Current or Previous Harbeth Owners…

My pre purchase comparison was The Revel Line of Speakers and Harbeth. I overwhelmingly preferred the Harbeth sound and presentation. Within that group I compared the Super5+, the M30 and the C7ES-XD. I was able to hear them with equipment similar to or the same as mine. For me the C7ES was the clear winner. The best soundstage and clarity. In comparison the M30 was too dark and lacked openness although it was quite accurate and the Super5 was a little too bright and while it offered slightly more low end I still preferred the openness of the C7. I listen to Classical, Jazz , Pop. The C7 blends perfectly with my Accuphase Amp, Aurrender Streamer and MSB DAC all of which have a similar warm, and open sound with excellent clarity.

I have owned Super HL5 Plus, and currently have Compact 7-ES3 30th Anniversary and P3ESR SE.  A good friend had the 40.2 and sold them.  I was baffled when he did, they were amazing.

There's always something "better", but at their price point, Harbeths are hard to beat.  It's going to come down to what you prefer. 

I replaced the Super HL5 Plus with KEF Reference 1.  The KEFs are a little more detailed and dynamic, without being bright.  With a little more laid back electronics, I may have liked the Harbeths better.  I have also owned Stirling LS 3/6, which are very similar to the Super HL5 and were close to, but not quite as good as the Super HL5. 

Even though they are a "lower" model than the Super HL5, I liked the Compact 7-ES3 30th Anniversary even more.  They seemed more cohesive and had less tendency to be bright.  

The P3ESR are amazing, but really made for a small room or near field listening.  I absolutely love mine and while I never say never about swapping out any component, it's unlikely they will ever leave.

The 40.2 are simply amazing - the tone, timbre, and texture of the music along with their ability to fill a room make them really special.  Imaging is great and they can create a very large soundstage.

Rockport of course! 

Back in the 1990's I owned a pair of Harbeth HLP3ES bookshelf speakers with a matching pair of Harbeth passive subwoofers. Did not care for the subwoofers but I did like the HLP3ES, which was a very pleasant sounding speaker.  I do, however, prefer the sound of my 1980's KEF Reference Series 101 bookshelf speakers, which I find to be more involving.  I also owned a few pairs of Rogers LS3/5A's, another lovely British bookshelf speaker, as well as an original version of the Linn Kan. The KEF 101's still sound best to me.  

I do not know your Harbeths, but become increasingly convinced there is so much to improve upon in front of any transducer in the way of not only equipment, but power conditioning and cabling.  My transducers (3 years now) continue to improve markedly as power cables and interconnects break in.

I've invested considerably in equipment stand, floor stander platforms, wall outlet and of course room treatment.  I believe many of us go down the rabbit hole chasing ghosts.  Those Harbeths being quite good may well have not reached full potential with what's in front of them.  Or, I could be wrong.  Cheers

Have I heard speakers that impressed me enough to consider a possible replacement for  my M30.2 XD’s?

Yes and No …. Let me explain …

NO: Nada at its speaker current pricepoint nor even if you double it and a bit more,…..

YES ….. but only at significant multiples in speaker price-point step-up AND (a fine and important distinction …) a stablemate many multiples price step-up for the rest of the upstream audio system electronics . (My system is in the $40k - $50K range ) 

I found YG Carmels were more enjoyable/musical than M30.2s in a medium sized room powered by Luxman L-590 AXii. Not by much though, and they’re 3 x more expensive. Harbeths are hard to beat, depending on what you listen to. In the same room I preferred M40.2 to Magico A3 with Luxman separates. In my current room I prefer Focal Kantas. Not as natural on voices but all around better soundstaging, bass and highs; more linear. Musical enough, and easier to pair with amplification. I haven’t had the M40s though in my current room, only the M30s. I’m sure if I had the right amplification and set up there’s a good chance I might prefer the M40s to the Kantas.

If you’re thinking about M40s, just make sure your room is big enough.  My original room was 14 x 21 feet, and while the 40s sounded great in there, ultimately they were just too big, too much bass.  I went from the 40s to the 30s in that room.  

I previously owned 40.1's and 40.2 Anniversaries.. preferred 40.1's fwiw.

NOPE!
 Only the Sonus Faber Toy Towers I had even come close to the performance of my current M30.2Xd's & even those were not quite as transparent through the midrange...