KEF Meta speakers vs non meta

I only had the LS50 and LS50 Meta. The Meta sounded better. Better clarity for sure. Maybe that was it, I do not remember all the particulars now. I do remember thinking that this was a nice upgrade.

My system was very revealing at that time so maybe that was a factor in me noticing the differences.

I was initially planning on getting the original Kef Ref 1 but the LS50 Meta and the KC62 sub seemed as good in my small room. The only speaker I liked more in the space was the Magnepan LRS+ with the KC62. The LS50 Meta was better with respect to clarity and detail but the wall of sound of the LRS+ was favored by me.

I have ls50s and ls50 metas.  The metas are a notch or two better. 

I also have the Reference 5’s non meta and was able to hear the Reference 3’s but not the. 5’s. We have a new dealer here and they are having some an event tomorrow evening and a KEF Rep is supposed to be there, so I hope to ask him a bunch of questions.

Curiousjim-I'd appreciate an update on what you learn and hear at the KEF event!

The magnolia the KEF rep sent me to did have a pair of Reference 3 meta's, but they weren't connected to anything and the network was down. I don't expect any better from best buy and it's really disappointing KEF chose them to carry their reference products.