I moved from lore s to tannoy. Very happy with tannoy.
Former Tekton owners: What have you moved on to?
I owned the Tekton Lore Reference for about a year and a half and they were great for the price. I ran them with a 50w tube integrated and it was a nice combo. For $750 I had no complaints except perhaps that the paint was cracking on one of the rounded corners. I ended up buying a pair of Gallo CL-2 for an office system on closeout direct from Gallo for $390/pair. After they were broken in I found myself listening to them more than the Tektons after awhile. I was getting addicted to the CDT tweeter.
Based on that experience I ordered the CL-3 refurbished for $650/pair shipped (crazy steal) and they were on a different level than both of the above. Sonically, one defining moment for me was listening to Joni Mitchell, Both Sides Now. (I think the Track was You’re My Thrill. )
During the intro there is a brief flute soli. With the Tektons it sounded like a really nice flute section that was very homogenous sounding and blended. With the Gallos I could hear each individual flute player and their unique tones and vibrato. The bass was also deeper and tighter on the gallos and the imaging was just amazingly holographic and wide and deep.
I know the timing of this is interesting as the Tekton hype train seems to be at full tilt right now with some of his higher models and I am curious to hear them. The 2 things that would give me serious pause and keep me from moving up the Tekton line are 1) the size and aesthetics 2) The very much "in your face" house sound that can get tiring to me. Just wondering what others have moved on to from Tekton and what they heard that moved them in that direction.
Based on that experience I ordered the CL-3 refurbished for $650/pair shipped (crazy steal) and they were on a different level than both of the above. Sonically, one defining moment for me was listening to Joni Mitchell, Both Sides Now. (I think the Track was You’re My Thrill. )
During the intro there is a brief flute soli. With the Tektons it sounded like a really nice flute section that was very homogenous sounding and blended. With the Gallos I could hear each individual flute player and their unique tones and vibrato. The bass was also deeper and tighter on the gallos and the imaging was just amazingly holographic and wide and deep.
I know the timing of this is interesting as the Tekton hype train seems to be at full tilt right now with some of his higher models and I am curious to hear them. The 2 things that would give me serious pause and keep me from moving up the Tekton line are 1) the size and aesthetics 2) The very much "in your face" house sound that can get tiring to me. Just wondering what others have moved on to from Tekton and what they heard that moved them in that direction.
196 responses Add your response
Went from Double Impacts (no upgrades) to Dynaudio Special 40’s and standard Tyler Acoustics D1X’s. I have since replaced parts and drive units in the D1X’s with Eton Hex Symphony II, Arcosia and SEAS Millenium. They are best speakers I’ve had so well worth the time and investment (total cost was below some previous speakers.) I still love the addictive Double Impact sound but I needed more refinement in my main setup and I don’t have the room for 2 pairs of big speakers. |
| Post removed |
They are ridiculous performers for the price. Srajan's 6Moons review from a few years back gives a good idea of what they can do. http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/gallo11/1.html |
I own a pair of the Gallo CL-3's. To look at them you would never expect such big, deep sonics to be produced. Very tight bass, wonderful midrange, and a huge soundstage. My only fault with them is the CDL is like a super-tweeter, highs are very extended and revealing. I've been toying with the idea of trying the Tekton Enzo's. My setup is in my living room (16' x 12'), and I need to limit the speaker height to about 40 inches. Reviews state that the Enzo images well and provides transparent and realistic sonics. I'm using all tubes. |
lowrider57 Are you running the Cl-3’s reverse polarity? Makes an enormous difference for the better in terms of smoothing out the freq response. Actually everything is better across the board. Anthony Gallo recommends trying it that way. IMO he should have made that mandatory. Run like this, the CDT tweeter is more revealing and smoother at the same time than the one in the Lore Refs. I found the highs in the Tektons to be pretty unrefined. Not sure which tweeter he uses in the Enzo. |
The upgrading of crossover parts and wire in the Double Impact speaker really takes the speaker’s refinement and sound to a whole different level. So much more potential than stock as an FYI. Best set speaker I have owned after about $2000 worth of carefully chosen upgrades. Easily bests my previous AZ Crescendo and Harbeth 40.1s. The design of the speaker is outstanding and The perfect speaker for A DIY guy to make into a very special music maker. I guess one could say I moved onto a highly modified Tekton DI. |
| Post removed |
@stereo5 Why would that be the case? If somebody likes the DI's then you, or anyone else for that matter, who has a different opinion is simply a different opinion. Not a big deal. I like my DI's for many different reasons sonically. I have also changed some of my components to better the sound and these do very well with changes. PC's, IC's SC's, as well as components all make a remarkable difference and are reflected in the sound. I have great bass, great sound staging and separation, very good detail, and wonderful sonics with tubes. I will also be modifying my speakers as well over time. Everybody has different ears and different sensibilities towards sound but the great thing here is the Tekton DI's respond so well to all changes. Regards, Greg |
| Post removed |
@stereo5 You made the comment about pissing off the "Tekton Fanboy" with your post and I responded to it. It wasn't off topic AND you don't even own the DI's, nor have you heard them so what is your point? You had a "Tekton" of some type and you didn't like it? You are trolling with your original post. Your post is is simply Gas Lighting. Regards, Greg |
By starting this thread, I was hoping to find people that liked Tektons and lived with them for awhile, but then found something they liked better. Since Tektons have very specific strengths and a unique sound signature, it's always interesting to hear what people bought after them. It’s also interesting to hear about the modded/upgraded Tektons. I certainly wasn't trying to start conflict. Thanks for the responses so far. |
| Post removed |
I went from tekton 6.5t monitors to ProAc studio 148. The 6.5t were on rigid yet minimalist linn / sound organization stands and are for sale in the Seattle area as shipping with stands are spendy. I remember many a great nights with those 6.5t monitors done nicely in macore cherry finish and the speakers that replaced them were easily 3x the cost. |
As a Tekton owner I find this thread interesting. Actually its more interesting than what is being said on the current long standing Tekton threads. Its sorta tapped out right now tbh. But to allow comments that can ignite emotions are not needed and shows a lack or maturity. Oh and to answer Stereo5’s question. It doesn’t upset me that someone likes a certain speaker more than a Tekton speaker. That’s probably not the answer you were hoping for. Sorry ;) |
I too will probably disappoint as discussing alternate speakers to Tektons not only doesn't piss off this owner of three different Tekton speakers but piques my interest. While I've moved up the Tekton chain from the Enzo's to the DI's to the DI SE's I find it interesting finding out what others speaker experiences are.....with Tekton and other speakers. I've often wondered what other HE speakers would be like, especially Tannoy or a modified Altec Lansing and I'm sure there's many more I don't know about that would interest me. Thanks to clarinet-monster for starting this thread, it should be quite interesting. |
I am a long-term Tekton owner. I have owned three Tekton speakers. I sold a early Fostex single driver model. It was terrific mini-monitor for office. I still own the Mini-Lore and Lore. They are really good speakers and perform well above their price points. They are now in my home theatre. I was lucky that my brother was moving to Europe and sold me his DeVore 0/96s and Harbeth SHL 5s. So, I haven’t exactly moved on. I especially trust grannyring, his ears and technical abilities. I will soon get a listen to the Tekton DIs and will make a decision on purchase. I will say the DeVore 0/96 will be very difficult to top. The DeVore's are wonderful speakers. Harbeth also. Best, mikirob |
@clarinetmonster2 Good thread topic. Speaking for myself, it is always great to learn and grow my knowledge base. Very helpful with downstream decisions and choices. @mikirob I auditioned and demoed the SHL5+ and both of Devore's: the O/93s and O/96s. All three are lovely speakers. And I would be happy owning any or all of them. : ) Having had the Double Impacts with the upgrade package, to my ears (and memory) and preferences the DIs outperform all three at least in ways that I value and prefer. The 96s clearly beat the 93s. They were well setup and run with premium Line Magnetic gear. For it me, it was a toss up between the 96s and 5+ (also run with good gear [Bricasti/Pass] and in a well setup room). Different speakers in not so subtle ways. For me, the 40.2s would be the correct target, but I did not get audition them. |
I had tried the Electron, but ended up returning them before the trial period ended, they were to replace my (vintage now?) B&O Penta's. In the end I preferred the Penta's smoother/more even range of sound, so I could not justify the $2750 for the Electron. To be fair, the Electrons were definitely clearer, but the B&O have better tone IMO. Call it familiarity bias if you like. I guess my old speakers replaced the Tektons? |
The cabinets are slightly deeper. Upgraded drivers, cross-overs, etc. They also come with a metallic paint finish (which is gorgeous by the way). And they are available through dealers like @audioarchon etc (which also accounts for some of the mark-up). NOTE: since you mention: Those are more than twice the priceWhen you add the metallic finish to the mix, the total cost is 6500 vs 4300 (sans grills). A 51% premium over the base DI, similarly finished. I recommend checking the Tekton website just to be sure on the pricing, specs, etc. |
This are my speakers andra1, Omega rs8 super cone , Technics monitor review by Herb Reichert, Diapason adamantes? Norh 9 modified, omega 3i, Wharfedale 10.1 And 10.2. Pioneer sb22 and 21. Since I bought the Tekton Impact Monitor I played them more than my other speakers, Sorry I can’t move on, Tekton all the way....👍 |
I believe he bought them. I just think he needed at least 100 hours of play or possibly worked with speaker position. Plus its seems he didn't like the look of them. For me it took over 175 hours for me to be comfortable with my Electons. But at the end of the day...DO I really care that he returned them?... NAH |
No I don’t care. Just want newbie aphiles to read about how important time and proper system matching to a speaker is. Takes time to get the best out of a speaker. Time and effort. Plopping a speaker in and listening for a few hours will never help one end up with the best sound for their ears and preferences. It will frustrate. |
Aniwolfe it’s clear, Maltuse saw them in the picture, So He knows how they look, It’s sad to waste shipping money to return them IF Indeed Bought the monitors, looking at his previous post .He understood that 24 hrs will not do it.I agree He miss the opportunity to have one of the best speakers for 2k maybe more., |
You’re right, I did waste huge money on shipping. Don’t get me wrong they had some positive qualities but the hype is just that, hype. I know a good speaker when I hear one and that was not it. They are unspeakably ugly as well. This becomes quite evident in real life much more so than you can tell from the website. The 24 hours was because I knew they wouldn’t work right away, no need for break in. Some really aggressive and arrogant responses to people’s opinions on this forum. |
I’ve had a Lore since early 2011 - was my main speaker for about 4 years. After 2.5 years, I fully rebuilt the crossovers and internal wiring with boutique caps and silver/teflon wire - bypassing the binding posts too. This took the sound quality up quite a bit in refinement. In early 2015 I went with Spatial M1 Turbo, which was a substantial step up IMO - exposed the Tekton sound to be a bit on the thin side, and much better soundstage. Later in 2015 I got a deal on some Daedalus DA-RMa V2 large monitor speakers. These were in turn another step up from the Spatial, with warm, natural, detailed, refined sound in spades. I’ve had the Daedalus for the past two years and haven’t found their limits yet - with many electronics upgrades yielding substantial performance increases over time. That said, I know Tekton presents quite a lot of value for money, and am really curious about the Deep Impacts - especially the upgraded versions. My current space is honestly on the large side for those Daedalus monitors. I could really use the Ulysses in my current space. So, I may have to give the DI SE a try at some point. Still have the Lores - they're great in the TV room, driven by a 2.5 watt Miniwatt S1 amp - great pairing that provides some valuable warmth and smooths out the hash from cheapo source electronics nicely. |
Oh and I would add that break in may be a real enough thing but it doesn’t change the sound that much, if a speaker is radically changing due to break in then there’s a problem. The only caveat with that are the magnepans which really do need serious break in. I know various “audiophiles” will disagree, but that’s my experience. |
@malthuse Look at genjamon’s post below yours and you will see a constructive way of helping people on this forum. What you said holds zero weight in my book. At least let people know in a mature way what the pro’s and cons are? How did they compare to your Maggies or Harbeths etc? Engage your audience! |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |
It seems a prevailing sentiment is, oddly, that one can say upon setting up a new speaker (like the Tektons) "It was immediately obvious how much better these were from my previous speakers!" But if someone says "It was immediately obvious these speakers didn’t have the qualities I was looking for" then, well, that’s called into question because what fool judges a speaker so quickly? Break in and all that. (Personally I always get a good reading on a speaker upon first setting it up. Yes further tweaking will dial things in, but the essential voice and qualities are immediately apparent and in my experience, remain throughout my ownership of the speaker). |
| Post removed |
@prof Its an interesting topic for sure. I think some reactions are driven by the joy and enthusiasm we get from a product. So when someone says they didn’t like it, we find it hard to understand. I just wish when someone likes or doesn’t like something, they can elaborate in a more interesting manner. " I owned Tektons impact monitor for 24hours and sent them back, yuck is all I can say. Hideous and they have bizarre signature sound. Moved on to Maggie’s, kef, and Tannoy prestige." |