What label and what title is it?
Be careful what you wish for. Half-speed mastering is but one in a long list of items that can give improved sound quality. Fleetwood Mac Rumours is one of my all-time favorites. I bought the original vintage LP, and then later the Nautilus Half Speed Mastered. For years could not understand why the original was better than half speed mastered. Until one day I noticed the Nautilus was digitally remastered. Another thing that tends to make for improved SQ is speed. So when a 45 RPM version came out I bought that and sure enough, blew away the Nautilus, better even than the vintage copy. The best then? Not so fast! Not every copy sounds the same. Tom Port cleans and listens to dozens of really good sounding copies then charges a small fortune for the cream of the crop. These he calls Hot Stampers and so out of all my four copies of Rumours the White Hot is by far the best- even though it is really just a vintage run nothing special pressing. In other words, you cannot tell anything really by half-speed mastered, 45, 180g, or any of that. It ain't quite exactly all luck of the draw, but it sure plays a bigger role than most care to acknowledge. Are we having fun yet? |
One of the HS Masters I have is Radiohead Hail To The Thief think I will spin it now, love it. @millercarbon these Hot Stampers are they worth the $$$. ??? |
I beg to differ. I've been underwhelmed by a number of half speed mastered recordings. Joe Harley from Music Matters and the Blue Note Tone Poet series commented on the challenges of half speed mastering in a recent video interview...I think with Ken Micallef. Recently, I purchased the half speed mastered Peter Gabriel - Us, fantastic music, disappointing sound quality. The old Classic Records PG records all sound far better. Cheers, Spencer |
Sbank- that’s interesting about Peter Gabriel. I have two of his albums, both just used copies for $10 or less at my local record store, and after good ultrasonic cleaning, they are among the best sounding albums I have. But my system loves that percussion. Experiences like that have kept me from going down the “what pressing/mastering/deadwax rabbit hole, though I’m sure there is some merit. I’m not motivated enough to learn and remember. It would be great if labels all said where they were pressed, though. I’ve yet to get a bad record from Quality Record Pressing. |
Apparently not. All cutter heads have resonance issues and that is treated with feedback from windings in the cutter head. But it can still be an issue and by cutting at a lower speed the resonance is pushed up an octave. Its also easier for a tape machine to playback all the highs present on the tape. IMO the biggest technical challenge is getting the bass right but all cutter heads have good bass bandwidth so that much of it isn't an issue. |