My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

My lines are dedicated lines...coming from the panel box inside the house and the ac system is connected on the panel outside the house. I don't understand this narrative that i have compromised outlets. I have 5 dedicated outlets with 10 gauge wire and aftermarket outlets. 20a, 20a, 30a, 30a, 30a-220v. 

viber6

it isn’t clear that Jay really has problematic AC power. I think Jay already answered your question.

The few details Jay mentioned about his AC power revealed some issues and he has dodged the topic since. It looks like he has an A/C unit or arc welder on his "dedicated lines," as well as some potential code violations. Perhaps it was those problems that led him to try the Stromtank, although addressing the AC issues is probably the less expensive solution. Of course, if he’s in a rental, he may not have any choice.

My Shunyata Denali conditioner yields a big improvement in every sonic parameter, and that’s without any work in my 1963 NYC apartment building. I will make a small $1-2K investment in the Amperetime battery and big Giandel inverter to see whether it is an improvement over my Denali.

That will be an interesting experiment!

The PS Audio Powerplant is not a battery/inverter.  It is a regenerator.  It runs off the wall power......it converts AC to DC just like any amp....then it generates an AC sine wave and amplifies it to 120V........so its basically a big power amp running off the wall.....very different from a battery powered inverter like the $1950  2500 watt big Giandel system (5000 watt inverter, one 200 amp hour battery and a charger) or the $27,000  2500 watt Stromtank.  I imagine Viber is going to buy a 100 amp hour battery....so that is $400 less.  Pretty easy on the wallet....these Giandel/battery things.  If you have your whole system on an inverter....you ALWAYS have the same sound.

Cleeds,

Actually you do have a valid THEORETICAL point that AC power can vary from minute to minute.  For this reason, if I find that component X sounds better than Y, I must repeat the A/B several times to be sure.  On my first A/B, it could be that the power quality was better for X, which gave it an advantage.  That assumes that the power for Y a few minutes later suddenly got poorer.  So I do another A/B 20 min later.  If I still find that X is better than Y, it is more likely that the reason is that X is truly better than Y, rather than if the power quality rapidly kept changing and changing to favor X.  You can do this a few more times, and if X is consistently better than Y, it is much more likely that X is truly better than Y rather than I was consistently fooled by changing power quality.

More importantly, you asked, "What is the benefit of something like a $16K Stromtank battery as compared to a clean, stable, filtered AC line? I suspect the difference in that case is much less than it is for Jay with his problematic AC power."   First, it isn't clear that Jay really has problematic AC power.  I think Jay already answered your question.  He installed good outlets and dedicated lines, tried respected conditioners like Shunyata Denali, Audioquest 7000, but found that the Stromtanks blew these away, including the PS Audio Power Plant 20 flagship battery/inverter.  Even if Jay has problematic AC power, I would think that the Stromtank would show greater benefit than it would show if someone in a rural, sparsely populated area tried all this.  THAT would be interesting to find out, whether reconstruction of a perfect sine wave produces better sonic purity for that someone whose AC power is already low in distortion and noise.

My Shunyata Denali conditioner yields a big improvement in every sonic parameter, and that's without any work in my 1963 NYC apartment building.  I will make a small $1-2K investment in the Amperetime battery and big Giandel inverter to see whether it is an improvement over my Denali.  The next step will be adding the Denali downstream from the Giandel to get the filtering benefit that ricevs claims is the best way to go, at least with the Puritan 156.   I will be honest and report here and on the other thread.

 

Alright folks 

Give me your selection from the video above. Which presentation did you like best ?

rbach

I give up...you win.

No, we're all winners! Being fortunate enough to enjoy music however you choose makes you a winner, too!

rbach

These two remarks are what most of us, including the OP feel on this thread. Not argumentative at all.

Pretending you know "what most of us" feel and suggesting "Why don’t you do yourself and us a favor and move on" is argumentative. I understand that you don’t see it that way but the deletion of that post suggests the moderators don’t agree with you.

Why is it that we can't talk audio on this thread without provoking this sort of animosity?

Post removed 

@clearthink

Nothing is ever going to be perfect or even approach perfect when doing YT comparisons of products - there are so many variables . Even hearing the same system in person in a store vs. your own home will most likely be different. Yes, WC is sharing his system as he always has, and yes, he now has some products he is a dealer for. If folks want to purchase his products based upon YT videos, well, that’s their prerogative. I’m guessing though that they will get WC’s take on the equipment comparisons - how he hears it in his room - and then go from there. If I can’t hear the equipment in my room before I purchase, then I will typically look at user reviews, as well as have a conversation with the Dealer.

I just don’t see a reason to pick on the YT videos, knowing already that they will never be perfect and never fully represent what’s actually being heard in the room. I liked viber6’s comment about the consistency of the flaws and still being able to compare YT videos. I also like Jay’s videos that typically follow - the ones that describe what he heard in the room, what he preferred, and why.

Dave

Now these, below, are arguments, and even rise to the level of being argumentative. You'll never see any content from me like that. I'm here to talk about audio.
 
kren0006

When one hears ad infinitum that nobody really cares for the opinions they are presenting, yet they persist in repeating the same tired objections, it’s akin to an argument.

rbach

Why don't you do yourself and us a favor and move on.

Post removed 

When one hears ad infinitum that nobody really cares for the opinions they are presenting, yet they persist in repeating the same tired objections, it’s akin to an argument.

 

To be clear, you have every right to post, as does Viber (who often does the same thing), but congrats, you’ve made him seem like the rational defender of the thread, haha (not a rip on Viber - he makes good points occasionally when not pushing his preferences)

kren0006

... cheering for Viber in this stupid argument  ...

For goodness sake, what aspect of this discussion do you find to be an "argument?" Why is it that asking questions, or raising concerns, is characterized as an "argument?"

This is becoming one of the most unusual threads on A'gon - and it's from a dealer who is presumably seeking to generate some sales. Truly strange!

cleeds and clearthink actually have me cheering for Viber in this stupid argument. WTF?  

viber6

... Jay had many power conditioners, but the Stromtank produced another world of benefits ...

Understood! What I find interesting to question is: What is the benefit of something like a $16K Stromtank battery as compared to a clean, stable, filtered AC line? I suspect the difference in that case is much less than it is for Jay with his problematic AC power.  (Let's set aside the fact that I don't think the battery would be sufficient to power even one of my amplifiers.)

Jay doesn't seem inclined to address his AC power issues, so we may never know the answer for sure.

 

"Relatively" clean, stable AC power?  Jay had many power conditioners, but the Stromtank produced another world of benefits.  There are many cheap alternatives to the Stromtank, as noted on the other thread.  Nobody knows yet which is best.  To learn the truth, the only way is to try for example, a single Amperetime 200 amp-hr battery + charger, and Giandel 2200 or 5000 inverter, for a modest $1-2K.

viber6

Factor X distortion from Jay’s AC power is the same for both videos and therefore cancels out, so the perceived differences are true.

Actually, you don’t know that. Power quality can vary considerably, from time of day, day of week, even minute-to-minute, depending on where you live and what your local grid looks like. Isn't that part of why Jay got into the $16K battery business in the first place? And of course, if that a/c or arc welder that’s on Jay’s audio circuit powers on, all bets are off.

With the Stromtank, his electrical power quality is likely better than yours.

Maybe. I have dedicated, derated lines and power conditioning and that works in my system. I think it’s cool how some are willing to go the battery route, but that’s not for me. I like the simplicity of getting relatively clean, stable AC power. Although I’ve gone to a lot of trouble to do that, it’s been much less expensive than buying a bank of $16K batteries.

In any event, this isn’t about whose system is "best," is it? That seems like a silly debate. Aren’t we all here to have fun?

Cleeds,

You still miss the point.  Factor X distortion from Jay's AC power is the same for both videos and therefore cancels out, so the perceived differences are true.  With the Stromtank, his electrical power quality is likely better than yours.

Can you hear?

viber6

Jay already has dedicated lines.  

It isn't clear what Jay's AC power looks like, although the last time the topic arose it looked like there was a welder or a/c unit on one of his "dedicated" audio lines. It's a topic Jay tends to prefer to avoid, hence the threat that he'll take "corrective action" if anyone questions him.

Jay already has dedicated lines.  Maybe he didn't go all out and get an electrician to tap into the local power station, but he found that the Stromtank battery/inverter has much greater benefits than any other ancillary component.  Those on the other thread (accessible from near the top of page 406 of this thread) know this from their other battery/inverters.  

The technical people think they can explain sound differences solely from technical analysis.  But they have canyon sinkhole sized blind spots about which measurements and factors correlate with which sonic criteria.  They should re-read my last post that whatever factor X distortion is in YouTube or one's electrical system, that factor X is the same for both power cord videos, so the perceived differences are quite obvious which everyone has noted.

I already told you - we don't see eye to eye.

Yup, though you've never explained yourself, so I really don't know what you're talking about.

Don't address me.

This is as open forum. If you have a complaint about me, take your complaint to the moderators. I

 

It’s so clear to me that most folks on here aren’t interested in hearing from the "gurus" or "crusaders" who preach HARD ...

I don’t see anyone "preaching" here. What are the comments that you think "most folks" find objectionable? Why not bring your complaint to the moderators rather than lecture us?

Jay, you’re a dealer selling a $16K battery. You might want to consider looking at how some of the other dealers on A’gon conduct themselves, because that’s the kind of treatment I think "most folks" who are audiophiles expect. I don't think your silly claim that you're being "crucified" here is a sound business plan.

It’s so clear to me that most folks on here aren’t interested in hearing from the "gurus" or "crusaders" who preach HARD on here yet they don’t even have a system listed on their profile. That’s like me going into a Mercedes-Benz dealership and criticize the prices of these vehicles yet little do they know that i took the bus to get to the dealer...

Some people want to eat caviar but pay beef jerky prices. Some others want to drive a Mercedes Benz S class but want to pay Hyundai prices. If they can’t afford the caviar or Mercedes S class, they have crucify those who have the means to buy either as well as lecture the masses how stupid it is to pay so much money for a car or caviar.

Maybe i should join a Ferrari forum and tell them that i know of  a faster car for less money and save them from paying expensive vehicle maintenance?

Hmmm 🤔 i wonder how that would work out for me once they find out i drive a Ford...

 

 

It is strange, unusual, and odd that some here can't have "fun" if others reveal actual data, facts, and simple, basic, elemental  deficiencies in something as basic as a music reproduction system's electrical foundation. Pointing out these irregularities is not "complaining" but just a sign of living in the real world where facts, science, and the human brain can work together to yield improved performance,  outcome, and results.

It should also be mentioned given your objections that the poster here is selling, promoting, and recommending battery power systems that cost tens of thousands of US dollars EACH of course that is fine and but for many it is wiser, more "expedient" and possible even safer to call an electrician first.

You can have fun with a broken toy but I prefer a fully functioning "toy."

 

Post removed 

clearthink,

You make valid points about technical problems in these videos. However, the differences I heard were consistent among the several songs, and quite easy to hear, even with all the flaws you mention. But the flaws are consistent, and a relative constant, so they cancel out, making it very possible to form reliable conclusions. I used two lousy computers but came to the same conclusion that I preferred presentation 2, and I am quite confident that it is the Transparent. If Jay says it is not the Transparent, I made an arbitrary error, no big deal.

I have heard excellent violinists and mediocre violinists play the same crummy factory violin as well as a great sounding violin. No matter which violin, the big differences in the sound are 99% due to the violinist rather than the violin. The crummy violin is like YouTube, which still lets us hear the big differences between these power cords.

@clearthink

I walked into the basketball gym and two guys were playing 1:1. Both are great players and many of us wondered who would win. Lots of us saw different things they were doing and it was fun to talk about it. At the end, everyone had a fun time with it.

One guy though (let’s name him Dude) pointed out that the rim might be slightly bent downward, the floor wasn’t perfectly clean, the humidity level was higher which caused the players to sweat more, and he pointed out some other problems with the 1:1 game.

Everyone then realized it was stupid of them to believe that this was all for fun, and Dude felt good that everyone went home disappointed.

:-)

Oh, sorry, actually, what happened was that everyone had a great time and didn’t really care what Dude said.

Thanks for the fun WC!

Dave

Post removed 

It is easy to see the various, multiple, compound problems with these "evaluative" videos continues without attention, disruption, or resolution. The biggest issue plaguing this undertaking and effort are the underlying house voltage delivery inadequacies and uncorrected deficiencies that have been previously revealed, explained, and detailed. As I previously mentioned parts of the US are known for "third-world" quality utility delivery systems but that should not hinder, dissuade, or prevent Jay from attempting their proper correction.

What is particularly odd about the "evaluative" video is that uses power cords as the variable yet power is the primary, underlying, over riding defficiency in this music reproduction system so you are hearing distortions, anomalies, and irregularities that are the result and consequence of the power problems plus all the issues previously defined with the You Tube production itself which includes spurious unexplained signals

My findings are the same as those of skebet.  The tonal balance of #2 shows more upper midrange and HF content.  I understand the synergy advocates who might prefer #1.  This is because the inherent tonal balance of the S7 speaker favors the  brilliant tweeter.  Actually, I believe the tweeter is accurate, but the rest of the drivers don't quite keep up with the tweeter's speed and resolution.  Despite this, I like the S7 as the best speaker I have heard from Jay's videos.  I enjoy the brilliant aspects of the S7 with the brilliant/revealing Boulder electronics, AND #2 power cord.  But the synergy camp will prefer toning down the brilliance of the rest of the system with #1 power cord.  

My guess is #2 is Transparent, #1 is Shunyata.  Except for my Shunyata Denali which is brilliant and detailed, I didn't like the flagship Shunyata Sigma power cord and preferred the more brilliant Shunyata Venom HC which is just high quality 9 gauge.  Whatever filter networks are in the Sigma, they produce a more laid back softer sound.

Thank you, and oops by me: I see the song descriptions now at the bottom of the video info.

@skebet and all who do not know about this

Download the "Shazam" app on your phone. While playing the song from Jays video , (of course you cant be using your phone as your player or source of the music ) open the app and click the icon and Shazam... It tells you the name of the song and Artist.

 

@jays_audio_lab This latest video blew a friend and I away with how non-subtle the difference in presentation is between the two cords (She prefers the warmth and resonance of #1; I prefer the clarity and resolution of #2.)

Anyway, sorry if this is a FAQ and I understand why you don't post this in the YouTube description, but would you mind sharing here the name and artist for those four tracks?

 

Much obliged, and keep up the fantastic content!  

Well,

That was awfully sweet of you, Daddy, to stop what you were doing to help her find her Eye Color. I think that is what she said.

Thats a dedicated Daddy ! Especially when you are your sick .

I am not sure but, you kind of sound like you might be.

I commend you  !!

And we don't have transparent opus speaker cables inserted...then this begs the question: do we need the $40,000 cables in the system when the powercords are doing an exceptional job at creating tons of resolution and clarity? I am torn here and may need to go back and forth but if I'm looking to save some money I'd say stick to a quality speaker cable and use opus powercords. 

In my members only section of my website, i will go more in depth as to what the opus speaker cables are doing and how the Boulder 3060 interacts with them. 

I am working on the 3010 is 2110 raw footage as well and my raw uncut opinion on which preamp to get and why. 

The website is almost there guys. It's SO MUCH WORK! 

Stay tuned !

 

 

Totally Jay. One of my dogs is my constant companion when I listen. She tries to push herself into the sweet spot.

Nah... It could be said that most of us listen alone or with the cat and dog because for the most part women don't have any interest in discovering how the sound changes with footers or cables lol. 

Agree about the cat.  I think Jay's message with the other items is that certain types of women go for guys with money.  But cats and dogs love you unconditionally, on a higher plane.

w all due respect on the cartoon topic

best to quit while ahead. 

cat can be an amazing companion

can we have a dog if we add a sub? or power conditioner?