After owning several SVS subs I think they're great for HT, but not for 2-channel. I owned the SB13 Ultra and SB 16. I changed back to a JL Audio F112 v2 and to my ears it has better, more articulate and defined bass. I recently switched to a REL Carbon limited sub, but I'm having problems with it being connected to my Jeff Rowland 625 S2 amplifier.
Keep SVS SB16 or change to REL S5 music only
Im only listen to music and having a SVS SB16. And i think its a little boomy sometimes. Maybe its the settings that are not dailed in.
Or is it bettet to change to a REL S5?
My gear is:
Mcintosh C500T preamp
Mcintosh MC452 amp
Lumin T2 streamer
B&W CM10 S2 speaker
SVS SB16 sub
Or is it bettet to change to a REL S5?
My gear is:
Mcintosh C500T preamp
Mcintosh MC452 amp
Lumin T2 streamer
B&W CM10 S2 speaker
SVS SB16 sub
13 responses Add your response
I’ve had the same experience. I recently had an SVS PB 12 / 2 plus and it was an absolute monster. Weighed 140 (?) pounds. Could barely move the damn thing. It sounded good, had all kinds of power and was pretty tight sounding. REL (T9i / Shmiko S9) has far more finesse. I prefer REL and am actually becoming a REL fanboy. They just disappear, widen the soundstage and clean up the mids and highs noticeably. If I had an extra $1000 right now, I’d probably buy 4 Sumiko S.0 and set up a swarm... I think that you may prefer REL over SVS. I don’t want to take anything away from SVS because I think they build great subs, especially the higher end stuff like the SB 16 and SB 13 Ultras, but from what I’ve experienced, REL is so subtle and refined with finesse. I have only used the descriptive “finesse” with REL... didn’t really know what finesse was until I got a T9i. |
Personally we would recomend instead upgrading the loudspeakers. The change in sub will not gain you much, a Rel is generally a tighter sounding sub then the SVS. We have the SVS Ultra 13 on the floor to try it out it was a trade in and it was a bit on the slow and boomy side, but it did move alot of air. Other subs from Paradigm, and a few others were better for music. However with that being said after looking at your system, the weak link is the B&W CM 10, going to a large speaker with deeper bass will sound way better and the sub will only have to add very little to increase that speakers bass output. So by upgrading the speakers you will make the subwoofer integrate better, and you can increase the system's overall performance greatly. Just food for thought. Dave and Troy Audio Doctor NJ |
n_brio, That's great that you like the RELs. I've owned SVS SB13 ans SB16, dual JL Audio F110s and a single F112 v2, HSU, Martin Logan Depth i, and now dual REL Carbon limited subs. I agree with b_limo, "They just disappear, widen the soundstage and clean up the mids and highs noticeably." I actually prefer JL Audio for HT, but absolutely love my RELs for 2-channel. |
Im only listen to music and having a SVS SB16. And i think its a little boomy sometimes. Maybe its the settings that are not dailed in.Report this Nice to hear you found a satisfying presentation. Was this the SVS SB16 Ultra? Did you find the SVS setup procedure overwhelming or simply inadequate to dial in your desired tone? |