and Mephisto? 99%????
I can’t because the xs300 isn’t near the level of those two amps..
Every review you read by anyone is "usually" only good up until that particular point in time. If enough time has passed since then, one must read what has changed and been released since then because if there has been innovation, there might already be a better component today with more of what didn’t exist before.
 If Gryphon releases a Mephisto mk2 in the near future, most likely it would overthrow the current Mephisto if it was designed to do so.
Plenty of people chase their tail looking for a "cost no object" stereo  power amplifier yet if they read between the lines of what I've said , they would have already been finished looking by now (assuming they like what i like of course because this is subjective)
Totally understand the analogies.  However, that being the case, then how is it that the DD makes the favorite amp list and not the Xs amps - which you liked better?    That's where it gets confusing and where the logic of the analogy gets broken...
Dave
I don't believe Dan makes mid Fi products... That's the main reason why. I don't mind 4 chassis because I'm nuts but the average person doesn't want 4 radiators in their home. 
OK, thanks WC.  Just trying to nail it down.   4 radiators would not be desired by some folks for sure.    So, if I have this correct....according to you:

Pass Labs makes mid Fi products, but DD does not.   The Xs is better sonically than the DD, but the Xs is still considered mid Fi. 

Still does not make sense to me, but I'm thinking that's the best I will get from you.
Thanks,Dave
I gave those brand names thinking about the brand holistically speaking. You are primarily focusing on one power amp which i wasn't doing. 
I think the momentum with matching preamp (which i owned later if you recall) is much better than any pass labs amp with a xp30 or 32.
The xs300 is the only amp from pass i would own if i had to own one. It’s still excellent but it requires too much to deliver.
I’ll show you all something new in due time. Just be patient
If it's about one brand amp/preamp vs another brand amp/preamp, that is a different thing than just comparing one amp to another with the same preamp.   No worries.   Looking forward to what's to come.
Dave
I'm a little behind here......are we still waiting a month later to find out what the fourth preamp and the monos are?  Or did some of them get sold before they ever saw the light of camera (day)?

Sorry if I missed it, been a little checked out......
All these expensive amps will soon be boat anchors.  Check out the $7.5K AGD Audion....check out the $3K LSA Voyager (just released and I will be modding them soon), check out the new Mytek $6K Manhattan and $20K Empire amps (coming soon).  This new generation of Class D using GaN fets is just the beginning.  More and more high end companies will be releasing class D amps.....Imagine a class D output stage with Gryphon or Boulder discrete front ends driving them...WOW!.  Class D output stages are tiny and super efficient....so no heatsinks and banks of output transistors.  So, a Boulder or Gryphon class D amp would be way less heavy, be smaller and cost less.  They might be working on a GaN class D amp right now!!!!  If not, they are stuck in the past.  If you stay with the expensive heavy boxes you are going to lose a lot of money and have a hard time selling them in a few years as class D takes over.

Same with preamps.....check out the $2000 Denafrips Athena preamp and also the $3100 Holo Audio Serene preamp.......some serious technology in these things and getting rave reviews......and dirt cheap compared to $40K preamps.

Speakers.....well, one can make speakers for very little that compete and beat the big boys.....has been known for years.  My friend has the 98 db modified Lii Audio full range 10 inch driver on a 4 foot by 2 foot open baffle with 4 foot by one foot wings going straight back and is getting flat to 40 hz in his pretty good sized room.  He added an ESS dipole AMT tweeter on top using a copper foil cap to make it even better....total cost with wood and drivers is a little over $2K.  HE IS GOBSMACKED!  He goes to shows and his system right now is way out there.  He is going to add 2 15 inch woofs on the bottom on each channel so he can blow the walls down.....4 woofs plus solid state amp plus xover is another $3K.  Should blow most $100K+ speakers away.

This thread does nothing for the average audiophile.  They cannot afford any of the components discussed here.  This is why so little traffic, discussions and so few people subscribing to Jay's channel.  You basically have the same thing happening over and over and discussed by the same people over and over.......saying the same things over and over.  It is entertaining......but look at Supercar Blonde......she is entertaining and has over 6.5 million subscribers.  If you played the same game but at the level that most people are at then you would have thousands and thousands more people involved.  As it is.....it is a small club....for the wealthy and conservative non tweakers......a very small amount of people.

There is nothing wrong with this thread.....Jay and others are nice people.....it just does not serve very many people.....nor does it display a wide variety of music or opinions or the REAL possibilities of audio taken to the nth degree (at whatever price point). 

I know that many enjoy this thread and are grateful for Jay for doing what he does.  This is all good.  But.....there is more......much more......it is infinite.  May all be blessed with infinite joy and love.  Peace.
I refuse to change my journey and begin to review "normal" gear - for lack of better word.
I will occasionally bring components that are more affordable - as I’ve done before but that’s not my primary focus.
Why would I review the same that everyone else does?. You’re essentially asking me to regurgitate what has been said with that level of gear.
The day SOMEONE - A manufacturer or end user can put a product at my door that blows the doors off what I’ve had in here (or what i have here right now), i give you MY WORD, I’ll sell all my sH!t and buy these new affordable units. Why wouldn’t i want to have more money in the bank and less invested on equipment?
What I’m NOT going to do is buy this affordable stuff with my own money because if it sinks and doesn’t swim, i will be the one having to sell it.
I am a believer that there is a desire from some people which is that want me to buy these other components so they can hear what i have to say.
I’m not going to take advantage of the free trial period either. If these brands that claim to kill the ultra high end REALLY believed it, they would have used MY CHANNEL as means to get exposure. How much money would it cost them to send me something to try? Not much. They could easily see opportunity with me. The reality is that deep down they know they don’t have what it takes or else they would have come out with guns blazing and showed what they are capable of.
I’m here saying it: SEND ME THIS NEW AFFORDABLE PRODUCT and i will sell my Sh!t if it beats it. I will be front and center on my channel disclosing what transpired.
The thing is there’s no politics on my channel. If their product sucks, do they want me to say that? Nah..and this is no different than what other reviewers do. They also don’t speak up when something they reviewed sucks. This is A FACT by the way.
I don't want this to be a back and forth fyi. I spoke my peace and i will leave it at that. I think i left it quite clear where i stand with these "scenarios" of affordable "ultra high end" components. 






Regarding Pass i believe most who are in an uproar it's not so much about the equipment but the man behind the equipment that they feel they are protecting.

I have owned some of the amps you have reviewed and own Wilson's, what people have to realize is that in my experience differences are not night and day and on any given day an amp can sound slightly different. I do not think at this level there is a right  or wrong get what you like regardless of another's opinion, sure we all like a little direction but from there one should be on their own.
Remember one KEY FACTOR:
Those that claim pass labs is the best for them (which i applaud because they found something they love), have never had a " high " reference point.
I urge each and everyone of you to always ask what is the reference point of anyone making such claims.
Once you know, you’ll understand my position.
If i said the best watches are fossil watches , but yet i have never owned a Rolex, how much weight will my opinion have... I'll leave it at that. 
rices
There is truth in some of what you say.

I was able to compare my AGD amps against my brothers Boulder 3050 amps for a month driving Wilson XLF's. The Boulder edged out the AGD Audion's slightly but considering the AGD Audion is the entry level amp for AGD it did spectacular.
Right rh67, you have 238 posts and virtually every one of them is hawking the AGD amp.  Hard to take anyone seriously who is one tracked or a manufacturer of class D. 
jetter
It's the one product that in decades that has made a significant impact in my experience regarding audio. It's worth posting about and many here have taken my advice and concur as i do.

I do not post just to post as it seems many here do. I have owned many of the brands mentioned here but none have given me the motivation as the AGD's have. Now if i posted about every product i have owned and gave it a thumbs up then you would have reason to question a post from me.

Rh67I’m here man...send that stuff here and I’ll let everyone know if it sinks or swims? I’ll eat shipping both ways?
I will sell my new amps and buy those amps you got if they best mine. I will be 200% objective as well. I have heard gear in my room that has given me enough satisfaction to contemplate keeping it and then selling the more expensive piece. For instance, Gryphon Essence...I've been vocal as to how awesome it is and it isn't my most expensive amp. I'm still blown away by it. This should show you that I'm not all about the price. 
Jay...maybe OCD Mike Powell will loan you some AGD stuff.He seems confident that it is some of the best amplification to be had regardless of price... I won’t hold my breath though. 8)
rh67, that is a great recommendation.  If Underwood HiFi was to send an AGT amp to Jay for testing, and he was to give it the big thumbs up, I would be very tempted to buy one, and I think others also.


X3 - agreed.    Besides, I don't care about any amp brand, I was just trying to figure out the logic of WC's preferences.   Moving on...
Dave
Jay’s preferences have slowly morphed over the years. At a high level, here are the important qualities (these are randomly selected and in no particular order) that i seek:

1. Clarity
2. Bass control
3. Soundstage width & depth
4. Dynamics
5. Long-term effects ( how long i can sit in front of the component without having to turn it down)



@jetter 
That's what I'm talking about. I know that some of you would buy those amps if my opinion was positive because you know the level of gear I've been playing with. This is what I've been saying this whole entire time. 
" I was able to compare my AGD amps against my brothers Boulder 3050 amps for a month driving Wilson XLF’s. The Boulder edged out the AGD Audion’s slightly but considering the AGD Audion is the entry level amp for AGD it did spectacular."

Let’s look at this closer. We have the 3050 which is sonically superior to the 2150 amps that Jay reviewed and that he thought were the best amps he had ever heard.........So, are the $7500 AGD Audion amps then as good as the 2150s? The 3050s are $195K. The 2150s are $99K. The 3050’s weigh 441 lbs. each. The AGD Audion’s weigh 5 lbs. each!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The AGD amps are really a $3500 amp with added glitz in the form of fake tubes, tube guard, fancy shipping case and fancy power cords......If you took the circuit and power supplies of the Audion’s and put it in a stereo dual mono normal chassis and shipped it in a cardboard box then it would be around $3500.......so a $3500 amp was close to the $195K Boulder amps???????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Audion’s have one dollar op amps for the input buffers......they cannot be state of the art....never.....so that means that if they were done with better input stages, etc. they probably would blow away any Boulder?......not in power...hardly......but WTF. It already looks like all those heavy expensive things are boat anchors. Good luck trying to sell them after the really great class D amps show up. OMG what a revolution!
@jetter


Underwood does not sell AGD. You meant Voyager, right?

It would be enlightening, and likely destroy the high priced amp market and at the same time significantly increase the price of the Voyager. Best to let sleeping dogs lie

Anyone here has experiences with Nagra? Is it a good Swiss brand that could compete with Dan, Gryphon or other Swiss brands?
I didn't like Nagra when I heard it, but that was a while back and they could have improved since then.  For me, the sound was blah (a word I get from WC  :-)
Dave
ricevs
I’m lucky that my brother own’s the Boulder amps and pre-amp and i had the opportunity to hear for myself. I made it clear that the Boulder amp edged out the Audion. I had my brothers equipment for 40 day’s he was nice enough to drive it out fro AZ to Ca. He was also curious as he knows it takes a lot for me to get excited about a product, needless to say he was more than impressed with the little AGD amps.

The big difference for me between the amps is that the Boulder amps provided a presence within the mid-range that was special it is something that i cannot put into words but something that can be felt on an emotional level, like i said hard to explain but beautiful to experience.

Considering the Boulders price at over 20 times the price of the Audion it should be special. Is the Boulder 20 times better NO! How would the Boulder compare to the top of the line AGD amps i can only speculate. When the Boulders left my house did i miss them? Yes, but only for a couple of days.

One has to decide how much better something is in relation to price. A year ago the wife gave me the go ahead to buy a McLaren, i had been doing a lot of reading about the new C8 Corvette, i was lucky enough to drive both for several days. The McLaren is a spectacular car but for me it was not four times better than the C8 Corvette so i opted to buy the C8 even though i had the green light for the McLaren. Besides bragging rights the performance was not there to justify the huge difference in price.
I can't talk McLaren unfortunately. What i can say is the c8 (or viper ACR) would be the cars I'd own if i had a garage for them and the time to enjoy them as well. 
I am lately becoming more and more a high performance SUV enthusiast. I can haul equipment to fed ex, pick up heavy amps, go to pick up my daughter and do a ten second pass a the dragstrip. Hell yeah!
Jay,
How do you lift the heavy boxes into your high SUV seats?  I can lift heavy dumbbells off the floor, but am frustrated by bulky boxes.  Can you recommend a good hand truck that can help with the lifting?  Recently someone posted a hydraulic lifter that can lift 600 lbs, but the lifter itself weighs 178 lbs, a catch 22.
@logydoghan  i have first hand experience with the Nagra HV preamp.  IMO and to my taste, Nagra bested Gryphon, Dan, Pass XP32, Boulder 2010, ARC Ref 6SE and a few others (all paired with Gryphon Mephisto Solos).  In my listening sessions the only pre that bested Nagra HV was the new Koda 15SE.  

Regards, 
Jose
@jg2077 I just demoed Nagra Classic Line vs Gryphon Essence. Nagra is more transparent and neutral, whereas the Essence has a very warm and analog sound, maybe the class-A sound. Essence sounds better in voice but Nagra really shines in orchestral music. I hope there is something that's between the two. Maybe Dan?