Uh, the Diablo 120 weighs 57lbs.
Aavik I-280 I owned Luxman 590 AXII and auditioned Diablo 120 at home. |
This Plinius Hiato is worth a look… https://www.usaudiomart.com/details/649925710-plinius-hiato/ |
Post removed |
@arafiq How did the 120 compare against the Int 250? |
REGA OSIRIS integrated amp The Osiris comes in at 17″ x 14″ x 5″ (WDH) and a hefty 56 lbs. Don’t let that fool you. This thing is a brick. It’s crafted from aluminum and has a very industrial look. It cranks out 160W into 8 ohms, https://audiofi.net/2012/08/rega-osiris-punching-heavy/ “ … Where once I wondered whether the Rega pieces could keep up with established, pedigreed leaders in their class, I now find myself asking whether competitors can in fact keep up with the Isis and Osiris. They really are that good...” https://everydayaudiophile.com/2019/12/23/rega-osiris-a-dual-mono-champ/
|
What’s your budget ? The Coda class A amp 100 wpc in pure class A is one of best amps I have heard period , and I have heard far more then most , having owned aAudio store and in audio ver 40 years and owning many quality pieces this-amp is$16k retail. But even a tube lover would love this amp . TheGryphon is around 85 pounds the weight shouldnot be the deciding factor just get an extra hand . once-its there it won’t be moved around , there are a couple otherDanish Amplifier companies pretty exceptional I have heard .what speakers will they be driving equally important. |
A new acquisition strategy? Buying amps by weight. It won't catch on. When I needed a cheap Japanese SACD player decades ago before multi-players I told the dealer I didn't need to listen to them, they all sound the same (was wrong on that). I just picked them up and bought the heaviest, assuming it would be better made and have better components. It was, and is, a Marantz. |
@swede58 Unfortunately, I did not compare the Gryphon Diablo 120 and Pass Labs INT-250 at the same time or same venue. So any conclusions one might draw from such a comparison are bound to be meaningless. Having said that, going by aural memory I liked the INT-250 a bit more. The Diablo had a more muscular, slightly darker sound. But it also had better transparency and resolution. The INT-250 had more of the tube-like bloom which I enjoyed. It also sounded bigger, but at the expense of ultimate transparency and detail. The 250 was also a bit warmer, which is my preference. From what I understand, a better comparison would have been either Diablo 120 vs PL INT-60 or Diablo 300 vs PL INT-250. But I never got a chance to listen to the Diablo 300 in my home. So take it with a grain of salt, At the of the day, it really boils down to what kind of sound signature you prefer. For me, the Aavik U-280 kinda split the difference between the INT-250 and Diablo 120. It gives me a good dose of the Pass Labs warmth, bloom (though not to quite that extent) and the Diablo’s transparency and muscularity. |
@arafiq Thanks, I have heard the Int 250 at a dealer and I own a Diablo 300 (driving Magnepan 3.7’s) but I was curious how the Pass compares to the Gryphon. Never heard an Aavik. |