Contemplating DEVORE SPEAKERS (and others)....LONG audition report of many speakers


Told you it was long!

I figure what the heck, some people may find all of it interesting, maybe only some, maybe none.  No one forced to read it.  So onward....

Folks,

I've had Thiel 3.7s for several years and love them dearly. As I've mentioned in other threads, I have to downsize simply due to some ergonomic and aesthetic issues in my room - the speakers have to go partially by the entrance and so any big, deep speakers tend to get in the way.

Over the last two years or so I did a whole bunch of auditioning of many speakers over a year ago to find a replacement - Audio Note, Audio Physic, Focal, Raidho monitors, JM Reynaud, Paradigm Persona, various Revel models, Monitor Audio, Proac, Kudos, Harbeth, Joseph Audio...

I was going to give a report on all of them individually, at one point, but it's been a while so I'll just throw out some thumbnail impressions. They aren't meant to be particularly descriptive of the sound so much as brief reasons as to why I enjoyed or moved on from those speakers. I always sought the best set up achievable for an audition, but of course that's still not like being able to tune a speaker in one's own room. So caveats given, on with some brief impressions:

Audio Note:

(I forget which exact model but it was in the "quite expensive but not impossible" zone for me)
Excellent clarity. Good impact. Nice woody tonality (as in does wood instruments like cello, stand up bass etc with a convincing tone). My main issue is that I could really hear the corner loading aspect of the sound, especially in the lower mids down. Not that the bass was incontinent per se, more that I was just aware of the way the illusion of the bigger bass and sound was being created, in terms of using wall re-enforcement.

Also, I'm a real stickler about instrumental tone and timbre. I've always found that the more room you introduce into the sound, especially in the upper frequencies, the more it will tend to cast a scrim of room sound over the timbre of voices and instruments, homogenizing the most delicate aspects of the timbre. As the Audio Notes pretty much require or are meant to use the room, this was an aspect it would seem hard to get around. (That's one reason I tend to like speakers that will work closer to my listening position).

Audio Physic:

I'm very familiar with the AP sound - have had the Virgos, Scorpios and Libra in my home and heard much of the line through the years. The Avanti was terrific, tonally neutral sounding, clear lively treble without ear piercing. And of course their magical disappearing act, which I love.   But didn't have enough of the richness I'd become used to with the bigger Thiels. I suspect the larger Codex woud be killer, but they get in to the too deep/large category.

Focal

I've always found Focal to have a "look at me" sound to their tweeter. Nonetheless I often admired the rich tonality of their large speakers at audio shows. Unfortunately I never found this to transfer to their smaller stand mounted speakers. They struck me as more clinical and left me cold. Recent Audition of the Kanta 2 still had the "check out our TWEETER!" Focal sound, but was smooth and vivid enough.   Unfortunately to my ears sounded too "hi-fi" with disjointed bass.   My Thiels at home sounded far more organic and believable.

Raidho

Listened to the tiny X1s which were remarkable performers for their size. Super clear, clean, open, killer soundstaging, good snap on drums - represented Joe Morello's solos on Brubeck at Carnegie Hall far more convincingly than any tiny speaker has a right to. Ultimately, too small.

Dealer had a killer deal on the larger C 1.2 stand mounted speakers and I had hope there. I have never, ever liked a ribbon tweeter with cones because every time I hear the discontinuity. I'd say the Raidhos are the first time I did not hear that discontinuity. So it was all that air and delicacy without the usual drawback. However, I'm thinking part of the magic for this has to do with their house curve, which isn't flat but has a "concert hall" dip in the upper mids (I think). Ultimately I tended to hear this as a coloration, a recessing of a portion of the sound. I'm used to the Thiels which at my place are phenomenally linear sounding top to bottom. So there would be percussion instruments, piano parts, and other instruments that would be more distant and subdued on the Raidhos, losing some of the realistic liveliness. I didn't really hear more detail than I was used to from my Thiels, found the sound a bit "grayed" tonally, though rich in the mids and upper bass. These things KICK in terms of upper bass presence and sound much bigger than they are. But I also found that a slightly over-bearing.

In fact, that's a problem I often have with monitor speakers. So many of them are engineered to sound bigger than they are so you don't feel like you are missing base, but the goosing of the bass to achieve this can be to my ears a bit obnoxious vs the more linear bass of a good floor standing speaker (though down lower, they can have their room problems...my Thiels do not).

JM Reynaud Offrande Supreme v2

I was very serious about these speakers. I'd been around for the initial JMR hype years ago, and heard most of their models at a local store. Always had nice tone, both incisive and warm, but a bit too far into the ever-present-coloration territory to my ears. Still, I believe the Supremes had been updated since then and I had two separate auditions at a Dealer when I was visiting Montreal.

They certainly had the JMR virtues. Super clear, almost hot high end, lively presence all around, yet somehow allied to a gorgeous warm tone. This brings in one of the things I like in a speaker - a warm tone not necessariily in the sense of a ripe lower midrange, but rather timbrally - warm in the sense that when an acoustic guitar track is played through the speaker, the signature is that of the warmth of wood, instead of the cold, electronic coloration of most systems. The JMR does this with acoustic instruments and voices. Everything with an amber or blond-wood "glow."   And they definitley have a dynamic/transient/open sound that gives a feeling of musicians being right there, playing right now vibe.

Ultimately I found they were a bit biting to my ear in the upper frequencies. While the forwardness was a boon to putting musicians right in front of me, it also tended to fore-shorten depth. An always "they are here" vs "I'm transported to there" vibe. Also, the bass which was really big and deep - they are huge stand mount speakers! - was a bit on the pudgy side. But I get why people love them. If I had the opportunity I'd have liked to try them at home. (Though...maybe not. I actually don't like how they look, and REALLY don't like the JMR wood finishes).

Paradigm Persona

(I believe it was the 3F). Yup, these babies are clear, clear, clear and grain free. They are balanced top to bottom and were, like the Revel, the closest to my Thiel 3.7 speakers in terms of sounding balanced from top to bottom. Drum snares, cymbals, rim hits, percussion, guitar strings etc all had a fairly riveting precision. They had an open-window into the recording studio feel on almost every track. Plus, for their size they sounded BIG, including the image sizes, depth, width of the soundstage. A tremendous speaker for the money. Ultimately I couldn't get on with their looks, at least for my room. But most important, I did find them somewhat fatiguing to listen to after a while, and a bit less organic than my Thiels. (Though I'd bet that could change for the better if set up at my home on my gear).

Revel

I'd repeat most of what I just wrote about the Paradigms. They sounded similar, though the Paradigms seemed to have a next-level sense of purity and transparency vs the Revel. And the Revels tended to sound just a bit more linear and controlled top to bottom. The Revels just sounded like really competent speakers, but didn't grab me.
Again, something about the timbre/tone I get with the Thiels (and some other speakers) have an "it" factor I don't get with the Revels.

Monitor Audio (Gold, I believe - a smaller floor stander)

I've always liked the Monitor Audio sound. My father-in-law uses a HUGE pair of Monitor Audio monitors from the 80's that still strike me as one of the best marriages of believable tone with size and richness I've heard.
I own Monitor Audio bronze monitors for various uses, including home theater surrounds. Though I found once they moved to the Platinum line, with ribbons, the tone became a bit too bleached for my comfort.
The smaller Gold line still was able to do the "golden, bronze" tones in the upper frequencies...just turning toward silver a bit. They were astonishingly clean and clear, with a rainbow of timbral colors coming through. My main gripe is that I realized nothing actually sounded "real" - in the sense of believably organic. Everything sounded a bit hard around the edge - sibilance in vocals for instance being laid bare as processed in a bit too ruthless manner.

Proac - D20R (I believe...)

Love the look of these especially the wood finish in ebony on the model I auditioned. Would really have been a perfect size replacement for the Thiels, and went down about as low. Unfortunately I couldn't get around the extremely obvious character of the ribbon tweeter vs the mids/bass. I was always aware of it, and generally found the sound too cool in the upper frequencies to really get into.  Bass was also not particularly impressive in terms of tone and control.  One of the more disappointing speaker auditions.

Kudos

You really don't hear much about Kudos around here. Lack of dealers and North American presence I guess (as it seems to me a majority of people posting here are from North America...if I am indeed right about that).
Anyway, at a TAVES shows a few years ago I was frankly astonished by the sound coming from a pair of Kudos Super 20 floor standing speakers. It had a brilliant, reach out and grab me "alive" tone that made my brain think "real performance" more than most of what I'd heard that day. A bit forward...but wow what an effect. So they went on to my radar.

Turns out a local dealer carried Kudos, and there I heard some very small floor standing Kudos X3 speakers.
Well, there it was! That tone! Like the bigger model I'd heard at the show, this one had a dialed up upper frequency range that gave liveliness and detail. But it was, somewhat like the JMR speakers, allied to a generally warm tone, with a spectrum of timbral color to trumpet, wood blocks, acoustic guitar etc. If found the sound quite compelling, and so wondered about Kudos higher end models. As it turned out, Kudos in the last year has come out with the Titan range, a trickle down from their flagship. I really liked the design of the Titan 606 speakers, they were a great replacement size for the Thiels from the specs. But...my local dealer didn't want to bring them in so I would never hear them (I certainly did not want him to order them just for my sake, given I couldn't know before hearing them if I'd want to buy them).

But then during a recent trip to Europe I ended up in London for a couple days, so I found a Kudos dealer there.
And not only did he have the 606s for me to hear, but also the literally just introduced stand mounted Titan 505 that had many people raving at a recent British audio show.   Very cool. Both speakers, as with most Kudos speakers, employ isobaric loading for the bass.

Both the 505 and 606 displayed the Kudos house sound which was that lively top end. Great for adding bit to guitar picking, hearing the bow on strings, transient aliveness etc. Even if not strictly neutral, it's fun (so long as timbres to my ears are otherwise organic).   I found the 505 to actually sound a bit less balanced than the floor standing speaker. I suppose this is my allergy to the "tiny speaker trying to sound like a big speaker" tuning, but the bass seemed somewhat over-warm, and the speakers themselves a tad clinical from the mids up. Still, they were spacious, enthusiastic sounding, with great separation of instruments and voices. And certain tracks like Lightfoot's If You Could Read My Mind were actually magical on the 505. A similar warm timbre to the JMR speakers, and the added top end sparkle livened up the guitars and strings which can sound a bit tepid on many other speakers.

The larger 606 speakers sounded more linear, richer, a bit darker, and produced a satisfyingly large sound for their size. Similar to the Revel or Paradigm speakers.   The upper frequency balance was a double edged sword: it could make drum high hats, snares, cymbals, guitars stand out in particularly, and satisfyingly, vivid relief. But could also highlight the studio/microphone/effects on voices making vocals sound a bit more "hi-fi" than most. But naturally recorded vocals were by the same token vivid and clear.   Bass had an interesting character, sort of tight, punchy and big...a sense of the bass "spreading" in the room.   My impression veered between "impressive" on the bass and "hmm...not sure I'm sold on this isobaric bass."  I'll say that Herbie Hancock's Chameleon, one of my test songs on most speakers, was produced in a particularly compelling, vivid manner. The drums were just crystal clear and had that "live drum playing" feeling.   It was one of those "wow" moments that kind of haunt you when you hear a certain track sound different and more realistic than normal.

That said, some other tracks veered into the intolerable territory (e.g. horns too piercing on Earth Wind and F ire live). It's the kind of audition that was very promising in some areas, leaving me thinking "these COULD be awesome if I could tame the problems and keep the good parts." Maybe on tubes, and in my well damped room.   But a one time, not terribly long audition didn't allow me to commit to such an expensive purchase, when I hear some things that leave me with misgivings.I wish these models landed locally because I could further warm up to them, but that was the only shot at them.

Harbeth:

I auditioned the various models - Monitor 30.1, C7ES-3, Super HL5 Plus. (Also listened to the 40s, since they had them set up).

I love the Harbeth sound and there's little need to describe it, since so many are familiar. But wow...their particular magic with voices is something. They somehow capture voices actually being produced by an organic person vs an electronic version of a person. No matter what type of material, jazz, processed pop, R&B, even electronica/dance, they always seem be be able to find the "person" singing in the mix.   And of course they have such a smooth, full, rich sound with acoustic instruments sounding very much themselves.

The Monitor 30.1 had those qualities, but I was a bit too aware of their bass limitations (cut off at the knees), and was also aware of a bit of darkness, lack of "air." In the close my eyes "could I believe that guitar or person is really there" test, a darkening of tone, a shelving of the upper frequencies, are usually a dead giveaway to me of the artifice.   But within it's range....gorgeous.

The C7ES-3 were wonderful. There was that bass extension! Displayed the Harbeth mids if not quite as refined. But over all I found the bass a little less controlled than I'd want.

Super HL5 Plus was the Goldilocks choice of the group. It had the added bass extension I heard from the C7ES, but with better integration and control. It had super refined, open, smooth, rich midrange, but with the added top end openness and extension (addition of the super tweeter?) that made the sound more realistic and believable to me. Though I was still hearing some things that I felt my Thiels did better so I wasn't quite sure yet.
Unfortunately, when I came back to this particular store to audition the HL5 Plus I didn't have a good audition experience.   I've described the experience elsewhere here, so won't repeat it. But suffice it to say, it did not make me want to move forward with this particular store. (I have more recently had very good interactions with this store, so I would say my bad experience probably turned out to be an anomaly at that location).

Anyway, the Harbeths dropped off my radar for over a year until I heard the Super HL5 Plus sounding superb in the Montreal Audio show.   Intriguing. Later on an audio mart I saw a pair in a gorgeous rosewood finish for, by far, the best price I've ever seen for a used Harbeth.   I grabbed them, knowing I could definitely sell them without losing money,  with this thought: They are not in the finish I want. So I'll use them as a "home audition" of the Harbeths and if I love them, I'll sell these ones and go to my local dealer to buy brand new ones in the finish I require.

It turned out I really really liked the Super HL5 Plus, but didn't love. They did all the wonderful Harbeth things, that big rich sound, in this model especially, also with a studio-monitor clarity, and generally organic sound.
However, I simply found my Thiels did essentially everything the Harbeths did, but better. I never could get a satisfying depth to the soundstage of the Harbeths (not usually a problem in my room), always sounding a bit fore-shortened. And it seemed a flip-side of the fullness/lively cabinet design was a certain "filling in the spaces with texture" quality. The Thiels, for instance, separated the Los Angelese Guitar Quartet's guitars more effortlessly, with more precision and realism and tonal density, but without sacrificing any image size or warmth of tone.  Nothing quite sounds like the Harbeth on vocals. But ultimately they could not budge me from the Thiels and I sold them.

That said, I now have a store near me selling Harbeths and I'm in there buying vinyl a lot. Every time I hear the Harbeths playing I just want to sit down and listen, thinking "These are so beautiful. Why don't I own them?" But then I remember, I did...I did the comparisons. Would love them in a second system, though.

Joseph Audio - Pulsar and Perspectives.

As a long time high audio rag reader, I've long been familiar with the Joseph Audio name, but it wasn't until last year in Montreal that I actually heard a JA speaker: the Pearl 3.   Jeff Joseph was playing an acapella group piece and I was just stopped in my tracks. It wasn't just the clarity - tons of high end speakers produce vivid vocals. It was the authenticity of the timbre of the voices! It just sounded bang on. Not cold, gray, steely, silvery, or darkened, or all the "off-timbre" electronic signatures that define for me hi-fi voices vs real. It was that human warmth timbre, that sounded just like the people talking in the room. This was so rare and magical it put the JA speakers immediately on my radar. Upon reading that the stand mounted Pulsars had a similar presentation I found a local dealer and auditioned them. Yup, they did! They were fairly mesmerizing. Even despite my misgivings about small speakers trying to sound big, the Pulsars did this better than almost any other stand mounted speaker I've heard - very rich and satisfying. Though I did note a bit of excess warmth here and there in the lower midrange, upper bass.   And I still wondered if I could end up with a stand mounted speaker after living with big floor standers. At home, I listen not only in front of the speakers for "critical listening" but I'll also crank them to listen just down the hall, in my work office or through the house. And at these times I really start to hear the limitation on the small speaker. It can sound like it's going low, but it becomes sort of "fake bass" in a way, where it just doesn't have the solidity and impact of a big speaker.

So the dealer suggested I listen to the floor standing Joseph Audio Perspective model. I said I don't know, they cost more than I was thinking of spending. But, he persisted and...his up-sell worked ;-)

The Perspectives really grabbed me. They sounded more linear than the Pulsars to my ears through the mids down, had really thick, punchy bass that seemed to make every type of music fun, yet seemed controlled enough to make "audiophile" stuff very realistic.   They really disappeared with a huge soundstage and great imaging. I'm a tone/timbre buy first, but I ultimately want speakers to disappear and soundstage well - it's part of the illusion, the magic show, that I appreciate and that makes me want to sit in front of a high end system in the first place.

But what really grabbed me was the overall tone/timbre of the presentation! I remember playing some Chet Baker and some Julie London mono recordings and being shocked at how clear the sound was - how the Perspectives took a central mono image of voice, guitar, bass, drums etc and seemed to effortlessly unravel the different timbres and individual players. And how realistic the voices were.   Another moment I remember were some tracks from the Bullet soundtrack (I'm a soundtrack fiend). Every instrument that entered the mix - a single sax, a flute, an organ, a group of saxes, horns...sounded incredibly pure, distinct and accurate in timbre!   That's one of the things I always loved about going to the symphony, and sitting close, closing my eyes: that rainbow of different acoustic sources, materials, shiny silvery bells, brassy cymbals, woody reeds, woody cellos, golden hued horns...

The Perspectives (and the Pulsars) were giving me more of this sensation, of "surprise" in how each new instrument sounded, than I typically get from most speakers. And they did it with a particular purity, and lack of hash in any part of the frequency spectrum, making for a less mechanical sound than usual (Fremer nailed this in his Pulsar review).

Plus there was a great sense of "flow" to the Perspectives, the way dynamically the sound would swell dramatically when called fo (again, soundtracks were great on the Perspectives).  All these elements came together to produce a great emotional connection to music through the speakers.

So, they sounded special to me.

I got a home audition and they continued to sound beautiful in my home. But having both the big Thiels and the Josephs meant I could compare, which inevitably gave some ground to the Thiels - the bigger more realistic image size, the slightly better precision in imaging and tonal density, a more linear presentation from top to bottom from the Thiels, where the Perspectives could sound a bit "puffy" in the bass sometimes.
And yet, the Perspectives still had a magic the Thiels couldn't do with tone. I remember playing back Talk Talk's Happiness Is Easy and thinking "I literally don't think reproduced sound gets better than this."

So stuck between A and B I realized this: I couldn't give up the Thiels. After all my auditioning, nothing really did everything as well in the same package and the 3.7s had become very rare on the used market, no longer made, so it could be a big regret to let them go.

BUT...I was also bitten by the Perspectives. Once heard, they were hard to unhear.
So I decided, dammit, I'll have both! I tend to hoard speakers somewhat, so I'd keep the Thiels but buy the Perspectives, and I'd have the Thiels to throw in to the room whenever I wanted the Thiel sound.

But....this meant I'd no longer be selling my Thiels to pay for new speakers. So I'd have to save up for the Perspectives. And this I've been doing.

Then, aha! A pair of Thiel 2.7 speakers in the ebony finish I've always wanted showed up on Audiogon. I grabbed them for a killer price and they have been fantastic! Smaller than the 3.7s, better looking in the room, they have the Thiel attributes. Done...right? Naw...I haven't been a fervent audiophile for decades for nuthin'.
I've been on track toward the Perspectives for so long, it's hard to get off.  So once I got the 2.7s my thinking changed to "Well..now I can sell the big Thiels and have that money to put toward the Perspectives!"

So as I've been readying to sell the big Thiels, and about to spend more than I ever have on a pair of speakers (Perspectives are expensive to us Canucks), I thought "If I'm about to spend this much, I better do some due diligence and make sure I didn't leave another option on the floor."   So I recently checked out a speaker brand that I'd wondered about for a while now. Devore Fidelity.

And that will lead to my next post.


prof
Interesting stuff Prof...but your conclusions about the Magico are based on one audition without any consideration given to the fact that the upstream components might have some small effect on the sound.

I’m no Magico fanboy, but come on. Really?

So let’s start with the source, preamp and amp. What were they and why do you feel your conclusions about Magico’s sound are valid if you weren’t intimately familiar with everything feeding them upstream?



Prof, 

Very nice! I have been on a speaker journey recently. Thought initially I'd go for a widebander by Cube to go along with my Bakoon amp and dac. Then just decided to give Devore a look. I live in LA and Matt at Perfect Pitch allowed me an audition of the 3XL and O/93. Long story cut short, I now listen to a pair of 3XL's in my small room and loving the music making. And I aspire to reach for the O/93's after a bit more time with the standmounts. Devore has won me over big time!

Ciao,
Stoney40 
jriggy,

Yes I seem to remember the JA speakers liked to be goosed a little.

Then again, that is true to a certain extent with my current Thiels.  They manage good low level resolution when at low volume, but to get feeling the music I turn them up.  I'd think the Devore speakers with the richer bass presentation would do better for low level listening.  But I've actually been enjoying listening louder than I have before.  (I have struggled with tinnitus and occasional hyperacusis for many years,  but I seem to be able to cope with louder playback these days which is fun).

BTW, I just read the July issue of Stereophile in which Herb Reichert did a follow-up review of the JA Pulsar speakers.  He was pretty much amazed by the same things I was and many others: amazing detail with no hash, so it ends up being "musically involving" detail.  I've rarely luxuriated in the pure tone of instruments and voices as easily as through the JA speakers.  

In the end (spoiler alert!) Herb says he slightly prefers his Harbeth M30's for their fuller sound and added texture.  I get that. Though he made a point of saying in a recent show review that, upon hearing the floor standing Perspectives, they sounded bigger and richer than the Pulsars.  It has me wondering if that would push him toward the Perspectives over the Harbeths.  (Probably not as I think over all the Harbeth sound is more for him).
As thorough as you are, I’m sure you will but check out your listening volume between Devore and JosephAudio, you may find the JA speakers to like to be turned up more. So might depend on your listening style. 

Interesting pingvin, I may have noticed that a bit too.  The sound of the 93 was amazingly similar to the 96.  I wish I liked the aesthetics of the 93 as much as the 96s.

Still moving back and forth between a desire for the Devores or the Joseph speakers.  I really need to hear the Josephs again, which will probably happen at the end of the month when I get back from vacation.
Prof, no harm in setting some boundaries in this crazy hobby of ours. FWIW, I believe the O/93s are better for me than the O/96s — the O/96s are more impressive, but I find the smaller speakers are more coherent and “flow” better for some reason. 
Interesting discussion folks. I’ve heard the Devore O/96 and liked them. this is a good quality speaker IMO. I do however find the Horning ( I heard the Eufrodite) a particularly exceptional sounding speaker. It has a natural/organic sonic character that’s emotionally engaging and very life like in terms of tone, dynamics and sense of tactile musicians presence.

I heard them in the High Water Sound room at CES a few years ago. Honestly one of the best sounding rooms of the entire show. Jeff was driving the speakers with a 10 watt SET amplifier and it really filled the generous sized room with quite beautiful palpable music. The musicians were alive and playing with soul😊.

I strongly suspect the Aristotle would perform similarly in a smaller space. To be clear, nothing against the Devore O/96 but I believe the Horning is more open, dynamic , lively and engaging. As always YMMV. BTW Snowpro has very good ears and taste😊.
Charles
Oh man those Horning speakers look nice!  I like the design, the wood finish, and I've always enjoyed that lowther-thing when I've heard it (though with the usual lowther caveats).

Would love to hear a pair.  But the ones mentioned in this thread are too rich for my blood, and the speakers look to be too deep for my purposes (I need a shallower speaker to fit in my room).
Hi pingvin,
Sorry, I didn't hear the Aristoteles. I have a pretty big room and the Eufrodite probably would have filled the room better. 

I'm sure they both have the Hornings house sound. They are coherent, fast, natural, organic. Which makes you get emotionally involved in the music without analyzing the sound. Just sitting back and enjoying the performance.

 I've been in this hobby a long time and use to like hi-fi sounding speakers (won't name them) as you get older you learn to just appreciate speakers that don't call attention to themselves. The Hornings make you relax and just enjoy the music and the performance.

Prof, if you like the Devores I'm sure you would like the Hornings even more. They are easy to drive. I use Frankenstein 300b amps and Pass Labs XA30.8 amps. 

    
Yep. Plus ease, nuance, flow ... trying to get closer to those qualities that live music has (like the way a single note from a French horn just comes to you in an instant in the concert hall).

Plus I know that that the Hornings are very synergistic with my amplifier. (I’ve gradually replaced the upstream components with those from High Water Sound, which carries Horning.)

snopro, did you compare the Euphrodite to the Aristoteles?, 


Sounds like you guys are looking for even more "life and snap" in your speakers?
Good choice Pingvin. I have Horning Eufrodite Ellipse and love them.

I would have suggested Horning but, might take up to much floor space for Porf.

 
Sorry about that (it’s been a long post!). Happy hunting, and I’ll look forward to reading the next installment. 

FWIW, I  might replace the O/93s with Horning Aristotles, but that’s not to say that I’m unhappy with them. 
Thanks Ping.

I briefly listened to the Devore X, as I mentioned earlier in the thread.
They are too large and too expensive for my needs.  Sounded wonderful from the mids up, though a bit overblown in the lower bass.  I'm sure they can be mostly tamed in the right room. 
Prof,

Nice write-ups. I happen to very much agree with your conclusions vis a vis Magic, Vandersteen, Harbeth, Joseph, and Devore. I own the O/93s. If you are looking for something with the “soul” of the Devores but disappear a bit more, maybe the Devore X?

Cheers,
Ping
I went on a financially ruinous vinyl splurge over the last couple days - much of it centred around brazillian 70's gems of disco, funk, funk/jazz etc. Also picked up another gem of electronic music that was released not long ago:

Buchla Concerts 1975

Some really rare live performances by early female synth-music pioneer  Suzanne Ciani. You can just hear the joy of experimentation going on with all the ways you can tune analog while playing.  
Thanks for the reminder about Yello, ronkent. Yello has been mentioned by reviewers and audiophiles for as long as I can remember, but I never bothered listening. I’ll see if it’s available on Tidal.

astewart8944,

If you haven’t done so, on the Dave Brubeck live at Carnegie Hall, check out the song Castilian Drums!

Joe Morello does an extended drum solo, employing his hands lightly on the drums to ever more frenetic playing with sticks. It’s panned fairly hard left, but still with some spatial characteristics. But the intimacy of the drum miking make for a pretty astonishingly realistic rainbow of drum sounds bursting through your speakers. It's like the drum skins, rims and cymbals are right inside your speakers, behind the drivers.

Thiels are great for that kind of thing.


@prof Thanks. BTW I hadn't heard the live St Louis Blues Brubeck Quartet album before. It is surprisingly well recorded for a live venue IMO.
@ronkent I'm playing the Yello One Second album now. It fills up the room that's for sure.
want to have some fun and give your system a real workout.   try this one.   i have used it for years to test speakers for a number of variables.   https://www.amazon.com/One-Second-Yello/dp/B000AC5LD4/ref=sr_1_9?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1528039...
Nice to see that EBTG is gettin' some luv here.

They are certainly a talented duo, and as musicians open to experiment.
If you like electronica, they had some fantastic electronica albums in the 90's that were very well regarded and influential, and sound today as fresh as when they came out (their sense of melody and musicianship come through):  The Walking Wounded and Temperamental.

Later there was an excellent electronica re-mix album of their songs called Adapt Or Die.   I particularly like the first two tracks, Mirrorball and Before Today:

https://www.allmusic.com/album/adapt-or-die-ten-years-of-remixes-mw0000244711

Mirrorball sounds amazing on a good system - dense full analog sounding synths, with really spacious accents like the piano in the background which, if your speakers soundstage well, can sound like they have expanded your walls waaaay out into a new reverby recording space.
+1 Everything But the Girl--I just listened to the first track of Amplified Heart, which @prof uses as a test track (he listed Atomic Heart but his description of the track matches Rollercoaster--the first track on Amplified Heart). It sounds great on JA Perspective. Every instrument with right timbre; I like her voice. Thank you Rich
Regards
Al
Very nice selections - prof.I recently bought a lot of EBTG 80's CDs to add to my 90's collection.I enjoy the Los Angeles Guitar Quartet (LAGQ) as well. Miles Davis Kind of Blue (KOB)- a reference disc in any format. Check out Johnny Cash -Folsom Prison disc, especially, on SACD. I own Gord's Gold- fantastic disc.  I own the entire Herbie Hancock catalog.
Happy Listening!
jafant,

I use one of my favorite albums of all time, EBTG's Atomic Heart.  It doesn't matter that I've used it a million times to demo systems, I still put it on to listen all the time.

It's a combination of elements in the recordings - warm acoustic instruments, acoustic guitars, stand up bass, analog synths, wood blocks, bongos.  And a variable quality in the recording of voices - sometimes fairly natural, but a number of tracks have an artificial edge due to reverb/recording and even a teeny bit of apparent distortion here or there.  So it really tells me a lot both about how a system handles good and not so good elements in a recording.  Yucky systems can give the first few tracks a bit too much icy edge to the vocals and sibilance.
I prefer a system that shows me the characteristics on the recording, but doesn't kill me with it.

If the first track, Rollercoaster, doesn't sound utterly warm and inviting something is wrong and I'm not going to get along well with a speaker.
(It did so on the JA Perspectives, Devores, Harbeths and some others, much less so on Magico and some others).

I also love the track I Don't Understand Anything.  Great for soundstaging, acoustic guitar, voice, drum and vocals sound, and checking out how well a system conveys the emotion of the piece.  If a system doesn't produce the swelling, emotional moments in the song, that's not a good sign.  (Joseph speakers did really well with that).

Also the track Missing.  Tells me tons about the bass quality, separation of elements, and sense of rhythmic drive from a system.  It's a song that has a mid-level tempo that on some systems has real drive, but others can leave it just sort of plodding and dead.  (The Magicos left it in the plodding side, my Thiels make it a toe-tapper).

I usually play a ton of different music from my thumb drive or burned CDs.  Among them:

Johnny Cash's "American" albums.
Gordon Lightfoot . (if a system doesn't produce acoustic guitars with that familiar golden sparkle and a human warmth in Gord's voice, that's a very bad sign).

Chameleon - Herbie Hancock
St Louis Blues - Dave Brubeck Quartet live in NYC.  Great for instrumental tone, staging, and especially whether a system portrays a realistic drum sound (great solo moments with amazing realism on that album).

So What - Miles Davis (Hey...it's a standard).

Edgar Meyer Quintet For Strings Mvt 1 +2 - great for string tone and dynamics.

Jaws - Intrada recording.  I grew up with that soundtrack and if a system doesn't thrill me both sonically, musically and nostalgically on the opening piece, and the Montage track, it's not coming to my house.
(Same with the Star Trek Motion Picture album - not an incredible recording, but has to thrill me).

Bullit soundtrack - bursting with verve, a ton of different instrumental timbres coming at you a mile a minute.  Tells me tons about the chameleon and instrumental timbre aspects of a speaker.

Jason And The Argonauts - B. Herrmann.  Absolutely killer for the sound of woodwinds and brass.

Los Angeles Guitar Quartet - York: African Suite - great for very realistic guitars playing in front of you energetically.

Commodores - various - Brick House etc.

Talk Talk - The Colour Of Spring album - one of the great recorded albums.

Earth Wind And Fire - Greatest Hits Live - 1996.  An INCREDIBLE live album in terms of both performances and sound quality.  This can sound simply massive, with every single element - and there are tons - beautifully discernible.  Deep, tight, killer bass - both electric and synth. 
Vocals that are both "arena sized" yet somehow organic and natural.  A great system can really make you feel like you're at a real concert with the best sound system ever. 

And others....


prof
which Everything But The Girl tracks, other music,  do you carry to the dealers/retailers for audition?Happy Listening!

I figure I’ve reserved this thread as much for the occasional musing on my speaker hunt as for the reports themselves.

And to that end:

Last night I was listening to one of my favourite soundtracks: Bernard Herrmann’s Jason And The Argonauts. (Not to mention gleefully receiving some mint, unopened vinyl issues of some of his other recorded work from the 70’s. Yippee!)

This was through the Thiel 2.7s, which are currently spread out quite wide for a large, but focused soundstage.

It came to the track for the Hydra, which used deep swelling woodwinds and brass instruments. It was just incredible the sensation of looking aurally in to a space "inhabited" by palpable, air moving, floor moving, undulating big instruments. It really created in my mind the sensation of being in the presence of a gigantic slithering beast. So much fun!

And these are instances that remind me why I always end up going back to floor standing speakers over stand mounted. That sense of scale and moving air.

I have several stand mounted speakers that I love: old Thiel 02s, Waveform Mach MC (egg shaped), Spendor 3/5s, and MBL 121 radialstrahler speakers. All of them can make me just melt in to their presentation. (The MBL omnis still drop my jaw with the realism of their detail, tone and imaging). But after a while I hanker for the bigger sound (and I’ve tended to be allergic to subwoofers - though now I do own subwoofers, but first I’ll be integrating them with the Thiels, and hopefully whatever other speaker I buy.  Which has made me wonder if anyone has actually used Devore O speakers with a subwoofer.  I could see advantages, but on the other hand I could also see crossing over to a sub might actually diminish the particular bass character of the Devores that are part of their appeal).

On another note: I’m in equipment selling off mode (a few too many gadgets lying around unused) and any good audiophile knows that the minute he sells a gadget, he will immediately somehow regret it as some need for it suddenly arises. *Smacks head* why did I sell that? I need it now!

I’ve had an RDP-1 digital preamp eq that I bought a long time ago but which I never really put in to use. I just put it up for sale and literally last night I heard a little "bump" in the response of my Thiels (or room interaction) stick out, which had me thinking "hmm, it might be nice to equalize that out." Doh!

On the other hand, and this isn’t entirely rational, I have this weird thing that, since I now use both turntable and digital sources, I don’t want my system "unevenly tweaked." By that I mean if I tweaked it via a digital eq only for my digital sources, and I got used to that version, then it could annoy me a bit when I switch to analog source and it is not similarly "fixed." So, logical or not, in a way it seems better to me to leave it consistent across sources, warts and all. (And there are very few warts).

I’m also thinking of moving to a Roon platform for streaming my digital library, and I believe that offers eq function so maybe that will be a bit of a security blanket in terms of selling my RDP-1.

Anyway...more ramblings...

It seems to me my next step, when I have a chance, will be to hear the JA Perspectives again, which I haven’t heard for about a year now, to help come to my decision between those and the Devore speakers.


@prof Thank you for your hard work. You have cemented my relationship with my JA Perspectives. I write short. 
TAWW,

Thanks for dropping in.

Like the website!  I've been there before and enjoyed your show report.

I understand the reticence on Thiel speakers.  They have sounded bright or dry to a lot of people.

What I found early on was that Thiels can be magic with tubey amps like my CJ gear.  They maintain that density of imaging, liveliness and realism, but in a relaxed manner.  Jim Thiel's final flagship drivers and design I think finally banished any inherent brightness and don't even "need" tube amps to tame them.  But with my CJs I can listen all day, and far from clinical, the main characteristic I hear when I come home from auditioning most other speakers is how utterly rich and organic the sound is in my set up.  A fellow audio writer who previously said Thiels would make him run screaming from a room (brightness) agrees.  Best sound I've ever had.

But...hey...you know.  The itch!

BTW, I've also found the same with my MBL omni-monitors.  They are in theory brutal to drive which is why MBL is usually paired with mega-watt SS amps.   But with my CJ amps and even a small Eico 14W integrated they are magical!

BTW, I remember listening a number of times to Silverline speakers back when the Sonata was making a splash.  I still remember how they sound (I think).  I wonder if their house sound has been maintained or not over all these years.  (To me Silverline sounded somthing like if you crossed Totem speakers with Meadowlark Audio speakers...but Meadowlark is going back old school as a reference...)



Also I have heard the Audiovector SR 3 Avantgarde Arreté, a floorstanding version of the SR 1 (I think $12k). It's fuller and richer, but IMO not as fun as the SR 1, doesn't have the same transparency and magic. I think a SR 1 with a good subwoofer or two (e.g. REL) is a better bet.
Hi @prof - thanks for the fascinating thread, great to follow your journey. Super interested as based on your comments, your listening tastes feel pretty convergent with mine and you're looking for exactly what I want - a reasonably sized, aesthetically pleasing, superbly musical speaker under $10k. I haven't heard many of the speakers you've mentioned, but the ones I have, your notes are spot-on with mine - I'd probably be a hair more critical of a few. :)  I must admit I was never a huge Thiel fan in the past, finding them a bit dry, but it's possible I never heard them set up to the nines. 

Currently I have two contenders, both bookshelves: the Silverline SR 17 Supreme ($7500) and the Audiovector SR 1 Avantgarde Aretté ($6k-ish).  The Silverline is a superb balance of detail and body, with super natural tones and effortless dynamics. I'll have a review coming out soon. I would probably recommend a subwoofer to compete with some of the floorstanding models you're looking at. The Audiovector is a different beast, lightning fast and hyper resolving, but not in a hi-fi/clinical way - they are incredibly dynamic and nuanced in a way that will pull at your heart strings. I've never heard Mozart arias sound so breathy and emotional. In the right setup it will totally disappear and sound like your ears are plugged directly into your amp. It's en route from the manufacturer, and going first to my friend Marty DeWulf for a listen. I've heard the big Paradigm Personas as well as the new $10k Wilson bookshelf and while the latter wasn't broken in, they weren't close musically vs. either the Silverline or Audiovector.

I really wish it were easier to hear the Silverlines. I don't think there's much of a dealer network, and Alan Yun is out here in California. I think the Bolero Supreme could be perfect for you, though it's a bit over budget ($15k). 

I will keep my eyes and ears open for you and let you know if I find anything promising.

Cheers,
TAWW
http://taww.co
Thanks charles1dad!

rlb61,

Yes there certainly does tend to be a house sound within an speaker brand.  Both my Thiels have an amazingly similar "voice" and I've found most brands are pretty consistent too. 

About the Magicos:  It's interesting that some will describe the Magicos as "bright, clinical, cold" and others "smooth, musical, almost reticent."

And I can see how both impressions can take hold.   As I said, I found the A3s to not strike me immediately as "bright" but more detailed and fairly pure of tone.  It was only after listening for a while that a certain thinnness or some similar quality made me start to feel fatigued.  Yet I don't think I would even then have called it brightness or "harshness."

But, yes, there was some unforgiving quality in the sound.

I find it intriguing though that "unforgiving" is so often associated with "accuracy" or relaying fine differences among recordings.  Yet I've heard many systems that seem to easily portray the chameleon nature of different recordings, defects and all, but which weren't simultaneously fatiguing to listen to.  (My Thiels do this for me, for instance).

Just to chime in here ... there is a "house sound" that should be considered in comparing speakers. I think in the long run, that's the major criterion on which to focus. I've heard most all of the Josephs, and the house sound for them is a bit on the warm side with them being musically engaging, non-fatiguing, and tonally superb . Going up the line, there's just more goodness to be had. I  bought the Pulsars and find them to be simply stunning. OTOH, Magico's house sound  is a total 180, IMHO ... they're very "cool," with a clinical, almost harsh and unforgiving accuracy that can be fatiguing and challenging to long-term listening. I don't find them generally to be my cup of tea. Haven't heard tbe Devores, so I can't comment on them. 
Hello Prof,
I’ve enjoyed reading your thread this evening and find it both interesting as well as informative. I also grew up in a musical family piano,drums,trombone and I played the trumpet. This environment forever influences how I hear music and established listening criteria. So no surprise that I relate to much of your preferences and perspectives. .

1 Your assessment of Magico speakers is very similar to mine. Audiophile report card grades are pretty high yet music lovers emotional engaging quality scores quite low. Although I'll say that the Magico S5 driven by the Absolare Passion Signature PSET amplifiers was pretty good and the best I've heard Magico sound.  Unquestionably subjective I know. 2 Your street musicians encounter is something I completely understand. . Beautiful rich, colorful and vibrant tones and timbre, full bodied with dense harmonics and free flowing dynamically. Soul, heart, flesh and blood, breath of life etc. This is what I hear with live unamplified music and attempt to mimic at home.

When you wrote that much of current High End audio seems to go in the opposite direction, Bullseye observation. It does seem to me that the pursuit of ultra detail, transparency and "accuracy " have lead often toward an analytical, bleached,thin sound unrelated to real instruments heard directly.

No doubt there are those who Will have different options and I can surely appreciate this. Anyway your observations struck a particular chord with me😊. Your thoughts are well written and clear. Best of luck with your speaker selection.
Charles
kacomess,

Good question!

The only reason is that my past (admittedly very limited) encounters with Vandersteen speakers left me unmoved.  I remember auditioning one of their next-down-from-flagship speakers (or maybe it was their flagship) and another model or two - before that.

The impression they left we was: Nice boxless, airy, excellent soundstaging, decent palpability, but the overriding impression was of a somewhat "boring" tonality.  I pretty much immediately felt "these are not for me."  I have in my mind the picture of "greyish" tones when I think of the Vandersteens.  

Is that fair to keep that impression for a long time?  Maybe not.  I would enjoy hearing the Trios or Quatros if the opportunity presented itself.  But I'm not seeking it out due to past experience with Vandersteens leaving me cold.

Again...very subjective on my part and no pronouncement on the worth of those speakers as obviously they have really thrilled many owners.


Thanks for the interesting and informed review! One question: Was there any special reason you didn't audition the (ubiquitous) Vandersteen models?
ohlala,

Interesting observations.  Thanks.

As I mentioned, I did seem to find a bit of weird behaviour with the A3s as I tested different seating positions - nearer to them seemed to cause some weird spreading of some sounds.  But I can only infer so much from a single encounter.

Dynamically I remember one of the telling tracks:  Herbie Hancock's Chameleon.  Every speaker sounds great when that synth starts - just a big fat analog synth in just the frequency that doesn't seem to cause too much bloat in even bad speaker designs - and then the drums kick in.  It's always impressive.  The Magicos did a particularly good job in this respect: I always listen to high hats, and on this track especially.  
John Atkinson has put it well, that cymbals (especially I think high hats) on many systems can sound like more like "modulated bursts of white noise" rather than the real thing, real metal/wood causing the sound.
And that is so often true in my experience.

So I listen to the quality of the high hat at the beginning of Chameleon with that in mind, and the Magico's transparency did a very good job of distinguishing the tone of metal, vs just "white noise."  

However, as more instruments in the mid and upper mids came in - the various guitar picking, the clavinets parts, they were really clear, but dynamically limpid.  They just sort of "sat there" in the speaker drivers not really adding to driving the song.  I almost started to wonder if I was misperceiving this aspect of the Magico's shortcoming. 

Played on my system once back home, there it was: when each part came they felt more substantial, more moving air and driving the song.
(And it's really hard for instruments in that range to get that palpability/air moving sensation).

It's not a huge difference, but one of those subtle but subjectively important differences I noticed.

Again...though ultimately I wasn't grabbed by the A3s, they did imply some strong potential.
I enjoyed your A3 audition impressions. I heard them at Lone Star Audio Fest, a small but now a better respresented audio show. My audition was short with unfamiliar music in a carefully setup, oversized hotel room. https://www.flickr.com/photos/67568395@N04/41019336645/
I was interested what could be done with a $10k floorstander with an aluminum enclosure, especially in light of my experience with the S3s being so positive. My expectations may have been too high; they did not belie their price point that day, imo, despite my take on the potential of their features. Tone, resolution and integration and overall sophistication was not there that day like I remember the S3mkII or even compared my reference of similar slim box design at the same price, the Spendor D9s. Magicos are not dynamic and I had no expectation the A3s would be. The highs and mids were spatially disjointed. The highs hovered around and in front while the mids were way back, but not recessed sounding at all. I actually thought the bass was good and well damped, although I have a high preference for sealed cabinets. They were played with and without subs right next to each speaker; I preferred the better damped sound when subs were off. I look forward to hearing them again, maybe with better luck. 

A same-day comparison just down the hall was a Carmel 2, which made due with a worse room. The bass was bloated, ironically because the they were set up for the room to compensate for their lack of and over-damped bass. They were incredibly coherent, detailed and boxless sounding in comparison to the Magicos which shares some of the same ambitions. Obviously it is not an very fair comparison. In the spirit musing Volti’s non-retail horn concoction was awesome in tone and dynamics. https://us.v-cdn.net/5021930/uploads/editor/yq/bab4r6roe2tl.jpeg
I was just out for a walk (live near the downtown of my city) and passed by some street musicians playing across the road.  I stopped to listen and enjoy the music but, good audiophile that I am, I also closed my eyes and took notice of the sound made by live acoustic instruments - in this case two tenor sax and one drum kit.   (I've always been kind of obsessed with live vs reproduced sound).

The usual things stuck out: clarity with ease, the distinctness of the timbre and tone of whatever I chose to focus on - drum snare, cymbal, kick drum, or which sax was playing.  And always, the SIZE an palpability of the sound.  A single tenor sax sounds utterly HUGE in real life.  It may as well have had it's own sound amplification system - not at all needed in this case for these three acoustic instruments to "light up" a full block with sound.

Then there is the palpability.  The sound of the sax reached all the way across four lanes giving me the sense of feeling the vibrating air it was causing.  Really remarkable.

These are the types of characteristics I tend to seek in high end systems (and so rarely found).  Most high end audio reproduction seems so reductive in compared to the real thing.

But it's so hard - impossible it seems - to find a system that truly does it all (and certainly, that does it all for all listeners).

So for instance, in my own decisions, the Devore 0 speakers are giving some of that life-like size and weight and warmth to acoustic instruments and voices.

On the other hand, I think the Joseph speakers excelled at digging out those unique timbral differences that I hear in real life. 

The Thiel speakers I have seem almost an in between - not as big, warm and lush as the Devores, but palpable has heck.  Beautifully nuanced in finding instrumental timbre...but not to the degree found in the JA speakers.

So on one day it feels like I have the best of both worlds in the Thiel.
And I utterly glory in the sound.  (As I should).

On another day, it can feel like I have something that compromises on both those aspects of sound.   I notice what other speakers would do "better."

Such is the Curse Of The Audiophile! 
@prof "I wouldn’t say this is an entirely rational adventure on my part. Part scratching an itch, part adventure, part torture, part fun."

That describes almost every single one of us
prof(or anyone else), I grew up 4 miles from Canadian border south of Montreal and have always had a "thing" for things Canadian .I’ve owned several small PSB monitors and liked the house sound on Classical which is about 90%of my listening .

Any thoughts on the PSB T3’s relative to some of the jewels you auditioned ? There are no PSB dealers within 300 miles of where I live .
Like yourself, I have no room for speakers that I consider ugly , but every time
I see a T3 photo, I want to buy them . Most of my current listening is on Totem Sig 1’s which are not bad on classical . The fact they are from Montreal , which I consider to be North America’s best city, did play a small
part in me buying them ,
clarenetmonster2@    you can  listen bacheaudio --- read cellcbern@ post for less sleeping ability , it close to you

Prof, I have just stumbled on your thread. I've really enjoyed reading it from beginning to end. I too spent well over 2 years listening and evaluating tube friendly speakers before finally making my choice. A number of speakers I listened to are covered in your notes and it has been great to read your impressions. I will follow your thread with interest!

prof


You certainly covered much territory with each of these speakers in an astute and concise fashion. You are very fortunate to have such close proximity to these dealers/retailers for audition/home audition. I enjoyed reading this thread very much. Good to read that a Thiel loudspeaker can continue to "bring it" amongst such excellent competitors. Well Done.


I , too , am a big fan of Everything But The Girl (EBTG).

Happy Listening!

trelja,

Wise words.   But I wouldn't say this is an entirely rational adventure on my part.  Part scratching an itch, part adventure, part torture, part fun.

jackd,

I mentioned Verity earlier on this page.  Haven't heard anything new for a while now, except briefly at a show I think a couple years ago.  But as I said, several years ago I was quite familiar with some of the Verity speakers.  
prof

Have you had a chance to listen to Verity Audio in any of your auditions?  I am curious about the new Otello model.
@prof I also share your opinion on the Magico loudspeakers I've been around.  There's something hifi about them, and that's not a compliment.

If nothing satisfies like your Thiels, live with them, and be happy.  Oftentimes we need to go on a new chase to discover we already have the ideal


Just to add a comment to the little "review" I just posted above for the Magico A3:

A salesman's attitude makes so much difference in terms of gaining a customer in me.  This salesman made the experience relaxed, no pressure, no monologues selling the gear, realized he was dealing with someone who knew a thing or two, and mostly just let me listen.

That's a dealer I will go back to.  Vs some other dealers where I actually shrink from the idea of simply having to interact with them again.  I'm thinking of doing a Dealers Do and Don't post, from the perspective of a customer. :-)
Coo, shadorne.  You've auditioned the A3s too at some point?  Or maybe heard them at a show?