How do you sort your LPs?


How do you sort your LPs?
By:
1. Alphabetical Genre
2. Alphabetical Artist
3. Most listened
4. Others
I have procrastinated in organizing my collection. No excuses now.

128x128arion
Classical by composer. Jazz by instrument. Vocals by female/male/jazz/folk/rock/era. Classical guitar by artist. Separate area for audiophile and demo stuff.

If I want to listen to Chet Baker, I go to the trumpet section. If I want to listen to Cal Tjader, I go to the vibes section. For Cannon Ball Adderley, I go to the alto sax section. For Kenny Burrell, I go to the guitar section.

I also have a special section (my favorite) for the ’50s West Coast jazz. That’s where guys like Brubeck, Desmond, Shelley Mann, Conte Condoli, Buddy Collette, Chico Hamilton, and Bud Shank reside.

Frank
All other things being constant the more LPs you acquire the worst the sound gets. Sorry to be the bearer of bad gnus. 🐃 🐃
Alpha by Artist and then chronological within Artist.  All genres except Classical.  Classical has its own section. 
So that means I would have the bassist, Stanley Clarke, in the “C” section...
I have four categories:  Pop, jazz, classical, and "other".  Within the catagories I go alphabetical (performers for pop and jazz, composers for classical).  "Other" is things like seasonal records, novelty records, test records, comedy, and anything else that I can't fit into pop, jazz, and classical.  I also have a section of "current" interests, which includes new recordings and stuff that I have queued up for listening.
If I know what I am looking for, this system makes it easy to find.  More often than not, though, I'll just browse through the collection and pull out whatever catches my eye.  That's where the genre classification helps out.  Usually I have a dozen or so records ready in the "current" section, so I go to that first.
Another important feature in my collection is that I keep it manageable.  If I buy new records, I will take out the the same number of old records that I don't listen to anymore and get rid of them.  I don't buy very many CDs anymore (those have been fiercely culled down to about 100).  LPs are currently at about 350 (and I have plenty of material I am willing to part with when new stuff shows up).  I am mostly culling pop material and so-so classical.  I keep exceptional recordings and, of course, obscure stuff that I can't stream.  I have gone from over 500 records and over 1000 CDs to a much more manageable and meaningful curated collection of physical media.  I could cull the collection more, but I now have adequate storage space and no compelling reason to do so.
Using Ikea’s gift to the audiophile world, Kallax, my LPs are sorted into jazz, pop, classical, celtic/folk, and audiophile.

The jazz is sorted by major performer, same for pop, classical by composer (makes finding a specific performer or conductor a bit of a pain) and the audiophile by label.

The only way I can think of to make it easier to find things would be to create specific location with all LPs and locations in a database file. That is a lot of work. I am (barely) up to returning the stack of played LPs to the shelves before it gets too high.
Post removed 
No one has mentioned this method, but I think that it’s genius. I had a childhood friend who simply kept his records sorted in order of acquisition. The advantage is that he never had to shuffle them around them to add new records. (This task becomes ever more tedious as your collection grows.) And because each album was always in the same location, it was surprisingly easy for him to get to a particular record.

Many times I have regretted my attempt to keep my own collection sorted alphabetically by artist. There are many issues that arise which make that simple task more difficult than it sounds.




With Classical being the exception (I don’t have too many Classical LPs because I got no class), all LPs are in alphabetical order. First letter, ignore “The”.For example, The Doors are in D. The Cars, C. Thelonious Monk, T. ZZ Top, That’s a tough one. Do i go with the first Z or the second one?
Anyway, this works well for me. Especially since I finally found a psychedelic, fluorescent, astrological sex position, alphabet poster. 

Just like almost everything else in audio there seems to be a diverse set of opinions, methods or philosophies applied to LP sorting. Who would of guessed that :) Thanks for the good ideas.

I like the idea of having an area or section to queue LPs. My current loose method needs a little work. Weeding out the "unlikely to be used again" LPs will help too.

Thanks.
New Arrivals/The Rest-Sometimes regret this when hunting for something in particular but generally works well. I have gone through alphabetical, genre, but found this overall gave me the best listening possibilities. My only misgiving was it difficult to discover misappropriation although it's less of a problem in my later years.
Lol, I don't sort any of them due to laziness. I could not tell you where one record is from another as they are pretty much all over the place but neatly stored if that makes any sense. I probably have several thousand by now and it is too monumental a task to go thru them all. Maybe someday I'll come accross that Who album again and play it lol. I'm too busy with all of life's other crap to worry about it right now. 
For my collection of about 3,000, I do what others have noted, sorted by genre, then alphabetical, and the genres within rock are arranged in a loosely narrative way.For example:
1 - before the Beatles 2 - surf and hot rod
3 - garage and mid-60’s verse-chorus-verse stuff
4 - late 60’s hippie stuff
5 - country rock
6 - Southern rock
7 - mid to late 70’s American pop/rock
8 - British Invasion
9 - British rock after the British Invasion
10 - American singers and songwriters
11 - 80’s rock
12 - soundtracks
13 - blues and guitarists
14 - 70’s hard rock
15 - heavy metal
16 - power pop and 70’s verse-chorus-verse stuff
17 - female singers
18 - R&B
19 - protopunk & 70’s punk
20 - 80’s punk
21 - 80’s garage rock revival, cowpunk, Paisley Underground-related, and other non-punk underground rock
22 - countryish singers and songwriters
23 - jazz
24 - pre-70’s country
25 - female country singers
26 - 70’s and 80’s country
27 - instrumental country
28 - bluegrass
29 - folk
30 - comedy
31 - classical
32 - miscellaneous
I do this to make sure I can find what I’m looking for and so that some records don’t get forgotten. For example, when I was filing a Beau Brummels record away, I did a little browsing and saw The Buckingham’s first album, Kind of a Drag, a great little garage rock record before the band got lame and added horns; I hadn’t looked at or thought of that record in a year or two. There are many great records, like that one, that might otherwise get lost if I did everything alphabetically.
Other times, I might say to myself, "I’d like to listen to some Chicago blues," and I can go browse the blues and guitarists section, and it is all there in one place; I don’t have to go to several different places.
There are all kinds of "does this go here or there?" questions, and I enjoy pondering those. For now, for example, Led Zeppelin goes in hard rock instead of British Rock after the British Invasion with Elton John and Dire Straits. Anyway, that’s what works for me.
Here's one I haven't heard yet:  due to the size of my record cabinets (IKEA makes some great ones, I have different configurations ranging from one cube to 2 x 3 cubes that can put placed either way), I separate rock by American artists/groups versus British artists/groups, then in alphabetical order.  I have so many Beatles (group and solo) records and Beach Boys (also group and solo) records, that they merit their own separate cabinets.  
LP's?  What are those?   <g>  Actually, when I first moved to AZ and needed money, I left my stereo but brought all my albums. I sold them at a swap meet in Tucson for $1200 lump sum. Boy was that a mistake. I'd always open the album, throw the paper liner away and replace it with a plastic lined liner, and the opening was always 90 degrees to the cardboad liner, and NEVER EVER touch the grooves. 
I have over 3500 LPs at this point. I occasionally find duplicates and forgotten music. A less random arrangement would likely be better. It is fun to rediscover music though. 
I really can't imagine any practice other than basic alphabetical filing. Yes, I have a separate section for classical, and also for greatest hits collections that include multiple artists. (I collect radio station greatest hits collections. Please don't ask why.)

My LP collection is large enough that it has to be spread over two floors. So for convenience, it is filed A through Z on each floor. And in my listening room, I have a small "hot box" in the rack to file new purchases as well as current favorites, so that they don't have to be constantly refiled.

Of course, whatever works for you is what's best!
By genre then last name alphanumeric. I'm just starting to try the discog thing. Thanks uber and big greg for the tips, nice.
I have 25,000 LPs, 7,000 78s and 7,000 CDs.  My CDs and LPs are organized by genre, alphabetically and by vocalists/instrumentalists.  There are many genres.  I have excluded Direct to Disc and Japanese 45 rpm/DD LPs onto a separate shelf.  I also have 5,000+ LPs not in the collection with 1/2 sorted by genre, alphabetically and others just by genre.  As to CDs, the large boxed sets are nearly all Classical and located in two rows on top of 6' long CD storage cabinets (I use Can-Am steel cabinets from Canada).  The LPs are stored in custom built wood/melamine in a music storage room (storage shed & garage for 5,000+ LPs).  The 78s are stored mostly in the music storage room by genre and size 10" and 12" on the bottom levels.  Also, unsorted in the storage shed and garages (I just haven't gotten to them and moved last year).  I don't have more than 100 CDs on a rear corner of my listening room-a major coup from my last home.  Just equipment and seating.   
I don't organize my jazz by artist as so many are multiple artists capable of filing.  The Poll Winners I did file under (Barney) Kessel but I had to put a Coleman Hawkins Encounters Ben Webster as a jazz instrumental group recording, Hawkins.  Sometimes, it is difficult to pick whose name will a recording will be filed under, especially jazz.  Not so much in vocal, classical or ethnic music.
Mostly listened to classical rock when I was young. Then came kids and of course life went in a different direction. Got back into music as they got a bit older and started listening again in the mid 90"s. So only three categories for me; Classic rock, mid 90's and later, jazz and other (movie sound tracks, comedy etc). Alphabetical within categories.
Post removed 
Post removed 
Record store style. Worked at one in the 70s. Stuck with me.
Genre. Within genre alphabetized by last name of artist or band name. Jackson Browne in rock under B. J Geils Band in rock under J.
Amount of records would be a consideration. I you only have 200-300 records it might not make sense to put them in genres. 
I no longer own any LPs and my CDs are ripped upon arrival then go to storage however I still face many of the same issues devising a digital archive.  I have about 53,000 songs from about 4,000 CDs.  I add about 400 CDs each year to my archive. I have spent considerable time and effort working out my rules so I pray this may be useful to others.


CDs are first sorted by genre. As noted this can cause issues with performers who cross genre often. I use Allmusic as the authority, what ever Allmusic.com lists as the first/top genre for an artist that settles the issue. If for example Willie Nelson is a Country artist than even his gospel CDs are Country genre. I want all of an Artist’s work in one genre where I can find it by artist.

 I see no benefit sorting by micro genre or decade and I often combine major genre which helps categorize many performers.  So Jazz and Blues are combined into Jazz-Blues. As is Rock-Pop, Stage-Screen and Country-Folk.

 I have a genre for Christmas which includes all holiday music, another for Classical of course. Audiophile genre is sorted by record Label such as Chesky, Telarc, Works of Art (AudioQuest).

 Almost every genre has a “Various” directory for compilations.

 Recording artists are alphabetical by first name with in genre so Jazz-Blues starts with Al diMeola then Al Jarreau and Al Jolson.

 I discard any “The” preface. And any second billing isn’t. So I also discard “Quartet” for example. Arthur Fiedler gets all the credit and the Boston Pops is ignored. Cannonball Adderley was a solo act by my rules because that is how I want to look it up and I want all the Cannonball Adderley in one directory no matter the billing.

 Within an artist’s directory CD’s are prefaced by (yyyy) four digit date so the artist’s work is always sorted chronologically.  The exception is within Stage and Screen which are not by artist but in the format Title (yyyy) so I can look up the movie by name. Example: West Side Story (1984)

 I have a genre “Easy Listening” which includes many difficult to file CDs.  London Symphony Orchestra has numerous symphonic rock-pop CDs.  Is it Classical or Rock or Pop? It is all easy listening.

 One can created play lists by copying file into a directory. So I have Demo directory for music to evaluate or show of systems.  A few artists have a directory titled BIN so I can listen to their entire repertoire with out jumping from CD to CD.

 I hope this helps. What works well for a digital archive may not work for LPs.

 When I had LPs I had all those sticky color coded end tabs that one uses to file physical office files  I would two tabs per LP so I could look across the room and see where a where on a shelf a LP belonged from 15 feet away.  I can’t find any now on Amazon but any good office supply place will have them and I highly recommend them.