The nice thing about tube gear is just by changing tubes one can realize a sonic improvement! This is not possible with SS gear. |
Or living hell. But you can always go back to living heaven.
Any tube change will have different sonic outcome even same brand, same year, same week or day, same type.
Tubes are so.
G |
Wonderful musical system.Enjoy! |
Thanks to all, particularly EBM-so gracious!
I believe the Matsushita 7DJ8 is simply a nicer tube than those spec'd by Manley which were JAN Philips 6922's. Before buying a brand new ARC Ref 6 from a local AD I had an Audioprism Mantissa preamp for over 12 years and did a ton of tube rolling with it. In my experience the JAN is a polite solid 6922, an all-rounder and a good choice by Manley. In my system the 7DJ8 provides a bump up. Greater air, extension, and palpable grip. Not warmer per se but more meat on the bones. |
Love your post! One has to remember manufacturers use tubes that will be reliable in the long term, not so much for sound quality. No owner of tube equipment wants early or unexpected tube failures but these can and do exist and if it’s under warranty, they want readily available tubes.
Most tube equipment manufacturers encourage tube rolling but at the customers expense for good reason.
Have fun! |
The 7044s, or any of the several congeners of the 7044, in the Steelhead are not "rectifiers", first because 7044s are dual triodes, not rectifiers, and then because they serve as White Cathode Followers in the Steelhead, which is just a fancy cathode follower. Cathode followers convert voltage to current while dramatically reducing output impedance and adding no gain to the signal. (Which is why it makes little sense to sub the stock tubes with very expensive equivalents.) The low output impedance of the cathode follower then makes it possible to drive either the volume control in the Steelhead, if it is being used as a full function preamplifier, or the outboard linestage, if the Steelhead is used as a phono only stage. In the case where you are using it as a full function preamplifier, there is a cathode follower that drives the volume control and then a second identical cathode follower that is driven by the volume control and outputs to the amplifier. So, the output stage sequence is: CF - (coupling capacitor) - volume control - CF - (coupling capacitor) - amplifier. That’s why, if memory serves, there are two 7044/6922s per channel, one for each White CF.
The 7DJ8 is by all accounts a nice tube, but bear in mind that it is designed for a 7V filament supply, not the 6.3V supply that is standard for filaments of most dual triodes and which is present in the Steelhead. Fortunately, it works on 6.3V, apparently.
For the single amplification tube per channel in my Steelhead, I substituted some Siemens CCa, happily, but I won’t say it’s a night and day difference from OEM tubes. I made some changes to the output section I described above, in terms of the output coupling capacitors, that made a much bigger improvement in SQ. Note that the signal must flow through two coupling capacitors on its way out to the amplifier, if you use the Steelhead as a preamplifier. |
Lewm, thank goodness I did not post about Covid and Peter Lederman. Thank you for your elucidating post.
And, I do not use my Steelhead as a preamp. See my second post. Or not. |
I used 7DJ8s in my Herron preamp and enjoyed the exact same benefits as you. I would suggest buying multiple sets as they didn’t last more than 18 months in that application. Totally worth it though. Love your gear! |
Just out of curiosity, in the Herron what tube type does the 7DJ8 replace? |
I forgot to mention that I think the Steelhead is a great unit, made greater by a few mods. But if you are using it as a phono only stage, then my upgrades would do less for the SQ. The very same CF and coupling capacitors that couple the output of the phono section to the volume control, when the Steelhead is used as a preamplifier, are instead diverted to connect to the output RCA jacks, when you use it phono only. Therefore, you could consider upgrading only those coupling capacitors, if you care to do so.
|
@lewm Cathode followers convert voltage to current while dramatically reducing output impedance and adding no gain to the signal. (Which is why it makes little sense to sub the stock tubes with very expensive equivalents.) My experience is that changing tubes in a cathode follower position does have an impact on sound. I tried different tubes in the cathode follower on my old Jadis preamp - the change in sound was significant. Similarly with my Marantz 7 - for example long plate mullards sound quite different to flat plate Telefunkens in the cathode follower position. I would also assume low noise, matched sections would be an advantage, particularly if the cathode follwer tube is shared between channels. What caps did you upgrde to in the Manley ? |
You know what, Dover? I wouldn’t argue with what you say about CF tubes. When I wrote what I wrote, it might have been in spite of my own experience. At least where I got rid of a 12AU7 and replaced it with any electrically similar substitute, e.g., 6CG7, 12FQ7, ECC99.. I’ve done that more than once and always thought it beneficial. The fact that the CF provides no gain would lead one to believe otherwise. But I don’t know about for example replacing a 6922 with a more expensive 6922. At least I wouldn’t bother. |
Lest I be chastised as I was once before by Dover, for suggesting incompatible tube substitutions, I hasten to point out that although the 6CG7 and 12FQ7 (and the 6FQ7) are identical to a 12AU7 in electrical parameters, one cannot blithely sub them for a 12AU7 without first doing some very minor re-wiring of the tube socket. You would also need to know that your unit supplies 6V to the filaments, in which case the 6FQ7 would be the choice, not the 12FQ7. On the other hand, the ECC99 has the very same pin-out as a 12AU7 and can be plugged into a socket wired for a 12AU7, but the ECC99 has a higher transconductance and lower plate resistance than a 12AU7, which only makes it an even better CF.
|
