Bypassing / Jumping Pots? Ex: Rotel RB-1050 or Parasound HCA-1000a


Hi Gents, what is the general consensus on removing pots from the signal path? Looking at an RB-1050, there are two pots for each channel at the front, introduces wire, probably signal quality loss, and would do nothing for me.

Conversely, when looking at Parasound's HCA-1000a, there are 'THX Level' pots at the back, throttling the input..

In either of these cases, what might the procedure be to remove these pots from the chain, simply jumper?

In the case of the Rotel, I found the schematic here:

 

Parasound, I was able to find this photo of the back of the pot/input board:

 

Appears to me the Parasound is a significantly better amp, but interested in your thoughts on this too.

rickysnit

I had a pair of Parasound 1000a’s. Wouldn’t mess with bypassing the pots. Great amp as is.

Just turning them up all the way should pretty much be same thing unless you are going to desolder the wires and solder a jumper at the circuit board to eliminate the short run of wire and even then with good gear the change should be negligible.

Well, if you don't know how to work around a pot maybe a nice piece of gear isn't the best place to start??