I have for years. Pioneer CLD 704, Arcam DV88, Oppo 205. I dislike unnecessary redundancy. All were as good sounding at their price point in their time as dedicated CD only players.
13 responses Add your response
I use an Ayre DX-5 DSD with balanced analog to a KX-5 Twenty for stereo, HDMI audio to a Bryston SP3 processor that sends balanced analog front LR to a by-pass input of the KX-5 and surround to a pair of NAD C288 amps. HDMI video from the DX-5 DSD goes directly to the projector. The sound is superb as is the Anchor Bay video the DX-5 uses. |
In my experience, dedicated CD players have superior sound with CDs than multi-format players. I've owned the Oppo 205, the Esoteric X05 and some others, but I have never liked the sound of CDs as much as I liked the sound of the Naim players or the EAR Acute or my CXC/Heed combo I'm using now. Perhaps with very expensive players in the 10k+ range, the CD playback is on par with good dedicated players. Of course, everything is about what you personally hear. |
Post removed |
To me, my Beta WAS better. NOT dramatically so. The same with DVD-A. But it IS easier to rip surround. https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/how-good-is-the-ayre-dx-5-universal-as-a-cd-player |
I have an OPPO BDP-205. When playing CDs, I can’t tell the difference between the onboard DAC and the DAC in my Ayre QX-5 20. This is my third Oppo and each has been an upgrade over the previous one. My last dedicated CD player was a Rega Planet 2000 and the BDP-85, which was my first Oppo was better than that Rega, no question (eg my wife said so). That said, I almost never use cds anymore, I just rip and stream with Roon as there is no audible difference in my system. |