It's not likely to ever happen, but the study that would be needed to determine reliability of high end audio products compared to others would be very interesting. Do high end audio products in general determine the high end in regards to reliability to go along with the big price tags and thereby lower total cost of ownership and increase the value proposition? Or are they no better or perhaps even worse than the rest in regards to reliability?
Higher reliability would help offset acquisition costs and make higher price tags more digestible for me, but I am skeptical that this is the case.
I see no positive correlation between price tags and reliability in general based on my purchases over the years.
In fact, I would have to say the higher end pieces I have owned over the years have also proved to typically involve more ongoing costs for maintenance and repair than the rest.
For example, high end tube gear involves periodic replacement of tubes to retain the good sound. PRices of tubes, especially those suited for high end audio application seem to be on the rise.
The highest end amp I have ever owned recently went in for a repair. THis was the first time in years I had an amp go bad on me. THe repairs were handled efficiently and for reasonable cost by the maker though I must say.
The highest end CD player I ever owned was a Cal Audio Ikon MkII which went in for expensive repairs on several occasions. CD players, especially transports, have always seemed to be relatively problematic though I must say.
On the other hand, my Linn turntable has been going strong since bought originally new back in the 80's and has been one of the most reliable pieces I have ever owned.
