Surprisingly, now I think about it, it varies for so many reasons. I suspect I'd do it more regularly and more often with a mighty fine pair of German-made scissors. I'd like to know all about those.
591 responses Add your response
Solingen, the Audio Note and Jager Lacoutre of snipping blades. Incidentally, this thread thankfully lead me to the Seiko Orange Monster which I got for $200 and wear it more than 35x more expensive IWC - which I love, but I love wearing the OM, and my stereo sounds much airier in the highs, the bass is tauter and more tuneful, the midrange is, well you know, more liquid, and it even slightly improves dimensionality when I wear it, even more improvement than an great pair of ICs and power cords, don't why it works, it is irrational, but so efficacious. |
It makes good sense that wearing an excellent watch improves your hifi. All of the tweaks I buy improve my hifi. I realised long ago if you only bought a hifi tweak your wife agreed improved things youÂd miss out on just about all of them. LetÂs assume, for the sake of argument, you canÂt detect a 1% tweak improvement. It becomes essential to read very many reviews and use your judgement that a given tweak would pull on the same end of the rope as another tweak. Ten tweaks give a maximum improvement of 10% - and so IÂd hear it. Even with a couple of misjudgements, rope-wise, IÂd still get a 6% improvement which IÂd also hear. Note this is indistinguishable from ten tweaks averaging +0.6% each. Or nine tweaks averaging +0.7% and one error of -0.3%. IÂm not a mathematician but wouldnÂt be surprised to learn that gives at least factorial 10 divided by factorial 2 + factorial 10 divided by factorial 3 etc etc - permutations of tweaks. This is a big number and makes it pointless trying to eliminate rogue tweaks. I hope this makes some sense. ItÂs a lengthy process typing one handed in the foetal position  especially when you canÂt see your watch. IÂve looked up Solingen, thank you, but what I need are very fine clippers not scissors  ideally ones that float. |
I see the logic of this. It just might be possible that with 140 tweaks in aggregate, you could possibly surpass the sound of the real thing (TAS), and wouldn't that be something. Clippers, hmmmm. The Germans seem to be good with steel, but the Swiss shouln't be discounted either. The world's best toe nail clippers upon which everyone can agree? I know it is out there. Nothing worse for the sound of your system than an ingrown toenail - at least according to the lab measurements made by Julian Hirsch in the summer of 1974. |
I ditched my toenail clippers years ago after I took an old Dual turntable, glued some high-end 220 grit sand paper to the outer rim, and use it to fine-tune my toenails. It seems to work much better when supported on a maple amp stand. This way I never have a problem with clipping a little too close. If the nails get a little long, I add a weight to it to help with inertia. |
08-15-11: MrtennisI *think* that the OP is trying to ascertain whether or not the audiophile breed is as discriminating in the things they wear just as they are in the audio gear they purchase...... reading several of these posts the conclusion I seem to be coming to is that audiophiles are a discriminating breed from A-Z in the things that concern them personally. Also, the higher up the "audio gear chain" (i.e. more expensive the equipment) a certain audiophile is, he/she is gets even more discriminating. There appears to be a direct correlation. I.E. I have not found, as yet, an audiophile having a $100K+ system & wearing a plastic Timex watch - he/she'll be wearing some boutique brand, expensive watch. Another empirical conclusion I seem to be drawing is that discriminating people seem to be drawn to this "hobby" - the nonchalants call themselves "music lovers" instead. So, it seems to me that people in this hobby have a propensity to discriminate to start off with OR this attribute is latent in them & once they find audio they take-off on the discrimination process. Maybe this the status-quo with other hobbies as well? FWIW. IMHO. YMMV. |
Mrtennis, I agree mostly with your understanding that audiophiles are probably more likely to enjoy the finer things in life. I think this thread is actually relevant on Audiogon because of that. In fact, I have a number of other things that I enjoy while listening to the music. Whether it's a nice glass of wine or wearing a very comfortable pair of slippers, it enhances the experience. In fact, I decided to post a thread on what are audiophiles' favorite steaks to eat while listening to the system. Again, it synergizes with the music, and typically makes for a better music session (for me, anyway). Michael |
I wear a Victorinox automatic. Can't remember the model number, as it's several years old. It's most similar to the Divemaster, but isn't a divert watch. Very solid and reliable. I wear it almost everyday. A great value for the $400 or so my wife paid for it at the Victorinox outlet store. I think it retailed for about $800. If I had the money, I'd go with a Corum Admiral's Cup Trophy. One of these days, I suppose. Oris seems to make some very good watches in a variety of styles for somewhat sensible prices. Maybe once my 9 month old daughter is out of daycare. |
My Omega Seamaster quit working! I had to get it completely overhauled after only 2.5 years of light (but regular) use. Luckily it was still under factory warranty since it has the "fancy" co-axial movement. But it was still a real bummer. My Rolex GMTII-C is doing great though. I can't believe it but I'm getting +2 seconds a WEEK! Although I attribute that mainly to dumb luck. Either way though, I love this watch more than I ever thought I could. |
08-29-11: Aball My jeweler sent my Seamaster (Titanium and Rose Gold) back to Omega for clean and refinish. I received the estimate by phone last night, nearly $2000.00 including tax. I requested they return with no work done. I'm considering selling and going to another brand I'm so angry. Years ago when I had Rolex they were a fraction that cost for complete overhaul. |
Post removed |
Years ago when I had Rolex they were a fraction that cost for complete overhaul.Yes, you are right. Most watch manufacturers charge an Arm for nearly nothing. Rolex is expensive when you buy it, but their Revision incl. repair is a bargain compared to others. I had a Datejust running 23 Years nonstop, then it stopped working (Dry). Rolex made the repair with new parts and polish for 500$ only. I expected much more, because it was not working anymore. |
You're right Syntax, I dropped my (then) Rolex President off at the factory in Switzerland when my wife and I were on vacation many years ago. Fortunately I registered it with US Customs because when it was returned there was no way to tell it from brand new in the box. It was literally perfect in every way. Cost was I think about $400.00, I assume much more now but no way $2K like Omega is asking. The Omega does not have anything broken, runs very slightly slow and looks good, no scratched crystal or anything damaged. I'm pissed at Omega, will likely put the watch up for sale at Flea Bay. I have no idea what to replace it with. |
Albertporter, I have been in the jewelry industry for over 30 years, and I also happen to own an Omega Seamaster GMT (stainless steel). Several years ago, because of corporate reorganization, they nearly destroyed their reputation because of poor customer service in regard to repairs. That problem has been addressed now. I don't know where you live, but I recommend that you find a private watchmaker who has a good reputation, and allow him to do the work for you. It is absolutely a myth that only the facotry can do excellent repairs and overhauls. A good place to start is the jewelry district in the nearest large city. Ask around for referrals. If that is not possible, do an internet seach for your area. Rolex is a different story. They are absolute control freaks, and even though their movements are quite conventional,(think Honda) they manage to get a majority of their out of warranty work sent to them because they will only release parts to dealers, and exclude most (but not all) private watchmakers. I believe, based on my experience that you were correct to decline the estimate you received. I think that you should be able to have the watch overhauled for $600.00 or thereabouts. Check araound. Also, remember that bracelet refinishing is an extra charge. Also, remember that the jeweler is the middleman, and they are tacking on a healthy profit margin to what Omega is actually charging them. I say that assuming that you went through a jeweler instead of contacting Omega directly. In any case, my advice would still be the same. |
Roxy54, thank you for that information. One jeweler told me Omega is now owned by Swatch and that change is what brought on all the customer service and PR issues, including increased repair cost. My previous service years ago, I sent my Seamaster direct to Switzerland. The invoice was almost exactly the number you mentioned and the watch looked and worked perfect in every way. Part of me wishes I had a Rolex again. My Rolex was no more or less accurate than other mechanical watches but service was fast, fair and reasonable. |
I have owned an Omega Seamaster since 1994. In early 2001, I was living in Germany and it started losing time so I took it to a jeweler who sent it back to Omega Switzerland for an overhaul. It cost me just 400DM ($200) and that included new hands, stem, oring and band parts. They gave me back all of the old parts. I wear the watch almost every day and it is still keeping good time. The red on the hands have faded again a bit, but otherwise the watch still looks great. Since being back in the US, I have been wondering what I should do when it is time for another servicing. |
This thread seems to perpetuate the same theme we see in audiophilia. Enthusiasts excitedly talk about the intricacies and emotional delights of owning a beautiful, artpiece created by renowned artisans. Someone comes along and talks about how they don't see the use of having a watch, what with televisions, cell phones, pagers, the sun rising and setting, cocks crowing and all. Yet these very people inhabit this forum, purchase cables more expensive than these watches and argue the same point to people who tell them that with car radios, Ipods, computer speakers, bose speakers, cell phones, not to mention watch radios, what's the use of owning a world class audio system? |
Pabul57, Does that model have rough, irritating parts that rub your skin? I ask because while my Seamaster was being serviced I bought a Seiko and then had to return it. It was tearing up my wrist. Here's a link to it: Seiko Size and band seem similar to Black Monster. |
My jeweler sent my Seamaster (Titanium and Rose Gold) back to Omega for clean and refinish. I own several Omega's and hang out from time to time at the Omega forum at the watch enthusiast site, Watchuseek. I've never heard of a number close to $2000 for routine maintenance. Something seems amiss if the watch is as pristine as you state. Maybe the titanium and rose gold requires unique care, but I would suggest checking in at some of the watch enthusist sites for advice. |
Funny, factory service/warranty work for Omega was sent to Dallas, who in turn would send to us in NJ or a couple of other independent shops. Some special watches would be sent to Switzerland. I don't understand why a Seamaster would be. I am in Dallas. The Omega was first serviced here and when the refinish job on the Titanium turned out less than perfect, I ask it be redone. They said they did their best, did not charge me and suggested I go through another dealer who was specialty Omega seller. I know my watch was returned to Switzerland because I was given the registered USPS receipt to pay when I refused the $2K factory quote. |
I would suggest that you join the Omega forum over at Watchuseek and post pictures of the watch when you get it back, along with any estimate that that me be included with the return from Omega. Knowledgeable folks there can give you some advice in regard to the costs and reasonableness and/or perhaps a local repair person as an alternative. I have to believe the cost you were quoted includes some level of mechanical and/or case repair to reach that level of expense. good luck. |