THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME DOMAIN RESPONSE MUST READ


Speaker designers ignore or downplay the importance of TIME. Why?

A high end speaker should be as accurate as possible and that means it should not only be optimized with regard to frequency response but time response.

Back in the 70’s and around that time, speaker engineers thought that a perfect speaker would be one that had a flat response. This idea has waxed and waned in popularity over the years and even now there is no consensus.

What the speaker engineers forgot to consider is Time response.

The time reponse of a speaker is how fast it starts and stops. A perfect speaker would have a perfect time response of 0. Since this is not possible, we must get as close to it as possible. The problem is speakers engineers have neglected this aspect of the design and so speakers over the last 40 years have not improved in this respect.

Time is such an important aspect of the sound we hear. We not only hear tone but also time. The brain can detect time differences of only a few microseconds. Experiments have shown that the start of each note is what we use to determine what instrument is producing that sound.

We must ensure that our crossovers do not smear the time response because it will be heard by our ears. Time inaccuracy is why high end speakers do not sound like real instruments.

Diffraction from the cabinet can also cause time smear. We need spherical cabinets not square boxes. Tweeters need to be time aligned in order to ensure that when the woofer stops so does the tweeter. When the woofer starts, so must the tweeter. The woofer itself has to have a Qts of ZERO to prevent time smear. Ports must not be used or else you will get ringing.

We need to make it mandatory for speaker companies to publish the time response of all their speakers so that consumers can easily compare and decide exactly what they want. Some may actually prefer a speaker that has a poorer time response and that is fine. The problem is, we cant decide unless we know what we are buying can we?

Unfortunately, 90% of speakers on the market, even high end speakers have ports. And they are also made of cheap wood, even though there must be better materials by now. Some materials ring more than others.

So dont be deceived folks. If you want better speakers, you will probably have to make them yourself because speaker manufacturers dont care about sound quality. They spend millions of dollars on anechoic chambers all so that they can get a flat response but they spend zero effort on better time domain response. We are being duped.

kenjit

Gosh. Who needs to watch/read the drama of political debates between unapologetic, fire-breaking partisans, when we can get all the drama we need right here on this forum?

Thanks, Kenjit

 

 

Does damping factor of the amp have any effect on the ringing of the driver and hence the Q of the total system?

There are many sources of ringing within the speaker. The cabinet can ring, the driver can ring, the crossover parts can ring. We need to stop all ringing wherever it occurs.

Maybe let’s just ignore the ringing that may be happening long after the square wave’s fundamental period is over.

Or we could take a step function, so we only have 1/2 of the square wave… and that makes it simpler to consider and we got rid of half of the square wave… and also got rid of a train of square waves.

 

...

It needs to be able to reproduce a square wave

What needs to reproduce a square wave?

  1. The position of cone or the velocity or the acceleration?
  2. or the air pressure

What should the electrical square wave input look like in a plot?
What are we supposed to be measuring… and how?

Hopefully @kenjit can clarify what he means, so we are not left guessing.

There are many sources of ringing within the speaker. The cabinet can ring, the driver can ring, the crossover parts can ring. We need to stop all ringing wherever it occurs. It needs to be able to reproduce a square wave

Maybe @roxy54 - or the air pressure response of a driver given an impulse of current or voltage…

But the later assumes that the current is somehow not allowed to ring in the circuit from the mass of the driver and its motor through the cable to the amplifier.

Hopefully @kenjit can clarify what he means, so we are not left guessing.

 

Then there is:

The time response of a speaker is how fast it starts and stops

So it that a speaker, as in cabinet, driver… i.e. the whole enchilada?
or “speaker” as in a single “speaker driver” unit?

(where “speaker driver unit” is like an indivisible quanta fundamental element (i.e. unit) of what makes up an elemental speaker.)

@kenjit  said:

"The time response of a speaker is how fast it starts and stops."

I claim to know almost nothing about the subject, but isn't kenjit confusing time alignment of individual drivers in a multi driver design with the impulse response of an individual driver?

And of course, as usual he frames it as a plot that "they" have cooked up to dupe us. Go home. 

we need to look at the cumulative spectral decay to ensure that its 0ms at all frequencies from 20hz to 20khz. I've

What is oms?
(Is that 0 milliseconds?)

I do not think that we can apply an impulse to a system and get it to decay instantaneously unless we have zero output impedance, which a passive crossover  sort of gets in the way of.

The spectral decay is amplitude based in frequency versus time.
So yes it is a time domain based description, but it is shown in a PSD tyle of frequency response.
Is there a phase or complex component lurking around somewhere?

 

Lets assume that we have two speaker, both with 0 msec of decay.

Are there other measurements that would inform us of whether one is better than the other?
Say ones that included some idea of phase or time domain response (without frequency response), or do we just use frequency response? 

so you see @holmz 

the spectral decay ensure its oms at frequencies...... I dealt with this guy for a week everyday,  he did not absorb a thing..... complete aggravation 

Kenji,  you are confusing the X and Y axis with the L & V axis.   

How wold you define “right”?
Are there some specific measurements that show when one is more right than another?

we need to look at the cumulative spectral decay to ensure that its 0ms at all frequencies from 20hz to 20khz. I've never seen any speaker come close to that. 

Of course they dont know what they’re doing. A speaker is supposed to reproduce the signal you give it. Yet all high end speakers sound and even measure differently. They can’t all be right can they?

@kenjit How wold you define “right”?
Are there some specific measurements that show when one is more right than another?

 

@erik_squires 

Kenjit, who has never designed a speaker,

This is also a false accusation. I have designed speakers. But just as all speaker designers will not reveal their secrets, why should I? If you have spent years tuning a speaker why should you give away all your hardwork? Does Fritz tell us the values of the caps he uses in his designs so that others can copy his work? I dont think so. I have worked hard to be a champion and I will not help my competitors gain an advantage and put my status at risk. 

@timlub 

You know Kenji,  you are one person that I wish that i would have never responded to when contacted

Likewise. You misled me into thinking a design would be forthcoming, even giving me a deadline yet you then pulled out at the last minute after hours of discussion. Perhaps you realized that meeting the requirements of such a perfect audiophile like me was far more difficult than you first thought. 

 

@bigtwin 

Apparently, the engineers who design speakers don't know what they are doing?

Of course they dont know what theyre doing. A speaker is supposed to reproduce the signal you give it. Yet all high end speakers sound and even measure differently. They cant all be right can they

@erik_squires 

Kenjit, whi has never designed a speaker, would like all of the professional designers to know how wrong they are.  Again.

Its not just about getting them to know how wrong they are. Its about getting them to design speakers correctly. Audiophiles spend millions of dollars on high end speakers. It is a multi million dollar industry. We deserve better quality. So I deserve my speakers to be accurate not only in tone but also in time. Until that happens we are stuck and the only solution is to make and tune our own speakers. Which is what you obviously realized when you did the SNR1. Do not buy fritz though. They are not very good. 

 

 

Based in absolutely nothing:

Speaker designers ignore or downplay the importance of TIME. Why?

Kenjit, whi has never designed a speaker, would like all of the professional designers to know how wrong they are.  Again.

 

😂

The QTS for a troll must be yuuuge! Lots of reverberations in my head after reading this. Should have know better. Lesson learned.

Apparently, the engineers who design speakers don't know what they are doing?  They must be beating a path to kenjit's door to have it all explained to them?  I for one don't need to understand all the minutiae it order to know if I like the way it sounds.  Why am I still investing time typing this? 🤣

Peter Walker invented the first time-coherent speaker back in 1955! It is the Quad 57 - named for Peter's company and the year the first commercial ones appeared. Still a landmark product!

You know Kenji,  you are one person that I wish that i would have never responded to when contacted.  I tried to help you,  you tore me down,  I still tried to help,  you argued and now, you post that I don't know anything about your room or your boxes..... Ok,  I am done with you..... You know, I can post our conversations that you sent to my home.  I can tell others what drivers you use, that they are put in MDF with a flat front, that they are not countersunk that they are forward firing with no tow, that they are 7 to 8 ft apart, (you didn't want to measure) and are currently set up in a triangle..... No,  your right, I didn't ask you anything about your current speakers or set up.  Consider your email blocked from my home.  

Why focus on the motor alone? it can be also due to the input signal current, the mass of the driver etc

What you are calling time domain response is in direct correlation to drivers alignment combined with each drivers natural rolloff and crossover components used.  

The cabinet also rings. yes crossover circuitry can also cause ringing. So how do you stop it? Do you have any answers?

You stated that it tells us "how fast a speaker responds:.

The motor of a speaker directly affects the speed in which a driver reacts.

What you are call ing time domain response is in direct correlation to drivers alignment combined with each drivers natural rolloff and crossover components used.

On QTS, you did quote the textbook response that qts is a summed combination os qms and qes, but you still show no understanding of what that means. 

Mechanical q can be affected by mass, electrical q affected by electrical transfer in the motor and induction of the coil.  

The combination QTS is a direct correlation of how this Zdriver will work in a sealed box vs a ported or vented.  Any driver that has a qts below .4 ish will not go down in a sealed box and any driver with a qts below .25 or so will have a problem going down in any box.  As QTS rises..... .3 to .4 do a very good job of being used in a ported or vented box,  a QTS of .4 to .5  ride the line that can be used in ported or sealed and .5 and above will work well in a sealed box.  Combine this with VAS,  the drivers equivalent air pressure tells us what size of box this driver will work in.  

 

@timlub feel free to correct me if you think I do not have a correct funamental understanding

@ditusa The question was for Kenji.... he has emailed me at home many times and I can tell you that he does not have a fundamental understanding..... as you can see,  read the answer he sent.  

What is Time Domain Response?

I explained that at the beginning of this topic. Time domain response is how fast the speaker responds. 

I thought the Motor assembly was the biggest part of how or why a speaker starts & stops.

Rubbish. The cabinet can sing along with the drive unit and smear the time no? That has nothing to do with motor assembly

What is QTS?

The QTS is the Q of the driver. It is the total combined Q including electrical and mechanical. 

How do you get a QTS of zero and what would that do?

It would mean that the woofer starts and stops when its told to. It woud not ring like a bell which when struck will continue to resonate.

How does zero QTS prevent Time Smear?

Continuing with the bell analogy if you hold the bell when its struck it wont ring anymore. The speaker needs to start and stop exactly the same way the input signal does. Minimizing the time smear is a way to do this.

How do Ports Ring?

They ring when the air inside the wooden box vibrates at a certain frequency. However, like most things that vibrate, they unfortuntely do not stop immediately but can take time.

Why are your own speakers made of wood and why are they ported?

I have more than one speaker. But yes wood is used for one of them as a test cabinet. Wood would not be used for a reference design. I experiment with various types of technology. I use ports for the same reason everybody else does. In order to get more bass out of small cabinets. However I understand that this is a compromise and perfect speakers must not use them.

Or are these things that only a Master Audiophile could know?

It is not enough to know how to tune or design a speaker in order to be a champion audiophile. Many speaker designers do not understand music. They obsess over measurements and dont know how to listen to their designs. This results in a poor outcome. So this should be a lesson to you. You thought you could tune my speakers without even seeing them. Custom tuning involves every aspect including the room. You had no idea what room I have you didnt even ask. Do you have a device to measure the polar response because that is also important. 

Post removed 

What is Time Domain Response? I thought the Motor assembly was the biggest part of how or why a speaker starts & stops.

What is QTS?

How do you get a QTS of zero and what would that do?

How does 0 QTS prevent Time Smear?

How do Ports Ring?

Why are your own speakers made of wood and why are they ported?

Kenji, You cannot accurately answer any of these questions. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

Or are these things that only a Master Audiophile could know?