@pilrem Yes on the AMG and definitely Yes on the HRS. S or M levels platforms are amazing. Which AMG?
Am I a hopeless audio snob?
I think that I may have a problem, I am becoming an audio snob.
I am going to upgrade my turntable and spend some good money. I read good things about Technics turntables but for some reason I can't take them seriously. From a few feet away, a $4000 Technics plus rig looks like a $400 Technics rig. They look cheesy to me. Low tech 1980's stuff.
I am plunking down some serious money on my next table, but I can't even consider Technics because of the looks.
I think that I need help!
Keep spewing your uneducated nonsense. That'll teach me. |
Personally I find a Technics SP-10 or -15 series in an aftermarket plinth much more visually appealing than most of the fancy gizmo-looking belt-driven tables out there, but to each their own. Sometimes less is more. I do tend to agree, though, that Technics might be limiting their sales by making their $4k tables look nearly identical to the ones you can find on Facebook Maretplace for $500. |
Well, sorry you did that, but I am sure the dealer was happy! We found that the record did not sit on the "pads" very well and the arm, therefore, traveled more in a vertical direction than it should, so we never really got it to work. However, if you still have it, it sure is pretty, so I would have it out for people to look at, anyway.. I think they stopped making them in the early '80's after they moved the factory or something. Anyway, they still have parts and I think will service them if you can find them. We also had tangential arm tables, which physics people say are MUCH better at tracking than normal arms. Unfortunatley, only B&O had a good one, and it was VERY limited by a mediocre cartridge that could not be changed. Once again, PRETTY product, as all B&O stuff is. RABCO made a stand-alone tangential arm as well, but it was pretty clunky. I wonder why someone has not invented a new one since they are truly more accurate than regular arms, and today, money is no object. Technics SP-10 tables, SOTA back then, were a few hundred dollars. Today, I have no idea, but thousands, I think, which is ridiculous, but whatever sells, right?
Cheers! |
The current Technics SL-1200G is a fine turntable at its price point. It is stronger on rythmic drive and bass coherence than it is on tonal refinement, but an excellent performer nonetheless. While it looks like the old disco 1200, it does not look or feel cheap in use. However, if aesthetics are a problem, there is the SP-10R, or the SAT XD1, which does use the latter's drive system. Costs a few $$$ though :)) |
Richopp, sorry old chap, but your paragraph on tangential tonearms is rife with misinformation. For one example, The best part about the B&O SL turntables was the MMC1 or MMC2 MI type cartridges with which the best of them were equipped. Furthermore, the vintage Technics direct drive turn tables at the highest level (SP10 Mk3) are competitive with just about anything you can buy today for under $10,000. Whether one given individual will prefer the sound to that of a modern turntable is of course a matter of taste. On that scale, the current prices of properly refurbished and repainted examples are not exorbitant. My opinion, of course. |
I have had a number of good tts in my system through the years, including the SOTA Star Sapphire, SOTA Cosmos, Teres, and finally a hotroded Technics SP 10 mk II. You're going to buy the table that you like but don't rule things out that really deserve a listen. You can see my Technics setup in My System. It was better than anything I had earlier and not by a little bit. You can, to a point make it look however you want, but the sonic strengths of it are worth whatever limitation you see in the cosmetics. |