Hi Fi Tuning Supreme fuse-Burn In?


Hello,
I've gone through the Hi Fi Tuning line of fuses starting with their Silver and then on to the Classic Gold.
I recently purchased the the Supreme.
The Supreme does everything I hoped it would but as with anything in this crazy hobby, there's seems to be a trade-off.
I'm getting more clarity and air but the presentation seems to have an edge or sharpness to it.
If everything was just slightly more-should I say organic?-I'd be one happy man.
I have about 60 hours on them.
Will more time smooth things out?
The Gold's are definitely smoother but they lack the air and clarity the Supreme's provide.
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

greh
It’s entertainment if you’re easily entertained. For example if you think Love Boat 💕is the greatest TV show ever. Or Fantasy Island. Zee plane, boss! Zee plane! ✈️
Post removed 
+1, geoffkait. 

If anything, both kosst_amojan and sleepwalker continues to provide consistent dose of entertainment with their posts 🤪
I hate to be judgmental but, generally speaking, it appears a winning strategy might be to take whatever kosst_amojan says and do the opposite.
For people who have massively built power supplies such as the Nelson Pass First Watt 7 Amplifier, it's sound significantly improved when I replaced the stock fuse with a Synergistic Research Blue fuse. 

I found this to also be true when I put a SR Blue fuse in the PassLab INT-60 amplifier.

David Pritchard


geoffkait I’ve had about a dozen fuses...They go in and stay in until I melt them
Just because it was deleted doesn’t mean you never said it.

You’re obviously not at all familiar with the First Watt products. You know... Like the J2 that got Stereophile’s Amp of the Year award. Mine is a modified clone of the F5. The power supply in it is actually more muscular than what Nelson built the First Watt F5 with. The fuse pops at 300 watts like in all FW amps, but because mine runs 32V rails instead of 24V at the same 120,000uF reservoir capacitance, the in-rush current is a bit higher.
Like I said above, my amp uses very simple in-rush current limiting. In-rush current is the amount of power the amp draws when you turn it on. My amp uses nothing more than a pair of NTC CL60 thermistors to limit the in-rush

I’ve had plenty of fuses blow because my amp has a massive power supply and the most basic in-rush current limiting. I’ve gone through about half a dozen this year
.
How do like these apples, er, facts? You said it. You took a nice design and changed it to suit your fancy. Stop hiding behind Nelson Pass’s work. And while we're at it, why don't you email Nelson Pass and see how he feels about your mods to his design? I'm sure all here would love to know his views.

All the best,
Nonoise
Post removed 
Post removed 
Yes, the concept of boutique fuses is one of the most hilarious things I’ve ever seen
but not heard, and therein lies the rub.


sleepwalker’s the one that exclaimed, "Everyone except you knows that the motion of electrons is the definition of electicity(his spelling, too)." and probably believes, we still live in a Newtonian universe. Try a little update there, at least to the 20th Century, Sparky! https://www.quora.com/Are-photons-involved-in-all-forms-of-electricity-for-example-when-it-flows-thr...    and   https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=2348
Well Folks,

This looks like an argument with no resolution. The "fusers" and the "fuse deniers" will just have to agree to disagree.🧐
kosst_amojan
Sure! I’ve got proof most people think this stuff is a laughable joke! 
I support Kosst’s statement.  Yes, the concept of boutique fuses is one of the most hilarious things I’ve ever seen. Makes me chuckle to myself every time I see someone claiming a boutique fuse is worth the $250 each they got billed out of. I also feel sorry for them, but they ought to know better. 

I hate to be judgmental but this appears to be a simple case of ye olde Appeal to Authority. Any naysayer can dig up some authority figure somewhere who agrees with his position. It’s called cherry picking. 🍒

Geez Louise, rodman. Roger not being incompetent is what is called a joke, apparently one too subtle for some. I don’t accept the word of the owner of the damaged Music Reference amp, but I do accept the word of Roger Modjeski, and what he has reported about what he discovered when he inspected the damaged amp, and what he has to say about the Hi-Fi Tuning Fuses he found installed in the amp.

I have provided no evidence, and therefore am not going to "provide FURTHER EVIDENCE". All the info on both that I have read, and have repeated here for the potential benefit of fellow tube power amp owners, has been that provided by @ramlabs. Perhaps Roger will once again provide that info for those truly, sincerely interested. I’m done trying to help fellow tube amp owners. Talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth ;-) . Good luck, ya’all!

At 47 hours and 36 minutes my system took a LeaP forward -lol- and if you believe the fuse nonsense : Vould I interest used in a slightly used bridge?In New York?? 
Hey, nobody’s right all of the time. We can forgive him RM his mistake.
Don't forget that koost admits that based on a perfectly good amp design, he built one to blow fuses. He feels it's the best way to get the most performance out of it. He bragged that he "melts fuses" and keeps a bunch for when he has to replace them. The fuses have to be cheap, bog standard fuses or he'd go broke.

All the best,
Nonoise

@bdp24 - You seem to have difficulty in the area of comprehension. I don’t have a problem, at all. Nor- did I ever call Roger, "incompetent", anywhere in my posts. I have a differing OPINION, borne out by my own(years long/multiple components) testing. The customer that blew up his amp, may(or- may not) be another story. You can accept his word, if you choose(matters not, to me)! Try reading my prior posts(start with 12-01 at 10:20 am) VERY SLOWLY, and when you can provide FURTHER EVIDENCE, of these fuses(when correctly selected as specified by the manufacturer) being a risk in ANY amplifier(tube OR SS), as I’ve CLEARLY and REPEATEDLY ASKED, get back to me.
Post removed 

@odman99999, Roger Modjeski has explained numerous times (both on his AudioCircle Music Reference Forum a few years back---which is still available to read, and on a recent thread that has unfortunately been deleted, perhaps by Roger himself. He may have also discussed the subject in his current thread asking for technical questions) why the original Hi-Fi Tuning Fuse (and ONLY that fuse, as that is the only "High End" fuse Roger has looked into) is designed and built in such a way as to not be able to protect an amplifier in the event of a tube failure in a DC circuit. Is has nothing to do with voltage or amperage, but rather the tube’s, as I said, design and construction, which Roger fully explains in his posts on the subject.

I myself need to go back and reread what Roger has said, but he provides info on how a fuse, any fuse, reacts internally when it "blows". That info should help people better understand why fuses are created the way they are, what the differences are between various designs, and why he warns against using the above fuse in specific applications. I really don’t see why Roger’s warning has been met by some with such hostility and defensiveness. That warning is well-founded, as a reading of it will make very clear.

The owner of the Music Reference RM-9 amp that came back to Roger for repairs did nothing wrong; he installed the correctly-rated Hi-Fi Tuning Fuses (9 iirc) in the amp, and when it was damaged sent it back to Roger for repair. Why he has been called incompetent is a mystery, part of the defensiveness and hostility I mentioned above. Roger fully looked into what had happened inside the amp, and has reported on what he discovered. He did some research on the fuse, and reports on what he learned about it. Is that a problem for you? If so, you are free to ignore Roger’s well-founded warning. Roger is also not incompetent ;-) .

I’m looking forward to further evidence, of amps being damaged by, "high-end" fuses. Like I said, the Internet SHOULD be replete with the tales. One would think the Fuse Police, ought to have an easy time digging them up. Perhaps, AT LEAST ONE informed amp manufacturer(aside from our resident fuse cop), that warns against them in their owner manuals? No caveat emptor, in ANY reviews or magazine articles? Again, why would a correctly valued fuse(in voltage, amperage and time), as required by amp’s owner’s manual, be a danger to it’s DC circuitry? Only in the vacuous gourd, of one with no concept of the scientific method, would conducting one’s own experiments(successfully) be considered, "I did a dumb thing and it worked". Until the middle 20th Century the best, known science/Physics couldn’t explain how a Bumblebee stays aloft. I guess no scientific nay-sayers, told the Bumblebee, those tiny wings couldn’t generate enough lift, to drag it’s fat butt into the air(you’re stupid to try)! Then someone introduced Fluid Dynamics to the world. "OH, OK Bumblebee(now you can fly)!" https://www.livescience.com/33075-how-bees-fly.html
kosst_amojan
Sure! I’ve got proof most people think this stuff is a laughable joke!
Great! Please show us the proof. It might be interesting.
No one is claiming that high end audio is not a niche hobby. Audiophile fuses are not a major industry. Duh! Nobody ever said they were. That argument is just plain silly. A last ditch effort. However, judging from the numbers of fancy fuses sold, 80,000 or more, things are not going too bad for fancy fuse makers, at least not for the top two or three. SR, HiFi Tuning, Audio Magic. It’s not as if the top fuse makers don’t have other products, except perhaps for HiFi Tuning. The definition of success is not how many you sell but whether the number you can sustain the business. So, from that perspective I’d say aftermarket fuses are a success. High end audio should probably just ignore the angst and anger if the lower echelons of the hobby. They can be so emotional! 😥
Post removed 
hifiman5
If you haven’t tried these more nuanced tweaks, then why condemn those who have and appreciate the differences they bring to their systems?
That’s a fair question. It’s covered in Beware the audio guru, which is the only thread (so far) that I’ve ever started on Audiogon.

Just as with all of our senses, doing is the proof. Sight, taste, touch, smell and hearing are all done by doing. "A sense is a physiological capacity of organisms that provides data for perception." The premise of test equipment doing the listening for us is not possible. For one, a microphone is not a human ear. For another everyone has different sensitivities.

Some people are wired not to be as perceptive as others in audio. If kosst says he can’t hear it therefore it doesn’t exist, I for one am cool with that. As for many of us who can hear these things we should just accept that kosst can’t and move on. Does it really matter who can and who can’t? I think it only serves as a reference to know who does and who doesn’t for future talks.

What is sometimes weird to me is, after a person is here posting for awhile it’s easy to see that they are taking a position just to have one. They are going to make the same statements everywhere they go. None of us should be surprised that kosst is going to raise the "snake oil" flag every time he gets a chance. Like wise I will always say "everything affects everything else". Folks like kosst can’t hear certain changes and others can hear every slightest change, and the rest are somewhere in between. I think we just need to let it be what it is, cause I don’t see a lot of people all that willing to change.

We should be audio gentlemen above all, and respect that some do and some don’t. It would be scary if we all showed up at the same restaurant and all ordered the exact same meal wouldn’t it?

Michael Green


PS just saw this as Cleeds puts it nicely "Speaking of measurements, do you have any to support your claim "most people think this stuff is snake oil?"

kosst_amojan
Is an actual measurement of a claimed result really unreasonable to ask?
Please feel free to make your own measurements. I'm sure some of us would be interested in your results.

And if one could actually be obtained, wouldn't that be some very impressive advertising since most people think this stuff is snake oil?
Speaking of measurements, do you have any to support your claim that "most people think this stuff is snake oil?"
Post removed 
Clausius would be SO PROUD of that last post. What a swirling blast of hot air and cerebral entropy!
Post removed 
@kosst_amojan. 

I would like to challenge you to order one E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies, put it inside the door of your electric service and after a few weeks pass, claim you do not hear a new-found naturalness to your system, and see an improved clarity and smoothness of texture on your video picture.

Nothing whatsoever nuanced about what those Mats do!!
@kosst_amojan.

I believe my ear/brain interface!  I also believe gear designers who specify specific brands of fuses for specific circuit applications and mark the fuses for directionality so if the listener ever needs to replace one of those fuses they know how they should be oriented.

You seem well informed on audio issues so I am perplexed that such nuances of circuit execution have escaped you. I truly don't get it.  OR are you simply so skeptical, in general, that you have never even tried to hear such differences?  

No offense intended.  If you haven't tried these more nuanced tweaks, then why condemn those who have and appreciate the differences they bring to their systems?
Post removed 
All the hot air seems to be coming from your direction. Take your head out of your amp once in a while and take a look around. 
Post removed 
michaelgreenaudio
Directional? Yes they actually are directional. But, can be trained to go the other way, just like cables can (some cables).

>>>>That’s quite ironic because that is what HiFi Tuning said for quite a while. But, HiFi Tuning eventually scrambled on board the fuse directionality train and for the last, I dunno, eight or ten years or so they’ve been marking their fuses with that cute little diode symbol 🔜 and have also published on their website the Data Sheets that support the theory of fuse directionality. Isoclean from Japan has always promoted their fuses as being directional.

It’s really not that difficult to confirm the directionality theory since all fuses, even stock fuses like Littelfuse and Bussman fuses, are directional. I tried this successfully with stock fuses quite some time ago - fuses that had been in the system for more than two years. So, I would not buy into the theory that wire established direction over time. Of course, many high end cable manufacturers mark their cables with directional arrows for a reason. No, I’m not talking about the shielding. It also explains why Audioquest’s new high power cords, just like all of their high end cables including HDMI cables are controlled for directionality.🔛

Hi Guys

I'm not going to speak to the reliability of fuses because quite frankly I've never had one blown or cause damage to any products. Maybe that's me just being careful. However I have had experience in how they sound as well as how they change sound depending on a few mechanical adjustments and material choices. I've now done fuse swapping on over 10 amplifiers and at the end of the day (2016) yes they do sound different and yes they do sound different per amplifier. Directional? Yes they actually are directional. But, can be trained to go the other way, just like cables can (some cables).

If I were to give a caution it would be these, watch out for the upward shift in tone and keep your ear on the bottom octave as the wrong fuse will get phazy sounding. Also keep an eye on your stage, because when you make a fuse change you are also going to make a speaker placement change more then likely, or even cable change. "everything affects everything else".

Michael

ramtubes has been on the warpath trying to debunk fuses for at least ten years. Watch out, ramtubes take em scalp. You can’t debunk something that’s not bunk. 
@kosst- "I’m gonna believe Ramtubes over snake oilers who’ve never built a circuit."??? Ever heard the saying about making assumptions? Of course, in your case(apparently), that ship sailed, LONG ago!
Post removed 
Those highly discounted, NEW Silver Stars and Classic Golds(from Burlington, Ontario), are probably being proffered by Parts Connexion.  
Speaking of HiFi Tuning Fuses, crazy prices over on eBay for new HiFi Tuning Fuses, selected values and types. Check it out, Bubba!!
It seems, quite a few that frequent this site, value the opinions of the Stereophile Magazine writers. Personally, I would think, they’d be somewhat conscientious, as much as they value testing things, before recommending a product/tweak, in their reviews and follow-ups. ie: https://www.stereophile.com/content/hifi-tuning-fuses and https://www.stereophile.com/content/hifi-tuning-fuse-follow-may-2012 It appears, no one(as of 2012) told them, about all those amps being destroyed. I’d further have to think, that highly experienced sellers(ie: Music Direct, VH Audio, Parts Connexion, The Cable Company, etc), would have been made aware(by now), were there an issue, and avoided selling anyone's, "high-end" fuses(and any possible, attendant liabilities). There again: Just my own observations/opinions.