Thinking out of the box here. It might make some defensive
I was thinking, that all the different wire constructions and purities is pointless if they are tied to a connecter. How can the signal carry the purist signal when it has to be compromised by the mercy of a connecter. Why not make a solid wire out of the connecter and use the bare wire for the connecter? Same end result. I’m not an engineer but it seems to me it would sound the same. Right? The end product is only as good as its weakest link. I’m beginning to think speaker cables are too over rated . I switched out my $1500 cables for some 10 gauge $20 copper wire with bare ends and I will say if there was any difference it was slight. I do know my amp doesn’t clip like it used too. And music is louder and more dynamic. I tried some 12 gauge and couldn’t tell any difference from the 10. And yes all the cable lengths were 8 foot. If you want the purist signal then you would have to take the wire and run it right through the speaker and bypass the terminals. So my question to the electrical educated members here is how can the signal arrive intact if it has to be transmitted through a connecter and then to the speaker terminals. It makes me think speaker wire is not all that important. I’m just saying. I don’t mean to be starting a war here.
I just spent the last three hours listening to a new set of cables from the same maker and the only difference is a change up from 16 gauge to 14 gauge and what a difference it made. Size matters.
One man answered an add for a music teacher. During an interview he revealed that he didn't teach music and couldn't even read notes, but he came to tell them they shouldn't count on him.
It is pretty much the same when somebody claims on cable forum that cables don't make any difference :)
Another man answered an ad for a music school. He was told that practice, or even holding an instrument, was unnecessary; all that was required was meditating upon the inner nature of the instrument.
Surprised by this, the prospective student quoted results from the neurophysiology of learning. He was told that science was a poor way to understand the world, and that the school was for those who had transcended reality.
"My point is why pay for all the fancy wire when in the end the signal
has to pass through a connecter and then a speaker terminal. Any
perceived advantage of pure exotic copper or intricate twisting of the
wire or insulators is a total waste."
Check out Enklein Cables especially the David, but hang on to your wallet.
I just want thank you all for the funniest posts on audio let alone cables I’ve read! I’ve gone to church and transcended reality, a big thank you for my happy moment.
Oh I use TimePortal cables as much as possible. I’m so into EMI/RFI control and am very happy with my gold plated terminals and the results. Bring on the music.
i'm sure you're right and it is so logical, also read the same from elsewhere... the only thing is to make sure your cable is properly protected from oxidation. i think we should all use bare silver/gold plated cable ends
This all just reinforces my decision to completely eliminate all cables and power cords and connectors. It’s called distortion avoidance. No more speakers cables, no more interconnects, no more house AC, no more Ground, no more power cords, no more digital cable, no more connectors. No more teacher’s dirty looks. 👀 And running low power completely avoids noise and distortion from large capacitors, AC ground issues, transformers and fuses since there, uh, aren’t any. You have to die and be reborn. What’s it sound like? Like heaven. Big things have small beginnings. There’s no substitute for signal to noise ratio.
Some posts suggest that their may be benefits to soldering your speaker wires directly to the crossovers in a speaker and avoiding the influence of the mechanical connection between speaker cable to the binding post. (The same exact logic should concern audiophiles at the amplifier end, off the PC board to the binding post on the amplifier face)
What is shocking to me is how many people say that "its a hassle" because they change cables often enough to make it problematic. And yet.....
You can't throw a stone in here without hitting posts that describe the huge efforts that need to be expended on speaker placement, room treatment, turntable set up, (plus many more topics) and all are items that "must be done" if you expect to get the most out of your system, and make audible and significant differences.
Seems that some kind of work is ok, and needed, but not other types? Or, are some people more closed minded than they want to admit?
It is not a silly discussion at all. From a technical aspect, the people that maintain you can hear significant differences between cables really have to admit that the material be it metal, wire, or solder between the crossover and the speaker wire likewise HAS to have an affect on the signal. Can everyone hear it? Probably not. Is everyone willing to experiment and take the time to SEE if they can here it? Probably not. Can you measure it? Probably not. Doesn't mean the difference isn't there for some people.
I'm reminded of my favorite story about situations like this:
A new Rabbi is confronted by leaders of two factions from his congregation. The first says... Rabbi, confirm for me that the tradition is to sit during the Shmah. (a prayer). The second says, Rabbi, confirm for me that the tradition is to stand during the Shmah.
The Rabbi is unsure what to do. He has seen it both ways, and wants to please ALL the congregation. He suggests they visit not the newly retired old Rabbi, but the oldest surviving Rabbi... still hanging on at the nursing home, and still of clear mind. They all go there, and crowd in the room.
They ask him: Is it the tradition to stand? "No" They ask him: Is it the tradition to Sit? "No" The young Rabbi out of exasperation starts up.... "But Rabbi, for years we have been arguing, bickering taking sides and.....
The old Rabbi brightens up, and exclaims loudly....
XY, I doubt if very many people doubt that differences between cables exist. I suspect that many doubt (a) the correlation between cost and quality, and (b) the bang per buck.
As has been mentioned, connectors do not share the same characteristics as speaker cables or interconnects. As long as there is a secure and clean connection, wither using quality spades or pins or just direct connect with the cable, IMO and experience that there is no good or ill affects of the connection/connectors, as related to the sonic qualities of of the cables or components. Over the past 40 some years as an audio enthusiast, even though I'm not a snake oil kind of guy, I've come to the conclusion that there is a difference in both speaker cables and interconnects and it's not necessarily a matter of biggest or most expensive, but the ones that are most sonicly invisible in your particular system and imparts the least amount of their own personality or coloration into your system. In this new age, where everything is going wireless, maybe the best cable is no cable.....Jim
Well I’d like to hear from an engineer that can explain how all that expensive weave in the wires and network boxes make a difference when it all ends up trying to go through a solid connector. I think that defeats the purpose.
Just imagine the effort to eliminate vibration from wire…a silly endeavor that some enjoy and/or profit from, and seems obviated by the items like crossovers, connectors, and wire inside your speakers. A vibration nightmare...The trauma occurring in my powered subs has to keep the paranoid anti-vibration maven up at night…and don't even mention "combo" (speaker and amp in one box) guitar amps…horrifying!
Neat article. I see why my 14 gauge speaker cables sound better than my older 16 gauge cables from the same maker. I wish I could afford the 12 gauge version.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.