Thiel Owners
unsound... Roger that. I just bought a Thiel eq off of eBay for $108 shipped. Lucky me. Per your suggestion I will contact Pass and explain the path I'd like to take. I'll also give a shout out to Thiel as well. Wow, "modded" 3.5's. I'm pinching myself. But a final word on that. I've mentioned before that I leave the eq in, largely because I figure that Mr. Thiel knew more about his design than I ever will. Secondly, by removing it I found the spatial characteristics became diminished. I did this blindfolded with assistance from my girlfriend on four separate occasions. It stays in. Thanks again. |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |
Nuttin' yet... The eq I bought in haste off of eBay is the wrong one. I'm watching the other one linked here now. <---is an idiot. Aaaargh. C'est la vie. PS: this Khozmo passive pre with the PL X150.5 does have some serious merits. I keep mentioning "articulate" when I espouse Thiel and/or Pass in general, and after having the Khozmo in line all week that aspect of both is affirmed. I switched my cables to anti-cable level ones all around which haven't quite asserted themselves yet. The Pass sounds noticeably better with at least 30 minutes of warm-in, and I've yet to make the meter wiggle but a hair, so I'm in class A all the time methinks. Articulate. Linear. Clean. At modest to moderate levels everything is simply there. It has taken me a long time to get to this spot and I am truly pleased as all hell. Once I find out if the Thiel eq modification will be do-able per unsound's suggestion, I'll consider myself done. Well, except for cabling of course. Enjoy the upcoming holiday weekend! |
| Post removed |
dlcockrum... I'll turn 60 before the end of this year so the prospect of switching out 60-75 pound amplifiers or even heavier speakers on the timetable I have been using has gotta stop! unsound's suggestion regarding mono-modding the eq's for my 3.5's is a much physically easier upgrade path for me - as are jafant's cabling posts. My choice of amplifiers IS done. Speakers? I most definitely would consider moving up to CS 3.6's if any become available. I would have bought a pair of CS7's listed here for $1750 but the gent wouldn't ship them. Anyone in Florida reading? The listing ended but...hoping he'll re-list. If yer down there scarf them up! |
| Post removed |
oblgny, Let me guess; you bought an eq for Thiel 3's instead of 3.5's? The 3.5's eq was a nice upgrade over the 3's eq. I have admit, considering how the eq works, the bi-wireable binding posts on the 3's would appear to be a good option with eq. On the other hand, Audiogon member Lrsky, who used to work at Thiel around that time has claimed that the eq works beyond the bass spectrum, which would negate that consideration. While I don't doubt the sincerity of his assertion, I haven't seen anything that would confirm it. Have you reached out to Pass Labs or Thiel yet? |
| Post removed |
unsound... Yes, I rushed in and bought the eq thinking it was the 3.5 eq - my error. I'm going to keep it anyway. I've been too caught up in business this week to contact Thiel. (I'm in the wine/spirits biz and the next six weeks are NUTS). I will do so tomorrow in the morning. I've read as much on the 3.6 m's as I have on my 3.5's and my curiousity regarding the 3.6's will bear fruit only by becoming geographically desirable. (I started out with 2's). Heck, I drove to Massachusetts to pick up my first pair of 3.5's. Finding a pair of 3.6 wouldn't make me trade off nor sell my 3.5's, either. Hell, no. jafant often mention's a system's synergy in describing his experiences, and for myself, for now and the foreseeable future, Pass and Thiel are the best I've had. Cables and perhaps preamps may still find changes depending upon circumstances, but Thiel and Pass are my reference points. They're locked. |
I have been reading the strong opinions about the 3.5 equalizer that I eliminated from my system by using a subwoofer so I tried it back in my system again. I get the same result as before. The midrange is a bit more veiled and the instruments, voices and over all image appear slightly larger, When I go back to my arrangement with the Velodyne sub and no equalizer the midrange seems cleaner and the bass is tighter. I would conjecture that the slightly larger image that the equalizer produces in my system is due to a lack of overall focus. I can't be sure if this would apply to all 3.5 systems because: a. I am dealing with room responses that I can't really alter; but others could; b. I have a 100-watt tube amp that may be bloating the boosted bass load from the equalizer that a larger, solid state amp could better handle; c. the tighter bass due to the massive solid state amplifier and active feedback in the Velodyne system may be doing less smearing and enlarging of the midrange image or maybe not; and d. the midrange driver is no longer getting carry over of the boosted bass through it's first order, 400-hz crossover. The Stereophile review of the CS3.5 has a graph of the equalizer response that indicates it only affects the frequencies below 300 hz so I question the notion that it is somehow improving the midrange response and image. In my situation i think it is an extra link in the signal chain that adds an extra layer of veil to the sound. So much to know, so little time. |
richardp01, I some how feel somewhat responsible for causing you some level of neurosis over the eq. Every room is different, and as Jafant has wisely noted, we all hear differently. Keep the eq in case you move. In the mean time, as I'm not in the habit of arguing with success, if it's working for you sans eq: enjoy! |
Nice banter- Guys! good to see everyone sharing info and experiences regarding their fave Thiel loudspeaker models. oblgny- Thanks! for the updates. Yes, your business does have a fast run as we round out 2016. Wine and Spirits are very popular this time of Season. I would certainly keep those eq- maybe another fan can use them. |
richard01- very insightful advice regarding wether or not to use an eq. Also, solid state vs tubes and the veiling of your own "sound", in your own listening space. We all have to try to figure out the factors that work. All listening spaces are different, all of our hearing / taste is different as well. Keep striving for the absolute sound- this is my personal quest. |
Jafant... Back to you. We know you're seeking to finalize your system around the Thiels "by 2017" but I don't think you've mentioned your current associated gear - and what is being replaced. I know you're considering Pass for amplification, but what else? Are you using a sub/considering one? Damn fine anchors these Thiels make, aye? |
| Post removed |
Jafant, are you sure about that short list for the Thiel 2.4 SE's? http://www.stereophile.com/content/thiel-cs24-loudspeaker-measurements#0RqHTvKEMC4Xqcgd.97 |
| Post removed |
| Post removed |
