andy2
Responses from andy2
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... At least the author uses science and math. I didn’t realize how an objectivist can be fooled so easily. Just throw around some fancy equations and they will just bend over. | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... Are you a preacher? | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... Even $8K he has not justified. A quick search shows $10K for 0.05% accuracy out to 1MHz. OK, some misinformation here. You claimed your LCR meter can measure up to "0.05%" of accuracy. How does that equate to .004dB at 20MHz? Seems like a s... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... So yes, 0.05% is more than good enough for human hearing, or any practical manufacturing process. So basically you just pulled some number out of a hat without anything to back up. Kind of like a magician. So much for being an objectivist :-)... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... In my day job, we wouldn’t trust any equipment. We actually have to characterize equipment to make sure they measure what they advertise.Apparently, some here just google up some equipment and think they are good enough. $10K for 0.05% accuracy ou... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... A lot of the so called "objectivists" believe in some of the so called "measurement websites". They measure some frequency responses, some basic distortions and make some wild claims that nobody cares to check. It's funny how these "objectivists... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... . "Maybe the pup is still busy growing and learning Sartre." | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... Lols. You looked up my quote and got the one from Sartre. You couldn’t find it because it came directly from me. That’s why google couldn’t find it either Looks who still busy growing up. See that’s then intention of the quote. Here’s another one ... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... "People who are busy growing up seldom rock the boat" | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... ^^^ AudioVoodooScienceReview.com. I thought this name would be more accurate to describe them. | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... If Feynman couldn't explain it, what hopes are there for you guys to be able to explain it. | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... Insertion loss and return loss are relevant for RF in antennas and microwave but not audio in a few feet of wire. Since you're the data guy, I suppose you have data to back it up? Otherwise you're just talking out of your behind. | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... "By participating in a discussion regarding the existence of God you have proved you believe God". “The law of gravity and gravity itself did not exist before Isaac Newton." ...and what that means is that that law of gravity exists nowhere exce... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... Not sure why but Audioquest has a lot of hates from the "objectivist" bunch. Their dBS has generated a lot of ridicules.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLghg0QXPzs&t=37shttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf3Yez8WTz4It’s funny to see these frequen... | |
| So you think wire conductors in cables are directional? Think again... Legit curious question: What more than 1's and 0's constitutes digital signal?1's and 0's are the abstraction. There is really no 1 and 0 in real world data. It's just the voltage level. We assign a high voltage as 1, and low voltage as 0, bu... |