Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC?


Dear friends: who really needs an MM type phono cartridge?, well I will try to share/explain with you what are my experiences about and I hope too that many of you could enrich the topic/subject with your own experiences.

For some years ( in this forum ) and time to time I posted that the MM type cartridge quality sound is better than we know or that we think and like four months ago I start a thread about: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1173550723&openusid&zzRauliruegas&4&5#Rauliruegas where we analyse some MM type cartridges.

Well, in the last 10-12 months I buy something like 30+ different MM type phono cartridges ( you can read in my virtual system which ones. ) and I’m still doing it. The purpose of this fact ( “ buy it “ ) is for one way to confirm or not if really those MM type cartridges are good for us ( music lovers ) and at the same time learn about MM vs MC cartridges, as a fact I learn many things other than MM/MC cartridge subject.

If we take a look to the Agon analog members at least 90% of them use ( only ) MC phono cartridges, if we take a look to the “ professional reviewers “ ( TAS, Stereophile, Positive Feedback, Enjoy the Music, etc, etc, ) 95% ( at least ) of them use only MC cartridges ( well I know that for example: REG and NG of TAS and RJR of Stereophile use only MM type cartridges!!!!!!!! ) , if we take a look to the phono cartridge manufacturers more than 90% of them build/design for MC cartridges and if you speak with audio dealers almost all will tell you that the MC cartridges is the way to go.

So, who are wrong/right, the few ( like me ) that speak that the MM type is a very good alternative or the “ whole “ cartridge industry that think and support the MC cartridge only valid alternative?

IMHO I think that both groups are not totally wrong/right and that the subject is not who is wrong/right but that the subject is : KNOW-HOW or NON KNOW-HOW about.

Many years ago when I was introduced to the “ high end “ the cartridges were almost MM type ones: Shure, Stanton, Pickering, Empire, etc, etc. In those time I remember that one dealer told me that if I really want to be nearest to the music I have to buy the Empire 4000 D ( they say for 4-channel reproduction as well. ) and this was truly my first encounter with a “ high end cartridge “, I buy the 4000D I for 70.00 dls ( I can’t pay 150.00 for the D III. ), btw the specs of these Empire cartridges were impressive even today, look: frequency response: 5-50,000Hz, channel separation: 35db, tracking force range: 0.25grs to 1.25grs!!!!!!!!, just impressive, but there are some cartridges which frequency response goes to 100,000Hz!!!!!!!!!!

I start to learn about and I follow to buying other MM type cartridges ( in those times I never imagine nothing about MC cartridges: I don’t imagine of its existence!!!. ) like AKG, Micro Acoustics, ADC, B&O, Audio Technica, Sonus, etc, etc.

Years latter the same dealer told me about the MC marvelous cartridges and he introduce me to the Denon-103 following with the 103-D and the Fulton High performance, so I start to buy and hear MC cartridges. I start to read audio magazines about either cartridge type: MM and Mc ones.

I have to make changes in my audio system ( because of the low output of the MC cartridges and because I was learning how to improve the performance of my audio system ) and I follow what the reviewers/audio dealers “ speak “ about, I was un-experienced !!!!!!!, I was learning ( well I’m yet. ).

I can tell you many good/bad histories about but I don’t want that the thread was/is boring for you, so please let me tell you what I learn and where I’m standing today about:

over the years I invested thousands of dollars on several top “ high end “ MC cartridges, from the Sumiko Celebration passing for Lyras, Koetsu, Van denHul, to Allaerts ones ( just name it and I can tell that I own or owned. ), what I already invest on MC cartridges represent almost 70-80% price of my audio system.

Suddenly I stop buying MC cartridges and decide to start again with some of the MM type cartridges that I already own and what I heard motivate me to start the search for more of those “ hidden jewels “ that are ( here and now ) the MM phono cartridges and learn why are so good and how to obtain its best quality sound reproduction ( as a fact I learn many things other than MM cartridge about. ).

I don’t start this “ finding “ like a contest between MC and MM type cartridges.
The MC cartridges are as good as we already know and this is not the subject here, the subject is about MM type quality performance and how achieve the best with those cartridges.

First than all I try to identify and understand the most important characteristics ( and what they “ means “. ) of the MM type cartridges ( something that in part I already have it because our phonolinepreamp design needs. ) and its differences with the MC ones.

Well, first than all is that are high output cartridges, very high compliance ones ( 50cu is not rare. ), low or very low tracking force ones, likes 47kOhms and up, susceptible to some capacitance changes, user stylus replacement, sometimes we can use a different replacement stylus making an improvement with out the necessity to buy the next top model in the cartridge line , low and very low weight cartridges, almost all of them are build of plastic material with aluminum cantilever and with eliptical or “ old “ line contact stylus ( shibata ) ( here we don’t find: Jade/Coral/Titanium/etc, bodies or sophisticated build material cantilevers and sophisticated stylus shape. ), very very… what I say? Extremely low prices from 40.00 to 300.00 dls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, well one of my cartridges I buy it for 8.99 dls ( one month ago ): WOW!!!!!!, so any one of you can/could have/buy ten to twenty MM cartridges for the price of one of the MC cartridge you own today and the good notice is that is a chance that those 10-20 MM type cartridges even the quality performance of your MC cartridge or beat it.

Other characteristics is that the builders show how proud they were/are on its MM type cartridges design, almost all those cartridges comes with a first rate box, comes with charts/diagrams of its frequency response and cartridge channel separation ( where they tell us which test recording use it, with which VTF, at which temperature, etc, etc. ), comes with a very wide explanation of the why’s and how’s of its design and the usual explanation to mount the cartridge along with a very wide list of specifications ( that were the envy of any of today MC ones where sometimes we really don’t know nothing about. ), comes with a set of screws/nuts, comes with a stylus brush and even with stylus cleaning fluid!!!!!!!!!, my GOD. Well, there are cartridges like the Supex SM 100MK2 that comes with two different stylus!!!! One with spherical and one with elliptical/shibata shape and dear friends all those in the same low low price!!!!!!!!!!!

Almost all the cartridges I own you can find it through Ebay and Agon and through cartridge dealers and don’t worry if you loose/broke the stylus cartridge or you find the cartridge but with out stylus, you always can/could find the stylus replacement, no problem about there are some stylus and cartridge sources.

When I’m talking about MM type cartridges I’m refer to different types: moving magnet, moving iron, moving flux, electret, variable reluctance, induced magnet, etc, etc. ( here is not the place to explain the differences on all those MM type cartridges. Maybe on other future thread. ).

I made all my very long ( time consuming ) cartridge tests using four different TT’s: Acoustic Signature Analog One MK2, Micro Seiki RX-5000, Luxman PD 310 and Technics SP-10 MK2, I use only removable headshell S and J shape tonearms with 15mm on overhang, I use different material build/ shape design /weight headshells. I test each cartridge in at least three different tonearms and some times in 3-4 different headshells till I find the “ right “ match where the cartridge perform the best, no I’m not saying that I already finish or that I already find the “ perfect “ match: cartridge/headshell/tonearm but I think I’m near that ideal target.

Through my testing experience I learn/ confirm that trying to find the right tonearm/headshell for any cartridge is well worth the effort and more important that be changing the TT. When I switch from a TT to another different one the changes on the quality cartridge performance were/are minimal in comparison to a change in the tonearm/headshell, this fact was consistent with any of those cartridges including MC ones.

So after the Phonolinepreamplifier IMHO the tonearm/headshell match for any cartridge is the more important subject, it is so important and complex that in the same tonearm ( with the same headshell wires ) but with different headshell ( even when the headshell weight were the same ) shape or build material headshell the quality cartridge performance can/could be way different.

All those experiences told me that chances are that the cartridge that you own ( MC or MM ) is not performing at its best because chances are that the tonearm you own is not the best match for that cartridge!!!!!!, so imagine what do you can/could hear when your cartridge is or will be on the right tonearm???!!!!!!!!, IMHO there are ( till today ) no single ( any type at any price ) perfect universal tonearm. IMHO there is no “ the best tonearm “, what exist or could exist is a “ best tonearm match for “ that “ cartridge “, but that’s all. Of course that are “ lucky “ tonearms that are very good match for more than one cartridge but don’t for every single cartridge.

I posted several times that I’m not a tonearm collector, that I own all those tonearms to have alternatives for my cartridges and with removable headshells my 15 tonearms are really like 100+ tonearms : a very wide options/alternatives for almost any cartridge!!!!!!

You can find several of these MM type cartridges new brand or NOS like: Ortofon, Nagaoka, Audio Technica, Astatic, B&O, Rega, Empire, Sonus Reson,Goldring,Clearaudio, Grado, Shelter, Garrot, etc. and all of them second hand in very good operational condition. As a fact I buy two and even three cartridges of the same model in some of the cartridges ( so right now I have some samples that I think I don’t use any more. ) to prevent that one of them arrive in non operational condition but I’m glad to say that all them arrive in very fine conditions. I buy one or two of the cartridges with no stylus or with the stylus out of work but I don’t have any trouble because I could find the stylus replacement on different sources and in some case the original new replacement.

All these buy/find cartridges was very time consuming and we have to have a lot of patience and a little lucky to obtain what we are looking for but I can asure you that is worth of it.

Ok, I think it is time to share my performance cartridge findings:

first we have to have a Phonolinepreamplifier with a very good MM phono stage ( at least at the same level that the MC stage. ). I’m lucky because my Phonolinepreamplifier has two independent phono stages, one for the MM and one for MC: both were designed for the specifics needs of each cartridge type, MM or MC that have different needs.

we need a decent TT and decent tonearm.

we have to load the MM cartridges not at 47K but at 100K ( at least 75K not less. ).

I find that using 47K ( a standard manufacture recommendation ) prevent to obtain the best quality performance, 100K make the difference. I try this with all those MM type cartridges and in all of them I achieve the best performance with 100K load impedance.

I find too that using the manufacturer capacitance advise not always is for the better, till “ the end of the day “ I find that between 100-150pf ( total capacitance including cable capacitance. ) all the cartridges performs at its best.

I start to change the load impedance on MM cartridges like a synonymous that what many of us made with MC cartridges where we try with different load impedance values, latter I read on the Empire 4000 DIII that the precise load impedance must be 100kOhms and in a white paper of some Grace F9 tests the used impedance value was 100kOhms, the same that I read on other operational MM cartridge manual and my ears tell/told me that 100kOhms is “ the value “.

Before I go on I want to remember you that several of those MM type cartridges ( almost all ) were build more than 30+ years ago!!!!!!!! and today performs at the same top quality level than today MC/MM top quality cartridges!!!!!, any brand at any price and in some ways beat it.

I use 4-5 recordings that I know very well and that give me the right answers to know that any cartridge is performing at its best or near it. Many times what I heard through those recordings were fine: everything were on target however the music don’t come “ alive “ don’t “ tell me “ nothing, I was not feeling the emotion that the music can communicate. In those cartridge cases I have to try it in other tonearm and/or with a different headshell till the “ feelings comes “ and only when this was achieved I then was satisfied.

All the tests were made with a volume level ( SPL ) where the recording “ shines “ and comes alive like in a live event. Sometimes changing the volume level by 1-1.5 db fixed everything.

Of course that the people that in a regular manner attend to hear/heard live music it will be more easy to know when something is right or wrong.

Well, Raul go on!!: one characteristic on the MM cartridges set-up was that almost all them likes to ride with a positive ( little/small ) VTA only the Grace Ruby and F9E and Sonus Gold Blue likes a negative VTA , on the other hand with the Nagaoka MP 50 Super and the Ortofon’s I use a flat VTA.

Regarding the VTF I use the manufacturer advise and sometimes 0.1+grs.
Of course that I made fine tuning through moderate changes in the Azymuth and for anti-skate I use between half/third VTF value.

I use different material build headshells: aluminum, composite aluminum, magnesium, composite magnesium, ceramic, wood and non magnetic stainless steel, these cartridges comes from Audio Technica, Denon, SAEC, Technics, Fidelity Research, Belldream, Grace, Nagaoka, Koetsu, Dynavector and Audiocraft.
All of them but the wood made ( the wood does not likes to any cartridge. ) very good job . It is here where a cartridge could seems good or very good depending of the headshell where is mounted and the tonearm.
Example, I have hard time with some of those cartridge like the Audio Technica AT 20SS where its performance was on the bright sound that sometimes was harsh till I find that the ceramic headshell was/is the right match now this cartridge perform beautiful, something similar happen with the Nagaoka ( Jeweltone in Japan ), Shelter , Grace, Garrot , AKG and B&O but when were mounted in the right headshell/tonearm all them performs great.

Other things that you have to know: I use two different cooper headshell wires, both very neutral and with similar “ sound “ and I use three different phono cables, all three very neutral too with some differences on the sound performance but nothing that “ makes the difference “ on the quality sound of any of my cartridges, either MM or MC, btw I know extremely well those phono cables: Analysis Plus, Harmonic Technologies and Kimber Kable ( all three the silver models. ), finally and don’t less important is that those phono cables were wired in balanced way to take advantage of my Phonolinepreamp fully balanced design.

What do you note the first time you put your MM cartridge on the record?, well a total absence of noise/hum or the like that you have through your MC cartridges ( and that is not a cartridge problem but a Phonolinepreamp problem due to the low output of the MC cartridges. ), a dead silent black ( beautiful ) soundstage where appear the MUSIC performance, this experience alone is worth it.

The second and maybe the most important MM cartridge characteristic is that you hear/heard the MUSIC flow/run extremely “ easy “ with no distracting sound distortions/artifacts ( I can’t explain exactly this very important subject but it is wonderful ) even you can hear/heard “ sounds/notes “ that you never before heard it and you even don’t know exist on the recording: what a experience!!!!!!!!!!!

IMHO I think that the MUSIC run so easily through a MM cartridge due ( between other facts ) to its very high compliance characteristic on almost any MM cartridge.

This very high compliance permit ( between other things like be less sensitive to out-center hole records. ) to these cartridges stay always in contact with the groove and never loose that groove contact not even on the grooves that were recorded at very high velocity, something that a low/medium cartridge compliance can’t achieve, due to this low/medium compliance characteristic the MC cartridges loose ( time to time and depending of the recorded velocity ) groove contact ( minute extremely minute loose contact, but exist. ) and the quality sound performance suffer about and we can hear it, the same pass with the MC cartridges when are playing the inner grooves on a record instead the very high compliance MM cartridges because has better tracking drive perform better than the MC ones at inner record grooves and here too we can hear it.

Btw, some Agoners ask very worried ( on more than one Agon thread ) that its cartridge can’t track ( clean ) the cannons on the 1812 Telarc recording and usually the answers that different people posted were something like this: “””” don’t worry about other than that Telarc recording no other commercial recording comes recorded at that so high velocity, if you don’t have trouble with other of your LP’s then stay calm. “””””

Well, this standard answer have some “ sense “ but the people ( like me ) that already has/have the experience to hear/heard a MM or MC ( like the Ortofon MC 2000 or the Denon DS1, high compliance Mc cartridges. ) cartridge that pass easily the 1812 Telarc test can tell us that those cartridges make a huge difference in the quality sound reproduction of any “ normal “ recording, so it is more important that what we think to have a better cartridge tracking groove drive!!!!

There are many facts around the MM cartridge subject but till we try it in the right set-up it will be ( for some people ) difficult to understand “ those beauties “. Something that I admire on the MM cartridges is how ( almost all of them ) they handle the frequency extremes: the low bass with the right pitch/heft/tight/vivid with no colorations of the kind “ organic !!” that many non know-how people speak about, the highs neutral/open/transparent/airy believable like the live music, these frequency extremes handle make that the MUSIC flow in our minds to wake up our feelings/emotions that at “ the end of the day “ is all what a music lover is looking for.
These not means that these cartridges don’t shine on the midrange because they do too and they have very good soundstage but here is more system/room dependent.

Well we have a very good alternative on the ( very low price ) MM type cartridges to achieve that music target and I’m not saying that you change your MC cartridge for a MM one: NO, what I’m trying to tell you is that it is worth to have ( as many you can buy/find ) the MM type cartridges along your MC ones

I want to tell you that I can live happy with any of those MM cartridges and I’m not saying with this that all of them perform at the same quality level NO!! what I’m saying is that all of them are very good performers, all of them approach you nearest to the music.

If you ask me which one is the best I can tell you that this will be a very hard “ call “ an almost impossible to decide, I think that I can make a difference between the very good ones and the stellar ones where IMHO the next cartridges belongs to this group:

Audio Technica ATML 170 and 180 OCC, Grado The Amber Tribute, Grace Ruby, Garrot P77, Nagaoka MP-50 Super, B&O MMC2 and MMC20CL, AKG P8ES SuperNova, Reson Reca ,Astatic MF-100 and Stanton LZS 981.

There are other ones that are really near this group: ADC Astrion, Supex MF-100 MK2, Micro Acoustics MA630/830, Empire 750 LTD and 600LAC, Sonus Dimension 5, Astatic MF-200 and 300 and the Acutex 320III.

The other ones are very good too but less refined ones.
I try too ( owned or borrowed for a friend ) the Shure IV and VMR, Music maker 2-3 and Clearaudio Virtuoso/Maestro, from these I could recommended only the Clearaudios the Shure’s and Music Maker are almost mediocre ones performers.
I forgot I try to the B&O Soundsmith versions, well this cartridges are good but are different from the original B&O ( that I prefer. ) due that the Sounsmith ones use ruby cantilevers instead the original B&O sapphire ones that for what I tested sounds more natural and less hi-fi like the ruby ones.

What I learn other that the importance on the quality sound reproduction through MM type cartridges?, well that unfortunately the advance in the design looking for a better quality cartridge performers advance almost nothing either on MM and MC cartridges.

Yes, today we have different/advanced body cartridge materials, different cantilever build materials, different stylus shape/profile, different, different,,,,different, but the quality sound reproduction is almost the same with cartridges build 30+ years ago and this is a fact. The same occur with TT’s and tonearms. Is sad to speak in this way but it is what we have today. Please, I’m not saying that some cartridges designs don’t grow up because they did it, example: Koetsu they today Koetsu’s are better performers that the old ones but against other cartridges the Koetsu ones don’t advance and many old and today cartridges MM/MC beat them easily.

Where I think the audio industry grow-up for the better are in electronic audio items ( like the Phonolinepreamps ), speakers and room treatment, but this is only my HO.

I know that there are many things that I forgot and many other things that we have to think about but what you can read here is IMHO a good point to start.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Ag insider logo xs@2xrauliruegas
Downunder and Lewm.....I know quite a few guys over at the Vinyl Engine, that have told me that the AT15SS and AT20SS are great cartridges, with new stylus from LP Gear. That is why I was surprised when I asked question here, and was told it was not original, but made for LP Gear by AT. I couldn't believe it. So I emailed both LP Gear and AT, and got the same answer by both companies, that these are in deed NOS Stylii that LP Gear bought them all out from AT, and are Genuine, Original NOS, and a real bargain. Good Price. I was not in the conspiracy against LP Gear, I was trying to make sure there was no conspiracy. Ray
Rayr, Too bad I cannot just mount the ATN20SS stylus assembly and listen to it with no cartridge. C'est la vie.

Raul, I had already decided the MP50 would be nice to have, but I am going to wait until I addition my present "collection" before buying any more MMs or MIs, unless an AT15 or AT20 comes up. As you know, I have about 5 cartridges that I have not yet auditioned. By the way, what's with the MP500? By description it is identical to the MP50, only slightly more expensive.
Dear Lewm: +++++ " I have about 5 cartridges that I have not yet auditioned. " +++++

my God, I have dozens that I don't hear it yet. Lew buy it while it last, next month maybe you can't find it.

Btw, I never hear/heard the MP-500 but my " feeling " is that performs very similar than the MP-50.

regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Dear Downunder: If I remember you posted that own the Ortofon M20FL Super ( NOS ). Do you already hear it?, I'm interested in your experience with this cartridge.

regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Raul,

Concerning the ATML-160: "I know that it is not easy to say this but its quality performance is over the Empire 1000Ze/x or even tha Andante P-76 or Empire 1080Lt or Garrot P-77 or MMC2."

My post 'against absolutes' in this thread relates to this ongoing temptation and rush to announce "THE BEST". With NOS and the online purchasing that tends to apply to the MM's discussed in this thread, 'caveat emptor' cannot generally be applied but one can at least be circumspect in making and receiving recommendations, I think.

In fact, a critical underlying message from this thread must be that judgements of quality and value are relative (be it with regard to differing psychoacoustic expectations, system synergies or listening environments). At least that is what I take as a lesson regarding many of the frequently undervalued gems that are MM's.

Your opinion is still appreciated but...
Raul

yes I do have the Ortofon M20FL Super ( NOS ). But like Lewm, mine is sitting in a draw getting lonely as I have a couple of MM's not yet tried.

I only have one MM phono stage, so I need another one. changing tonearm cables is a PITA.

I will let you know after I listen. Do you have one as well??

BTW - have you heard a B&O MMC20EN Cartridge? Can a standard Ortofon P adaptor work with this cartridge?

cheers
Dear Downunder: Yes, I own that Ortofon and its similar brother the M20ESuper, build difference is on the stylus shape where the FL is a line contact the E is for elpithical.

No a standard P adaptor don't fit the B&O that needs its dedicated one. Btw that model is the second in that B&O series line where the MMC20CL is the top one. It is good cartridge but if you are looking for I will go for the 20CL.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Dgob: I don't know what you are trying to tell me through your last post.

When I give an opinion or put a post on any cartridge subject I almost do it because I'm sure on that subject ( certainly I can be wrong sometimes. ). Normally what I post everyone can try it or hear it just like the VTA on the 1080LT or the 100K on load impedance or many many other samples about.

To say that overall the ATML160-LC/OCC is a better performer than the MMC2 or other cartridges is a way to tame and to make a range of cartridge overall quality performance levels.

Do you know that Stereophile and other magazines have some kind of " criterium " to say wich audio item perform better?, that's why exist Class A or B or whatever.

As always my attitude is try to help and sayiong that this or that cartridge is better or not is not an absolute but a humble guide for any one of us just like I posted to Downunder on the B&O subject.

Anyway, like me anyone one read and take the posted information coming from any one where we think can help us and when not then we don't take it in count.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
I kind of agree with Dgob. There is a kind of "flavor of the week" quality to this thread, if you read it at one sitting. Two or three weeks ago the Andante P76 was all the rage, and already Raul has found something better. I do appreciate Raul's unending sense of adventure and his enthusiasm, and I would not want to inhibit him from continuing to inform us of his discoveries, but this is one reason why I am sitting on the sidelines re new purchases, until I have had a chance to audition what I already own. If something exciting comes up that is really inexpensive (e.g., less than $100), I guess I might pounce on it, but something like the MP50 costs "real money". BTW, there's a rave review of the MP30 over on VA today.
Dear Lewm: As always I respect your opinion. I don't like that " flavor of the week " attitude because certainly it is not on what I posted ( it does not matter that you see it in that way ).

After the P-76 comes the Empire 1000 and the 1080 and I don't say it were better than the P-76.
The reason that I posted that the AT 160 is even better than the P-76 is because IMHO it is and not because a " flavor week ".
Normally I don't " function " in that way. Certainly that the very high quality performance that shows many of these cartridges makes a little hard to ranking but thank's to my very long experience ( like many of you ) and tools on hand to do it I post on the subject with confidence for you can take that cartridge experiences and make with what you want it.

Lew, normally I'm serious in my comments on any subject and don't like to made/make a " lightly " comment that can't help any one. As I posted certainly I can be wrong on what I post but I always do it in confidence of what I think.

Anyway, please that this subject does not convert in a controversy and we can return to the thread.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Raul,

No controversy. I agree with Lewm perspective and that was all that I was saying. I also do not believe there is sufficient detail in many of the value judgements on cartridges being "better or best". These generalisations were my point.

Hope that helps
Dear friends: Reading here and there I find that the AT-160ML-LC/OCC was build in 1982, this is 27 years ago and this is a clear confirmation ( other one ) due to its very good quality performance against today cartridge designs ( any ) that or the cartridge today technology design is exhausted or with no single advance through all these years.
This could tell us ( a good news ) that maybe ( who knows? ) in a near future we can have a serious advance with the same cartridge technology ( this is up to today cartridge designers. ) or new cartridge technology that can surpass what we already have.

Now and returning on the AT 160 subject I find that performs the same with any kind of music and even with " difficult " recordings is very good.
One thing that help this cartridge and other MM/MI designs is its low distortions against other cartridge designs. As we go up ( step by step ) on the quality performance ladder as lower is the distorion on the MM/MI cartridges or at least shows lower distortion that we can't hear it.

Normally I like to try a cartridge not only with easy recordings where we can't " see " its real quality overall performance. I know that recordings like the 45rpm on David Bowie " Cat People " it is not only a kind of music that many of you don't like it but that you don't have the recording to hear it but many of these kind of recordings are really a deep/hard test for any audio system and that's why I use it to know the real cartridge performance.
These kind of recordings are very demanding not only because some of them are not very good recordings ( engeneering ) but because are heavy equalized ( this is mainly music for Discotheques. ) and were recorded in one side LP at 45/33rpm with wide dynamic range that is higher of what we hear/heard in our today Audiophile recordings.
If any one of you want to know how good is your system these recordings are a good source to know it because many of these recordings if your system is not as good as you think ( everywhere starting with your cartridges. ) you almost can't listening for more than three minutes ( 95db at seat position. ).

Well the AT160ML-LC/OCC makes not only listenable the recordings but appealing.

These are some of those recordings other than Cat People:

CHIC " Le Freak " ( 33rpm ) Atlantic DK4700
RAY Parker Jr. " Ghostbusters " 45rpm Arista 12-580
Marilyn and the Movie Stars "So disgraceful" AIM Records AIM12101.
Billy Ocean "Caribbean Queen" Arista JD 1-9215
Miko Mission " How old are you " Blow Up Disco BU 0032
Yvonne Gage " Lover of my dreams " Pinnacle Records PIN-102T
Laura Branigan " Self Control " Atlantic 0-86954.

From these recordings the one by Marilyn normally has a " opaque/deaf " sound, well with top performers like the AT160ML-LC/OCC that " opaque/deaf " sound almost disappear, very learning.

Just try it if you can.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Lewm,

In many ways, I have great respect for Raul's opinion. However, there are many variables that lead me (like yourself) to resist the temptation to contiue to buy new recommendations.

Raul,

As I said, this is not intended as a personal attack. We all have moments when the enthusiasm of hearing a new piece of kit leads us to want to shout its praise from the rooftops. However, the value of anyone's judgements can only depreciate if they continue to find a new best (as seems to be a sad consequence of the paid hifi commentators to whom you refer). Maybe it's just my old age but this does seem to be a lesson of maturity, for me at least. And I would personally rather the forms of reference which suggest aspects of better performance in a cartridge in relation to other specific individual cartridges (rather than generalised references to all cartridges - whether that be "all mm's" or "all mc's"?!).

Many will differ and that is great
Raul,
I remember you said that AT155LC is slightly lesser that ATML170 and AT20SS. I just checked the spec and AT155LC has notch better specs then AT160ML. I have the AT160ML body, but it was purchased with probably worn stylus. So, I can't compare them directly. But AT155LC sounds very good.
Dear Dgob: Here in México the people say: " that when bells are sounding and calling to mass/church service ( catolig ) some persons attend and other only hear the bells but not care about ".

Btw, I can't make a in deep review on every single cartridge I heard/hear, no way!.
If you believe what I say good but if not good too. I don't have the time ( sorry ) to analize every single " detail performance " on each cartridge and at the same time hear all the ones that are on " line ". Right now I have the Ortofon A90, Veruito and Ruby 3 that I'm testing, these cartridges are not mine. I wish the day has more than only 24 hours.

I'm different from you and Lew: I buy any single MM/MI cartridge that I " know " could be a good cartridge because maybe I can't find it in the future and maybe this is all about.
Lew speaks about big money on the MP-50 and I agree that it is big money against those bargains that we ( with luck ) can find like the P-76 but in the other side the Nagaoka price is a bargain against almost any LOMC cartridges that you and Lew and me and other people owns.
My dear friends: all of us can buy at least 10 " big money " MM/MI cartridges for the price of one top LOMC cartridge. That you want to do it or not is not the subject.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
In all honesty all those new Nagaoka MP-300/500 for over $500 and NOS Nagaoka ML30/50 for somewhat less looks like greatly overprice cartridge to me. Since, I'm still being able to get some of the top Audio Technica cartridges for less then $200 and original NOS styli are pretty much available for some. Looks like on MP-500 the stylus is glued and not indexed into cantilever hole. Correct me if I'm wrong.
the cheapest and greater surplice was Azden YM-P50VL cartridge, which I scored for $40. Very engaging on pop and rock with built in foot tapping abilities :)
Dear Siniy123: Please make sure that you read in the top of the cartridge that your sample is the same model than mine, I read somewhere and I can't find it that there were two 160 models: I can't say for sure.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Raul, When I made that "flavor of the week" comment, I by no means was thinking only of your posts. You were actually more laid back than many in describing the Andante P76, for one example. You are clearly the leader here, but sometimes there is bit of a group frenzy over one particular model of MM that lasts for a week or so then subsides, as one might expect. It takes two to tango, as we say here in the states. By the way, in reference to some statements above, if anyone has an extra Audio Technica AT15 or AT20 that they wish to sell, you can contact me privately.
Hi Lewm,I think most of the people who bought a P-76 already posted their thoughts on it's performance,and part of the "excitment" over it was the very low price.The reason you are not seeing more posts regarding the P-76 is they are now hard to find.I still use and enjoy my other favorite cartridges as well,one of my favorites was not mentioned much buy Raul or anyone else on this thread, a Signet TK9 with a TKN10ML III stylus.I owned an AT-ML170 at one time and the Signet is just as good In my opinion.I am very happy Raul started this thread,I never would have went back to trying the MM/Mi alternative without his input.
Dear Raul, All I can find on eBay is an AT15 stylus assembly, not a complete cartridge. Am I missing something?
Dear Lewm: There was a complete cartridge, the model was: AT15S that I can read on the cartridge at the top plate.
Now the auction finish, sorry.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Travbrow: I agree with you, the Signet is a top performer mine is the TK10ML2 and if I don't talk to much on it it is not because it was not a good cartridge but because I try it months ago ( when I give my opinion about ).
I know is very good so I will try again.

I understand that Siniy123 own this cartridge and he likes a lot too.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Lewm: Returning on the " flavor of the week " I think that this example can explain a little about:

suppose that you have on hand 4-5 LOMC cartridges that you never heard/hear it, say: Titan i, Xv-1s, Colibri, Orpheus and Condor, then you begin to test each one in a period of time of two-three weeks.
What do you think that will be the information of each one cartridge in your report?, well something like this is what is happening with many of my cartridges ( all new for me ) in the last weeks-months: almost all were first rate performers.

I'm not an easy " excited guy " in almost any audio area but when you try one after other top performer cartridge you have to share the experience in the way is happening with serious responsability.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Raul / Anyone

Have any of you heard MM's that are current production?

Like Ortofon Bronze, Red or Black for example, or Even the Nagoaka current series.

I would certainly be interested in their performance.

I think MM's might have some more relevance to others if they can buy them easily, not hunt thru ebay auctions with no warranties.
Dear friends: I was re-thinking on what I posted somewhere about the advantage of cartridges with integrated headshell.

I think that maybe there is no such advantage due to no hedashell wires connection because if you analize the inside cartridge body that goes at the very headshell front end must be connected in some way to the headshell terminals ( at the very rear of the headshell ) that connect to the tonearm internal wires and I think that this connection was made with internal wires, at least that's the way the ADC ones are connected.
If this is true for other headshell integrated cartridges then IMHO not only is not an advantage but a " little " dis-advantage due that with a integrated headshell the cartridge is " married " and we can't choose for a different headshell to achieve a different or better quality performance.

What do you think about?

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Raul, from what I've learned in the past 18 months I agree with you. One of the things I have learned/experienced is that the combination of arm effective mass, arm construction material, headshell material and headshell mass can have an obvious effect on a particular cartridge's performance. So I think it reasonable that there may be a particular arm that a particular integrated cart/headshell sounds fabulous on, and another not so much, even if the particular arms are theoretically matched well to the cartrige with effective mass.

If nothing else an integrated cartridge/headshell provides no easy means of optimizing mass for a particular arm. Have you experienced surprises along these lines, with an integrated cartridge and the array of arms at your disposal?

Jim
Raul, Yes, I think you have aptly described the process. Just like me with the Colibri. It is now my "flavor of the week", except that since I don't get to listen as much as you do, my favorite flavors last longer. I was just down at the Kennedy Center in DC to listen to a very fine jazz singer from NYC, Giacomo Gates. If you like vocalise, I highly recommend his music and sound. Unfortunately, I don't think he has any work out on LP. I bought two of his CDs tonight. Tomorrow he is giving a jazz vocal workshop which I may attend, in keeping with my other obsession - singing.
Dear Lewm: I hope you was lucky to win that auction.

Regards and enjoy the msuic,
raul.
Dear friends: THis is not only a great quality performance cartridge but very hard to find in this NOS condition, good luck.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Bang-Olufsen-B-O-MMC1-MMC-1-Cartridge-RARE_W0QQitemZ120482629912QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item1c0d530918#ht_500wt_1182

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Raul,

Besides the problem you mentioned with integrated headshells, many tonearms with detachable headshells have the wrong offset angle for optimum (Baerwald) alignment. With a separate headshell you can twist the cartridge to improve the alignment but this is not possible with an integrated headshell.
At long last, thanks to a rainy Saturday here, I finally got my MM system up and running. As previously mentioned, I am using a Lenco/PTP3 mounted in slate with a Dynavector DV505 tonearm running into an Ayre P5Xe phono stage set for low gain, then into my Atma MP1 linestage. I am now auditioning my Grado TLZ, which was the last non-MC cartridge prior to my adopting MCs in the late 80s/early 90s. I always felt in the back of my mind that the TLZ was superior to any of the HOMCs I played with for many years. I guess this is one reason why I never sold the TLZ and always took good care of it. But I had assumed that the expensive LOMCs that I had been listening to for the last 8-10 years were in another (higher) league. Now I am not so sure, but I have more listening to do. I warmed up the Grado by running thru bands 2a, b, and c of the Cardas test LP twice. Then I could wait no longer and I began listening with a Cassandra Wilson LP that I just bought and had been listening to with my Colibri. On the first cut, the sound was very underwhelming, but it got better and better from first track to last, and the gain increased, too. It was like waking up sleeping beauty, altho I am no prince. I went from Cassandra to a Johnny Hartman LP that is one of my own standard test LPs, because there is a piano accompaniment that is difficult to track and which sounds like an electric piano on most of the LOMCs I had tried, altho the Colibri had shown that the instrument was more likely to be acoustic type. With the Grado, there was no mistaking the piano for anything but the latter. The midrange of this thing is beautiful, open, clean. I am a bit staggered. I have many new variables to account for; I had never used a Dynavector tonearm, and the Ayre is new to me as well. But for now I am quite happy I embarked on this trip. BTW, the Grado is not a MM cartridge, really. It is sometimes called an MI type, but in fact it is an "induced magnet" type, if you read Grado's tech comments. I cannot find anywhere the recommended VTF for this thing. 1.5gm was clearly too little. 2.0gm tracks better, but I wonder if it can go even higher. If anyone knows the recommended spec, please tell me. Also, it was with the TLZ, way back in the early 80s that I first independently and serendipitously observed that 100K was a better sounding load than 47K, so I expect the sound to go up another notch when and if I modify the Ayre in that direction. (I want to get Charles Hansen's permission to do that.) If you can find a TLZ or an XTZ, I say try it.
Raul & contributors to this thread,

I've been using an expensive MC for about 8 years and it does make my AT OC9ML MK11, Denon DL103 and 103D sound kind of inferior but it's not worlds a part from my FR1 MK11 MC.

I've heard this MC sound any number of different ways depending on the arm and headshell it's in and so much for the manufacturers recommended 2 gram VTF. I just discovered that 1.75 grams is the magic VTF in my current setup.

Prior to that, the loading drove me nuts and I settled on 571 ohms. The manufacturer does not recommend a loading as he believes it's system dependent and I go along with that but knowing that it's not a "typical" MC that likes to see between 5 and 100 ohms helped.

It was "work" but the end result is an excellent tracking very neutral and well integrated presentation that the cartridge is known for and that works for me BUT---

A couple of weeks ago someone on the Vinyl Audio Asylum brought up the issue of MM versus MC and provided a link to this thread.
I had seen this thread before and I knew I had some MM's that I thought were "special" but I never devoted the time to see what they can really do compared to the MC I've been using for so long.

I finally took the time and tried some better old MM's in different arms and on different tables in some cases.
My Empire 4000/D111 sounded just OK in my Empire 598 BUT in an SME 3009 S2 improved arm mounted on a Thorens TD125 it came to life. PRAT plus detail up the kazoo with bass as good as the MC on a TD124 MK1. That made me wonder why people think idler drives are so superior to belt drives for PRAT and bass because so far my TD125 MK1 and 11 aren't that different from my TD124 MK1's and 11's.
I haven't gone to low capacity cables and a 100K load for the 4000D/111 but I do plan on trying that.

Then I tried a Shure V15 type 111 in the Empire 598 and it sounded just OK. Changing the stylus to an aftermarket one that may be an old Astatic generic with a Shibata stylus made a world of difference for the better so now I need to try a Jico SAS stylus.
The belt drive Empire 598 is lighter on the bass than the TD 124's and TD125's but not by that much.

I tried my Grace F9L and that sounded pretty darn good too but I haven't played with it much yet to see what arm/headshell it likes.

The problem now is that I like the MC I've been using, the Empire,Shure and the FR1 because they all do things right for me in my system. So I guess I'll be a multiple table listener and use the setup that suits my mood at the time.

The morals of the story are that it does seem that you don't need an MC cartridge to be in vinyl heaven and that arm/cartridge matching is VERY important and probably largely overlooked as being very important.
I found that althought a cartridge/arm combo may pass the tests on the HiFi News test LP it doesn't mean the cartridge will sound it's best in that arm/headshell.

I bought the OC9ML and both versions of the Denon 103 due to the "flavor of the month or year on the Audio Asylum but they just don't float my boat after hearing other cartridges.
My old Ortofon SPU leaves them in the dust and that's yet another sound that I can get into because it's so big and full with substantial detail for a .17 dia stylus tip.

Now the new Ortofon MM's are the flavor of the month but are they better sounding than some 15-20 year old MM's?
I don't plan on spending $400-$500 to find out but the advantage is that new styli should be readily available for some years to come or you can stock up now.
A NOS Empire D/111 stylus isn't cheap and a Grace F9L stylus sold on E-Bay for big bucks.

I also tried a NOS Ortofon 540 MM but it didn't do it for me as my first one had in another table with different speakers in another house some 15 years ago. I can only conclude that a table/arm change and/or speaker change plus perhaps a sonic taste change are in play.

The other thing I find interesting is that there's so much talk about using a mono catridge for mono LP's. My personal experience is that I like the sound of mono LP's played with a stereo cartridge NOT using the mono switch on the preamp. When I do that it seems to kill the "presence" or the 3D sound in lots of well done old mono's.

Dave
Dear Lewm: Good to read your really first experience with the " new " cartridge alternative, welcome aboard!

This is a good notice for you and IMHO the very good news is that the best wil/is coming when you test and enjoy the other cartridges in your MM/MI arsenal!

Yes, the 100K move/change is worth to do it.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Dean_man: Not really surprises but a new way of thinking on the integrated-headshell-cartridges.

I was ready to buy an ADC one but I stop to think if there is a real advantage on this kind of cartridge mounting design and I can't find any that could help me to achieve a better performance than with a stand alone cartridge.

I concur with you.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Lewm,

I have a Grado MCZ5 that I forgot to mention. I had it in an Empire 298 about 10 years ago and it didn't really make my feet tap so I ignored it for all these years other than to buy a new stylus for it a couple of years ago just in case I ever wound up using it again.

I've tried it in a few different arms and the midrange stikes me as being nice and full but overall I can't get it "just right" for me so I need to play with it some more.
It seems to be more critical of mass than the other cartridges.

In a conversation with someone at Grado a couple of weeks ago I was told that the Grados like an arm mass of around 14 grams.

In the literature that came with the MCZ5 it says that the entire "Z" series tracks at 1.5 grams and that they are not sensitive to capacitive load.

Dave
Dear Lewm: As Dave states the VTF for that Grado is 1.5grs. These are other cartridge specs:
channel separation at 1K: 35db and at 10K: 20db, output level: 2.2mv, stylus radius: 0.15x0.9.

They say is a Flux bridge design.

Now, I own the Grado Amber The Tribute that I posted elsewhere isa great performer.

Well I have on hand a letter/brochure by Joseph Grado where he speaks about this Amber cartrridge ( this brochure comes with the cartridge pack. ) and its technical design where we can read that the Amber is a descendant/improve of the Z Grado cartridge series where after 1.5 years of research/test he finally incorporate to a top of the line Z cartridge his " Optimized Transmission Line " patent design that he used many years before when he designed a MC cartridge.

In his words: " I sent out OPTIMIZED transmission line pic-ups to " Golden Ears " all over the world and did the final tunning using their ears as well as my own. I can tell you know that people do hear very accurately one to another and this enabled me to really zero in on the target. For the first time in more than 35 years of phono pickup design and manufacture, the reports came back unanimous, all raves, my concept of an OPTIMIZED transmission line transducer had been proven once again.

.......After that I'm sure that you will notice the spectacular improvement in the overall sound that no doubt will set new standards in the state of the art. "

I can tell that the Amber is worth to try it and I understand is a current model that is on sale ( I don't know why there and not on USA or other country. ) in Australia.

So I'm lucky to own it with out aware almost nothing on the Z Grado cartridge series that you and other people has in high praise.

I have to test/hear it again.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Jlin: Yes you are right and yes definetely there is no advantage on that kind of cartridge mounting designs.

Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
Raul,

Sorry, missed your response (been too busy working and actually listening to music). Anyway, yes:

"Many will differ and that is great"

Happy listening
Raul and Dave, Thank you for the information. My TLZ, after only a few hours post it's resurrection, is definitely not happy tracking at 1.5gm. (And now that I think of it, that was the VTF I used to use with it back in the 80s.) Perhaps this is because the suspension is still stiff after 20 odd years on the shelf. Right now it tracks much better at 2.0gm. Interestingly, Needle Doctor has NOS styli for the TLZ. If I decide I am really in love, I may buy one.
Raul, I had noticed your mention of the Amber Tribute back in your original post that started this thread. On a few occasions I have done a search for that model and found none for sale anywhere. Nor did I find any info on the cartridge itself;it's good to know that it is a linear descendant of the TLZ. Do you mean to say that the Amber is for sale in Australia, NOS? The current "Statement" line of Grado cartridges would seem to be similar in concept to the TLZ and Amber, with only 0.5mV output and a very low output impedance (3 ohms, I think). That also is enticing, but the price is "serious money" again.
Dear Lewm: I think that that Grado suspension needs a " refresh ", 20 years are 20 years!

The Grado Amber is a top cartridge and due that does not needs additional gain like the Grado Statement maybe is even better than this one.

Here you can buy it, is not a NOS but a current Grado model:
http://www.audiophile.com.au/product_amber.html

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Dear Siniy123: Motivated on your post and one from other person about the Audio Technica AT-155LC ( that I owned once and remember it as a good performer. ) I buy a NOS stylus replacement and a cartridge body, all these is coming so in around two weeks I could have the possibility to compare it with the great AT-160ML-LC/OCC, stay tunned.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Raul, $2800 for the Amber. Need I say more, even if it IS Australian dollars? I will look for a used one. How do you rank the Amber at this point in your odyssey, compared to cartridges you've heard since your original posting that founded this thread?
Dear Lewm: Remember that your TLZ was 500.00 in 1988, make your numbers.

I will test the Amber again and let you know.

Btw, I never see it second hand, good luck.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
LEWM,
I also own the Grado Signature TLZ, its a great cartridge, received many great reviews, and was used in many testing of eqiipment, such as speakers, etc, in the Absolute Sound and stereophile. Stylus is still available from grado himself, for $250.00, expensive, but an excellent cartridge. I think its better than alot of the new Grado Woodies. Ray
Thanks, Ray. It's good to have independent confirmation of my preliminary impressions. I always did like the TLZ and only went to an HOMC in order to be "in fashion", I guess. I do remember auditioning the next lower priced Grado model at that time, the MCZ. It was not nearly as good as the TLZ in terms of bass and treble extension, though it had a similar midrange. Choosing the TLZ over the MCZ was easy. Beyond that, quien sabe?

Raul, Good point about the cost of the Amber vs the TLZ corrected for inflation. During the time between the two cartridges, we not only had monetary inflation but also an inflation in the price of audio components that went beyond the dictates of the economy per se. I think there is a little of both factors in determining the cost of the Amber Tribute.
Hey Lewm,
A very good friend of mine, who has worked in many of the High End Audio Salons, mostly as their Turntable Setup Man, has had tons of experience with Tables, Arms, Cartridges, Pre and Power Amps etc...He has a $5000.00 Phono Stage, but at any rate, he has always hated Grado's and Grado in general. I lent him my TLZ about a month or so ago, and he posted alot of his fiindings on the Vinyl Engine, and admitted, that it was a completely different Grado Sound than what he was used to. He found that is was more like a MC Cartridge in that it was not so sensitive to Capacitive loading. But he stated that it was a very nice sound, and was surprised that a Grado could sound this good. That made me feel really great, because he is a perfectionist, and the evaluation was excellent coming from him. Ray
Dear Davev: +++++ " I had some MM's that I thought were "special" but I never devoted the time to see what they can really do compared to the MC I've been using for so long. " +++++

IMHO the key words in your statement are: " never devoted the time ", this is very important not only to " see "/hear the MM/MI alternative but to make comaparisons with other cartridge designs.

That very old Empire 4000DIII is something to hear to understand the MM/MI alternative and not only that but something that can make us think or ask: how is that this very old cartridge ( that in many ways is un-orthodox in its design especially in the way is mounted to a headshell. ) has so great specs and sounds so good?, an Dave even better at 100K.

Of course like you say and like we always " support " in this forum: with the right tonearm/headshell matching devices.

Those Denon's that you mentioned are in different quality performance league and far away from the MM/MI alternative.

Btw, I can't say if the Jico SAS stylus replacement is better than the one ( after market ) that you try with the Shure III but it is a real improvement and worth to try over the original Shure stylus.

Regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Raul,
There are alot of guys over at the Vinyl Engine that dont take your posts on MM/MI being any better than MC cartridges, mainly because they disagree with your loading of everything at 100K. They claim that that is plain wrong, and you are losing alot of what a cartridge can really perform like. Ray