Using battery power to go off the City's power grid


I'm using a Bluetti AC200MAX 2,200 watt expandable power station to take my system off the city's power grid.  It runs off a lithium ion phosphate battery with a 4,800 watt pure sine wave inverter. My total system only takes about 450 watts so I have never heard the fan kick on - it is totally silent. The music comes from a completely black background, with a huge soundstage that sounds very natural. I know that Ric Schultz has talked about these types of setups and there is a very expensive Stromtank battery system that is marketed to audiophiles. Anyone else tried this type of setup in their audio system?

Here is a link to a review:

 

128x128sbayne

@veroguy - Great post. I certainly agree with your findings regarding sound quality. Both you and Ric use the Puritan conditioner so I’ll probably check that out in my system at some point. Good to see you can go 4 hours without the fan kicking on. How much power does your system use? Grannyring said he was looking at the AC300/B300 combo so I assume he would be interested too. Thanks

@viber6 Thanks for telling me about the Tweak Audio Inverter Power article. That was a huge help, now I have some idea of what people are talking about. First however, I need a new tonearm for a Thorens that I’ve been modifying into a dedicated mono table that will out perform a Linn LP12. After that project, an entry level battery system will be the newest priority. As you know with this hobby, it never ends.

As for my ASR Emitter II Exclusive, it is a beautiful sounding amp. The battery has six lead acid gel batteries that need replacing about every ten years. I’ve replaced mine once so far. The two power supplies charge the battery and the amplifier has a particular setting for the charge while the amp is turned off. No special power cables for the power supplies and battery are needed, just those that came with the amp. It’s recommended to charge the battery about every three days if listening every day.

As for the ASR’s sound, it has a fully fleshed out presentation with a full dynamic range. It’s clear and musical with a black noise floor and a very wide soundstage. A harpsichord might sound as if it’s nine feet long however that’s the only time I might question the representation. It’s never taxing but it’s never artificial sounding.

My digital and analogue rigs are simply plugged into a passive PS Audio line conditioner while implementing Akiko Audio tuning sticks. There’s nothing objectionable about the sound. There’s always room for improvement but I’m in pretty good shape. I also need a better power cable for my DAC and on the note, upgrades happen rather slowly. 

@sbayne , Sorry, I have not yet updated my system page but the Phono stage is now a Channel D Seta L plus and I have a pair of Atma-Sphere MA 2's in construction as we speak. They are class A and I just checked, They burn 1600 watts at idle. They are going to run the Sound Labs and the JC 1s will do sub woofer duty. So the updated system will burn 3600 watts at idle. The current one will burn 4800 watt at full output. The QSC amps are running on 2 ohm loads. Why do I need that much power? There is no such thing as too much head room. It is wonderful to have a system that can drift along at 105 dB in effortless fashion.

@theaudiomaniac , I may have stepped in it but the fact of the matter is that there are much better ways of improving the performance of your system than battery power supplies for line level equipment. I certainly will not be buying one as I do not have a noise issue. With all levels pegged I can not hear any noise at the listening position. There is nothing to gain. 

@mijostyn - I’m sure those Atma-Sphere MA-2 monos are going to be incredible with the SoundLabs. A number of years ago, I heard the Majestic 845s paired with an earlier version of the MA2s and a Micro Seiki RX-5000/RY-5500 (I forget the tonearm & cartridge) it was fantastic! One of the top 5 systems I’ve ever heard. 

@sbayne  - My system doesn't use much power.  Just checked using the kill-a-watt monitor, and at 75db, my system uses about 90 watts.  I only have 3 components: amp, dac, streamer.

The two b300 batteries provide 6000kWh of power.  I can run the stereo for a couple days off it.  Recharging it via 120v will take 3-4 hours.  But, I'm putting a few solar panels on the roof, which will charge it daily.  I guess that will be a listening test as well - with the batteries being charged, does the sound change?

That 90 watts is without the internet router running off the Bluetti.  Which reminds me - I need to do a listening test with the router on the Bluetti as well.  But, I use both the Gigafoil and Network Acoustics ENO for filtering, so maybe I won't notice. much with that change.

I see you use the new MUON filter.  I'm going to try it.

I'll add that not only does the bluetti provide a darker background, it also increases the realism of the sound.  More organic and natural, with more presence - which is what I strive for in my system.  My DAC has those characteristics, and running off the Bluetti bumps that up a bit.

 

@veroguy - Ok, makes sense why the fan doesn't kick-on for over 4 hours of use -  90 watts is nothing for the AC300/B300. Yep, the MUON is excellent. I went with a linear power supply for my router and was surprised with the improvement in sound quality. Great idea to run your router off the Bluetti.

 

The owner of the property I live on has a Bluetti AC300 that is about 25 feet from me right now......so, he is going to bring it in sometime soon and I will a/b with my Goal Zero Yeti 400. The only thing the Goal Zero does negative is that the bass is not as good as the wall AC (when I run the amp on it). This makes sense as the output impedance of such a small inverter is not very low. If the Bluetti sounds in the league with the Goal Zero but has better bass....that is nice. However, my friend with the Giandel system first started with a Goal Zero Yeti 3000 which was sonically surpassed by the EcoFlo pro......which was then completely blown away by the Gaindel 5000/2 200 amp hour LIfePo4 system he has now. My guess is that any all in one will not perform at the level of a great separate inverter.......we shall see....errr hear.

BTW.....the PS Audio Regenerators do not use an inverter......they take the AC wall power and convert it to DC just like any power amp....and then create a sine wave and amplify the sine wave with an AMPLIFIER.......same as any amp running on AC..

Purepower regenerators do use an inverter.......but run off the wall AC......they convert to DC and then back to AC via the inverter.......PS Audio uses a power amp.

ricevs,

When saying something is better, we should be more specific.  In general, sonic purity and accuracy is associated with more extended HF and tighter bass, among other things.  But the tighter bass is also less full.  If the Goal Zero is more accurate than wall AC by removing distortion, I suspect that HF are more extended and open, while the bass is tighter and less full compared to the wall AC.  Is that what you hear?  How does the Amperetime/Giandel system compare to the Goal Zero specifically for HF and bass accuracy?

I also look forward to your Bluetti/Goal Zero comparison.

mijostyn,

There are certain audiophile buzzwords that are nebulous concepts with uncertain musical meaning.  "Noise" and "noise floor" are examples.  As a musician and music lover first, and audiophile last, I am interested in tone, resolution, clarity, detail.  I don't listen for "noise."  In fact, some of the best classical recordings are from late 1950's Mercury Living Presence which have lots of hiss.  Still, the detail of these recordings is outstanding.  The issue we are interested in here with all these batteries/inverters is whether there is more purity and resolution from this approach to eliminating distortion.  That is why everyone should be interested in trying and learning the firsthand truth about these batteries/inverters.  Since you have excellent electrostatics which have more purity and resolution than all dynamic speakers, you have the most to gain.  Me too, with my Audiostatic 240 electrostatics with the Enigmacoustics Sopranino tweeters in parallel.

 

Man-0-man, The (800Lb. flywheel) was there really as simply an example of what is out there. And I guess that most of you do not have the capabilities that I happen to have either. And you would be "very" surprised at what some people "re-furbish" at home these days. Or just design/build from scratch. There isn't too much a body couldn't find a way to produce. Having simply a 'Bridgeport" mill and a decent 4" tooling lathe...

But it sounds like a couple of you already know way more about this subject "And everything else too, apparently". So much more than "I" could ever possibly even fathom to know the lofty depths of.

So, I shall leave you to it.

"Aim small". "Miss small"!

Good luck!

Noise and distortion are the same thing.  When you reduce noise then you hear more of the true musical nature of the instrument....you hear more harmonics, you hear more nuance, you hear more space around the instrument, you hear more body to the instrument.....It is all about noise.  YOU can have lower overall noise and yet the bass could be looser because the output impedance of the amp or inverter or whatever is too high.  Many factors are independant.....not everything is "more detail".....in fact, a pushed upper midrange can increase apparent detail but is actually phony.  A lot of silver wires and connectors do this....I have tested this via straight wire bypass tests.  When certain types of noise go away the hardness goes away.....this can be disconcerting to those that like zippy sound.....or are used to a certain amount of "speed" being present.  An acoustic guitar played normally does not have speed.....I play one,.......now if you bang on it.....that is another story.  I used to play the Chesky CD.....of Livingston Taylor....titled INK......I used to think the guitars were maybe electric because they were so zippy.....over the years my stereo has got more refined and now I hear the guitars so clearly.....as acoustic instruments in their own space........the inverter helps with this. 

The Bluetti is in my room.  I will be testing it tomorrow.....pretty sure it will have much better bass than the tiny Goal Zero......we shall see.  I am only testing it on the power amp as my front end is hardwired into the Goal Zero.....the amp was being plugged into it.....So, just the amp will be run off the Bluetti while the Goal Zero will still power my transport and DAC.

When I ask my friend if he is done with his stereo.....he always comes back with "well if I can reduce the noise further.....I am in"......this is why he keeps improving his stereo......He just got the upgraded power cord from Puritan that runs from the inverter to the Puritan.....he said it "lowered the noise" even further so now everything is slightly better.  Next, he has the new Puritan Route Master coming.....When he changed his wire from his ground rod from 14 or 12 gauge to 4 gauge it lowered the noise mucho......this game never ends....people who say...."I don't hear any noise from my stereo....it is dead quiet"......have no idea what I am talking about.  This is not hiss or audible noise......this is low level noise that is obscuring the signal at low levels and it affects the sound in serious ways.  You go "I did not know there were 4 back up singers....I thought there were 3......now I hear what brand of strings are being used.  Now, I hear everything laid bare like never before"......again this is not hiss or normal noise you would hear from the speaker when you lift the needle or put your digital on pause.....

Low level noise is everywhere....this is why you want great cables, cables off the floor, great AC, remove as many connectors as possible, use my Music Purifiers and Ground Enhancers, use super contact cleaners, super stands and feet, remove or use audiophile fuses, felt around mids and tweets........time align your speakers, use the best caps, coils, wire and resistors in the speaker xover, use Bybee Clarifier on the back of the magnet, hardwire the xover right to the voice coil wire on drivers, etc. etc. etc. into infinity.  Everything has noise.....so removing as many things as possible helps and what is left....you got to scrub it clean.  It is not about dry super detailed sound.  It is about super natural super detailed OMG I am crying and goosebumps sound.  When my friend went from his Ecoflo Pro to the Gaindel.....he was besides himself......he said "It's like the person is playing for ME......I can hear exactly his intentions and inflections.....it is so real"......I think, many of use are seeking this experience.  Now his system is at least $80-$90K......but he cannot stop......it just keeps getting so much better.  My whole system......I mean everything is about $5500.......but becaue it is so simple and pure.....OMG, does it sound good.  Every part needs to be "noise lowered".....tweaked to the max....or you are missing a lot.  EVERYTHING MATTERS......Worship everything and everyone.....It is all divine.  The noise in our minds.....is ego chatter.....when we reduce that noise then we feel more love, joy, peace and compassion......we FEEL more alive.......every single second is the most incredible moment that has ever happened in the entire history of the entire cosmos.........the miracle of NOW.......is awaiting on you all.......wake up and breath in the joy and love with every breath.....you are loved, you are blessed and you are deserving........This has ALWAYS been so.

Ric - how much power will your amp be drawing from the Bluetti AC300? The AC300 has a 3,000 watt/6,000 surge inverter and is great in @veroguy’s system but his amp only draws about 90 watts. Its also gotten excellent reviews from the non-audiophiles who push that inverter to the max using it for emergency/ solar power. Really looking forward to your conclusions.

Great post, @ricevs - many great points there, and you reminded me of a few more things I've been wanting to try.

Regarding what you called a "zippy" sound:

I'll add to that a pronounced sound of "air" and other micro details.  It is impressive, and even seductive, that a system can reproduce and present that "plankton" (for lack of a better word) in a recording - and good systems can do this without it sounding harsh or fatiguing.  It's very cool, and my system has done that.  But in my opinion, it is not natural if you compare to hearing a live performance. 

On my own journey, with each successful change to lower noise in my system - that "zip" and air and pronounced plankton is not as noticeable.  It's there, but not a main player anymore - just supporting the artists and instruments.  

My experience has been that lowering/removing noise has increased realism which creates more frequent emotional responses to the music - for me.  Natural, organic realism is what I respond to most.  And being able to have that emotional response on demand is my goal.  

Happy listening to all.

 

ricevs,

I agree with much of what you just said.  My main question was about the bass from the Goal Zero.  Comparing to wall AC, Is it looser and fuller, in other words quantitatively greater but qualitatively worse as with old school tube amps?  Is it tighter but quantitatively less?  I assume you found that aside from the bass, the Goal Zero is more accurate in midrange/HF?

Still, noise reduction easily occurs when you roll off HF.  With crude Dolby noise reduction, I remember HF hiss was nearly eliminated this way, but information in the rest of the range was severely destroyed, creating lifeless sound.  The sonic effect is its own type of distortion.  So noise is not synonymous with distortion.  

We want LIFE to all the instruments.  For wind instruments, you want to hear the nice tone, but also the mechanical sounds such as keys, valves, spitting.  Some people seek to get rid of these extraneous "noisy" sounds, but all these sounds are part of the complete sound of the instrument and must be revealed although not exaggerated.

+1@ricevs I've been working at noise reduction for years what with all my battery experiments, dedicated ac lines, conditioning, and now with streaming.

 

Noise reduction in streaming is so linear to ac cleanup in general sense. You are describing the exact qualities I hear with my present setup. My streaming and cd rips no longer sound like digital, simply sounds like performers in room, and better than my vinyl setup due to higher resolution/transparency.

 

If battery power could outperform my rather intensive ac cleansing this would be comparable or superior to major component upgrade. At this point trying to decide if my next move will be another network filtering device or battery power.

Viber,

The bass using the Goal Zero Yeti 400 is looser but not fuller...there is the same exact amount of bass as with the wall. It has relatively high output impedance compared to big inverters so makes sense that bass would be affected negativiely (sounds slower). You seem to have one opinion of everything....."something is either detailed, tight and accurate or its loose bloated and slow". This is far, far from the truth of things. There are a million shades of grey and many sonic factors are independent of each other. You can have loose bass that is less, the same or more than tight bass.....tight bass can be small, medium or large and full....yes, listen to some bass playing live......depending on the room, instrument, whether it is amplified or not....bass can have infintie descriptions. IT IS NOT ONE WAY......expand your mind.......it it infinite.....However, we ARE ONE......but many are the ways and names.

Actually, live unamplified bass in the appropriately sized room or hall is delightful because of the many harmonic overtones which go up to HF.  Take a French horn which has bass, although not as deep as a tuba.  James Boyk has an essay called "Life above 20 kHz" or something like that.  He showed that the French horn has significant energy up to 9 kHz.  When you hear the French horn up close, it has tightness of bass, as well as midrange/HF.  Bass by itself isn't tight, but the perceived tightness is from the much higher freq overtones integrated into the total sound of the instrument.  

Bass instruments in various sized rooms have different tonal balances.  The large piano in a small room sounds awful, because the walls reinforce the bass more than higher freq, creating a bass dominant heavy sound.  The same piano on a large concert stage sounds lighter in tonal balance, with less perceived bass than in the small room.

The Goal Zero 400 is a special case where the high impedance is another factor to its detriment of bass.  Perhaps larger inverters with lower output impedance is a big factor in explaining their superior sound.  But impedance is only one factor.  We can look up the impedance of the larger Yeti 3000, and compare to Giandel 2200 and 5000.  There are probably other factors responsible for the superior sound of the Giandels, and whether the G 5000 is superior to the G 2200.  Any of these units are a tiny fraction of the Stromtanks, so that's why I am going for the G 5000 which your friend vouches for.

There are no specs for any inverters output impedance.....don't make stuff up...,..just listen and report what you hear......this is what we all want....real knowledge.

OK, used the Bluetti on the amp (that draws 35 watts at idle).........the bass was a little better than the Goal Zero but the imaging was not nearly as real.....you can see the space of the recording venue and each instrument is in its own space more with the Goal Zero......The Goal Zero sounds a little soft......the Bluetti sounds more like the zippy wall sound. When listening with the Goal Zero you want to turn it up 2 db and then it is goosebump heaven. time The Bluetti is sitting on the floor and the Goal Zero up on some wood blocks. The Goal Zero also has a PPT AC thangy plugged into its spare AC outlet. Really the test is mostly meaningless. By having the amp plugged into the Goal Zero you are getting more noise interaction from the amp to the other components.....so, I should have a second Goal Zero just for the amp to be fair....and also a PPT thang plugged into the Bluetti and also have it off the floor.....everything makes a difference.....But, I will say I did not want to go back to the Bluetti after hearing the Goal Zero again......If this baby denuded Goal Zero sounds this good what the heck does a 5000 watt Giandell sound like? I want to know.....Maybe I will start a go fund me page and you guys can buy me one.....he he.

The Bluetti I have here is the AC200P not the AC 300 which is an inverter with out battery......this one has the battery.

@ricevs - Too bad it was actually the Bluetti AC200P which uses their older inverter design that according to Hobotech is much noisier than their current MAX series of inverters. The control software is also different. Anyway, I've been looking at your webpage again (great info there) and will probably build a Giandel 5000 system.  

I have an Entech power line noise analyzer arriving on Monday. OCD Mikey used one in his videos regarding the Puritan conditioner and they are fairly cheap.

ricevs,

Too many variables between the compromised Bluetti AC200P and the Goal Zero Yeti 400 with its woodblocks and PPT.  I thought you were using the Yeti with your front end only, not with power amps.  The most meaningful A/B you can do is between your Yeti 400 and your friend's Amperetime/Giandel, both used only on his front end.  Your Yeti 400 can't handle the power amps, unfortunately.  But maybe you remember the Yeti 3000 which can handle the entire system, and how it compared to the A-time/Giandel in your friend's system.  How did the Yeti 3000 and A-time/Giandel compare for just the front end, and the whole system, for bass and the other sonic aspects?

I use the Yeti 400 for the whole system...the front end components are hardwired into the inverter and I plug the power amp into it with a connector.......that is why I could not do the full system on both.  Who would A/B a $400 all in one with a $2800 giant Gaindel system?  No one.  As I have stated over and over again.......the Yeti 3000 was beaten by the Ecoflow Pro which was annihilated by the Gaindel system.  I have no idea how the Yeti 400 compares and who cares.....it is too small to use for most people and has a noisey fan (which I made silent by removing most all the casing).  My friend uses the Giandel sytem and used the Yeti and Ecoflow on his entire system.  Get out of your head!!!!  Just do it!!!!!

The Entech will tell you something but not much.  People are already modding the Puritan 156 (which would not even measure with the Entech). and getting better sound (and that better sound has NOTHING to do with a measurement).  We are talking better jacks, better wires and Fo-Q treatment.  I will be installing burned in Furutech outlets and inlet and better wire on my friends Puritan 156 next Wed.  Most things that make for better sound CANNOT be measured.  An inverter that measures lower with the Entech may sound way worse than one that measures better......this game is complicated.

Why not use a 36 or 48 V battery and connect it directly to your amp's internal diode bridge rectifier, bypassing all troubles from 110/240V, inverters and what have you? It'll be a lot cleaner, and cheaper.

@rudyb This is exactly what my N.E.W. DCA66 class A ss amp did, and this all back in late 90's!  It was nice to have an off the shelf all in one package offering, thought I would have seen more offerings in such a package over the years.

ricevs,

I still don’t know what you mean when you say the Amperetime/Giandel is "better" than the Yeti and Ecoflow. To me, "better" means more clarity/resolution in the entire freq range, but to euphonically oriented listeners, "better" means warmer and rolled off, etc.  If you say the Goal Zero sounds a little soft compared to the Bluetti you tried, I would probably prefer the Bluetti.  You say the Bluetti is "zippy" compared to the Goal Zero, but Bluetti owners here have not found them to be "zippy."  More advanced Bluetti options put them in a similar price range as A-time/Giandel.  Did your friend A/B these Bluetti's to his present A-time/Giandel?

This discussion is not at all like a typical discussion coming from Jay, where he claims that expensive invariably means better.  We are out to find battery/inverter solutions at 5-10% of the price of the Stromtank 5000, the only S-tank unit which can handle an entire high power system.  If Tom Lyle found the Goal Zero Yeti 400 sounded identical to the Stromtank 2500, that implies that the S2500 is a little soft, like the Yeti 400.  Is the A-time/Giandel more like the Bluetti for resolution at all freq?

Again with the clarity/resolution verus warmer/rolled off addiction game. It is not one game....It is not one way.....

You will only know what better is by trying one and listening......then you will know.. I can tell you a bunch of words (you like words) but words are not experience. When you get your Giandel (maybe in few years of talking about something you know nothing about).....and you listen.....ONLY then will you know what "better" is......but then again, you might find it "worse".....and this is why you need such hand holding.........."That jump off the curb really is small" says your mother....."I will even hold your hand." God, life, your mother, all of us are holding your hand. You will be safe. Trust the universe....trust your experience....but in order to have experience.....you have to JUMP!

So when is your Giandel arriving so you can listen and tell everyone what you hear? Or, are you just going to keep asking questions and making comments? Do you really want to know something? Knowledge is experience. I can describe the taste of chocolate all day long and you would still know nothing......You put a small piece in your mouth and you instantly KNOW..

Here are some words you all might like: The guy Oeno is the guy with the Giandel system....please read his comments: especially posts #56 and #61 on the next page

https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/rada-precious-one-phono.34842/page-3

ricevs,

Please just answer my simple questions.  I know how to interpret your direct answers.  If you tell me that the Giandel is a soft sound like the Yeti, I won't waste even $2K trying it out.  I am perfectly happy with my present system not to bother with the extra considerable floor space requirements of batteries/inverter.

Don't school me on life, experience, etc.  My musical experience and knowledge exceed anyone you have ever met in your long life.  I respect your technical knowledge, so just answer my questions, please.

I'll read Oeno's account on WBF, thanks.

@ricevs Good that you can hear the failings of the interters you are testing.

About your comment on PS audio, I don't understand what you are saying or else you don't.  Inverting is changing DC to AC.  The PS audio rectifies the DC from teh wall and the converts it back to AC, the definition of an inverter.  

Are you trying to point out some other subtlty?  

But I say it is the quality of the inverter,  the quantity of amperage, and the low output impedance, that makes a quality power supply expensive.

Jerry

Viber,

I have never heard a Giandel Inverter.....I KNOW nothing about how is sounds......but I trust my friend and know his system (which is incredible). Here is what I will tell you......the Giandel will give you everything you ever wanted and more........or it won’t. he he

The PS Audio uses a generated sine wave and a power amp to do inversion....very different from the "normal" inverters. I don’t know the technology.....but looking at the schematics it is very different from a "normal amplifier". Actually, it does not matter about terminology.....of what does what.....What matters is the sound. Even Jay on his forum likes his $27,000 Stromtank inverter better than the $10,000 PS Audio thang (whatever you want to call it).

The quality of the inverter is based on infinte things. When I was modding the Exeltech inverters back in the 90s.....I changed the output filter cap from a Panasonic cap to a Wonder cap and the sound was more pure.....a gazillion things make for sound differences. The inverters out there are not made by audiophiles who listen to every resistor, wire, inductor, cap, damping, etc. etc. They are made to function well for their intended use......So, if you find one that is exceptional sounding for audo....it is a find......The Giandel seems to be the one for NOW.....only NOW....for tomorrow it may be tossed out for the SUPER DUPER lastest one......This game has just begun.

"My musical experience and knowledge exceed anyone you have ever met in your long life" Wow, someones ego is out of control. How do you know this? And WHY would you state that? Do you want to be seen as super important and all knowledgable? When you really love yourself deeply.....you also deeply love everyone. You would never try to make your self superior to others.....We know who is most loving....by their love. No one needs to brag that they are loving.

You are so beautiful.....you never need to brag or put on a display....you simply be yourself.....and the "yourself" that is real wants to always be of service and love everyone because that is what is REAL and gives the most happiness to everyone.

"I’ve learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”~ Maya Angelou

Please, love one another.....make someone FEEL good.

A beautiful woman was talking to me as I was leaving the property here a couple of days ago. She called me "sweetheart".........As I drove out in the street, I was glowing.....I kept saying to my self....."she called me sweetheart".........she made me feel good. So, my sweethearts....have a great day, and a great life...YOU are loved.....pass it on.

ricevs,

Thanks for links to Oeno's comments.  He has good musical insights and describes the benefits of his Giandel system in a useful way.

You will want to get a Giandel for yourself, maybe a smaller 2200 if that's what you can afford.  Go to Oeno's place, and A/B it with his Giandel 5000, using his same batteries.  Then put Wonder caps on yours, and you both can listen and evaluate.  But it might be risky to take his 5000 and modify it, since he is very happy at present, and there is a chance that he has slightly different sonic tastes than you.

You want to know how a 2200 watter sounds versus the 5000 watter?.....you buy them both and compare.....You have the credit to do that ($1300)?  or are you as money poor as me? (remembering that you can get your money back on either or both).

I only mentioned that you get the G 2200 so you can learn firsthand what the benefits of your mods (Wonder Caps and possible other tricks you have) would be for the G 2200.  If Oeno is intrigued with your mods, he might be interested in your mods for his G 5000.

I have plenty of money, but am prudent because high end audio is a minefield of many ways to financial ruin.  Even after careful research, it still is a minefield unless you listen for yourself through a friend with mutual interests.  You listen in each others' systems, and he lets you borrow an item for a week so you finally learn the truth in your own system.

Don't count on money back guarantees from a company on the other side of the world.  I still can't tell the country of manufacture for Giandel.  It is a tough economy with many delays due to supply chain disruptions.  I go into this project with the possible outcome that I lose all money spent, at best 50% assuming someone from this tiny audience will buy my stuff, but then he will know that I don't like it.  I can afford to lose $1-3K on all this. So I get the best known system (A-time/Giandel 5000) at this point.

First paragraph.......Do you really think I am that stupid that I did not already know all that? Do you really think that would be easy to do and something I would want to do? Most of what you "mention" is already known....you like to reiterate things over and over and make it seem like you are super knowledgeable. But now I see why you want me to do it.....because:

In the next two paragraphs......you show your huge fear of loss. Look at the words you use....."I am prudent, minefield, financial ruin, don’t count on money back, tough economy, lose all money spent". Such drama!!!! You don’t trust the universe....This is sad. I feel sorry for you. If I had the money a Gaindel 5000 would be here in a minute.

You cannot take your money with you to the other side. Your life can be over in a millisecond. You can enjoy better sound or whatever you want in this NOW.....you can enjoy your life NOW. There is only the NOW.....ALL the love and joy and happiness that has ever existed.....exists right NOW. Most people are asleep to how alive and loved they are. Please wake up and enjoy the beauty that you are, everyone is, and the possiblilies of what you can do with your stereo and every other part of your life. YOU ARE LOVED. YOU CAN let go of your fear of loss.....the Universe LOVES you. Stereo is not really that important in the scheme of things.....but if you put energy into it....why not make it bliss and fun and play.......It does not have to be a struggle to "avoid financial ruin".........lighten up.....hug yourself....hug someone today.....go make someone feel good. Buy an inverter.....have fun! I AM Listening to the words I write. Truth applies to everyone....including me. I WILL be more trusting today. For I AM LOVED....I AM DESERVING.

I love words....I just now looked at the word deserving.......DE (of or about) SERVING.   When you feel loved....you feel grateful and you naturally want to give it to everyone......you want to SERVE.

Ok, here are results of the Entech Wideband Power Analyzer I recently got to check out the noise on my house power lines v. the Bluetti AC200MAX. Its rather humorous but remarkable! I assume if I got a Puritan 156 it would take the noise reading down to zero.

 

Thanks for sharing on video.  Fun tool to play around with for $40. I have multiple conditioners on 2 systems and 2 solar battery (48v AGM) backup outlets with different inverters that I can use it on to compare results.  Should be fun to hear the  results.

Cool little toy.  The Puritan is so low in noise that it won't even measure on that thing......but a single measurement does not mean that much by itself.  I am going to change the outlets and inlet and wire on my friends Puritan on Wed. because people have already done this and said it "sounded better"......the different jacks and wire will not make it measure any different......most things that make for better sound cannot be measured.  You could have two inverters that measure quite similarly but sound radiclally different.

Some of you could skip over all of the hassle of setting up separate components of batteries and inverters by simply purchasing UPS' which contain both of these components all in one package. Many models include metering too. Here's the thing about UPS' - there are typically two types; standard (or line interactive), and double-conversion. A standard UPS only transfers power to batteries when a power outage is experienced. In this situation, one specification to note is transfer time. That is the time it takes for a standard UPS to switch from utility power, to battery power. Sometimes that time can be 10 milliseconds, or higher. In a typical broadcast application (I'm a former Radio Broadcast Engineer), I used UPS' in many broadcast situations to momentarily supply power to broadcast gear, until a generator kicked in (after the loss of utility power) and took over. Sometimes this 10 millisecond (ms) transfer time was not quick enough, so many pieces of electronic microprocessor based equipment would lock up. What a pain. I then began using double-conversion type UPS'. This is a type of UPS that is *always* on battery power, with no transfer time. It sounds like with all of the batteries and inverters you're setting up, you're in a way creating a double-conversion UPS. Lead-acid batteries were the norm with UPS', but now many are utilizing Lithium Ion batteries. Here's an example of a double-conversion UPS:

 

UPS' come in a wide range of volt-amp outputs (easily converted to watts via website volt-amps to watts calculators). Another added plus of a double-conversion UPS is since it's always on line, it protects your equipment during momentary (and longer) utility power outages. All of my home audio equipment (TV's too) has been on a double-conversion UPS for years now. A word of caution though if you go searching for a double-conversion UPS; make sure to read the fine print. Some manufacturers use different terms for double-conversion. Key words being - no transfer time. 

   

@jollygreenaudiophile2 mentioned a flywheel type system. Just in case some of you wanted to take a look at this type of energy storage system, here's one that I'm aware of (BTW, you can click on the link on the right hand side for a tutorial):

https://vyconenergy.com/products/ups/vdc-products/

I believe these are mainly used in data centers (and other broadcast applications) to cover the building load, while a generator is ramping up to full voltage, which will then take over the building load. I've never used one, or been part of a facility that had one, but it looks like they can take the place of many UPS'.

When you're really serious about power quality:

Fluke 43B/003 Power Quality Analyzer

Even though this model is now discontinued, you can still find them used on ebay. This unit will display the 60 Hz waveform (in addition to many other things), AND, give you a THD figure. With this meter (I've had one in the past), you might be surprised to find out that your home/apartment/condo utilityAC power is cleaner than you think it is. As many of you are already aware, AC line THD is a good indication of how clean your power is. 

ricevs,

Here's a perspective on how stupid audio expenditures can be.  Is $2K a trivial amount of money for an audio item that you cannot try before you buy?  NO.  If you buy it after your own listening for a week when you are working with a reputable local dealer, and you like the improvement in the sound, then it is worth every penny, even if you spent $10K.  

But $1K buys a medium intensity PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic field) unit which can be used for numerous health problems.  $10K buys a powerful PEMF unit which can heal major neurological diseases like Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, chronic fatigue, cardiac disease, prostate enlargement and others for which mainstream medicine merely uses drugs and invasive procedures.  Since I know you are interested in alternative health methods, I think you will be interested in this.  Read the writings of Dr. William Pawluk, a major expert in this field.  Look at his site drpawluk (dot) com.  

Wanna be happy?  That comes from achieving the best health and well being possible, which is much more valuable than fleeting audiophile satisfaction.  Most sane people who have good but not perfect health are happy, but many audiophiles who are seeking perfection are never happy.  You can have both, and it is necessary to have a perspective on what is really important so you can justify whatever money you spend on both pursuits.

That station’s radio tower is a couple miles away so fairly close. Interesting that particular RF goes away when on battery power. I assume my house wiring is acting like an big antennae. I just tried it in a few kitchen outlets and got great radio reception there too! haha

For $40 the Entech is enough for now. The Fluke analyzers, even used ones, are over $500. Good inverters have THD of less than 3%. The voluntary THD limit for US voltage is 5%. So, that might explain partially the result here. But, I agree we must listen to music and not just rely on a cheap Entech or expensive Fluke analyzer.  Measurements are a tool not a result.

https://electrical-engineering-portal.com/essential-basics-of-total-harmonic-distortion

Many audiophiles (myself included) consistently focus on earth grounds, grounding, and "clean" power. Yes, that's important, to maintain low noise floors (as earth grounds can also act as bonding conductors, which is also good), but what many times gets overlooked (IMO) are AC neutrals. Many times you can lower AC power total harmonic distortion (THD) by maintaining clean neutrals (and sometimes even oversizing them).

Let's take for example a dedicated 20 amp circuit, exclusively used for audio equipment. If you only plugged in one piece of audio equipment to that circuit, the THD on that circuit would probably be at 1% or lower (a good sign of clean power). Start plugging in more equipment to that "dedicated" circuit (especially equipment with switching power supplies), and the THD on that circuit is almost guaranteed to rise in value. The *neutral* bears the burden of equipment with poor power factors. There is a whole science behind this.

When electrical building engineers design an electrical system for a building, (if they're smart) neutrals, and balancing 3 phase electrical systems, are paid close attention to (neutrals especially). The story revolving around The First Interstate Tower (now called the Aon Center) fire in 1988 in Los Angeles has many times been reported as electrically related. Here's what Wikipedia says about that: "The fire's origin has been attributed to overloading of the building's electrical system by reactive distortion of lighting circuit currents." I'm not sure reactive current was fully understood in 1988, as computers were just starting to be the norm in office buildings, along with electronic fluorescent ballasts. It is rumored that the building had a lot of personal computers in the building, which all had switching power supplies (along with the numerous electronic fluorescent ballasts), which possibly/probably overloaded undersized neutrals (probably because the 3 phase power was not balanced correctly).

Times have changed, and switching power supplies are being built with better designs these days (energy star), and have better power factors (a perfect power factor is 1.0 or 100%). A perfect power factor means the piece of equipment is using all of its power, efficiently. There are however still a lot of switching power supplies (and electronic ballast fluorescent lighting) out there that have poor power factors, and high THD. 

So when establishing (utility powered) AC circuits for audio, have as many dedicated AC circuits as you can, and make sure that each circuit has a dedicated neutral, along with a dedicated isolated ground (no daisy chaining neutrals). I realize this can be costly, and quickly fill up a circuit breaker panel (technical term being Load Center), but it will keep AC circuit THD at low levels, which is the key to maintaining high quality noise free utility AC power.

Personally, besides trying to keep my neutrals clean, I also employ Equitech balanced AC power (Google that), isolation transformers, and Tripp Lite Ultra Isobar surge protectors to keep my noise floors as low as they can be. Good luck everyone.    

Thanks dpop. What you are saying for utility powered AC circuits makes total sense (dedicated lines, balanced power, isolated grounds and neutrals, etc) @ricevs and others have really done the yeoman's work on trying to find a reasonably priced but high-end battery powered solution which is what I'm focused on for now. 

The central and unknown issue is what types of distortions are coming from inverters.  They are substantial, a lot higher than from filtered and grounded power.  Using a Puritan or other filter after the inverter makes sense for a one-two punch.  So we are back to the primitive state of wondering why there may be natural aspects of tube electronics yet with their much higher distortion measurements vs SS.  Back to listening.

@dpop The setup you're speaking of is pretty much exactly replicates my AC setup!

 

Speaking of neutrals, recently I experimented with two of my diy power cord recipes. One has exact same number and gauge of wire for neutral and hot, the other has oversized neutrals. While I expected the recipe with equal N and H to outperform the oversized neutral coming out of my BPT balanced transformer based PC, result was quite the opposite. PC with equal N and H being more lightweight, bass shy, along with more hifi/analytical qualities.

 

I don't know how much this has to do with the way neutral is treated in my dedicated lines, but it is there. First discussion I've seen on the importance of neutrals!