THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME DOMAIN RESPONSE MUST READ


Speaker designers ignore or downplay the importance of TIME. Why?

A high end speaker should be as accurate as possible and that means it should not only be optimized with regard to frequency response but time response.

Back in the 70’s and around that time, speaker engineers thought that a perfect speaker would be one that had a flat response. This idea has waxed and waned in popularity over the years and even now there is no consensus.

What the speaker engineers forgot to consider is Time response.

The time reponse of a speaker is how fast it starts and stops. A perfect speaker would have a perfect time response of 0. Since this is not possible, we must get as close to it as possible. The problem is speakers engineers have neglected this aspect of the design and so speakers over the last 40 years have not improved in this respect.

Time is such an important aspect of the sound we hear. We not only hear tone but also time. The brain can detect time differences of only a few microseconds. Experiments have shown that the start of each note is what we use to determine what instrument is producing that sound.

We must ensure that our crossovers do not smear the time response because it will be heard by our ears. Time inaccuracy is why high end speakers do not sound like real instruments.

Diffraction from the cabinet can also cause time smear. We need spherical cabinets not square boxes. Tweeters need to be time aligned in order to ensure that when the woofer stops so does the tweeter. When the woofer starts, so must the tweeter. The woofer itself has to have a Qts of ZERO to prevent time smear. Ports must not be used or else you will get ringing.

We need to make it mandatory for speaker companies to publish the time response of all their speakers so that consumers can easily compare and decide exactly what they want. Some may actually prefer a speaker that has a poorer time response and that is fine. The problem is, we cant decide unless we know what we are buying can we?

Unfortunately, 90% of speakers on the market, even high end speakers have ports. And they are also made of cheap wood, even though there must be better materials by now. Some materials ring more than others.

So dont be deceived folks. If you want better speakers, you will probably have to make them yourself because speaker manufacturers dont care about sound quality. They spend millions of dollars on anechoic chambers all so that they can get a flat response but they spend zero effort on better time domain response. We are being duped.

kenjit

Showing 10 responses by kenjit

Why focus on the motor alone? it can be also due to the input signal current, the mass of the driver etc

What you are calling time domain response is in direct correlation to drivers alignment combined with each drivers natural rolloff and crossover components used.  

The cabinet also rings. yes crossover circuitry can also cause ringing. So how do you stop it? Do you have any answers?

What is Time Domain Response?

I explained that at the beginning of this topic. Time domain response is how fast the speaker responds. 

I thought the Motor assembly was the biggest part of how or why a speaker starts & stops.

Rubbish. The cabinet can sing along with the drive unit and smear the time no? That has nothing to do with motor assembly

What is QTS?

The QTS is the Q of the driver. It is the total combined Q including electrical and mechanical. 

How do you get a QTS of zero and what would that do?

It would mean that the woofer starts and stops when its told to. It woud not ring like a bell which when struck will continue to resonate.

How does zero QTS prevent Time Smear?

Continuing with the bell analogy if you hold the bell when its struck it wont ring anymore. The speaker needs to start and stop exactly the same way the input signal does. Minimizing the time smear is a way to do this.

How do Ports Ring?

They ring when the air inside the wooden box vibrates at a certain frequency. However, like most things that vibrate, they unfortuntely do not stop immediately but can take time.

Why are your own speakers made of wood and why are they ported?

I have more than one speaker. But yes wood is used for one of them as a test cabinet. Wood would not be used for a reference design. I experiment with various types of technology. I use ports for the same reason everybody else does. In order to get more bass out of small cabinets. However I understand that this is a compromise and perfect speakers must not use them.

Or are these things that only a Master Audiophile could know?

It is not enough to know how to tune or design a speaker in order to be a champion audiophile. Many speaker designers do not understand music. They obsess over measurements and dont know how to listen to their designs. This results in a poor outcome. So this should be a lesson to you. You thought you could tune my speakers without even seeing them. Custom tuning involves every aspect including the room. You had no idea what room I have you didnt even ask. Do you have a device to measure the polar response because that is also important. 

@timlub feel free to correct me if you think I do not have a correct funamental understanding

How wold you define “right”?
Are there some specific measurements that show when one is more right than another?

we need to look at the cumulative spectral decay to ensure that its 0ms at all frequencies from 20hz to 20khz. I've never seen any speaker come close to that. 

@erik_squires 

Kenjit, who has never designed a speaker,

This is also a false accusation. I have designed speakers. But just as all speaker designers will not reveal their secrets, why should I? If you have spent years tuning a speaker why should you give away all your hardwork? Does Fritz tell us the values of the caps he uses in his designs so that others can copy his work? I dont think so. I have worked hard to be a champion and I will not help my competitors gain an advantage and put my status at risk. 

@timlub 

You know Kenji,  you are one person that I wish that i would have never responded to when contacted

Likewise. You misled me into thinking a design would be forthcoming, even giving me a deadline yet you then pulled out at the last minute after hours of discussion. Perhaps you realized that meeting the requirements of such a perfect audiophile like me was far more difficult than you first thought. 

 

@bigtwin 

Apparently, the engineers who design speakers don't know what they are doing?

Of course they dont know what theyre doing. A speaker is supposed to reproduce the signal you give it. Yet all high end speakers sound and even measure differently. They cant all be right can they

@erik_squires 

Kenjit, whi has never designed a speaker, would like all of the professional designers to know how wrong they are.  Again.

Its not just about getting them to know how wrong they are. Its about getting them to design speakers correctly. Audiophiles spend millions of dollars on high end speakers. It is a multi million dollar industry. We deserve better quality. So I deserve my speakers to be accurate not only in tone but also in time. Until that happens we are stuck and the only solution is to make and tune our own speakers. Which is what you obviously realized when you did the SNR1. Do not buy fritz though. They are not very good. 

 

 

Hopefully @kenjit can clarify what he means, so we are not left guessing.

There are many sources of ringing within the speaker. The cabinet can ring, the driver can ring, the crossover parts can ring. We need to stop all ringing wherever it occurs. It needs to be able to reproduce a square wave

Fritz doesn’t use capacitors in his crossovers.

And how does that disprove my point? He does not publish his circuits online does he? So why should I reveal all my secrets? Every designer can only reveal so much. 

Once again kenidjit strikes out. He uses the acoustic reality series crossover. One of the reasons why his speakers measure so well, and how they provide an easy, and consistent  load for the amplifier to see. 

Just take the damn thing out and use an active crossover. 

Well said. And if he cares about music and speakers so much. why will he not say what he listens to?

How would that change anything? A scoffer like you would not believe me even if I did state what I listen to. 

@mofojo 

It’s a GD injustice is what it is!!!!!! I’m with ya Kenjit I am piiiiisssseeedddddd. These evil speaker companies must be stopped at all costs. All must come together as a nerdly whole! Stop 1. organize riot at Magico headquarters. Stop 2. Dairy Queen… we’ll deserve a tasty treat after all that rioting. 

Thankyou for your support.

I know of no speaker manufacturer who wouldn’t immediately jump at the chance to highlight their technology or approach as a distinguishing feature.

The differences between speakers are small but exaggerated in order to gain an advantage. Secrets are few and far between. How would you know what design aspects are being kept secret if they are secret? 

For you to attack other speaker makers without being willing to show example of your work and how your designs differ is simply crass.

Some of the ways you could improve a speaker are obvious though. You could use thick braced HDF rather than thin unbraced MDF. It would only add a couple of hundred dollars at most to the cost yet the speaker manufacturers will not do it unless you pay tens of thousands of dollars for their top models. 

Custom tuning is another thing that is better than mass production. Those Fritz speakers you mention are mass produced. Their only unique selling point is their stupid series crossover. Whereas I would just take the damn thing out and go active anyway. Funny how if series crossovers are so wonderful only Fritz can successfully implement them dont you think? 

Its incumbent on the speaker companies to make improvements, not me. If these commercial speakers are so good, why were you forced to make your own? For exactly the same reasons I have mentioned. You wanted something customized and at a less exorbitant price.