@ethan_winer You are most welcome -- and to everyone else, I want to add that I inherited 14 different acoustic unit treatments, including GIK corner units and 2x4 foot traps. They all promised bass absorption but I still was not able to tame the bass in my room. Ethan Winer's recommendations were exactly what the room needed -- no excess, just right -- and they made it possible to do what I could not do what twice the number of other bass traps. It was really no contest.
Thanks Hilde for the mention of RealTraps. To answer the original question, memory foam is not suitable for acoustic treatment. Like mattress foam and packing foam, memory foam is closed cell. Real acoustic foam is called open cell, and tiny fissures burrow deeply into the material. When sound waves get into those fissures the resulting friction converts the acoustic energy into heat. |
In my experience, Real Traps was far better than GIK. @ethan_winer was enormous help with placement and determining the right number for my room. |
Post removed |
@audiodwebe That’s the best way to go. Joe Nies |
Thanks, guys.
I have lots of GIK panels but was considering ordering a few more and I have this mattress taking up space so thought I might cut it up. Have since decided not to and order a few more instead.
|
Greetings The memory foam will absorb some frequencies and can cut back on reflections. I have tried numerous absorption and diffuser devices over the years. The only DIY ones that remain in my room are the 20” tube traps that I built and the diffuser cones on the front wall. The ones specifically manufactured for room acoustics works the best. Give it a try, you got nothing to lose and maybe something to gain. Joe Nies |