Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10

I would mostly agree with your post till you used the word boring. The inventiveness used by the greats always stuns me. I almost always am rewarded with something new when listening to the masters!

 I don't really know what to say. I normally like Ms. Nah. At least Ulf was good.

Been listening to this recently. Sam Rivers with Miles Quartet. Everyone including Rivers in great form.

I think that he has the right to speak his mind and new blood is welcome no ?

 

And anyway it is a shame Youn Sun Nah the korean jazz/pop/folk singer is not more known ... She is more than simply talented.... It is a versatile singer like Joni Mitchell was...A true artist...

And why not Elena Frolova , a less impressive voice, but a no less impressive poet.... But here we are no more in jazz for sure...

I apologize...

i listen geniuses nevermind the genre anyway....I quit listening genre and style only long ago...Any great musician will do even chinese one, jazz or not... :) 😁😊

 

Then welcome to anyone who dare to speak his mind...

Or is it a closed club?

By the way i always spoke for myself and dont appeal toward an invisible crowd for help to attack someone, especially newcomer...

Sorry but i spoke also my mind...

We are all friends here and may differ of opinion, this is a good thing....Not a reason to throw stones to anybody....

I like discussion a lot with reason....

I am dismayed at the number of people that stay stuck on the old classic names.

I will only add that i love classic in jazz because i dont know all of them by far....

Then my only criterion isnot new versus old jazz, but genius versus more ordinary....

Then i differ with our new guest on this point....

 

 

 

 

 

 

Was that a gauntlet I heard drop?   The man has been on the site 2 days and this is his second post!!  Surely you Aficionados will not stand for this outrageous assault.

Cheers

I am dismayed at the number of people that stay stuck on the old classic names. Not that they aren't worthy. For heaven's sake I started out on those same albums back in the 60s but if I had stopped there I would never have heard musicians like Furgison, Brubeck, and others, Also there are a huge number of new albums coming out that are great. Now I know that a lot of the music is someone trying certain songs from out of the history books to show their proficiency, but it doesn't have to end there and even with those oldies, there are newer ingenious ways of doing them that make a newer artist stand out in the crowd. One example of such an artist might be Youn Sun Nah. Now she does generic old songs and sounds just like everyone else UNTIL you run across tunes like her Jazz rendition of "Ghost Riders in the Sky' (the live version is 100 times better than the album version) and a few other songs she cuts loose on. There are things she does with her vocal cords that should be Illegal. I know of one jass site that lists most new albums out and they have many new ones every day. Literally Hundreds of albums just in the first half of this year. I have a small collection of albums (2000+ with over 700 artists) that I have come to find the old stuff Boring and am constantly looking for that new voice that is so much different than anyone else.

Paul, few pages back I have posted Paul Desmonds concert in Canada, if you do not have it, check it out...there is also a 7 cd edition of it...this one is double cd, on Verve, great sonics

 

Hello Alek hope your having a great summer. The 7 disc set is 300 bucks on Discogs so I settled for the 2 disc set

 pjw, I don’t think it is the odd meter tunes that cause some to be luke warm about Brubeck’s music

Hey frogman thanks for your take on Dave Brubeck and co. 

pjw, I realize I'm commenting among the heavyweights here, once frogman joined in.  But I'm a big fan of Brubeck individually, many of his quartets, and particularly when accompanied by Morello.

pryso your input on Brubeck and co. is welcomed as much as the frogman

 

Its interesting how the both of you mentioned the "white factor". I remember when I read Art Peppers great autobiography Straight Life that Art mentioned numerous times throughout the book his altercations with Afro American jazz musicians because of him being white. This was such a regular occurrence that Art developed a deep resentment towards black jazz musicians which did not subside until much later in Arts life after spending some years at San Quentin Correctional facility and sober houses.

Art had a great resurgence in the 70's and he and the great black pianist, George Cables, collaborated on the majority of Arts output as a leader during his "comeback" period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yesterday checked the hystory of his posts, he has not posted anything since the end of the last year. Hope he is ok. Have not seen @schubert posting anything also. Again, if you guys are reading any of this, just give us a proof of life,,,

Paul, few pages back I have posted Paul Desmonds concert in Canada, if you do not have it, check it out...there is also a 7 cd edition of it...this one is double cd, on Verve, great sonics

 

Oldies but goldies?

Milt Jacksn with James Moody, Cedar Walton, Ron Carter and Candy Finch, live at the Moma 1965.

 

 

pjw, I realize I'm commenting among the heavyweights here, once frogman joined in.  But I'm a big fan of Brubeck individually, many of his quartets, and particularly when accompanied by Morello.

In fact I've posted "Castilian Drums" here previously.  I respect many other jazz drummers but if picking a single favorite to listen to it would be Morello.  His rhythm is relentless and impeccable, as frog pointed out.  But for me it is also his melodic and creative playing.  There is continual inventiveness, not repeated and boring.

Being a Brubeck fan for decades I've thought about the controversies of his popularity.  No doubt some of that is the "white factor" frog suggested.  But I believe the biggest issue was his popularity itself.  I think possibly some other jazz musicians resented his success in record sales and concert attendance.  And some jazz fans felt he couldn't be that great when he was acknowledged by non-jazz fans.  From both sides, he was so "in" he was "out"!

Frogman I have a Paul Desmond box set that I listen to often. IMHO Desmond's tone on the alto is more distinguishable then any other alto player.

I know I could take a blind listening test and choose Desmond as the player every time.

 

pjw, I don’t think it is the odd meter tunes that cause some to be luke warm about Brubeck’s music.  In fact it is those tunes that became his best known.  I think it is more the fact that Brubeck’s music had a distinct feeling and way with swing.  It was very much in the West Coast style of Swing, not quite the same amount of swagger and feeling of the Blues that East Coast Jazz has.  Some have referred to it as a bit “white”.  
 

Paul Desmond is one of my favorite alto players and for me he was always the main attraction of Brubeck’s band; a band that while not my absolute favorite, I enjoy very much.

I must confess i dont like usually much many drummers solos.... These one are more music than "drummers solos"....This is why i like them Morello and Roach ...

Thanks...

 

I apologize for being provocative at time....

Hello frogman hope you are enjoying the summer so far.

As a "casual listener" of Brubeck I was wondering if you own the great album Dave Brubeck Quartet at Carnegie Hall 1963.

 

Morello drum solo (over 10 minutes) Castilian Drums is a long standing favorite of mine as is the whole album. Funny thing about the great Brubeck Quartet is many jazz aficionados do not like them.

Do you think its because of Brubeck’s compositions which have many variable time signatures like 11/9 for one. I have always liked the band and think the Paul Desmond, Eugene Write and Joe Morello are all outstanding professional musicians just like their leader Brubeck.

Lastly thanks for the great Max Roach clips

 

pjw, that Joe Morello clip is outstanding. Being a rather casual listener of Dave Brubeck’s music I confess that I did not have enough appreciation for Joe Morello’s playing. I’ve always thought he was great, but I didn’t realize that he was GREAT. His time is remarkable; it just doesn’t waiver. If only due to physical fatigue, if one listens closely to most extended drum solos one can usually hear a bit of time lag. Not here. To accomplish that while being creative and musically logical on that level is phenomenal. Thank you for that.

On a conceptually more modern style (not necessarily “better”), Max Roach could do that:

 

 

 

as has been mentioned and recommended often in posts here, i have really been enjoying kenny wheeler, especially what now? album with potter holland et al

lovely lovely music, wonderful recording

Post removed 

Very interesting post! thanks....

 

Classical for me is like Tai-Chi....Jazz is like real martial art....

In Indian music the mix between improvisation and planning is balanced , it is why this style is so deep....

None is inferior though in any musical styles......

 

Each musician is a personnality and the life of a classical musician is not the same life than a jazz one in any written novel....

Chet Baker or Miles Davis dont look like the usual classical musician ....

How Baker or Miles did their practice? They play all night in a bar drinking ....

How did Murray Perahia did his practice? Alone in a room....

And between our two hemispheres one goes looking his internal map, the other one wait for the unrecognized around him....

Any musician can chose to be anything he want , he is free but habits are also masters....

We are programmed by ourselves...

This is at the same time our freedom and the limit of our freedom...

Our brain obey our heart, but when the heart has set his choice the brain take the habit seriously....

Any jazz musician can play jazz, or the reverse, but they win usually at one game or the other....Keith Jarrett being an exception....

 

But remember like said frogman that the greatest musicians were master at improvisation....The crowds came to see them improvising and were amazed... For example Bach walking kilometers to listen Buxtehude improvising, or Bruckner so amazing at organ improvisation that people dumbfounded claimed that he was Bach reincarnated....Bruckner was born the greatest organ improviser before learning how to compose... Remember Paganini mesmerizing audience in a trance by violin improvisation so flabbergasting people thought he was possessed by the devil.... Listz and Scriabin after him founded modern piano music by improvisation on the spot also.....

 

For example the Vivaldi phrasing style is so remarkable, that we know right on the spot that this priest with a special permission from the pope to interrupt a mass to play music, improvized so easily, that he said that he was "able to compose more speedily than for someone to transcribe anything written "....

 

Reality is a complex matter, the brain, too and the heart only is simple because he is the master of his two slaves hemispheric servants...

Musicians improvise or play a written score because their heart said so at the times they chose....

 

**** All I saying is Classical has thousand times more music than jazz ,****

This is true; as is all you wrote. Important to keep in mind that Classical music has been with us over one thousand years if one includes its earliest forms while Jazz is barely one hundred years young.

Classical Music and European history have a similar track.  When the Catholic church ruled Europe, everything was about God.  Or more to the point, their  interpretation of God.  The Classical composers followed the monetary support.

The combination of Martin Luther, and much later, 1LT Jimmy Europe, and the U.S. Army, NY National Guard, 369th Harlem Hellfighters Band, changed everything for good.   And for the good.

 

Cheers

I think both Jazz and Classical are worthy and deserve respect.

 

That said , Classical was about God from around 1200 and was still that to the days of Bach, Mozart and Schubert and Brahms and many, many thousands more .on the way.

I love Coltrane {and his wife)but if he never told what his music was you not know what it was. Religious .

 

All I saying is Classical has thousand times more music than jazz ,

And until WW1 had more to do with society than other music or "music"

Seems irrelevant when I read both Jazz and Classical are 5% of music sold together.

My rich friend says the last Classical Concert will be Beethoven 9 in 2056 in Tokyo .

I say we’ll all be cooked by then . Excuse my bad writing ,

P.S. The Lutheran National Choir is very good as is a hundred others in the Twin Cities . No joke .

I think music is, ultimately and from the start, a musician language and all musicians are able to TRANSLATE one idiom to another one ...

Human culture in spite of his manifested differences is universal....Consciousness is one...

Then jazz, classical, or Indian or Chinese music are understandable by any musician on earth and by any listener...The greatest discovery of the last century was the inter-translation and influence between all specific cultures and revealing that in essence  there is only one with many communicating  facets...Then so much precious is the center of any tradition to be what it is, so much precious are the area of contact between them...

The musical interplay between playing a tune or a symphony , or improvising and creating a new one is a musician matter...

Music is musicians heart affair and there is no absolute frontier between lovers...

And, let’s not forget that improvisation is not unique to Jazz. Less so today than in Beethoven’s time (since he was mentioned) when it was more common, but Classical music has a long tradition of improvisation. Many Classical works (concertos) include a cadenza which is to be improvised in the style of the written music. Just as in Jazz where players follow a set of chord “changes” as the basis for improvisation, some of Bach’s keyboard works include a prelude in which elaborations of chord progressions are to be used for improvisation.

coltrane1

There is zero comparison between jazz and classical.

You just made a comparison right there.

As others have noted, there’s considerable overlap. Players such as Adam Unsworth can move effortlessly between the two. He doesn’t reserve certain notes for one style or the other.

Well, I could preface my response with “With all due respect…”, but I have to ask myself just how much respect someone who comes in like a bull in a China closet to preach in an insensitive and ill informed way deserves. But, I digress….so, I will instead try and educate you…a little.

You could not be more mistaken. First, there IS a “Classical music for Aficionados” thread already, in which many of the contributors here also participate. Now, more importantly, your premise is mistaken and shows an immature understanding and attitude toward the music which is the focus of THIS thread and music in general. It is not true that there is “no comparison” to be made between Jazz and Classical. There are, in fact, many comparisons to be made between the two. The most obvious being that harmonic concepts in Jazz are rooted in Western Classical music. That is a basic and important fact that anyone who would dare to identify via his moniker with the name of one of the giants of Jazz should understand. I would also point out that if you truly understood what Coltrane was all about you would know that Coltrane himself would be the first to point out what I just wrote.

Much more to say related to the above, but I won’t waste any more time unless I know there will be receptive ears. Given the attitude demonstrated so far I would not bet on it. I would say that Jazz and Classical and all that comprises their respective compositional and performance practices have a fair amount in common. I would also say that while they may be neighborhoods apart, they certainly are not “worlds apart”.

Stick around, here and also Classical MFA. Some very insightful folks lurk about.

which was rooted in slavery.

 

I disagree. I have never ever heard a blues tune make even the slightest reference to Slavery. The Blues is about Women, Whisky, sex and hard times. Topics that are all universal in their appeal. Anyone can and do have the Blues at some point.

Classical and Jazz are both considered Serious Music.  Pop / Rock /Rap  / Metal etc... are all throwaway genres.

 

Folks hear, Black folks, The South, and they always think slavery. There is more to it than that. Next thing you know, using this silly commonplace logic, the music of Ellington, Monk, Mingus et al. actually came from Africa. That’s called the BIG LIE.

Cheers

There is zero comparison between jazz and classical. They are worlds away from each other. Start a Classical for Afficianado’s thread. 
 

The birth of jazz is rooted in the blues, which was rooted in slavery. That’s not Classical. When you’re immersed in Beethoven you’re not thinking about Stan Getz or Ray Brown. 
 

I appreciate Classical as much as anyone. But Jazz stands on it’s own. 

Schiff forever , said the same I said 65 years ago, Rock etc, etc, etc are NOT music

 

I’m no genius or anything , ! But when I bought a few Schubert records in the 60’s

at 99 cents in U of M bookstore , I knew nothing about Schubert other than a lady in store said he was great .

I went home and played on AR turntable , no one else there ..

The first thing I heard was the"Winterreise" with Fischer-Dieskau , I really belive that God knew that was the best for a Vietnam vet ,at least this one..

How else could  I know Schubert was so Human .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'James Clay only led two record sessions before settling in obscurity in Texas, where he would not be rediscovered until the late '80s. Cannonball Adderley helped present him on Riverside in 1960, so it seemed fair that Clay utilized several of Adderley's sidemen on this session (cornetist Nat Adderley or vibraphonist Victor Feldman, bassist Sam Jones, and drummer Louis Hayes) along with a young Gene Harris on piano. Clay splits his time between his lyrical flute and tough tenor, proving to be an excellent bop-based improviser.'

 

 

I kept asking myself, “7000”? “7000? What the hell are these guys talking about?”Took me a while to realize. 7000 posts! Has it been that many? Has it really been more than twenty years that I’ve been here? How time flies!

Anyway, thank you guys for your comments and for the shared music. It’s a pleasure to exchange ideas about the gift of music with true music lovers. Best to all!