In my quest to buy my retirement preamp 4 years ago, settling on the Lamm LL2.1 Deluxe, I went through about 7 preamps and the only one that in my mind that rivaled the Lamm was the First Sound Presence which I believe can be had with a remote. In my system both these preamps are the cream of the crop in that price range. Enjoy the music
61 responses Add your response
Thanks tooblue! I am also looking at my end game preamp. I value tonal richness as most prepamps i have tried is not giving me the sound. I currently own cj ET3SE and getting that more than my previous LTA MZ2. I am thinking of either the Bottlehead 300b tube pre, K&K Mir Allnic L1500, Prima Luna Evo 300 or the current Don Sachs 6SN7 preamp. You can tell i want to spend less to get great sound haha. But if I have to pay 6 to 8k for the best sound might be able to do it. |
Post removed |
Post removed |
@erik_squires , brings up a great contender, heard one in a friend of a friend's system and loved it, just could not find one in the used market to live with during my culling process but was on my radar. Please do let us know what you buy and if you decide on the Lamm, get with me as I went thru Lamm directly since there was no dealer in Houston and he referred me to a few dealers to buy from and have it ship directly from him. You would not believe the price they quoted and what I paid. Enjoy the music |
Post removed |
@kw6 feel free to give me a call/text and I can help you with an LL2.1 Deluxe. - Colin Lamm Industries dealer https://gestalt.audio |
Since two years i am using the Lamm LL2.1 Deluxe and I like its sound a lot. Also to have two outputs is very convenient as I am using the second one for my subs. However the lack of remote is not adding convenience and over the time it started to be annoying. I have tried various alternatives and the only one that I found to deliver sonic enhancement on top of the remote operation is the Aries Cerat Incito S. It is indeed substantially more expensive, but the sound is fabulous. It is building on all strengths of the Lamm sound, bringing it to the next level. Worth trying. |
Hi, Personally I've had approximately different 60 preamps go through my reference listening room and yes I am in the audio industry. Recently I had a very nice Karan preamp in on trade and it sounded excellent. I've also had an Absolare preamp (no remote) that was very transparent. The Lamm is another excellent choice but if I had to choose just one I would also go with the Aries Cerat Incito S line stage. Aries Cerat is my reference preamp. Cheers, |
As an alternative to "tonal richness" you actually could try a Tortuga: http://https//www.tortugaaudio.com/products/passive-preamps/ldr3000p-v25-passive-preamp/ 30 days; return shipping your only cost. Apple remote. |
Stibi you are right as my previous preamp was the standard LTA MZ2 no remote and it drove me crazy had to get up to adjust it a tiny bit. I tried the Tidal volume slide but doesn't sound the same as fixed volume and using my preamp to adjust volume. Actually my cj preamp is not bad. Just looking for something more organic the next level. I prefer something with tube rectification. I will Google Aries again but sure out of my range. Thanks! |
I’m interested in this thread, because there is such universal praise for this pre. Can anyone comment on the sonic difference between this and its predecessor, the Lamm LL2 Deluxe? I bought one from a member in Hawaii about 9 years ago, and had it shipped directly to Vladimir in Brooklyn for the once over, after which he sent it to me. Now you can believe this or not, but the pre I was trying to replace with it was a Morrison ELAD, and within a short time, I realized how disappointed I was. I would never describe it as tonally rich, and other attributes that I was hoping for like bloom, depth and wider soundstage were missing in action. After four months, I gave up and sold it. I should mention that 2 years prior to that I had purchased a second hand Joule Electra (LA 100 MK II ) and was also disappointed in that well praised pre. So my question is, is the LL2.1 a different animal? |
kw6, You just jogged my memory. I knew before I bought it from reading that it had high gain, and my speakers are very efficient, and I also read that the .1 had selectable gain, so I had Vladimir reduce the gain in mine before he returned it. I remember it as sounding natural enough, definitely not tubey, but in no way harsh, but lacking the dimensional tube "roundness" that I have experienced before. It was just not exceptional in any way, and that was in direct comparison to a $700.00 solid state op-amp based pre. |