Does the 'Buck' Start with the DAC?
I subscribe to the position that "Everything Matters"
As I consider front end choices, I'm trying to gauge if I should be leaning more heavily on a DAC versus a SOURCE (server / streamer).
Feedback and perspective from both camps, or any others, will be helpful. Thank you.
Please Note: I'm not looking for validation of the position that "only the bits" matter... I accept that some believe this wholeheartedly... and that's okay by me.
I guess in the lower price point, say <$2500 I would spend more on the dac. After that I would try different things. If I ever get to that. This one looks like a good start for a streamer. https://volumio.org/product/volumio-primo/ |
@atdavid - Reasons for "the streamer should not matter at all"? - Which DACs fit these criteria, according to you? Which streamers would you pair with them? I originally ordered an Ayre QX-8 DAC but was getting frustrated waiting so I picked up a used QX-5 Twenty for the same $$. It sounded great while I was waiting for my Roon hub and just running thru ethernet cabling. Once the Roon hub arrived and was connected via premium USB cable, its was noticeably and immediately better.. Since I did both "updates" at same time, hard to tell how much was the streamer and how much to assign to the cabling. Either way/ w/o changing amps or speakers or other cables, its was a quantum leap in SQ. I was shocked and very pleased. |
Hi,Sound wise the SSD is the best I have heard. Tidal and the built in CD
player are also excellent but the SSD does edge out any other format we
tested. Roon Stream is also excellent and the Wavedream Net is the best steamer we have tested but the SSD has slightly more air. So if you are asking me which I prefer, it is the SSD but 80% of the time I am streaming my music. Cheers, |
Hi David, Yes the Wavedream NET has both a Roon Core and Roon Endpoint/Renderer. It also has a very good CD player and can be ordered with a SSD. Sound wise the SSD is the best I have heard. Tidal and the built in CD player are also excellent but the SSD does edge out any other format we tested. Cheers, |
Hi, I have been very fortunate to hear many dacs with my Rockna server. Two weeks ago we had a Nagra HD ($30000) dac traded in on the Rockna Signature dac. The Nagra HD was a very nice sounding dac but is now sold. There are many people that purchase a Rockna WD Net server and keep their own dac. There are also many people that like the idea of a perfectly matching server and dac via i2S connection and a built in clock. There is no wrong or right but instead just personal preference. I recommend people just play and have fun with audio. If you have a great dac that you prefer than keep it and build around that dac. Cheers, |
The problem is finding a really good server/streamer that matches your dac properly. @worldwidewholesales Other than the matching components, within the brand...are there other approaches you recommend? For example, have some of your clients matched the Rockna Wavedream Net with other DACs? And to what outcome? Thanks. |
Hi,
First I want to be very clear and say that we are the North American distributors for Rockna dacs and server. Over the past 40 years I have had 78 different digital front ends. Lots of them were A/B direct tested and the best front end became my reference. I was in the camp that the dac made the biggest difference and that the dac was the most important digital piece of equipment until I got my hands on some very good servers/streamers. The server/streamer IMHO can have just as big of an impact on your system as your dac can. The problem is finding a really good server/streamer that matches your dac properly. From my experience, I prefer an i2S connection and a digital designer that builds their own dacs and their own matching server/streamer. The reason I like this is because the 2 pieces are designed to work together. I also prefer the clock to be built into the server/streamer, this saves you money. For
the record I do not believe there is a BEST when it comes to digital but
instead really well designed digital. The reason I say this is because I have
heard many $30000 dacs with average server/streamers that don't sound as good as a well designed $10000 dac
with the matching server/streamer. I understand in theory this should not be the case but when you get into the more expensive digital front ends, the server/streamer makes a huge difference and therefore must be considered as important as the dac. |
There is quite a bit of information available in the various reviews of players that suggests the quality of the player is important to the quality of the sound produced by the DAC. You can't expect a PC or Mac, or any computer with a hard drive to be as quiet, or sound as good, as a player, which is designed to minimize noise and interference in the signal transmitted to the DAC. But... I've found that the DAC makes a huge, huge difference in the sound quality of the combination. I have a number of both, and I've found the sound quality of the Bryston BDP-3 is about as good as it gets for the money (very quiest, very clean signal), and anything above that is likely diminshing returns. However, I've found the Schitt Yggdrasil is far and away about the best DAC available - just a whole lot more real / live sound, with all of the resolution, transparency, clarity and vibrancy and holographic sound that you will find at virtually any price. But, as you would expect, the rest of the system must be able to present the sound that it produces, including the player. |
@david_ten I have not heard about a GX Series roll out but I dont follow as closely as some. You may find a lot of info through this link: https://community.auralic.com/ |
I can answer that on behalf of @atdavid - simply by knowing ASR thought process and "proof": In terms of DAC: anything from China measures good enough. Example: Topping at $50 a piece Streamer: does not really matter. A Chromecast Audio at $35 will do |
@david_ten It's pretty well documented on the Auralic community board, and by statements made by the designer - Xuanqian, that the Aries G1/G2 provide improved SQ when paired with the Vega G1/G2 compared to using the very basic built-in streaming capabilities that come with the Vega DACs. I don't think the improvements are tremendous but there is general consensus that they are there, not to mention that much better functionality/buffering/etc of the Aries streamer compared to the built-in one on the Vega. That's one thing I have my eye on is looking for a good deal on a used Aries G1 to pair with the Vega if I can find it. |
Post removed |
Post removed |
@david_ten I really don't have much experience in the over $5K world of DACs but from all I've read the law of diminishing returns applies pretty squarely to them. I run an Auralic Vega G1 that I'm happy with and I know first hand that running an Auralic Leo GX Reference Master Clock through a Vega G2 is stunning in comparison to what I have but you'd need to spend close to $15K for that combo. For $5-6K I think you'd be pleased what an Auralic G2 or T+A DAC8 can deliver attached to a $10K source but I'm sure others may suggest there's value to be had a greater spends. I'm just not sure as my experience is limited. |
@thyname Understood. @three_easy_payments That makes sense. Question: Expanding on your example, if you go with a $10K Source what would you recommend the DAC spend be (using dollars only to serve as a proxy for performance/quality)? Asking because the equation weights very differently at lower price levels (in my experience). |