Why are you trying to run 2 amplifiers?
Splitting line level out from preamp, versus using 2nd set of outputs
I'd like to add a line lever splitter between my preamp and amplifier, close to the amp end on a set of 4 meter interconnects and send signals to two amplifiers that are located near to my speakers, versus buying another 4 meter interconnect to drive the second amp from the second set of line level outputs on my preamp.
I'm considering asking the interconnect manufacturer to make me a set of female to 2 female splitters out of spare set of interconnects. I'd use two one meter pairs of the same interconnects to feed the amplifiers.
These are RCA cables.
I know that it can be done, my question is, am I setting myself up for disappointment?
Wouldn’t you want a splitter with a female to two males? |
That should be fine. It’s hard to imagine the extra connection point and IC would penalize this enough to notice, unless psychological. So you’re using 3 sets of ICs to ensure symmetry between the 2 paths. That’s perfectly fine, but if it were me I’d probably look for an adaptor to work more like a "loop out" from the 1st amp, so I only need that 2nd IC set to hit the 2nd amp (if positioned close enough). The loop-out is used quite commonly on electrostatic headpohone amps (Stax) - and here, I’ve not noticed a penalty from using the loop-out. Of course you’ll find folks who are obsessed about the connector quality, and these can get quite expensive on the high end - I’ve been there in the past; now I don’t care so much. When "stacking" cables in series, with different brands or makes (especially copper vs. silver), the sound tends to be "additive" in the traits of the 2 cables. Like tube rolling. Which again, is generally fine IMO. IC sonic differences are generally pretty subtle to me, with exceptions for very long runs or specific slots like phono that can be sensitive to capacitance. Are you bi-amping? |
A splitter made the sound worse for me. When I needed this same feature (amps), I purchased the CODA 07x preamp which has 2 sets of XLRs. This sounded much better than a splitter. In my case, 1 amp drove speakers and the other amp dove my RAAL SR1a earphones. Today, I use a Schitt Kara F preamp to do the same thing. |
The OP is trying to avoid buying another 4M cable from the sound of it. The Y connector should 1M>2F with the male plugged into the amp driving the high frequencies, and the short cable into the low frequency amp, assuming passive biamplification is the objective. A preamp with dual outputs effectively has a splitter built in. |
I would like to avoid buying another $$$ interconnect, and I’d like to leave everything where it currently sits (equipment on left side amplifier(s) between speakers. i would be adding a second amplifier and bi-amplifying one set of bi-wireable speakers
Neither amp has a line level out, and those are some great suggestions to keep the signal clean. |
I'm 76, over the many years, I've used Y splitters for this and that, and it's never been discernable to me or my friends that help me listen for any problems/differences. I just gave an old 4 way Video Switch to a friend, he used it backwards to select between two TTs, works great, no more switching cables manually. |
Dynacohum, I think your idea is better than mine. As the signal runs it would hit a female rca at the start of my splitter. Leg one and leg 2 split. Leg one could be very short, and would end in male rca to connect directly to the high frequency amp. Leg two could either be long enough to reach the low frequency amp, in which case it would also end in male rca terminations, or it could also be short, and in such case would have females on its terminus. |
Morrow audio makes whatever cable you need, splits, varied lengths, whatever connector you need. They have a range of cable types for every budget, often having substantial discount sales. |