C'mon, everyone!
Take sides and shoot it out before this all gets deleted!
Thin Line Between Critique and Courtrooms: A Dialogue on the Recent Audiophile Drama
Hey Audiogonians,
In the vast, vibrant universe of audio reviews, where the line between subjective opinion and objective analysis often blurs, a new saga unfolds. It involves a Youtuber, well-known within our community for their take on speaker designs – designs that, while innovative, haven't shied away from criticism. The plot thickens with another Youtuber's revelation: the speaker's designer and manufacturer has filed a lawsuit against a reviewer over their less-than-glowing feedback.
The core of the debate? Whether it's acceptable to push back against reviewers when their findings diverge from what manufacturers desire. It's not a new drama; history is littered with tales of reviewers facing legal threats for daring to express their truth. Yet, each story brings a fresh perspective on the delicate dance between free speech and brand reputation.
This particular episode raises several intriguing questions:
- Where do we draw the line between constructive criticism and damaging feedback?
- Is the courtroom really the arena for settling disputes over reviews, or should dialogue prevail?
- And crucially, what does this mean for the future of honest, independent audio reviews?
This isn't just about the nitty-gritty of legal battles, many of which remain cloaked in confidentiality and technical jargon. It's about the principle: the right to voice one's opinion in a space that thrives on diversity of thought.
So, fellow audiophiles, what's your take? Have you ever felt swayed by a review, only to discover a different truth upon listening? Have you faced the ire of those who didn't appreciate your candid feedback?
📢Let's make this a discussion to remember – not just for the controversy, but for the unity and respect we can foster, even in disagreement.
Showing 23 responses by thecarpathian
He does like to throw the ’slander’ word around a lot. He’s done it here more than a few times.(Even though he means 'libel'.) And I just know he’s reading this... Will he comment? If he’s really that hot headedly dumb, yes! If he has even a scintilla of common sense, no! I would be happy to contribute to Erin’s potential GoFundMe. I cannot stand a bully. |
Will you explain why you didn’t do that in the first place instead of threatening to sue him? Forgot that little tidbit. Now you’re playing the understanding good guy after the "fact". 😂 Looks like nothing more than damage control after your litigation threat bought you a truckload of bad publicity.
|
@johnk , You've missed the point completely, I'm afraid. |
+1 @nonoise , There is but a single, precise definition for litigation. There is no interpretation. This Tekton video is nothing more than after the fact attempted damage control. A lame attempt at that.
|
@grislybutter +1. He's his own worst enemy. |
Learned about his personality years ago on some now deleted threads where he among other things threatened to sue fellow members for 'slander'. So, @johnk , It isn't about tearing down Tekton. Its about calling out arrogant bullies who, after yet more threats of litigation against someone and the ensuing avalanche of negative press it brought, now tries to sugarcoat what he originally did by playing the misunderstood good guy. I couldn't care less about the company. I've never disparaged the sound of a Tekton speaker in my life. It's bullies I have no tolerance for. You seem a kind, decent fellow whose heart is in the right place. The world needs more people like you. |
@soix , Going way back for that Steve Martin line!😆 |
From another review last October:
Bad review? Sue sue sue! |
@gents , Well said. |
@2psyop ,
Yep, guilty as charged. I’m always willing to call out arrogant bullies and that is how this man consistently acted. I have never denigrated his speakers as I’ve never heard them, nor have I ever denigrated his company or employees. As for the rest of your post, I don’t think you would have replied the way you did if you gleaned the facts of the case. Then there’s the laughable attempt at Tekton damage control that just threw napalm on the fire. He’s shot himself in the feet so many times while back peddling when his bullying threats set off a firestorm of negative press I don’t think he’ll ever need to buy another pair of white New Balances again. |