I think the new 3050 looks awesome. I wish I actually had a need for it. Love the looks.
NAD 3030 experience
has anyone owned this or still uses it today? Any opinions to share?
On that note, anyone excited about the brand new NAD 3050? (still no real reviews anywhere)
My 2 cents: the 3050 design is absolutely botched. It looks like a Christmas tree (in April) compared to the flawlessly pleasing looking 3030. Why change it if it worked!?
@shtinkydog I was too harsh. I love it too. But I love the old one's design way waaaay more. |
I was first super impressed. I am total sucker for the vintage look. But then I compared it with the 3030. Much cleaner look. And the led is just awful. that's so 80s. The designer should be arraigned! The reason I asked this in this post is that I bid on a 3030 on ebay and besides the looks I hope it sounds good too. |
I worked at a store that dealt in NAD in the mid 70s when Peter Treibman, formerly with Advent, became the US importer. The 3030 was the base integrated amp and we liked it…but the failure rate was such that instead of New Acoustic Dimensions we began calling it Not Always Defective! As I recall it was usually the round push buttons that got stuck and caused a channel to drop. This sort of thing was not rare back then. H-K receivers were flaky too. Pioneer, Sansui, Yamaha…much better QC. |
Good to know! I will probably pass on it then I heard in the darko interview that NAD sold millions of 3020s. And I owned Marantz amps from the same time period, that all worked amazingly well. I don't think the design has ever been as stunning as in the 70s. Probably the golden age of industrial design in general. |
FWIW, my system employs the NAD 7600 Monitor Series Power Envelope RECEIVER (which combines the 2600 power amplifier and the 1300 preamplifier with the 4300 tuner—all flagship components for NAD at the time, which was the late 1980s). I have never looked back. The unit I had as an original owner finally began to fail in various ways after 30+ years of daily use (and transportation to various dwellings in various states). Because it was hard to find a replacement by then, I auditioned various integrated amps, including several that are very well regarded; I've got audiophile friends, one of whom owns the best shop in the county, so I had lots of sweet options to choose from. None sounded as good! Finally, eBay came through, and once again, the NAD 7600 powers my system. Nothing else, in my experience, was as transparent, with natural timbre of instruments, vivid soundstage, and tremendous power. Just sayin'.... |
@rumblestrip I do like Darko but publishing 2 reviews before he sees it, hears it is just lame |
@grislybutter, those are called overviews rather than reviews. When a new model comes out for any product, and reviewers/journalists/influencers talk about it before they have had a chance to put hands on it, it's an overview. |