Avalon used to get a lot of press, and now it is fairly quiet.
Manufacturers past their heyday
There are many companies that we all recall from years gone by that are gone. There are some companies that while still around, seem be be past their glory days. For instant, while Conrad Johnson is still around, they just don’t seem to be nearly as relevant as they used to be. Of course, my thought on CJ are purely subjective. And yet other companies seem to be as relevant today as they were 20 of more years ago. VPI perhaps? Definitely McIntosh.
Who are the other former high flyers that seem to be operating on an altogether different level these days?
Who are the other former high flyers that seem to be operating on an altogether different level these days?
91 responses Add your response
Conrad-Johnson is an interesting mention throughout this thread. They were pioneers in the finest tube sound fifty years ago. Clearly, by all reports they still make some of the best sounding tube equipment using modern circuits and parts. And, thanks to the foresight of the original owners, they are still there standing behind the original equipment. Very few, if any of the company’s mentioned can claim that quality and consistency. Do they add $20K to an amplifier in custom metalwork so the owner can point to his shiny stuff with the useless meters? Nope, just good sounding tube amplifiers. Quite an enviable record. |
Try this one: https://monarchy-audio.com/ |
Looks like Monarchy Audio is still here. http://https//monarchy-audio.com/index.htm And a version of Blue Circle https://www.tlp-audio.com/powerConditioners2.php |
There are several factors at play here. One, many of these legacy companies have been absorbed by big conglomerates (Mark Levinson, McIntosh, Harman Kardon, and Martin-Logan come to mind immediately) so they're no longer driven by a few brilliant guys passionate about delivering the best audio possible, regardless of how much profit they can squeeze out of every unit sold. (And, a lot of the legends and pioneers of high-end audio are no longer with us, Those geniuses were the drivers of their brands. Without them, many of their brands are shadows of what they once were.) Two, audio technology hit a plateau years ago. There's only so much audiophile-worthy innovation that's coming forth nowadays, unlike during the golden age of the 70-90s. Three, digital. Streaming audio has more or less killed the notion of audiophile sound. Convenience over quality. Then again, it has driven the vinyl renaissance, so there's the silver lining. |
A speaker I owned and thoroughly enjoyed in the past was Jantzen. I had the 412A model of speakers. They had a 12 inch woofer and 2x2 array of electrostatic elements in a sealed box. The company is still around and is now run by the son of the original owner. I have not heard a current production model. I would love to hear them, however, they are way out reach of my retirement income. |
My systems are full of old Marantz, Focal, KLH, and Jolida stuff. In part, bec. I have no interest in putting more money into this hobby than I have, and also bec. I am very happy with the sound, and don't want to go through the turmoil of 'upgrading' or 'experimenting' again (which once almost killed my enjoyment of music altogether). I will say I am not at all happy with the latest Jolida piece I got on spec while I was fixing something else, and you will probably find it soon here or on Audiomart. |
As for Usher, still around, and it’s Fred over at Katli, in Cali. Dealers tend to take on.. and then...(as time passes) not sell more of a given product, not due to quality or quality in comparison to others.. but due to push vs pull sales. ’Push’ sales, is when the seller has to convince you. (explain, detail information on products, etc) ’Pull’ sales is when you come into the store looking for specific products and brands. Guess which one is easier to navigate in a world of older deeply opinionated audiophiles. It’s not the dealers who make the executive decisions on what is best and what is not. In most cases, that is. |
tomic601 Your comment misses the point. The post does not ask why absolutely all older companies are passe. It asks why some are. I think that McIntosh is better than ever, but I am still not a fan. I really lost interest when Bob Carver, Julius Siksnius, John Curl, Nelson Pass, David Hafler, and James Bongiorno, etc. entered the fray. |
It's a lack of depth and understanding. Most of the companies listed as relevant, are sold and re-sold, and maybe still good, but as said before here it's marketing. Question- "why has marketing influenced/formed your opinions". Some equipment casings are pure eye candy. Sound is, or should be the one thing on trial here and each one of us are entitled to that opinion, our impressions and what we like. My opinion is that many companies can make an amp or preamp or speaker. Some do a better job for my ears than others. CJ- Well Conrad Johnson is still extremely relevant. Their many decades long employee and designer, Jeff Fischel, has put his fingerprint on again, decades worth of equipment. They still take calls, emails and they still service equipment made 30+ years ago. They are a boutique provider, and that's their model of business. The model is high value, high dollar, at a limited production. The other manufacturers are what they are, same or different. I doubt CJ is selling 20+Million in products. This also means they don't have the marketing budget of some more well marketed/relevant companies. a year. Imagine a much smaller staff, high value in part quality and true to their house sound. Relevance- it fades, is fickle, means what to whom? If something is so relevant, do I need others to make me feel like my purchase is justifiable and therefore reinforce me making it? I'd take a CJ Premier 350sa, a solid state amp over a newer and better advertised product any day. I'd take a CJ Premier 12 Monoblock tube amp set over anything close to the price of a used pair (of which there are quite a few great buys on the market). Why? The presentation of sound, the imaging, sound stage, that these monoblocks have is incredible to my ears either with KT88, 6550's, or KT120's. I do get impressed by my Pass Labs XA amps or my PrimaLuna EVO' 400's and my LTA Preamp, but none of them are as pleasing. The OP did mot mention what he/she owns? What do you own? |
zavato I have a concrete example of how something begins to lose relevance: When the revolutionary B&W 800 was released, it was the pinnacle of speaker sound design. Many recording studios immediately bought them, including Abbey Road and Decca. Revierwers were awestruck. When the 801 series 2 was released, it was perceived to not be as good. It actually was better, mainly due to its lack of speaker box resonance from its internal matrix design; Unfortunately, it was released with the first, gigantic 800. There had been nothing universally considered to be finer than the first 800, but the Series 2 had the 800 as its competitive ideal, as well as some competition from other speaker companies. |
Post removed |
Yes, Linn is certainly NOT past its heyday. I understand that they have recently completed facilities to bring all their manufacturing in-house. My new Akurate system (hub, Exaktbox-i) and "old" AV-5140 speakers, now aktiv via the Exaktbox-i, sound about as good as I can imagine a system sounding. I believe Linn is in the ascendant. |
Here's a little story about memory and perception. https://lincolnhigh73.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/whatdidyouteach.jpg DeKay |
Now you're talking! Silvertone. Definitely past its prime. How many remember Kenner? https://toytales.ca/close-n-play-phonograph-from-kenner-1973/ Kenner is so far past its heyday nobody even knew it had a heyday! How about MAG LEV? Or did they just have a hype-day? |
millercarbon, In that case then it would be a rebirth. Glory days, well they'll pass you by, as the great philosopher sang. Yes of course its a joke. The only hypotheticals I take seriously are how to build a system. If you ever think I'm being serious about ones like this all I can say is must have been some other buddy no, no, no it wasn't me. |