KEF Meta Reference 1's? anyboy heard them?


still seeking endgame speakers within non silly money territory, 

these things seems to tick all the boxes, right size for my room, good looking , and lots of local KEF dealers that offer deals below msrp

anybody have opinions on these?

I've had LS50 metas, the active version, was not super impressed with the sound as far as personal preference although I do believe they were an excellent product and absolutely outstanding value proposition

 

 

 

 

audiocanada

heard them the other day driven by a hegel H390 amp.  

recessed midrange, midbass coloration, poor bass depth and extension.  

at least the metallic treble was gone.  

not a fan of the KEF reference series and consider them some of the worst return on investment in audio.  

check out the Legacy Audio Calibre standmount.  blows the KEF away in every metric.  

@avanti1960 

Poor synergy of the combination. Don't discount the KEF, it's the Hegel. Just recently heard a Hegel integrated playing through a pair of Focal's. The Focal's sounded terrible. The Hegel is the common denominator!

BTW, heard a pair of the LS 50 Meta's thorough a Prima Luna integrated in a small room. I could not believe the bass that the little guys produced. We tested them against everything up to $5K, nothing compared!

I hope you are wrong about the Reference 1's, just ordered a pair!!

Ref 1 are primo, I owned a pair 5 yrs ago. Needed cash back, sold them a few months into it. Always regretted it. They're small but thunder with the right amp. 

I have only heard the Reference 3 but my thoughts align with avanti1960. Just shows you how important hearing things for yourself are. 
 

I would spend a little more and listen to the Focal Kanta 2. Or spend a little less and demo the Revel 226be (these would work in a small room close to a wall). I would run all of these with subs… If your open to use the Kanta 2/3, or Sonus Faber Olympica III would be in your price range and take up no more floor space then the Reference 1. A used pair of Wilson Sabrina is only a grand-ish more than a new pair of metas…


Nothing wrong with liking the kefs. I just felt they sounded hard (as in compression) and the bass heavily relied on the ports for output which made it sound “boxy” to me. I have a 20 year old Thiel 2.4 in my second system that outperformed the much newer Kef to my ear. One of my local dealers has Revels sitting next to the kefs, you would have a very hard time selling me the kefs. The Revels are cleaner, more open and play louder. 

It's funny how we all hear things. I owned the Revel Salon1 and heard the Salon2 several times. Whenever I heard the KEF Blade or Thiel CS3.7 I was thinking how much more I was enjoying the music over the Salon 1's.

I like the Reference 1 and the Blade the most from the KEF lineup. Looking forward to hearing the Meta.

BTW - I am under the impression that Revel no longer exists.