Well, I own the Fritz Carbon 7 SE MKIIs. Can't make any comparison to the others mentioned. I find the Carbons to have a very even tonal balance, play deep enough into the bass region for my tastes (room about 11x15x8.5'), great soundstaging and image focus, with good dynamic range. A side from the sonics they are easy to drive having reasonable sensitivity and I believe more importantly a flat *ohm frequency response. I drive them with electronics (pre & amp) costing 3X their price.
???Compare-Contrast & Comment???5 Pairs Large Monitors
As stated in the title,seeking comments,comparisons & contrasts from anyone & everyone who has ears on experience with any of these large monitors in the last 1-2 years...
Spendor Classic 3/1
Harbeth M30.2/30.2XD
Reference 3a MM De Capo BE/BE II
Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2
Fritz Carbon 7 SE Mk.II
Post removed |
subject-wise https://speakerchoices.com/ has all these except a different Spendor Classic version as well as the Fritz. You can select and compare the specs of all if you wish. I have only heard the Sonettos |
it was a joke (attempt at least). Not in any way an attempt to pick a fight. If I freaked out and threw obscenities at everyone who made irrelevant comments under my posts, I would be messaging all day. I think you overreacted but that's just me. I have duly noted, no jokes with you. My sincere apologies for upsetting you.
Jokes and audiophiles usually don't mix well. |
You can find my take on the Spendor SP2/3R2 against the Harbeth M30.2 Anniversary here: https://forum.audiogon.com/posts/2700741 I have found the Spendor Classic 100 (same series as the 3/1 you are inquiring about) to sound even more colorful than my SP2/3R2. As a side note, I wouldn't call the 3/1, M30.2 etc. "large"; 2/3 are "quite large" (but my brother called them "huge", to my amusement as I was also having a pair of Martin Logan Impression 11A at that time, so I guess it depends on one's point of reference); Classic 100 and M40.x are "LARGE"! |