Maybe what we need is a movie about audiophiles like the one done for food in The Menu.
@nonoise, spot on!
Thin Line Between Critique and Courtrooms: A Dialogue on the Recent Audiophile Drama
Hey Audiogonians,
In the vast, vibrant universe of audio reviews, where the line between subjective opinion and objective analysis often blurs, a new saga unfolds. It involves a Youtuber, well-known within our community for their take on speaker designs – designs that, while innovative, haven't shied away from criticism. The plot thickens with another Youtuber's revelation: the speaker's designer and manufacturer has filed a lawsuit against a reviewer over their less-than-glowing feedback.
The core of the debate? Whether it's acceptable to push back against reviewers when their findings diverge from what manufacturers desire. It's not a new drama; history is littered with tales of reviewers facing legal threats for daring to express their truth. Yet, each story brings a fresh perspective on the delicate dance between free speech and brand reputation.
This particular episode raises several intriguing questions:
- Where do we draw the line between constructive criticism and damaging feedback?
- Is the courtroom really the arena for settling disputes over reviews, or should dialogue prevail?
- And crucially, what does this mean for the future of honest, independent audio reviews?
This isn't just about the nitty-gritty of legal battles, many of which remain cloaked in confidentiality and technical jargon. It's about the principle: the right to voice one's opinion in a space that thrives on diversity of thought.
So, fellow audiophiles, what's your take? Have you ever felt swayed by a review, only to discover a different truth upon listening? Have you faced the ire of those who didn't appreciate your candid feedback?
📢Let's make this a discussion to remember – not just for the controversy, but for the unity and respect we can foster, even in disagreement.
- ...
- 265 posts total
@botrytis While I agree with most of this, your statement about what I'm doing or how I deal with customers isn't correct nor does it describe who I am. Most of the negative reviews I've read that were undeserved were not about my products. For example (one I've already given), Gryphon: the reviewer wanted them to give him a very expensive set of amps. When they didn't, he published a negative review. I was there in the room at CES when he threatened them. Again though, your last statement is not what I was talking about.
|
Wow so many people eager to take a swing at Eric at Tekton. Kinda like the Salem Witch trials. Every man, woman and child throw a rock at the woman going through the gauntlet. from the Op” And crucially, what does this mean for the future of honest, independent audio reviews?” I have not seen one. I am always skeptical of YouTube reviewers and some admit it’s a part time job for them to supplement their income. I don’t pay attention to these reviewers, honestly. But I COULD SEE where they can hurt a company who makes the product they review. |
@2psyop I couldn't disagree more, based on what I have read. Tekton had provoked it, people (here) have been reasonable and pretty soft on Tekton. He kept throwing rocks at the window until he broke it and he didn't stop there, he went around the house and broke all the windows. We are just acknowledging it. |
@2psyop ,
Yep, guilty as charged. I’m always willing to call out arrogant bullies and that is how this man consistently acted. I have never denigrated his speakers as I’ve never heard them, nor have I ever denigrated his company or employees. As for the rest of your post, I don’t think you would have replied the way you did if you gleaned the facts of the case. Then there’s the laughable attempt at Tekton damage control that just threw napalm on the fire. He’s shot himself in the feet so many times while back peddling when his bullying threats set off a firestorm of negative press I don’t think he’ll ever need to buy another pair of white New Balances again. |
- 265 posts total