KEF Meta speakers vs non meta


I have KEF Reference 5 speakers (non meta) and am happy with them.  But I can't help wondering if the Reference 5 Meta provides a noticeable improvement. Dealers near me don't stock either speaker so I haven't been able to compare them.  Has anyone?  Or, if not, has anyone heard the KEF Reference 3 Meta in comparison to the Reference 3?

 

 

brownsf

Showing 1 response by yyzsantabarbara

I only had the LS50 and LS50 Meta. The Meta sounded better. Better clarity for sure. Maybe that was it, I do not remember all the particulars now. I do remember thinking that this was a nice upgrade.

My system was very revealing at that time so maybe that was a factor in me noticing the differences.

I was initially planning on getting the original Kef Ref 1 but the LS50 Meta and the KC62 sub seemed as good in my small room. The only speaker I liked more in the space was the Magnepan LRS+ with the KC62. The LS50 Meta was better with respect to clarity and detail but the wall of sound of the LRS+ was favored by me.