Even if you were able to optimally place these speakers in any given room, you'll never be able to cure the lack of definition / damping / ringing that the bass suffers from. This is a built in design trait and unavoidable without making modifications to the design of the speaker itself. Some people may not notice this as they are used to listening to ported speakers. Until one hears tightly controlled low Q bass, "sloppy bass" sounds normal because that is what they are used to. In fact, speakers that actually display much higher levels of accuracy with low Q designs are typically referred to as being "lean" sounding.
On top of that, seated listening height DRASTICALLY affects the sound / tonal balance of this speaker, so one should be aware of this. This has to do with the geometry of the drivers and the radiation pattern that results. In order to achieve proper tonal balance, one would either have to be much taller than average and / or use a seat that is higher than most. Once you do this, then you'll be on axis with the tweeters and you'll see how bright and glaring that they really are.
Other than that, this is a speaker that offers a lot of visual impact for the money and received a great written text review in Stereophile. Many people will be fooled by these factors. Having said that, this speaker lacks design integrity and execution. This fact was displayed quite obviously in the published test results of that same issue of Stereophile. If one has well trained ears, their listening experience would confirm those test results, not deny them. As to whether someone likes this speaker or any other model for that matter, it is a personal preference and nobody can argue with that.
Having said that, it almost seems as if Legacy designed this speaker so that the brightness was balanced out by the "robust" bass output. Kind of like the "old days" of youth when many people cranked up the bass and treble controls or ran their equalizers in the "Flying V" or "smiley face" shape. This allows those that consider themselves to be "audiophiles" to eschew "bad things" like tone controls and equalizers. At the same time, they can still achieve a tonal balance that they find "exciting", "dynamic" and to their liking without resorting to "devices that distort or colour the sound". In effect, the same results are achieved, but done so with a somewhat "cleaner conscience". In effect, Legacy has been able to achieve a "sonic placebo" effect, sell gobs of products and smile all the way to the bank.
Like i've said before, buy and use what you like. You're listening to your system and making that an enjoyable experience is all that counts. With that in mind, others should take ANYONE'S comments or suggestions with a grain of salt. That includes me too.
Due to the high levels of divurgence from accuracy / neutrality in many systems, and systems that were built to please one's own personal preferences, what sounds good to one person in the confines of their system might sound horrible to another person in their system. Unless a system is built to achieve a high level of neutrality and / or the person making the comments has a preference for neutrality, any comments made are subject to personal interpretation and preferences. If one's opinions / comments can be compared and contrasted to "standardized test results", that at least gives you something to compare those comments / opinions against when forming a baseline for your own thoughts and opinions. Sean
>
On top of that, seated listening height DRASTICALLY affects the sound / tonal balance of this speaker, so one should be aware of this. This has to do with the geometry of the drivers and the radiation pattern that results. In order to achieve proper tonal balance, one would either have to be much taller than average and / or use a seat that is higher than most. Once you do this, then you'll be on axis with the tweeters and you'll see how bright and glaring that they really are.
Other than that, this is a speaker that offers a lot of visual impact for the money and received a great written text review in Stereophile. Many people will be fooled by these factors. Having said that, this speaker lacks design integrity and execution. This fact was displayed quite obviously in the published test results of that same issue of Stereophile. If one has well trained ears, their listening experience would confirm those test results, not deny them. As to whether someone likes this speaker or any other model for that matter, it is a personal preference and nobody can argue with that.
Having said that, it almost seems as if Legacy designed this speaker so that the brightness was balanced out by the "robust" bass output. Kind of like the "old days" of youth when many people cranked up the bass and treble controls or ran their equalizers in the "Flying V" or "smiley face" shape. This allows those that consider themselves to be "audiophiles" to eschew "bad things" like tone controls and equalizers. At the same time, they can still achieve a tonal balance that they find "exciting", "dynamic" and to their liking without resorting to "devices that distort or colour the sound". In effect, the same results are achieved, but done so with a somewhat "cleaner conscience". In effect, Legacy has been able to achieve a "sonic placebo" effect, sell gobs of products and smile all the way to the bank.
Like i've said before, buy and use what you like. You're listening to your system and making that an enjoyable experience is all that counts. With that in mind, others should take ANYONE'S comments or suggestions with a grain of salt. That includes me too.
Due to the high levels of divurgence from accuracy / neutrality in many systems, and systems that were built to please one's own personal preferences, what sounds good to one person in the confines of their system might sound horrible to another person in their system. Unless a system is built to achieve a high level of neutrality and / or the person making the comments has a preference for neutrality, any comments made are subject to personal interpretation and preferences. If one's opinions / comments can be compared and contrasted to "standardized test results", that at least gives you something to compare those comments / opinions against when forming a baseline for your own thoughts and opinions. Sean
>