Townshend Audio F1 Fractal Interconnects - Less is More!


This is turning out to be my hardest review to date. I held off a long time waiting to be sure. Good move. Paid off. After last night this will be a lot better than anything I could have done earlier.

The Townshend F1 Fractal interconnect is based on the same Fractal copper ribbon technology used in their speaker cables. Main differences are the conductors in the interconnect are suspended in air inside a light weight flexible translucent tube.

The Fractal Wire is terminated in Neutrik Profi RCA phono plugs. These plugs feature a spring loaded ground collar. The outer collar on RCA is ground, the pin is positive or signal. With a regular RCA plug the pin sticks out making positive contact first, which can cause some pretty awful noises if the power is on and the source input is selected. Experienced audiophiles know to never do this, but apparently there are enough of the other kind to merit Neutrik designing a whole spring loaded RCA plug. Oh well. This RCA is also really beefy, exceptionally beefy, and has two segments angled in for extra contact pressure and an extra angled sharp line contact area, just to get the point across these things are designed for killer contact.

Plugging them in for the first time the extra pressure was obvious. The spring loaded part feels a little funny for an old-school guy like me but they work just fine. The F1 interconnects themselves are very light and flexible. Routing them was a breeze.

My reference interconnect was the Synergistic Research Atmosphere Level III Euphoria with ground plane technology. It was, like my speaker cables, wrapped in tubes of Perfect Path Solutions Omega E-Mats and treated with Total Contact. Having learned my lesson with the speaker cables I put a microscopically thin coating of TC on the F1 before connecting them.

The sound I heard even right out of the box was clean and clear and open but not as big and full as the Synergistic. This filled out within a few hours to where the F1 seemed well above the Synergistic in every way but one.

We all have certain parts of certain music where there is an instrument that we look forward to hearing. It could be the lead guitar solo in Money for Nothing, or the drums on Famous Blue Raincoat. Time and again I would be ready for one of these only to hear something a bit… different. I’ll be honest, it was kind of a let down at first. But the more I listened the more it started to dawn on me: this is right. All the extra sounds I was expecting to hear, it was all added.

The more and the longer I listened the more certain I was. This is to take nothing away from the Synergistic. I have used Synergistic since the 1990’s, compared it to a lot of others, always loved it. Especially the Atmosphere, which was so good I was really doubtful F1 would be able to match it, nevermind sound better. I would have been surprised even to hear it come close.

That is what took me so long to put this review out there. The F1 is not just close, it is not just a little better. The F1 is a whole hell of a lot better! By the time it had 20 hours it was so liquid smooth and detailed it is hard to believe.

I mean really, literally, hard to believe. So just to be sure, last night I put the Synergistic back in.

Tracy Chapman Talkin’ Bout a Revolution starts with strumming guitar. The sound was flat, grainy, out of focus, and there was a harsh metallic edge to the guitar. Chapman’s voice had an edge to it as well. The bass line when it came in was really big and full, but loose and bloated.

Regular readers will recall I was about ready to break down and buy tube traps to eliminate some boomy resonance in my room, but changed my mind when putting the Moabs on Townshend Podiums eliminated a lot of the problem. Well, turns out a good share of the resonance was in the wire. Who’d a thunk? It makes sense though. Townshend seems to have found a way of eliminating a lot of artificial resonances most other wires add to the signal. How he does it I don’t know. But the effect is substantial.

Chapman uses a lot of really deep, interesting and well defined bass. It was wonderful with the Atmosphere but way warm and bloated. I just never realized how bloated until compared with the Fractal Wire.

The edge and distortion, and flat stage, were an even bigger shock. Palpable 3D imaging and presence are supposed to be the forte or hallmark of the Synergistic sound. Hate to say it, waited and waited trying not to say it, but I am one of the rare guys left these days who lives by "let the chips fall where they may." Townshend F1 Fractal Interconnect makes Atmosphere sound flat and grainy like a freebie patch cord. I just had to wait and give myself time to really get used to the F1, then put it back in again, to be sure. I am sure. Un freaking believable.

On Side 2, and now with the F1 back in, Mountains of Things starts off with a lot of great percussion instruments, way too many to count, plus triangle and a cymbal, and each of these is so much its own thing in its own space with its own texture its a real treat. This isn’t some special pressing either, not a White Hot Stamper or anything, just one I picked deliberately because it is so very average and yet also something a lot of guys have heard and can relate to. I have never, ever heard this music sound anywhere near so true and right. Can’t even pick out any one thing to say wow great bongo’s or whatever, because I would be saying that about everything!

I have always loved the big full bass and the big full sound of Synergistic overall, a lot. This is not a case of my taste changing to something lean or a whole lot different. I still love me some good bass! It is just that with F1 (and Townshend in general) the bass is so much more pleasingly clean and full. It is at times even more deep and impactful than anything I ever heard from Synergistic. With the speaker cables in particular it was the bass that struck me first. With the interconnect the bass is still there just even more articulate and well defined. There is more character and control to the bass now than ever. It is simply that a lot of “extra” bass has been removed.

The top end is so free of ringing, edge and glare it can at times seem almost soft. Until something happens and it is clear the top end is definitely there, just no longer exaggerated. Sibilance is still there, just now those "s" sounds are much more natural. The records that have problems with this still have problems, they just aren’t anywhere near as hard on the ears now. Yet cymbals still shimmer, Sinatra still swings, the sax has real bite. Everything that should be there is there. Just nothing extra added.

Now with more time to listen and think, it is apparent this is a common theme running through all the Townshend components- a lack of additive resonance. All kinds of things vibrate, apparently, even electrical signals do it in the form of ringing. Max has shown this on some videos where the oscilloscope shows clearly the signal reflecting and traveling back and forth, in effect ringing. It happens with speakers. It happens with components. It happens with speaker cable. Now also it seems to happen with interconnects. Why am I not surprised?

Sometimes the ringing or resonance is high frequency, and this brings a hard edge and exaggerated top end. Sometimes the resonance is lower, and the midrange is full and warm, or the bass is big and round. Sometimes when the designer does a really good job of shaping the contour of this it can sound pretty good. That is what I heard with Synergistic. Probably a lot of what is going on with other wire is different guys find they like different things exaggerated to a different extent and so they pick the ones they like. But they are still exaggerations. They are still additive. They are still distortion.

With the F1 back in this becomes really clear. Exactly the right word: clear. The F1 is as clear and as open as I could ever want. Nothing missing, nothing added.

John Hannant at Townshend was telling me from the beginning that to get the full benefit it is best to run a full loom. I thought this was nothing more than good salesmanship. Now though I can see the reasoning behind it. F1 speaker cables removed the colorations and resonances, all the ringing going on with the speaker cables. But the Atmosphere interconnect was still there coloring the sound. I just didn’t know it. Quite honestly had no idea. Frankly surprised to hear how much.

This review has been hard to write in another way. I’ve been a huge fan of Ted’s for a good three decades now. Still regard him as one of the greatest creative geniuses around. Even now I have not one negative thing to say about any of his many terrific designs. For sure Synergistic has the biggest widest range of consistently high performing products, and from entry level to fairly high tier is still a top recommendation. At the very top end of the range though I have to now give the nod to Townshend F1 Fractal.


128x128millercarbon
An array of 4 subs well controlled will give 20 Hz of clear bass...

Nothing will rival with that ever...




But for average buddy who dont need 20 Hz like me...And could live around 40 Hz...

The resonators relatively to their numbers, locations, fine tuning, can take care of ALL resonance at ALL frequencies...But it is  not all people who can use 32 pipes and tubes in a room... But Helmholtz resonators numbered  3 or 6 could take care of bass resonance... The only difficult part is listening to determine the ratio neck lenght and diameter/ relatively to the tube volume....But it is just FUN to do...

It is the more powerful acoustical control device at no cost if you do like i did...  I pick discarded pipes and plumber tubes...Straws of different length and diameters.... It takes time tough to listen to them and fine tune them.... It takes me the whole month ... I just finisked it and the results are nothing short of extraordinary in my 2 listening positions...





For the podium : this is vibrations/resonance controls...

My springs methods with 2 sets over and under the speaker with (dissymetric compression of each sets of springs) fine tuned load damping will do the job at 100 bucks.... It is probably not so good than the podium but very near them probably.... Anyway cost me almost peanuts... These methods, the podium or my own springs method, anyway give something that will work giving much better clarity on all frequencies bass included... Millercarbon is right about that...

The only difference between him and me is the fact that  i created my own controls mechanical, electrical or acoustical  devices, i dont have 6000 US bucks (8000 canadian) and if there is a big difference between our S.Q. it is because for sure his gear is more higher engineering, perhaps not the amplifier but the speakers for sure...

Even if all his gear is better than mine the difference will be the room, mine is now under complete controls...

I know by experience, believe me or not , that cutting few inches of a straw affect all aspect of sounds in my system /room...Then timbre perception, imaging, soundstage, listener envelopment, source relative width, all acoustical factors are LINKED together....It is normal if we think what we perceived is not the sound coming from the speakers, but from the timing incoming wavefronts in milliseconds AFTER  they have already  crossed our room perhaps 10 times before our brain finish his wave analysis/ integration...

A single straw.... Astounding power of acoustic unbeknownst to most...




@mahgister
 Thank you. I understand. You're good with 40hz up.
If you want 20 Hz clear bass, Millercarbon subs array is the way to go...

My best to you...
@mahgister Yes, I want 20hz bass but I also want bass up to 40 hz. Take care.
I have grown to respect what millercarbon says, because I have arrived at an audio system something like his is configured. I do not have Tekton speakers, just Wilson Sasha 2's. I do have SR Euphoria and Shunyata cables, but I only listen to CDs on an Esoteric K-01XD player. 

Given his (MC's) longevity on this forum, I doubt he is marketing a product.
Here’s a link to the discussions I have started. https://forum.audiogon.com/users/millercarbon/discussions?page=3
Click on any name, takes you right to a page where you can see all the discussions that person has started. The MDS people attacking me, might be interesting to compare their discussions started list with mine.

A lot of them you will notice do not even have systems. I would say by and large we pay them more attention than they deserve.

PS- I like the way you say you do not have Tekton speakers, "just" Wilson Sasha 2’s. Good one. 👍 (And Euphoria is crazy good.)
MC you are so great. No need to discount others. Your greatness will speak for itself.

BTW you are incorrect to suggest that not having ones system posted here means they do not have one. We will give you a pass on that incorrect assertion for now however. Just try to get it right moving forward and we will not have to correct you.
mahgister,

Mission Loudspeakers 780 Loudspeakers | Monitors | Audiogon

Everybody else,

I apologize for putting this here.
Thanks glupson....

But it is another model than mine...

Mine are Mission Cyrus 781.... They are supposed to be the best of Mission.... It is the reason why i bought them and they were a bargain at 50 bucks....I never look back....My Tannoy dual gold were better tough BUT too big to be put on a desk, i sold them ( 2 pairs) 1000 bucks each pair...I dont regret anyway i never listen to the Tannoy at their real S.Q. peak because at this time i was not concerned by any embeddings controls....Then i owned the Tannoy for 40 years  without have been  ever able to  listen to them in the right acoustical controlled room, unbeknownst to me   ... A pity.... But most people are like i was all my life , acoustic is not the most important matter in audio.... All people vouch for their gear instead.... Anyway i speak too much....

my best to you glupson...


MC mentions that adding pods or Platforms under electronics adds the same type of improvements as the Podiums under speakers. I found this to be true. In my system the speaker Podiums (I'm going to simplify here for sake of brevity) made my speakers "better" in numerous ways and was a cost effective upgrade. The Platforms (pods) I put under my preamp cases and my streamer/DAC FIXED a significant ringing/sibilance issue I had. So in my system I can't do without the pods under my electronics anymore, but the Podiums are dessert. Samandlej21, was teasing MC about buying the Townsend Allegri Reference passive preamp since he was high on the Townsend Kool Aid. Well, I'll admit to being high on the Townsend Kool Aid as the isolation products and F1 wire loom are both so effective in my system. I ordered the Allegri passive preamp today. Just waiting for the almost 5K I got out of selling two "big name" interconnects to clear Paypal, to make my balance payment to Townsend.  I bring up the money issue simply to point out that there are products out there that are a tremendous value, and this forum helps us find them.  In fact the Allegri is going up against my ARC REF10, and if it wins I'll look to free up more cash to upgrade my dCS. If it doesn't beat the ARC it's flying back to London. I am very happy about trying equipment in my home that I can return if I don't like it. It's fantastic! Free Kool Aid samples for all!!
Good to hear. Appreciate it. The truth is I have a very long history of looking out for people's money by searching out and reviewing only the highest value components- regardless of who makes it or what it costs! Anyone seriously interested can easily find and read all my reviews, and see this is the case. Over and over again I strive to put things in perspective, whether it be by comparing a fuse to a power cord or the way these different Townshend products work. This sometimes results in some seemingly strange statements, like Nobsound springs at $35 are tremendous value, but so are Townshend Podiums - because even though many times the price they are many times the performance as well. 

The Allegri I am a bit jealous, because from everything I know it should be another killer component. I have known for years transformers are the best solution for volume, but not easily implemented. This makes all the glowing reviews easy to believe. Especially after hearing for myself just how good all the other Townshend stuff works. 

Because I am such a value-oriented audiophile I have pretty much my whole life been an integrated amp kind of guy. What I have said, to be fair, is separates do not make sense until you get up into a very high level of price and performance. All arbitrary of course, but for me that would be a Raven Reflection, probably the pinnacle of integrated amp performance. I don't know what level of amp it would take to match that, but the Allegri sure sounds like it could be part of that package. 

However that goes, bottom line, you are able to sell what you have, upgrade to Townshend, and have money left over. Wow.
My Townshend Allegri Reference sounded great from the off (compared with the original Allegri) but really needed a two month burn in period, before really coming on song, possibly because it makes use of copious amounts of Fractal wiring internally. I use a Chord Electronics power amp, but it should work equally well with valves. The Reference was reviewed by Martin Colloms (Hi-fi Critic) who uses an Allegri Plus for reviewing purposes and Rafael Todes (of Allegri String Quartet fame) for StereoNET UK, both agreed that it was of "reference" quality !! First thing to do is to level it up using the adjustable cushioned feet, I used a two way turntable spirit level to ensure that it was absolutely true. For the record, I am not sending mine back !!!
I have been a lifelong proponent of integrated amps, and tube integrated in particular for a good 30 years now. But that was always with the understanding separates are ultimately better, it is just that you have to get up into a very high range of performance before this becomes the case. Well now here I am at long last bumping into that range. Even so it still seemed a good tube integrated like Raven Reflection was the way to go. Now though comments like yours has me re-evaluating.

The Allegri being transformers and therefore totally passive devices do not require a power cord. Every component deserves a power cord of equal stature and so this is no small amount of money saved. The transformer is clearly the best method of volume control, that is why SUT transformers are used with MC, they simply are superior. But with a transformer the wire and construction are everything. Townshend has Fractal wire, and clearly knows how to work with it to produce incredible results. 

Just what I need, one more project. 😉 Dang. Sometimes I wish everything wouldn't matter. 😂 But it does. Thanks!
Post removed 
Post removed 
MC, oh c'mon.  You enjoy 'having another' audio 'project'....;)

The challenge is basically the reason and rational in the pursuit, anyway.

Scratch that itch....*G*
No, I really do hate the projects. Like today sitting on the floor peering into the Moab taking the crossover out measuring and planning on the table, putting it back in. Awkward position cut off the circulation to my legs, damn near killed my back. But the thing that keeps me going is knowing how phantasmagorically awesome it will be. Then it goes back in and I put on Silk Degrees just some ordinary copy not the White Hot Tom is sending me 😍 and it sounds so good I am like, does it really need to be better?

Sigh. Yes. 😉😂
Post removed 
I just want to point out these F1 IC’s are not based on the copper ribbons like the speaker cables.

Apart from the Fractal treatment (which Max claims is his new and improved wire conditioning process), the interconnects are totally different.

This cable uses a giant solid core ground wire. Coiled tightly around the ground wire is a very thin signal wire. This signal wire is bare but laminated. It’s all then housed within a hollow air tube.

Its a fairly unique cable geometry, as I have not seen it done (or its rarely done) in the industry.
Post removed 
Yes, it is a puzzle how he managed to engineer something that works so well even in spite of the fact that YOU cannot understand why it works so well. One of life's mysteries.
Are interconnects to allow the most interference free flow of electrons from output to input...or hyper-expensive, dressed-up tone controls? 


Post removed 
Post removed 
@millercarbon - FYI there is a used Townshend Audio Allegri Reference Preamp in black listed by a dealer on USAM as of yesterday. Still there.
I haven't been here long enough to know why, but it is clear Millercarbon has annoyed some of you. However, I recently purchased a pair of F1 Fractal interconnects and a digital aes/ebu cable and find his comments about this cable to be exactly what I experienced. I don't have a ton of experience with high end cables but have had Synergistic Research cables and my favorite have been my Kubala-Sosna Emotion interconnects (admittedly romantic).  The F1s sound "right" and as if resonances that I didn't even know were there have been tamed. In my opinion, and to my ears, these are an awful lot of bang for the buck. By the way, I listen exclusively on headphones (ZMF Verite) so subs have no bearing on my impressions.
And believe it or not that is exactly what annoys them so much, that I have the temerity to accurately and enthusiastically describe and promote anything and everything that I can find if it will in any way make my system - and yours - sound better.

Thanks for letting me know.
Yes, the F1 speaker cable replaced my heavily tweaked and improved Synergistic CTS. These cables are significantly improved from stock. Michael Spallone modified power supplies, and a bunch of other stuff. Way better than stock. Yet the F1 easily raised the bar with the same sort of performance mentioned above- a lot of resonance and coloration that wasn't even apparent is now gone with F1. Each instrument now has much more its own characteristic tone and timbre. The improvement is not subtle.

F1 are just real transparent, letting the music flow, without adding or subtracting anything, at least not as far as I can tell. 
millercarbon,
I am thinking of purchasing them. The reviews write about the bass but what about the mids, highs and soundstage?

BTW, I have tried the Silversmith Fidelium and as I stated elsewhere was just not impressed. Too anemic for me. My DIY speaker cables have beaten all other cables I have tried. And that is a lot!

But, I am really impressed with the Townshend Podiums (as per my review). Their products have peaked my interest to investigate further.

ozzy

Imaging is superb. Everything is, right across the board. Main difference between most other cables, there is no one thing that hits you right away as being better. Mids and highs are exceptional, but it can take a while to realize just how good they really are. I think that is because so many other wires add so much ringing and resonance we take it for granted. When everything's doing the same thing after a while it is easy to think that is because this is the way it is.  

Not the way music is, just the way music is through our systems. I for sure never dreamed my cables were editorializing so much. It always seemed like as cables got better and better they were simply revealing more and more. Now though I think this is only a part of why they sound better. More often than not the cables really are editorializing, imparting their designer's signature on the signal. A lot of what we're doing choosing cables is like buying speakers, choosing the one that matches what we think they should sound like.   

Which is slightly different than what they should sound like, which is nothing. At least for me, I don't want anything doing anything. Just transmit, amplify, and transduce, thank you very much. That to me is what I get with F1.   

The proof of this, if there is any, is in how very different recordings sound now. I mean comparing one to another. To the extent a system editorializes it imparts a signature sound onto the signal. It tends to make every record sound the same. Mine now, every record sounds very different. Not only sounds different, it is like being in a different world. From one to the next, no two alike. No kidding. Have to hear it to believe it.   

Anyway, a big part of that came from F1. If you order I highly recommend call and talk with John Hannant. More than once he has thought of stuff that never would have occurred to me, and he has never steered me wrong. 
Post removed 

@ozzy ... Hmmmmm....You seem to have a bit off a personal issue regarding the Silversmith Fidelium as you rarely miss an opportunity to comment negatively no matter how tenuous the link to the thread, was it really necessary to make the above comment !!!

I cannot help but construe that a nagging doubt remains niggling away at you as you are in a vanishingly small minority, as apposed to the many audiophiles who have tried the Fidelium speaker cables and have been thrilled enough to buy them!


millercarbon,
Thanks for your input.

tsushima,
We all have opinions, and thus far in our society I am entitled to state mine. (However that seems to be changing) If you like the Fidelium’s then enjoy them.
I did not.

ozzy
I don’t have them....Merely curious as to why you feel the need to mention that they didn’t suit you.... at every opportunity that arises !
Not really, they are mentioned so often as the pinnacle of speaker cables. There are other choices that should also be considered.

I will add that my choice for refund was carried out quick and easy, the seller was most gracious and responsive.

Try before you buy if you can, next best is a money back guarantee. 
I am also pursuing that question on the F1's.

ozzy
“Not really, they are mentioned so often as the pinnacle of speaker cables.”

Well.....It was rather obvious that you were using your ‘Experience’ in an attempt to even up the score...I fail to recognise folks as ‘Placing’ these cables on any ‘Best in Class’ pedestal...
Are you affiliated with Silversmith as you almost seem offended? Or, is it only okay if folks repeatedly state that they like a particular cable ,speakers or amps?
facten,
I think when people have invested their hard earned money on a product, they don't want to hear anything negative about. I understand and get it.

However, I did go ahead an placed an order for the Townshend F-1 speaker cables. I am always looking to improve and Townshend does provide a 30 day money back guarantee.

ozzy
@millercarbon I’m very intrigued by this cable.
Michael Spallone is one of my dearest friends. He lives less than 10 minutes from me and for the past 16 years we’ve spent literally hundreds of hours at each other’s homes listening to each other’s systems. He has changed cabling but for the most part, he has stayed with Synergistic. My system on the other hand, has changed repeatedly regarding electronics and cabling.
I’ll have to tell him about this Townshend cable, but knowing Michael, he’ll stick with the Synergistic. Honestly, after hearing his system for 16 years, I wouldn’t change a thing.
Without question, the widest, deepest and most cavernous soundstage I’ve ever heard on any system. Tone is spot on. The bass is guttural, to say the least. Midrange is beautiful and highs are detailed.

Maybe I should try this cable and put it in his system for a bit?

@facten...I couldn’t  give a toss about Silversmith or their cables, I do give a toss when a member takes every opportunity to diss a product when there is absolutely NO reason to make reference to it...


tsushima,
The Silversmith cable seems to be the speaker cable "gold" standard these days and gets all the buzz on these forums.

Thin copper ribbon as is the Silversmith cable has demonstrated in my system and ears to lose the dynamic’s that I am used to hearing with my DIY cables.

The Townshend cables are also in that realm of thin ribbon type cable. Thus my concern and question.

Do you get the connection now?

ozzy
devilboy,
Based on the work he did modding my Active Shielding I am sure you are right about the cavernous stage. His mods had exactly that effect on my CTS speaker cables. That is one of the great things about the Synergistic Active Shielding cables, they start out impressive but can be modded by a guy like Michael into something truly amazing. I am sure he did that to everything and would love to hear it! I don't care what people spend or do, there is nothing like a modders system, and Michael is one very talented modder!

Of course, the more you tweak and mod the more you put your own stamp on the sound. For that reason alone I would be surprised if he would prefer F1, or anyone's stock cable for that matter! A component to most people is a component. To a modder a component is raw material to maybe be turned into something...  🤣 That is part joke, but partly serious too! Anyway yeah that would be something.
@millercarbon  Exactly! Every time I've ever brought any one of my amplifiers, preamplifiers, DACs or cables over his house, while many of them sounded really good, in the end it was his modded equipment that won the day. He always tells me that everything he does is a labor of love. I believe that even if another component sounded better than what he had, he would still keep his modded stuff just because of the sentimental reason.
Yeah and it works like this. Vast majority of designer/builders they will first design, then spec out parts, then maybe sometimes depending on what and who it is they might even try and compare a part here and there to find the one they like. Even when they do this though they are always doing it with price points and profits in mind. So what we get in components, even though extremely good, is never quite up to what a modder like Michael can do. Take my Moabs, Eric built a damn fine speaker. I put half the speakers cost into modding the crossovers, it is beyond anything you could imagine you just have to hear them- and all I really did was buy better parts.

What Michael does is take all the better parts, painstakingly try one after another searching for the very best of the best. The one he just loves. That is why I paid him to modify mine. A mod I could easily do myself. For a lot less too. It would be better than stock, no doubt. But I know Michael has tried and compared everything. So I went with his acquired expertise.  

It is kind of like, you go to Ireland, are drinking some fine Irish whiskeys and they are so good you can't believe. Then you meet this one guy makes his own single malt from the grains from this one farmer, makes only these tiny batches, and it is freaking ambrosia. Man I would love to hear Michael's system.