Tonearm mount to the plinth vs arm board vs rotating arm board vs isolated tower


Hello,

I am rebuilding a Garrard 301 and looking for a plinth. I am planning to buy 3-4 tonearms to try. I would like to know which is the best way moving forward.

Is there a difference between mounting a tonearm directly on a solid plinth vs arm board (same vs different materials) vs rotating arm board vs isolated tower. 

Thanks
Nanda
kanchi647
In the case of the first you have a subjective means to winnowing out how a separate arm pod is a failed concept;
THE ATMASPHERE PRINCIPLE

THE 'FAILED' CONCEPT
That has been my experience as well sciencecop. FWIW Brass seems to dampen aluminum very effectively in combination with soundcoat material (1/16" thick sheets).  
05-12-2020 1:23pm
In the case of the first you have a subjective means to winnowing out how a separate arm pod is a failed concept;
THE ATMASPHERE PRINCIPLE

THE 'FAILED' CONCEPT

Thank you for reminding me of why I dont use rubber belt drive turntables or direct drive turntables - the swirling and lurching from note to note of a platter driven by a rubber band vs the grainy grey wash of the direct drive as it interminably tries to calculate the correction speed required on ancient "software" using 1970's electronics, not to forget that a can of Baked Beans probably has more structural integrity than the motor housing on the DD.  And to think you can even hear it with a low res MM. Thanks again for reminding me.


Thank you for reminding me of why I dont use rubber belt drive turntables or direct drive turntables - the swirling and lurching from note to note of a platter driven by a rubber band vs the grainy grey wash of the direct drive as it interminably tries to calculate the correction speed required on ancient "software" using 1970's electronics, not to forget that a can of Baked Beans probably has more structural integrity than the motor housing on the DD.  And to think you can even hear it with a low res MM. Thanks again for reminding me.
Perhaps you'd like to make a YouTube Video to show us the superiority of your esteemed system @dover ....?
What was that........?
Can't do...it's raining in New Zealand....videos can't show shit....my finger's broken.....
Ain't it great when you can spout 'garbage' without having to provide proof or evidence...🤥
You could fill Audio Forums with your 'wisdom'....🤗
Dover
04-26-2019 7:38pm
I have been following your cartridge postings - they are great. I have the Glanz MFG61 and was interested in getting a flavour of the 610 you have.
But then....
Dover
05-23-2019 7:49pm
And to think you can even hear it with a low res MM.
To this.....
Dover
06-06-2019 4:57pm
I preferred both my V15vxmr & V15vmr with a brazillian and a dab of superglue on the stylus holder - as used in my Eminent Technology ET2. Accurate tonearm set up, properly grounded TT & clean records obviate the need for heath robinson type solutions.I preferred both my V15vxmr & V15vmr with a brazillian and a dab of superglue on the stylus holder - as used in my Eminent Technology ET2. Accurate tonearm set up, properly grounded TT & clean records obviate the need for heath robinson type solutions.
And this.....?
Dover
05-23-2019 7:49pm
Halcro - thanks for the Decca post for Frogman and I - I have been a bit busy to respond - the music was great.
And this....?
Dover
07-22-2019 7:39pm
Hi Halcro
for me on my cheapo ear iPhone plugs -

Shure V15/III/SAS - full bodied but coloured sound

Shure Ml140HE - slightly recessed in the vocals, clangy in the upper mid area

Shure Ultra 500 - the least coloured by far of the three, the balance across the frquency spectrum far more even, and more resolution. On crescendos this cartridge holds that balance. This is significantly better than the other two to my ears, more open, more balanced and less coloured.

If you really want to hear the Ultra 500 at its best you need to buy yourself an Eminent Technology ET2, a significant gain in performance cf the Dynavector/FR64 to be sure - I own all 3.

To this again....?
Dover 
05-12-2020 12:52pm
And to think you can even hear it with a low res MM.
And from this....?
Dover
10-30-2019 8:05pm
Great music. Beautiful.
In a nutshell firstly comparing the Palladian to the Decca, again ibuds, the Decca wins, most notably I can hear the chest and body of the female choristers, even individually. On the Palladian it sounds like they are singing from the top of their throat - no chest. The Decca more accurately conveys the full weight of the choristers and the room acoustics.

Then comparing the Sony XL88D to the Decca - wow. More transparent and the majesty of the performance and the completeness of the full orchestral spectrum conveyed by the Sony is fabulous. There appears to be more chest/body with the choristers from the Decca, but the vocals from uppermids to top end on the Sony appear far more transparent. As the full orchestra comes in the Sony is simply wonderful, the most complete cartridge for me of the three..    

At this point I am done with comparisons - could you please just send me the Sony for Xmas. Now back to the music....
To this.....?
Dover
05-12-2020 12:52pm
Thank you for reminding me of why I dont use rubber belt drive turntables or direct drive turntables - the swirling and lurching from note to note of a platter driven by a rubber band vs the grainy grey wash of the direct drive as it interminably tries to calculate the correction speed required on ancient "software" using 1970's electronics, not to forget that a can of Baked Beans probably has more structural integrity than the motor housing on the DD.
Perhaps Dover needs 'constant' reminding......🤗 
Dear @halcro  : The failed concept is failed by physics law. That we like it the listening experiences through it does not means is " rigth ".

In the other side your post making comparison about is useless when the comparison you wanted show was with different TT, different tonearm and even different LP track and probably not exactly the same accurated alignment set-up.

R.
Hi Kenchi,
Wow, your question as to which arm and plinth is best for your 301 opened up an incredibly technical discourse on the physics of arm board construction!
I am somewhat new to high level TT set up and Garland 301 rebuild.
And I certainly do not approach this quest/avocation from an intense technical perspective. I research and use common sense. I have been searching and waiting for a “proper” rebuilt 301 rig for years.
Finally, I have what I believe is a great sounding set up. I can only share what I have been able to cobble together. Speaking of waiting, I still have not been able to listen to my 301 now waiting for the last critical piece-a Stealth Hyper phone cable which is still being built.
So, I can only relay my feelings and faith. For the arm, it is a Ortophon 309. Not the highest level but, I believe, period correct and really good. The plinth and TT rebuild is from Chris at Woodsong Audio. Believe he is one of a handful of rebuilders at the top of the game. And a very helpful and knowledgeable fellow. His plinths seem to be among the best. And to complete the picture, going with my taste for beautiful mid range a Myajima Shalbi. Hope this has been helpful. I hope that all my research, patience and common sense will result in rig that faithfully reproduces the drive and musicality that the 301 is famous for.
Atmasphere
"Or you could use a mirror mounted on the item under test, a laser and a sound source to demonstrate how a separate arm pod will not vibrate the same as the plinth onto which the platter is mounted, even if both use the same construction techniques!"

Have you tried this technique? It has been a thought experiment of mine for some time now, but I have never actually run it in practice. 
Easy to get more than 1000x gain with this technique. 
It would be most informative  

Cheers 
Yes, it works fine. Bob Worzella of Sound Anchors mentioned this to me about 30 years ago- this is how he was able to prove that his stands for Vandersteens actually resulted in better measurable performance.

@halcro 

a turntable that struts and frets its hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by youtube, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Post removed 
@halcro 

And for the record, I never made a statement like that. One way you can tell this is so is that I don't use emojis in any of my posts. Putting up a post like this is oxymoronic; the post is false in every way.


Look, rather than kill the messenger, why not look into the physics involved? Credibility is not gained by never admitting a mistake, its gained by acknowledging the miss-step when real and correcting it.
Dover, So what is your turntable of choice, if you revile both belt- and direct-drive?  As far as I know, that leaves only idler drive, which has its own issues.  All forms of tt drive have positives and negatives.  Execution of the idea determines the differences among turntables and what makes one turntable of one type better or worse than another turntable of the same or different type.  This shouldn't make anyone angry.  Anyway, what do you use currently?