Use your ears...try some silver vs copper comparisons. Copper will probably sound more musical. Violins are made of wood because wood sounds better than other materials. Right material for the job. By the way, most people make subjective, emotional responses to wires...few have sat in the great concert halls enough to understand what great music can sound like! With no reference point to reality, audiophiles vasilate between frequency emphasis and their own bias.
Silver vs. Cooper speakers cables
I want to know if silver cables are really better than cooper.
Up to the moment I use Audioquest Volcano biwire cooper cables but many people recomend move to silver for my Tannoy Speakers.
Pure silver or hibrid cooper silver ?
AQ silver cables are very expensive, but I can saw that there are many silver cables at very affordable price like Silver Audio or Analysis Plus.
Please let your opinions and recomendations.
Thanks.
Up to the moment I use Audioquest Volcano biwire cooper cables but many people recomend move to silver for my Tannoy Speakers.
Pure silver or hibrid cooper silver ?
AQ silver cables are very expensive, but I can saw that there are many silver cables at very affordable price like Silver Audio or Analysis Plus.
Please let your opinions and recomendations.
Thanks.
59 responses Add your response
We can measure differences in amplitude as fine as .01 db at 40Khz. Can the human ear hear this? Absolutely not. There are many other examples just like this -- where we have the ability to measure differences that are far below the threshold of audibility. So, Mr. Newell's "personal" view, if unqualified, is simply incorrect. It is as valuable as my " personal" view that the moon is made of green cheese. But, let's not discount the importance of the human ear. Afterall, this is what we use to appreciate audio. If the human brain and ear have the awesome ability to distinguish a difference between the sound of copper and silver, you should be able to produce at least one double-blind study where someone has heard the difference between silver and copper when matched for resistance. You will not be able to do this. No one has ever demonstrated this awesome ability. Ever. |
>>I can't imagine a three cables constructed from three different materials not sounding different.<< You said the key word, IMAGINE. If you can only imagine them sounding different, your imagination will take care of the rest. I believe this thinking is a holdover from musical instruments where nickel would strings sound different from bronze, a silver trumpet sounds different from brass, etc. There's no reason for a silver speaker cable to sound different from copper or gold, etc. The only meaurable difference between the three is resistance -- you want low resistance -- so if you use thicker guage gold you can match the resistance of silver or copper and if you do they all sound the same. There are no other measurable differences. |
Sorry Rsbeck, but we must agree to differ. I know my system and I know when the higher and lower frequencies are not sounding clear and extended. I'm past the 'it's all in the imagination' argument, so if you want to get into that one you'll need another sparring partner. Also, I don't recal stating that silver was 'bright', either to look at or to listen to. It may or may not be, depending on other components in the system, and/or how often you polish it. I can't imagine a three cables constructed from three different materials not sounding different. But that's just me. If there's a measurable difference in the three cables, which there is, then they ought to sound different, albeit subtly so. Maybe it comes down to the quality of supporting equipment, the state of cleanliness of ones ear canals, or just the time of the month for some of us, but there ought to be a difference. Incidentally, that 1,000,000 would be handy, I could buy some Marigo dots and Peter Belt foils, and really knock myself out. |
Post removed |
It is true that gold will not corrode like copper. Gold has more resistance, so you have to use a thicker gauge of solid gold to get the same resistance as copper. If you take care of copper cables, seal the connections well, clean them from time to time, etc -- they will not corrode for years and years. >>My understanding was that gold slightly attenuates the frequency extremes<< There is no evidence to support this. The only reason you might experience attenuation would be that because of the expense, you might use thin gauged cables and since gold has higher resistance, thinner gauge might cause you to lose signal across the entire audio band. There are many myths and wive's tales with regard to cables. There is no hard evidence to support the idea that silver, copper, and gold sound different from one another because of a sonic signature due to the material itself. People claim to hear differences, but when blindfolded, can no longer tell them apart. What does that tell you? It tells me that these supposed sonic signatures are imaginary. You look at silver -- it is bright. People claim it sounds bright. It is the mind at work. >>The cable I'm using did indeed sound a little rolled-off at both ends initially, but surprisingly is starting to open up<< This would be surprising. More likely, it is your imagination. Amazing Randi has a $1,000,000 offer to anyone who can prove to hear the difference between a cable that has been "burned in" and one that has not. There have been no takers. If anyone can hear this difference -- contact Randi and claim the $1,000,000. But, you have to do it blindfolded. |
The price of Gold has rocketed of late, the UK are trying to take the surplus cash from their gold reserve fund and use it to relieve third world debt, but it seems that's not high on the US agenda. That aside, there are some interesting properties of gold when used as a conductor. It has a higher resistance than copper and silver and is therefore supposedly inferior as a conductor. Yet it has superior corrosive properties, therefore the inference is that it's sound will remain consistent for the duration of it's life, whereas copper and silver might me more prone to deteriorate due to the effect of corrosion and how the corroded layer creates unwanted skin effects and negative interaction with the insulator. My understanding was that gold slightly attenuates the frequency extremes, and as s23chang say's gives things a sweeter sound. The cable I'm using did indeed sound a little rolled-off at both ends initially, but surprisingly is starting to open up, particularly on the higher frequencies. This thing has a lot of potential and I can't wait to get another 100 hours on it. |
Has anyone used Gold cables? If so what do you think about their sonic characteristics (if any) compared to copper/silver? I'm burning in a pair of Pear IC's presently, and getting some nice results considering <100 hrs of play time. http://www.pearcable.com There's some interesting information on the properties of Gold versus copper/silver on the above website. |
To answer the origonal question(my thinning hair is an issue, but I'm dealing with it) responders have talked about Acoustic Zen, with good reason, a good company, making good copper and silver cable. Not silver speaker cable of course. As others have said more eloquently than I, neither is good or bad, just good or bad in a given system. Cables seem the item above all, that is system dependent. I bought an AZ cable loom, partly through Audiogoners advice. The specific advise I got was silver ref between CD player and Pre, and matrix pre and power. In fact my system is much better with all silver reference(unfortunately in view of the price). The greatest improvement though, came with the copper hologram speaker cable, truly a major boost. Pretty obviously as with all areas of high-fi, try it in your system and see what works(remember the cable company has loaner cables for you to try) |
It depends on the system it is being put into.Silver is fast revealing ,with top end openness,BUT may not interface well with solid state gear.To much of a good thing is not always good.I from experience have found that silver ic's complement a tube system very well,but gives it to much treble on solid state gear,and makes it sound to analytical. |
To answer teajay's question from way back in this thread. (sorry teajay for the wait). I replaced the AZ Matrix Reference II copper with Silver Reference II between the CD player and preamp. It made my system sound flat. Took out air and ambience. The difference was immediate and quite noticeable. This means not much. That's what happened in my system. Unless you have it's clone then your results will differ. I always get a kick out of "the best cable/interconnect" posts or ads. Only in YOUR system will the truth be told and price doesn't neccessarily mean better. Best, Paul :-) |
OK I will provide the answer. Buy one pair of cooper and one pair of silver ICs. Place one of the silver ICs on the CDP to the preamp (right side only) and use one cooper IC on the left side. Then change the pattern from the preamp to the amp. It has been a long time secret that I have never let on until now. So, now you all know it! But, please don't tell anyone else. BTW, the hair thing was just a little joke OK? Happy Listening. |
You know, if you look carefully, this thread asks us to compare silver versus "cooper." So, in the interest of accuracy, I a/b'd a silver cable, which sounded good, but a little bright against cooper. While blindfolded, I asked an assitant to connect a friend of mine named Cooper between my amplifier and speakers. With a live human being as my cable, I felt I gave up a lot of detail and soundstage shrunk to nothing. Still, I liked Cooper better. Go figure. |
In the interest of full disclosure, I am the president of the Cable Club for Men. For those of you concerned about embarrassing signal loss, I recommend applying pheromone contact treatment on your banana plug terminations, whether you're running copper OR silver wire. Because an inefficient dialectric will only leave you with impedance envy, and none of us should ever have to suffer like that. Remember, we're here to help. |
This thread went from nearly belligerent to hilarious - very nice! Nrchy, great wit with the blockhead comment, and wisely directed at a bright gentleman. Ironic that this thread should pop up now; this morning I sat down to listen to my newly-Platinumized RLD-1 from Steve McCormack. I heard what I assume must be "digital glare," so I played with speaker positioning and then for grins swapped out my Silver Audio Jetstream IC for an old QED Qnex2. The "glare" went away but I lost some detail. I'm using nOrh speakers which use Vifa drivers, though, which I suspect are dry and analytical. I'm beginning to think I need to give up some detail for "fullness" in my system. :( I have to agree with the above posts; cables are like women - they're very reactive with what you connect them to! So now I'm sitting here researching old cable threads to find a cable that is warm and full without sacrificing too much detail that is in my price range. :( |
No Killerpiglet, Litz Braids are bad for dynamics and imaging, the braids dampen the sound. Boa2 should get his scalp removed and get a rug so that he can remove it when he listens to his system. But he'll also need my deluxe stereo-liquid-gel tonic to place on his bald head so that there is no room refraction when listening without his hairpiece. The tonic directs only the best sound waves into the ear cannel and filters out all the grain, hardness/harshness but increases dynamics, lush mids, with well defined bass, superior soundstage and separation of instruments, and extended airy and sweet highs. I will be running a special here on Audiogon soon but for now, for you suckers, I will extend an offer to buy one and get one free if you respond in the next thirty minutes, but wait there's more, act now and I'll throw in a lifetime supply of back issues (slightly used) copies of a well known audio review magazine and a pair of Krell mono block pictures! All this with a 2 year trail period and you can return the product for a full refund and keep the Krell mono block pictures! Act fast, this offer ends soon! Happy Listening. |
Baldness has a warm tube-like sound with mid-range bloom, sparkling highs, a huge, three dimensional soundstage and organic musicality. Behives have a hi-fi type sound that is artificially exciting, colored, lacking in palpability, and digital/solid state sounding. Where one parts one's hair is largely dependant on how one feels about the demise of eight track. |
After having read through and/or participated in a number of cable threads, I've come to the conclusion that the moderator should retitle them all as "how should I do my hair?" Because no one can tell you definitively, and invariably the respondents will lapse into a go-nowhere battle over the merits of beehives vs. baldness. Try out different cables, and you'll find your answer. The process won't work any other way. |
I think it is interesting that you would claim to already know my experience, since you claim I come from a third party perspective, and yet you go on to ask me to spell it out for you. That would make you a sort of Kreskin with Alzheimers or something. Let's examine your experience. You claim silver sounds "tizzy." That's interesting. That would mean a lot of people are paying a lot of money for " tizzy" sounding cables. What, in your belief, would cause a silver cable to sound "tizzy?" Did you a/b copper against silver? What safeguards did you employ? Did you a/b copper and silver in the same configuration? Employ precise level matching? Did you try a lower gauge of copper and a/b it against the silver to see if you were simply experiencing lowered or different resistance? Did you do your listening tests double-blind? What did you do to eliminate the possibility of the placebo effect? Anything? |
The only difference between copper and silver is that silver has slightly less resistance. So, all you have to do is use lower gauged copper and you will get the same effect as using silver. Since silver has slightly less resistance, it is possible people substitute the same gauge silver for their copper cables, hear the music slightly louder in comparison and they think they are getting more detail when in fact they are only getting slightly higher volume. In tests, people will experience slightly higher volume as more detail and that's why this is also the oldest trick in audio sales. The salesman A/B's two pieces of gear, bumps the volume ever so slightly for the higher priced piece while you're not looking and -- voila -- you hear more detail and he racks up another sale. The rest of the stuff people say about silver is unsupported. Which means you can believe or not -- your choice. I believe the idea that silver would impart a sonic signature is a holdover from the world of musical instruments. Nickle or steel strings sound different from bronze, a silver trumpet sounds different from brass, etc. But, these instruments make sounds by vibrating -- that's different than carrying signal. In blind listening tests when levels are matched, people cannot hear any difference between silver and copper and aside from the difference in resistance, no one has come up with a reason why they should. Again -- your choice to believe or not. |
Being an owner of two different levels of Tannoy speakers (Mx and Revolution series)in two different systems (one analog and one HT), I would be wary of silver speaker cabling. As people pointed out earlier, upstream equipment is very important and Tannoy can be very naturally detailed without any silver emphasis. I support the others who've recommended listening for yourself. |