Best Amplifier & Speakers combo?


Hello!

I’m moving to the next level for my stereo setting, with the budget cap I have I could get one of the following amp + speaker combos:

1. Cambridge Audio CX81 + KEF Q150

2. Cambridge Audio CX61 + KEF LS50 Meta

 

99% of the time I will use the system to listen records.

 

Which combo would you choose for a small/medium room? Or any other comparable model recommendations.

 

Thank you all!!!

 

alexco17

If you are dead-set on Cambridge + KEF, then specifically ask about Cambridge + Kef.

If you want other suggestions within a certain price range, forum members will need more information.

What do you have now and which aspects of the system’s presentation do you like and which are you looking to improve, in what way?

What is your budget?

New? Used?

Speaker sensitivity? Amp power rating?

SQ: Neutral? Warm? Forward?

What sort of music do you favor?

Source?

Room size/constraints?

IMHO, if you want a future proof combo. 

Buy the Vandersteen VLR bookshelf with a Belles Aria Integrated. 

Albeit, a little more than your budget, but, you'll have a very capable system that can be upgraded as funds allow.

These little speakers don't get the press like the KEF's, but they can really rock when given the right input.

 I use them for my office system, and find them to be very capable or reproducing music that engages you.

I do understand that you have a budget, but...

Investing in a stereo system means knowing what you like and dislike. If you can audition the KEF's and any other speaker/combo, it will enhance your ability to make a knowledgeable decision. In fact, this way you'd be able to buy some/all of the equipment used, and save some money, too.

And, @stuartk, added some very good points to consider.

Bob

To answer your question, 🙄, I would go for option #2. I doubt you would need the extra watts. Go for the better speakers. Just my opinion. :)

Just out of interest, have you hear this equipment? There are different flavors at every price point ($1K - $100K). Choosing the one that really connects with you is what is important. There is not an absolute better… like maybe which car accelerates faster.

@alexco17 

Why are you limiting yourself to these two combinations?

If you want the best at a given budget, why not list all your current equipment in the virtual equipment segment of this forum and provide a budget?

What will you do with the advice that you receive?  I ask because if you do the above you will get a diversity of suggestions.  How will you go from there?  Otherwise buy either of the ones that you suggested because few people here have heard both combinations and without hearing them, what value is their opinion?

Sound quality wise, CX81 and LS50 were better rated.  However, with LS50 priced at $1600, I will add a few hundreds and go with Buchardt S400 mk ii for its more extended frequency range (79hz-28khz -> 33hz-44khz ±3 dB).  LS50 is renowned for its midrange but S400 mk ii is not far away.  S400's extended, airy top end coupled with much more weighty and articulated low end enable you to enjoy music more.  You do not need sub for S400 either.

I would offer two suggestions.  1-Take the LS50 over the Q series, noticeable bump up in SQ IMO.  Both of my kids bought used LS50s and are very pleased. 2-The non-Meta KEF R3s are being discounted now and should be a strong consideration.  They will sound a bit fuller than the much smaller LS50s since they have a dedicated bass driver.  I'm sure they will do better with a bit more power which can be an upgrade down the line.  Good luck and cheers.  

I vote for the LS50 as well, but I am biased because I have them. However, I recommend you broaden your amplifier search to find a bit more power. Even at lower volumes the LS50’s benefit from an amplifier with some depth. 

The LS50 Meta is a great speaker. In my room, it was much better than the LS50. Even in a small room, the KEF KC62 sub makes the LS50 Meta a homerun. Without the sub the bottom end is lacking.

The better the amplification on the LS50 Meta the better the sound. I tried the LS50 Meta with the CODA #16, Benchmark AHB2, PeachTree GAN1 (modded), and a few others. The more power the better and the quality of amp will also show through.

I recently got the Magnepan LRS+ for my office and I "think" it is better long term than the LS50 Meta. I use the LRS+ also with the KEF KC62 but it is not as essential with the LRS+. I have my LS50 Meta for sale now since I am lacking space to put it, but I may change my mind and alternate with the LRS+.

My room is 12 x 11 x 9 with 4 extra feet where I took out the closet door and stuffed my desk and computer monitors. This seems like the ideal sized room for the LS50 Meta and LRS+.

BTW - I am getting a PeachTree GAN400 amp ($2K) coming today for my LRS+. I have a feeling it would be great with the LS50 Meta and work with the LRS+. Maybe not as good as the modded Peachtree GAN1 I have but the GAN1 would not work for you.