Everything that matters plays both formats, which are equivalent for all intents and purposes. ALAC is the Apple version of Flac, both free lossless formats playable on all modern equipment.
If there is any difference in playback quality it was claimed that it was in the different algorithms needed to decompress each. Either from:
As a person who evaluates algorithms for a living, I’d say that IF this were true it would be very much something that would be implementation specific. There are several major variables at play. |
It’s been a while since I had ripped to iTunes but I remember reading about and then making my own comparison between ALAC and FLAC. As @erik_squires says there was supposedly some minute improvement with ALAC but it wasn’t audible imo. I think the only reason to convert from ALAC to FLAC would be a concern that future players may not support ALAC |
Years back, when I just started putting cd into hard drive, I did not know about any of that stuff. So most are in. aac, it’s ok, when I listen for effect, I pop in a cd and relax on the couch with a triple dram and a frozen piece of granite or fire up the old trusty SL-1200 mkii.
Everything has been applelossless for several years now. darn,,another rant, thanks for wasting 3 minutes of your life, you will never get it back |