@gererick I would go that route for sure. Good quality caps installed in a parallel configuration would work very well 👍
Fuses
I have a Line Magnetic integrated amp. After heavy regular use for over 5 years, one day it just wouldn’t power up. After checking the power supply, I assumed it must be a blown fuse. I recalled that Line Magnetic sent with the amp two replacement fuses of the same type/quality that was pre-installed. I dug out one of them from storage, replaced the fuse and the amp powered up normally.
What surprised and delighted me was the change in sound with the replacement fuse. Fuller bass, more detail and more warmth. I have rolled the tubes several times in the amp, and am attuned to the subtle changes that can make. Popping in a fresh fuse seems to have had a similar affect. And these appear to be cheap fuses, available for a few dollars at most. I don’t think I understand any of this.
Sounds like it is a single capacitor? If it is, you can just bypass it normally. Make sure that on the bypass capacitor the outer lead is connected to the side between the resistor and the capacitor. (Duelund bypass capacitors have directionality) From Duelund "The outer lead out, closest to the edge of the capacitor, is connected to the outer foil and as such should be connected to the lowest impedance path to ground, generally the signal output."
Your signal is going out towards the driver, So Negative, to capacitor, to resistor.---> That is the direction of the signal, output is from capacitor to resistor, input is negative to capacitor. Hope that makes sense.
|
Yuviarora, thanks for your reply. If I understand the drawing correctly, my positive comes in from the amp, goes through an inductor, then heads toward the drivers. On its way to the drivers, there is a junction where a wire goes from the positive to the negative. On its way to the negative, there is a resistor and then a capacitor and then the negative wire. In that instance, what is closest and furthest from the signal output? (Sorry for my layman’s description) |
@gererick the 115.8uf capacitors are parallel capacitors installed as (3x)33uf+(1)10uf+(1)6.8uf Mundorf Supreme evo oils, all adding up to 115.8uf. I first installed the .01uf foils at the furthest point away from signal output, and they completely muddled up the sound, they just sounded bad. After taking them out I reinstalled them on a whim, but this time around I moved them to the front position, so they were in the closest position to the signal output, and my audio image just instantly snapped into focus. It was like going from 1080p to 4k. (I am still going through burn-in, and they haven’t settled in completely as of yet). I don’t know how a value as small as .01uf can have such a difference in my application, but it did, and they are staying in for good.
If you have the bypass capacitors on hand, try them out, you can find out for yourself if they work for you. They are pretty easy to take back out if you do not like what you are hearing. I am bypassing both my tweeter caps 10uf, and mids 115.8ufs. |
Yuviarora, found you over here on this thread. I am in the planning stage of a crossover upgrade (sorry to be off-topic from fuses; mine are all Synergistic Orange). My largest cap is 220 uF and next largest is 13 uF. You sound very pleased with a .01 uF value bypassing a 115.8 uF cap, correct? You mentioned having initially tried them in the wrong position, which I didn’t follow. When you tried a higher value bypass cap, was it in the ideal position? As I understand it, a good value bypass cap for a 115.8 uF cap is in the 1% range or 1 uF. I have several .01 uF Duelund silver foil caps, but hesitate to try them with much larger value caps until hearing the experience you described.
|
The .01uf Tinned copper has been an absolute revelation. I was up till 7 in the morning listening to album after album, non stop. Everything sounded like I was hearing it for the very first time..... I am dumbfounded by how much of a difference these little capacitors made in my setup.....just dumbfounded. Burn in has been especially crazy, at one point the sound lost all color, I have never experienced that before...and it came back after a while, and the sound became so incredibly liquid, and the soundstage became the most holographic I have heard on a speaker as of yet. Sadly that phase only lasted for a few hours, and I am hoping maybe they settle in eventually something close to that. But either way, the clarity, coherency, and timbre are just exceptional. This experience has convinced me, when I get my Magnepan 20.7s, I am building my whole crossover with just Duelund capacitors. Not settling for anything else. |
So I installed the other .01uf Tinned Cooper Duelund on the mids capacitors, 115.8uf. The mistake i made the first time around was installing them at the furthest point away from signal output, after reinstalling them in the 1st position, they also sound amazing. Resolution, timbre, coherency, and soundstage all saw quite amazing improvements. My speaker system was absolutely nothing to sneeze at before the installation, but these have been a a extremely nice surprise. I am now solidly in the camp of bypassing crossover caps with small foil types 🙏 Sorry George. I still have 100's of hours before they fully settle in, can't wait to hear the final end result.
|
Post removed |
@millercarbon and @oldhvymec So I reinstalled the bypass capacitors.....and they sound incredible. Sorry 🙏🙏 I was too quick to judge them....they sound open, crystal clear, and wonderful in both position on my speakers. Just needed a bit of burn in time. The Tinned Copper bypass capacitors have a wonderful tone, all the microdetails are still here... I'll add in more impressions after I get some solid listening time with these. |
Post removed |
There is no ideal power transformer with perfect magnetic coupling and no leakage flux. So the impedance will be always higher than winding resistance. No one would want to add more resistance to what is already there in order to keep the impedance of the secondary winding and the power supply as low as possible. Impedance is the current limiting characteristic of a transformer. If the amp needs a lot of current to drive a speaker load it will be audible if the impedance is high. A fuse on the other hand has to be a resistive load if the current in the power supply rises in order to operate as a fuse in case of failure . That will be audible if the amp has to drive demanding speakers at high volumes or dynamic peaks. This shouldn’t affect class A amps but definitely class A/B designs. So how would different material of the fuse wire which has to be a resistive load by design (gets hot and burns up if it reaches its breaking point) influence the SQ? A piece of wire that would not increase the impedance of the transformer would be the only logical solution in order to avoid these current limiting effects. But then it’s no longer a fuse. How does this all fit together with those expensive fuses? Any explanation? |
So I replaced all the capacitors on my Matrix USB H card for some AudioNote Kaisei ones. The caps were a hard fit, but got it done somehow.... If you guys are using a PC as a source, do not look past that dedicated USB card. The caps took a certain hardness out of the sound, and are extremely dynamic. Background is jet black, dead quiet. A massive bang for the buck upgrade. Very highly recommended. I think I am finally ready for this Winter’s Lockdown ;) Bring it on. |
Okay.....soooo I am in the camp of not bypassing signal capacitors. At least in my application, they caused issues in both positions. 👍 Correct, never bypass "coupling caps" in the signal path. This goes for all audio equipment even speakers xovers. But it’s good to bypass "de-coupling caps" in power supply or on voltage rails. Cheers George |
fiesta75-
MC makes some simple mistakes like series and parallel resistors...Ah yes the ellipsis, three dots that usually indicates the intentional omission of a word, sentence, or whole section of a text being quoted. Care to run that through your MDS decoder ring and translate into a full English sentence, please? |
Okay.....soooo I am in the camp of not bypassing signal capacitors. At least in my application, they caused issues in both positions. Sound got smeared in the mids, and the timbre change in the tweeter position came with a similar smudging of sound. The bypass capacitors really affected transparency in my system, and affected depth of stage. I only had them in for 3 or so hours, but I didn’t enjoy any part of this installation and have taken them back out. @georgehifi you were right, at least as it happens to be the case in my application. I am now in the camp for installing the single best possible quality cap that you can use in the signal path. Now having said that, I had voltage imbalances in my tweeter position, 1200v vs 600v (big cap vs bypass) and mids 115.8uf capacitors bypassed with a .01uf foil capacitor. Neither position sounded good. |
@yuviarora Thanks, OK, that's good to know, very good and comforting general advice. (anecdote - my SS amp manual is inconsistent anyway - on one page it says 1.5A, on another page 2A. I use 2A.) Yes, I had kinda guessed that about amps with glass, as my tube amp has the slowblow fuse as part of the IEC socket enclosure before any possibility of it being able to be manipulated by anything. |
@noske Most Solid state amps have inrush protection, it is tube amps that you have to usually worry about, and that is
why people use slowblow fuses for them. If a ceramic fuse blows on your solid state amp, it won't damage the amplifier, you would just have to go a size up and test it out to get to the required functional rating. |
OK, thankyou, I'm glad that its clarified that you are very experienced. I think that is important. The ceramic build having heat trap protection, that's interesting. Is this good? My lay intuition suggests that it might be good if any heat was dissipated. Obviously not. Anyway, on the ACME site they say that ceramic may be inappropriate for amps that do not have inrush protection, or the fuse may be "destroyed". How do you know if an amp (solid state) has inrush protection? ACME suggest using a stock (Littelfuse? they don't say) ceramic fuse first and just wait and see....if it is destroyed? https://www.revolutionpower.com/acme-audio-labs-large-silver-ceramic-fuse-cryogenic-treated I am not going to pretend that this strikes me as particularly robust advice coming from a manufacturer of premium fuses for use in quite expensive equipment.. |
I work in industrial Automation (or used to). I also have a ton of experience working on Audio equipment, and my comment about the fuse blowing up was just a silly attempt at forum humor. I can build/repair anything.... so not really worried about that. Having said that, I have kept the fuse at the lower end of my required rating, and I might have played it a little too safe. My next prototype will be a thicker filament. The fuse rating of copper that I am using as a template is in open air, the ceramic fuse cylinder also acts as a heat trap. . It’ll be interesting to see if it sounds different than the one I have already made. |
@yuviarora
The Fuse not exploding in my face is a win to say the least :) If this is a risk that is known and one which you are prepared to take, what risk then exists to your equipment should things not work as anticipated? How much are you prepared to spend on repairs? I have been reading some reports on equipment being damaged by incorrect application of fuses, that's all. One report that is perhaps one of the better known rants is that by Roger Modjeski at audiocircle, from quite some years ago now. |
Post removed |
So just put the Gold Plated OCC Copper Neotech fuse into my DAC. 3 strands .1mm (5x20mm) Filled with SiO2/mineral oil mix. Early report, the pianos and Cymbals really stand out to me, timbre is like a romantic Jazz club vibe, sweet and full, but not lacking in resolution one bit. I really like it at first listen, but have to do many A/B tests before I can make any final judgements. The Fuse not exploding in my face is a win to say the least :) |
Adding to the list of builders who do bypass caps in the signal path are deHavilland and Danny over at GR Research. Both are big advocates of bypassing with the right combo in signal positions. I agree 100% based on my builds and mods. It can work very well! It can also go south if not careful. Certain combinations/brands work great together and some don’t. Only experience and trial and error prove this out. For example, Vcap Odams up to 2.2 uf or so combine wonderfully with Vcap Cutf .01uf caps. Magical combo really. I would not bypass larger cap values of say 12 - 100uf with a .01uf bypass cap. I think here you may get the “nervous” type of sound some refer to. Like most things audio this whole question of bypass caps in the signal path cannot be answered in one broad brush statement of never or always. |
@georgehifi “ By-passing powersupply or voltage rail caps is a good idea, but it’s not a good idea to bypass caps that are in the signal path as they will have different time constants, and smear at frequencies where they are both doing work. Alway use the best quality "single cap" in the signal path.” If economical or physically practicable ^^^^ This ^^^^^ Is quite correct |
I added the Jupiter bypass as an experiment to see if the more expensive caps make a difference, and they do. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about this part george? They do make a difference, he just suggest a single cap and continues to ask questions, look at what he wrote. ALL question marks? NOT Statements.. He is ASKING if it might be better, or if it might change the timing.. I say use the same voltage and it won’t. :-) There is more than one mad scientist around you know. Regards |
Unlike you George, I am okay with trying new things out. If you are right about bypassing capacitors, Trust me I will be the first one to come back here and tell you that. As I have already said, the .1uf caps did not sound good as bypasses, they muddled up the sound on my speakers, I was not expecting that to be the case. I am not interested in being right for the sake of being right, I am only interested in things that are true. So if what you are saying is true, I will readily offer my apologies for not believing you. |
Can’t see the forest for the trees??? If you don’t believe me. Believe this, someone from Audiocircle who tried by-passing a quality cap in the single path (also known as a coupling cap) to see what he got, and there’s many more articles to read about it on the net if you bother to search, and a well known one it by Doug Self in his book. Currently I have 1 uF Clarity MR caps, bypassed with .01 Jupiter Copper Foils (into 100000 ohm impedance), I added the Jupiter bypass as an experiment to see if the more expensive caps make a difference, and they do.(1uf into 100kohms (100,000ohms) is fine as it’s -3db at 1.5hz) Like I said some just don’t want to believe, they just want to believe their own dreams and don’t want them shattered or take anything in that questions it. Cheers George |
Thanks for the info. Much Appreciated. I just got (4) .01uf Duelund Tinned copper foils. I’ll bypass both the mid and the tweeter caps on my speakers. Sadly no Duelund Silver foils were available anywhere, they might have been the better match with my Mundorf Silver in oils. All the capacitors in my mids crossover are 600v, tweeters are 1200v and Duelund bypasses are 600v. Fingers crossed. |
VTL and the old Marantz both use (frequency collection (bypass)) caps, I’ve seen more than one older Mac with FC caps too. .01 usually. Doesn’t change anything but ADDs a twinkle if you add one or two in parallel. A really good PIO with a FC cap that’s a copper foil (no oil) or teflons. I like V-Cap. Teflons and silver foil both are like razors, I don’t care who makes them.. Takes forever to break them in. But they are really worth it.. Copper foil, or with oil. I’m not so sure. I’ve been running them for a while.. We’ll see. Teflon/alu foil, copper or Silver foil caps.. $$$$. They are non magnetic too. I match the voltage too on the FC cap. That can cause issues in a passive crossover, I’ve done that and it does cause a timing issue. 200vac with a 600vac cap won’t work correctly.. 600 and a 630 is a lot better.. 200 and 200 :-) |
Don’t be sorry, it’s obvious from that reply, that you have no idea, don’t wish to know what’s correct, and only hope what your dreaming up will come true. Check out any hi-end equipment, amps or speakers, dacs, phono stages etc etc any sources and SEE IF ANY CAPS IN THE SIGNAL PATH are by-passed with another different cap. And you’ll find the answer is no, as to use 2 different time constant components in parallel in the signal path will only create distortion/smearing of the signal. The only time this will not happen is if both caps are identical in all parameters, make, voltage and uf. And you won’t get anyone here that knows what’s what, saying anything other than that. Good luck🙏 |
They were 0.1uf I tried 3 different capacitors. From everything I have read, .01uf is the value that is best used for bypassing. Larger values can cause coherence issues, which is exactly what I experienced. I’ll give them a shot, hopefully they work out. Thanks for your input. P.S. @millercarbon Take care of yourself and your family, things are about to get pretty rough out there. |