Stratospheric audio gear prices


The more time I have under my belt pursuing quality audio, the more I realize that high audio gear prices have some basis in their quality. Yet there is a limit. When you buy a Ferrari the cost is high, but you can see the money involved in the design and parts. Many would argue that high quality audio gear is similar to the quality and design of a hyper-car. But when you look a the sheer quantity an complexity of this kind of car, there is no piece of audio gear that compares. To me, a piece of audio gear that costs as much as even an inexpensive car is just a manufacturer cashing in because they can. Can you imagine what audio manufacturers would want to charge for a piece of audio gear that was the size and weight of a car? Like $100 million.  I believe it just drives the whole market up and we end up getting a little bit suckered. This is all perhaps a little overstated. I guess I just want to shame audio manufacturers. I do understand that they are not charities, or here for the betterment of mankind. If you are not frustrated by this, good for you.  Here is a quote from a book about marketing. The reference is a victim of link rot. Nevertheless it has common information. 
  

"Premium Pricing

Premium pricing is the practice of keeping the price of a product or service artificially high in order to encourage favorable perceptions among buyers, based solely on the price. The practice is intended to exploit the (not necessarily justifiable) tendency for buyers to assume that expensive items enjoy an exceptional reputation or represent exceptional quality and distinction . A premium pricing strategy involves setting the price of a product higher than similar products . This strategy is sometimes also called skim pricing because it is an attempt to "skim the cream" off the top of the market. It is used to maximize profit in areas where customers are happy to pay more, where there are no substitutes for the product, where there are barriers to entering the market, or when the seller cannot save on costs by producing at a high volume. It is also called image pricing or prestige pricing.

 

Luxury has a psychological association with price premium pricing. The implication for marketing is that consumers are willing to pay more for certain goods and not for others. To the marketer, it means creating a brand equity or value for which the consumer is willing to pay extra. Marketers view luxury as the main factor differentiating a brand in a product category."

Source: Boundless. “Market Share.” Boundless Business Boundless, 26 May. 2016. Retrieved 07 Feb. 2017 from https://www.boundless.com/business/textbooks/boundless-business-textbook/product-and-pricing-strateg...

ericrt
"...Consumption taxes on status-seeking spending, along with official and traditional sanctions on excess consumption and redistributive policies may lessen the negative impact of relative deprivation on well-being..."

Not for me. My well being would be negatively impacted if my hobby spending was taxed with consumption taxes. Nobody NEEDS a music system to survive but it does enhance my life, and it certainly doesn't need to be excessively taxed.   
So you saved a few million. 
 Paying up for higher end audio is more likely when you have available funds, and these wealthy souls help support pricing.  Frequency of very high priced speakers and amps is very limited.  But this pricing serves to stretch lower end gear pricing. Its a marketing strategy and does stimulate interest.

many have no clue what they are buying, and cant perceive any incremental sound quality from their ultra high end purchase which many a time is not really discernable.
I think that audio is somewhat like automobiles in some ways. To wit: I'll likely never buy a piece of high end kit brand new again. I'll let the original owner take the depreciation hit much like buying a new car and watching as the thing depreciates the moment you drive off the lot... Granted that doesn't apply to ALL cars. But the examples it doesn't apply to is vanishingly small compared to the general market. And even moreso with audio gear. Audio gear is a commodity much like anything else. Pay what you are comfy with and let the rest go IMHO.

Happy Listening.
I discovered hard way that in audio we pay for electronical design quality thinking that this equate to sound quality by itself...


Sorry this equation is false....

Vibration control, and electrical level noise control and especially acoustic control (no it is not passive material treatment) and acoustic treatment make more for S.Q, make more for increasing it, than upgrading to a higher price level for the gear....

If audio is a course to afford the best electronical design in the world, my observation is only relatively valid and limited by the possibility to upgrade from a 1000 bucks piece to a 100,000 bucks one...

If audio is the art to reach an optimal S.Q. with the lowest possible cost, my observation made complete sense without restriction....


You pay for what you get.
«But we pay more  for what we do not»-Groucho Marx 🤓