One key to building great systems over time.


One of the great things about participating in an audio forum like this is that it exposes you to users with all sorts of experience levels. Analyzing questions, I find myself assessing the person’s experience and then going back to that time in my history. I have been at this for fifty years… and I am constantly called back to my first few years when I was working to make sense of the whole environment.

 

It dawned on me that one aspect that really helped me was learning to focus on “main stream” highly reviewed (professionally) audiophile equipment. 

 

When you are young and have few pennies you have to take chances on “giant killer” components… and off beat / new astonishing technology. You have lots of time and little money. But looking back, after the first few chaotic years of swapping this “astonishing” component (that had a couple good attributes, but a lot of weak ones)… I slowly realized that the components that stayed in my system (like for 10 years or more) were highly reviewed components from respected high end companies. Back in the late 70s’ early 80’s that was, as an example:  Audio Research, Threshold Pass), and Nakamichi.

 

They cost lots more… but, if I would actually buy one… well, my jaw would drop… and I would realize… holy cow…so worth it!  My search for that component would end.

 

Over the ensuing decades, putting together a fantastic upgraded system has become much easier. The last couple major upgrades I have made… ~$45K to $75K and finally to $150K have had completely predictable results been the most fulfilling of my life. The decisions were simple.

 

So, for those just starting out… trying “highly touted” giant killers is a necessary way of assembling a system that is outside of your budget. But this also leads to lots of disappointments and equipment churning. 

 

I think my advise is to read lots of professional reviews (they are not all perfect), listen to that equipment when you can, and invest in these well regarded audiophile company components as soon as you can… or sooner. As a beginner, you don’t know what you don’t know… so companies with long histories of being at the very top of they fields are very likely to outperform in ways you are not aware of. 

 

I am talking about companies like Conrad Johnson, Audio Research, Boulder, Pass, Wilson, Sonus Faber, Rowland, Aurrender, Magico, Transparent. That is not an exhaustive list.

 

I hope this is helpful to those trying to make sense of this very complex and contradictory pursuit.  

 

 

 

 

ghdprentice

@glenn747

Off and on throughout my time (50 years) at this pursuit I have tried “Giant Killers” and without exception they proved not to be. Either immediately, or within a short time I would start hearing their shortcomings, after that, I could not unhear it.

@oldracer 

+1

 

Yes, working with a dealer can really help. For most of my time at this pursuit I have at least worked closely with a dealer. Often, they would not carry all the brands I was interested in. But, they can be invaluable.

The essence of pursuing the highest quality system you can get is navigating through a nearly infinite amount of equipment and possible combinations… only a very few that you could possibly experience… and all this equipment is surrounded be marketing hype, dubious reviews with lots of misinformation from folks with different values.

 

Navigating this complex space is difficult. Dealers can help. Also, why I made this post.

 

Unrelated, some folks enjoy churning equipment. Nothing wrong with that… the journey is the objective. Mine has never been that. Mine has always been get to the best well balance system possible and enjoy listening to music for the next decade.

 

 

True but there are giant killers that punch way above their weight class  I never got tired in the 70's of my Advents or my Hafler kit amp.   My dual mono Brit amps from Albarry to this day sound better than they should and held up close to even to a current Macintosh Integrated selling for 5k (even the shop thought so)  Also those storied companies you refer to often make lower end items with some of the DNA that do indeed hold up over time. But all kinds of really good stuff for small money from less recognized company  Schiit audio (love that name!) is one of many dozens making wire, electronics, speakers, streaming devices etc that work really really well and can provide decade's of pleasure if one chooses to be happy with what one has (obviously NOT what we audiophiles do)

@gowanus 

 

+1 Much of my equipment was purchased used in the first couple decades of me pursuing the high end. Great way to leverage your funds. 

@yoyoyaya 

 

Very true. Companies can loose there way… Nakamichi is a great example. Thst is why research is such an important part of the pursuit.

@tony1954 ”…Thanks for the advise to buy expensive, high quality equipment to get better sound.”

Well I didn’t exactly say that, there are very expensive non-mainstream components. But in general, that is true.

 

It may sound obvious… but if you read extensively in the forum, you will read many posts extolling the superiority of lessor gear. There can be many reasons… the persons current value in sound, inexperience in listening, etc. also, there are lots of folks that simply say the kind of gear I am taking about is just marketing hype, a rip off… etc. 

 

So as someone trying to get their feet on the ground in this persuit, it can be anything but obvious.

@pdreher 

Also a reasonable strategy. I guess I should have put in that my objective has always been to assemble the highest performing system possible over time. You are correct, for some folks that is not the objective.

I have found buying used equipment has significantly increased the quality of equipment in my system.  Spending half retail on quality components allows me to leap ahead. This is a great hobby!  The quality of my system has allowed me to heat details in music never realized before. 

Working with a good dealer can make a big difference.  I built my present system up over a 30 year span with a dealer who would take gear bought from him as trade-ins. Having a good relationship resulted in discounted prices and the occasional floor model at a great price. Eventually my system had reached a point where the diminishing marginal return on every dollar spent had reached my financial willingness to commit further. As much as I enjoy that system today, the journey getting there was a large part of the fun.

 

@pdreher +1

My root to musical enjoyment (not nirvana) followed the same path as you describe. The last building block is my digital front end. I bought used Ayre for my preamp/amp needs and am trying to nail down my digital gear. After some info gleaned from this forum and a hard discussion with a friend last night I am rethinking spending $10-$15K on the digital. I think now I will keep it down to 1/3 of that number by buying used and giving up a little to save a lot. I now believe I will forego the Aurender A20 and go with a Aurilic Altair G2.1. I may buy new but I saw a used mint unit with 2TB drive recently sell for less than $4K. I had the G1.1 a while back and enjoyed it so I can settle for this without issue.

Some will scoff but yesterday I brought home a pristine pair of Klipsch Chorus ll speakers and inserted them into the system. I was taken aback by how much these improved the sound in my room. Even my wife made a comment. She was in the next room sewing and she poked her head in and said that the sound seemed "fuller" to her. I always loved the Klipsch house sound with tubes but never knew how good they could sound paired with the Ayre gear. I guess retirement has made me less critical.

There are certainly benefits and drawbacks to any approach, but I feel strongly that there is great benefit by gaining exposure to excellent audio gear. Breaking from the mass-fi mold offers a significant advantage in sound quality IMHO, regardless of how or why you accomplish it.

My journey was very different from yours, as purchasing expensive gear has never been a feasible approach for me. However I did have some unique opportunities to hear, be around, and get a lot of exposure to audio equipment that was well above my pay grade. That exposure gave me valuable insights to what audio gear could sound like, so for me is was a matter of confirming what I liked to hear from my system, then trying to replicate it by whatever means I could afford....whether buying used, building it from scratch, or modifying existing components.

I'd encourage anyone to find a way to hear as much high end audio gear as possible, get as familiar with it as possible, and let that experience guide your future selections.

 

 

@ghdprentice, in general I agree with you. I'd offer a couple of supplementary observations. By and large, the companies that have staying power have it for a reason - in terms of the multidimensional quality of their products. They also tend to be fussy about their dealers and distributors. However, occasionally companies can lose their way - after the departure of a designer and or change of ownership - Classé is an example. Secondly, there are companies like Magico and YG that are now well established, but that are still relatively young. So I think we should be open to the potential of the new. My maxim is to never be an early adopter - in anything technological. But I appreciate the efforts of those people who are willing to take a punt on the latest and greatest.

 

"I am talking about companies like Conrad Johnson, Audio Research, Boulder, Pass, Wilson, Sonus Faber, Rowland, Aurrender, Magico, Transparent. That is not an exhaustive list."

Thanks for the advise to buy expensive, high quality equipment to get better sound.

That makes sense. Why didn't I think of that.

Big fan of Quicksilver. That is exactly the type of gear you want to check out. No frills, excellent sound, reasonably priced. There are lots of companies offering great value , these and other forums are a good start but nothing like visiting a dealer.

Most important!!! Something I heard a while back by ghdprentice, and that is NEVER make a lateral move. Total waste of time and money and source of major disappointment. If a new component doesn’t wow you, it’s not an upgrade

While I agree that your approach makes sense for those willing to spend considerable sums for higher end gear, I've taken the approach of reducing my spend, while increasing my satisfaction by buying older or more utilitarian gear, having  been dissatisfied with higher end / higher priced mainstream gear and no longer willing to pay the rapidly increasing prices of mainstream high end gear.

Examples of changes I've made in which I've saved money (or minimized spend) and increased my satisfaction:

  • Refurbished Altec Model 19's replaced and are more enjoyable than my previous Harbeth 40.2 Anni's
  • DeHavilland UltraVerve 3 preamp outperforms previous Aesthetix Calypso Signature
  • Roon Nucleus paired with Ifi Zen Stream as ROON endpoint sonically outperforms and is more dependable than previous Aurender N10
  • Duelund speaker cables outperform my previous Auditorium A23 speaker cables
  • Duelund power cables outperform my previous Cardas PC's
  • Quicksilver amps are utilitarian, with minimal expense towards aesthetics.   But they sound good and are reasonably priced.
  • I bought a used Weiss 202 DAC for $1750 , but it retailed for approx $7,300 and was predecessor to the current 501 DAC that retails for around $10K.

In summary... I don't disagree with your approach... but for those unwilling or unable to spend $15K for amplifiers and $15-25K on speakers, excellent systems can still be obtained for far less if done carefully.  In my case, I've increased my satisfaction by replacing higher priced gear with lower priced higher value and/or older gear that work well together.