Yes, I'm still around. My thoughts have changed a bit in the last twenty years ... there are some really good horns out there, and some dipoles too. Still trying to figure out how some of them work.
"The Art of Speaker Design" by Lynn Olson
Caveat: This is from 2002. Some of it is dated but much seems relevant. The writing is clean and sensible enough to make me want to post it. Yet it is from 2002.FYI.
I’ve not encountered this writer before. To my eye, a great explainer about speaker design; here.
The article explores the challenges and design philosophies behind speaker systems.
Summary of Key points:
The Future: Ideal speakers would use microscopic light and sound sources to create a perfect wavefront, eliminating resonances and distortions.
The Past: Early speakers (1950s) had limitations like boomy resonances and poor tweeter materials. Later speakers (1960s-1980s) focused on accuracy and neutrality but lacked the "sparkle" of earlier designs.
The Present: Challenges include:
- Difficulty achieving a realistic stereo image with only two speakers.
- Presence of coloration and resonances in all speaker types.
- Diffraction issues causing smeared sound and tonal colorations.
- Different people prioritize different qualities in sound (tone, immediacy, etc.), so the "best" speaker depends on your preferences.
Major Schools of Speaker Design:
- Flat Response (Objective Design): Focuses on minimizing resonances and achieving a flat frequency response through measurements.
- Pulse Coherent Dynamics: Prioritizes accurate pulse reproduction and time alignment, sometimes sacrificing other aspects.
- Minimalists: Use high-quality components and minimal crossovers, with less emphasis on measurements. Aim for a specific sonic character.
- Full-Range Single-Driver Systems: Offer simplicity but require complex driver design (e.g., Lowther).
The article concludes by acknowledging there’s no single "right" way to design speakers. It depends on the designer’s goals and how they choose to address the inherent challenges.