13,846 responses Add your response
Jafant... I'd say 30-45 minutes overall. I believe the cabling was Cardas. I brought along my Astell & Kern AK100 portable player simply because it sounds excellent. Being so familiar and impressed by Thiel in general simply didn't warrant the expenditure at this point in time. There is no need for me to replace my 3.5's just because an opportunity to "move up" was geographically desirable. They are so damn good I'll require a true "wow" moment to pry them away from me. I've learned from past audio experience that I'm more curious than sensible sometimes, a trait that has me regretting letting go of my Pass X150.5 amp for...I forget what! Aaaargh! I will however continue to explore more Thiel as opportunity and disposable income make possible; I'm hooked. For now my 3.5's will carry on. Extraordinarily difficult speakers to beat. |
I was tortured by NY/NJ traffic to get to the place where the speakers were, but that's typical. Physically speaking they were as expected for their age with no deal-killer imperfections to be concerned about. We listened through an amp with a similar power rating to my current one, 300 watts per channel. The biggest difference I found was in the mids and highs which were different, not necessarily better nor inferior to my 3.5's. No mistaking they were Thiel; if my 3.5's were ailing or unrepairable I would have scoffed them up immediately. I could not justify replacing my 3.5's for what I can at best describe as a nuanced or subtle improvement. The bass was equally good, albeit not as deep as my 3.5's - that would not have factored in whatsoever given the aforementioned scenario. They were beautiful sonically. I cannot help but feel a little bummed by the fact that Thiel is no longer what it was as I write this. Knowing there is a "guy" with his name on the equipment is a reassuring aspect of owning good stuff. Thiel is great stuff |
Laughing... decisions, decisions oblgny. I for one, am very interested in your upcoming demo of the CS 2.4 speakers. Specifically, I am curious to read about your session and impression(s) compared to the 3.5s that you already own. Take your fave tracks or LP/CD/SACD for your demo. Pieces of music that you are intimately familiar, know upside and downside, to ease your experience. Keep me posted and Happy Listening! |
Tomic601,,,,I would advise to be careful of the tilt. Floors are generally not level, and the difference accurate alignment is ...especially on phase correct speakers... is very noticeable. Get a laser pen, put it on top of the left speaker, move it left/right to shine on the opposite wall. Put a post-it on that wall, mark an X where the laser is.....do the other side and raise/lower one speaker to match the X on the wall. |
@jafant As mentioned in Stereophile, Kathy Gornik sold to VC interests led by CEO Bill Thomas. Bill was succeeded by John Wittman, who was replaced this year by Thomas Malatesta(reportedly from Proctor & Gamble.) The current designs were done by Mark Mason(formerly of PSB), who is no longer on board. Ouch! It appears that at least final assembly is done in Nashville. Googling Mr. Malatesta, it appears that he is an investor and founder of a number of start-ups in audio streaming, smart phone, and cybersecurity technologies. With respect to Thiel, it's possible that he was taken on as a turnaround specialist. |
I was waiting to hear what unsound would say... For me, going from the CS2 to the CS2.4 was a no-brainer. There was enough bass extension and tightness to make the jump. The 3.5 (or 3.6) is tricker because of their aforementioned attributes. I'm not convinced I'd hear the difference at the top end, so it'd come down to the aesthetics of the slimmer design, smaller footprint, and refined craftsmanship. Oh, and having the cable connections at the back, instead of the bottom! |
Oblgny, the 2.4's will be smoother, more refined in the upper midrange/treble, the 3.5's are more coherent throughout, have deeper bass and is much easier to drive. http://www.stereophile.com/content/thiel-cs24-loudspeaker-measurements#koJxkckLClGEdits.97 Many, if not most would choose the 2.4's, I much prefer the sealed box 3.5's. |
It's times like these, when you need to revisit Louis Rossman's rant on YouTube for some giggles. https://youtu.be/SkR5lAl22kk |
I've been following the new Thiel store on eBay for sh*ts and giggles and their most current offerings indicate the smarmy direction the new ownership has taken. The description on the new model is utterly void of any technical information, offering only bad marketing copy that resonates best in mass market publications or cheesey websites. *Sigh* Can we get together a crowd-funded takeover attempt and preserve the legacy? All Thiel owners MUST crank it up this weekend! |
jafant... I believe I have the Veracity speaker cables from Goertz which I ordered directly from them over the phone. Again, I start at the beginning and go up the food chains from there. I had bananas on both ends which were a nice tight fit on the 3.5's - some of the other brands I've used tended to fall out of the connects on the speakers which I find is more a design flaw in their placement than it is the cables fault. (Remember, the speaker connects are on the bottom of the cabinets and one has to go through that small tunnel to make the connection.) I know later models up the line have the speaker connects on the back of the cabinet which IMHO is a far better placement. The Veracity line is about as wide as a piece of standard masking tape and as thin as anything I've thus far used. They require a little more effort in running them so as not to bend them drastically, other than that it's as simple as any other. As Thiel owners know in advance, Thiels reveal. EVERYTHING in the chain. The Goertz let everything through favoring the mids and highs, but the highs were never harsh. In fact, the upper end sonics is what I find most appealing about Thiel in general. Writing this, I am tempted to return the Goertz cables just to see if what I thought holds water after switching them out. The only thing I've heard, and through my guys at Audio Den, is that some people have suffered damaging their speakers due to current overload? Or something? I'll re-ask the question to them later this week when I'm in the store - they've expanded their LP "department" so I've been going there more often. The only cables I have not switched over to Transparent are the cables on my Marantz T-15 turnable which are hardwired into the unit. As I've said before my vinyl sounds fantastic on my current setup. I may switch out the Primare R32 phono preamp with a MF unit, one of those small phono preamps that I've had laying around forever, just to see if it's the Primare's impact. While my CD and server components sound good, the vinyl trumps them indeed. Just...better. |