I'm not so sure 100wpc would be enough. The loudness is not the issue, it's the weight, the body of the sound, as you mentioned. I,ve heard the difference between 100wpc and a 200wpc amp, same brand. I know there are other factors like current that make a difference also. I also like having the extra power for the days I may want to crank it up, which is rare.
Indeed the choices are endless. Wht you say about equipment matching is also true. The reason I through a Rotel amp into the mix is because I have: Rotel RCD-1072 (CD Player) Rotel RC-1090 (pre-amp). I owned the RB-1080 also, but I sold that in order to upgrade to the 1090. I did that because I heard a significant difference (for the better) in my system using the two old Rotels I'm currently using. As I stated earlier things came up so that got delayed, and I figure I would look at other amps. The choices as you said are endless. I know if I get an amp other than Rotel I would want to change out my other gear to match that brand. I know you don't necessarily have to do that, but I guess the products from the same maker should go well together, one would hope.
First of all, I never think in terms of an 'amp' as a separate entity. My experience tells me that matching of goods, that is amps and pre amps are more important than just the individual piece. For example, while an amp may sound great, it only sounds great potentially, and that if it's matched with the correct pre amp, speakers, and so on. I am a fan of matching tube pre amps with solid state amps, though, with the 'neutralization' (just call me Ogden Nash) of some tube pre amps this has changed radically over the past few years. Now, with that said, what SS amp do I recommend? As much as I hate to kill retail sales people, a used Ayre amp, with the bias set to 1400. instead of their ususal 900 works great for me. It sounds like tubes, though not as much as people say. Black background, detailed, articulate sound stage. On Audiogon right now there's a V3 for sale for 1325. I believe. And if you call the factory they will do some things to the amp, making it much better than anything near the price, IMHO. Again, speakers, amps cables, and so on are always a synergism. It is impossible to simply tell someone (for me) what an amp sounds like. The variables are simply too great. Also, when someone 'tells me' they 'need' 300 WPC, I ask them more questions. How big is the room, what is your speaker, your listening tastes, music preference, and what do you think is loud? IMHO people give out too much even though it's free, cheap information.
Then there are some of the newer, but used McIntosh's which use the Toshiba transistors, which are detailed and sweet at the same time. Not thought of as an audiophile product for a long time, McIntosh has really come light years recently. The choices are endless
TVAD,I owned a Belles,which has tubes in the Pre amp, and Iowned a VAC Avatar,and have owned several CJ pieces over the years; I even questioned Fleming Rasmussen of Gryphon about using a Tube in the pass through for the tube sound. I have probably spent more on tube gear in my life than most people spend all together on all equipment. Plus the Integrated I own now, has a $250 pair of Telefunken tubes. What walk, and what talk am I missing? Plus it is possible that everyone 'needs'something different than they want. Advise is only valuable if it broadens the perspective of the enqirer.
OK. Let's throw another amp into the mix. How about a Rotel RB-1090? That's a 380WPC dual Mono amp. Two transformers four power supplys, plus it's only 2K. Thoughts....
Has any one listened to the Bryston and Belles amps side by side? What are the sonic differences? Also is there any difference in the Bryston line between the 4bsst and say the 14bsst or 7bsst mono's, or is it just headroom?
I've compared and used many solid state amps. The Brsyton SST series amps offer great sound quality within their price range and up. As a matter of fact the only amp that has sounded better (in my current system) than my 4B-SST, has been a Pass Labs X-250.
Bryston amps have some of the best bass I have ever heard, solid, fast, and extremely well controlled. The SST series have very competitive mids and none of the exaggerated highs of the much earlier models.
As far a a MF to Bryston comparison, well... you can see I have no MF gear. They make fine products and I have never heard a MF piece that made me say, ugh!
The question is, what do I recommend. VAC is a good place to start. Oftentimes Kevin Hayes of VAC has used pieces for sale on his website. Or just call and talk to him. You will learn more about tube gear from him in minutes than I could write in hours.
Musical Fidelity is overrated but more musical to me than the Bryston. Yet there are many tube amplifiers that have more musicality than either. So I guess I am a tube groupie, in that regard. Tubes sound more like music to me than solid state, and further, hybrid combo's of tubes and solid state, with tubes as pre's and solid state as the amplifiers sound most life like. For example, in the past an Adcom amp, with a conrad johnson amp had a more palpable sound with regard to sonic realism to me, than many other combinations. There is a reason why amps use mosfet designs, and it has to do with the sense of tube like sound.
I might point out that Bryston, in an effort to justify their pricing and quality differences, other than the obvious warranty differences, would intentionally show much better spec's than their OEM Lexicon counterparts. I would bet that the spec's are identical on both pieces, and that the difference is one of marketing. Smart, and meaninginless in terms of differences. I. E. Why buy a Bryston, other than the 20 year warranty unless the spec's are different? I know you like the Bryston, and well you should. It has been a staple in the industry for years, and only a 'taste' difference, in terms of 'sound' would lead one to a different product. I prefer it overwhelmingly to Krell's high frequency 'hash' for example. My preferences lean to tubes and their delcate presentation relative to solid state. The distortions of tubes are pleasant versus, unpleasant in solid state, with odd order harmonics. Think about your system, and how the Bryston sounds better in some ways. That has to do with the speakers, capacitance etc, as much as anything.
Actually I did, in that I (even though I did not include the dates) stated that I heard plenty of Bryston's and their current Lexicon which is their OEM product. Bryston is so damn good, that it is ridiculous to have any nit's but if you can imagine a square wave with the front part rounded, that is what I hear. It doesn't sound like a square wave, but a 'rounded' wave to me, with the leading edge missing. Hope this helps, AND we still have the offer of the master bedroom for you and Chris to visit you dog. Please come to Louisville, hear my LSA's and let me show you Louisville. You can meet the entire LSA crew, and take home a pair of LSA 3's in Rosewood. Larry
TVAD I don't know why I softballed your question, when you said, "I don't know what slow means" or words to that effect. For many years now, rise time, slew rate, have become lesser talked about figures in some circles than in others. I think the now deceased John Ivorsen of Eagle, was the first designer to talk to me about the speed and relative speed of amplifiers, and how capacitive loads dramatically effect the measurements: which is why different engineers have different measurements for seemingly the same product. He also, this was in 1986 talked about how most designers did not understand the proper utilization of 'current' in design work, then he started losing me at that point in my career. At that time his amp was vastly 'clearer' and I guess therefore sounded 'faster' to me, in the way that tubes offer more delicacy (to me) and low level resolution. My early days with Bryston date to 1985, then as I traveled the country for THIEL. Their distribution became spotty when the brothers split and Chris and John went separate ways, Chris going with Classe I believe. But explaining speed is almost like explaining, as I said, tube delicacy. It's not that it doesn't exist, its just hard to make clear. That is as when people talk about S/N ratios and they don't realize that 80db s/n ratio is 1/10,000th, then begin to what seems like a nit pick, with 80 db versus 100db, once you're already at 1/10,000th, isn't that already good? So speed--yes, I think, that to me Bryston sounds softish, and slower than many other good amps. If that sounds like an indictment I apologize. But we ALL hear things so differently, one thing that is obvious to one person is not as obvious to another. At 56, I had a hearing test, and my left ear was rated, according to the doctor, as 'perfect, and really remarkable', (he had the good grace not to say, for your age.) But the scale was not age relative, it was just perfect. I now realize why 'possibly' I hear and quantify things other people don't. Please don't take that as bragging since most of the things I hear, are unpleasant, so perhaps a curse in some ways. I am sure your amp is excellent, just not my personal favorite. Spectral, probably sets the world on fire with it's recovery times, yet to me sounds stark, and dry. So what does that tell me? Who knows?
I've thought about the 'slow' comment, and it is admittedly vague. I think I always thought of the Bryston as less refined sounding than some others. For example, many will disagree, but I find the Levinson to be uninteresting, musically. I am not sure if it lacks dynamic contrasting, but to me, (just to me IMHO) not interesting. The Bryston, (and I was a dealer for them for a short time) many years ago; the same characteristic sound is found for me in their OEM Lexicon Amps. Solid well built, probably never break, but not as detailed as some others I like more. Hell, maybe it's just neutral. Just, not a fan of it's 'sound' perhaps.
you are so correct! That's what started it all. I figured if I'm going to spend close to 2K maybe I should look at other options. Thanks for all the info.
I think I will put my nose in where it doesn't belong.
I have not auditioned a Bryston. Before I started my upgrade spree I had the CDM9NT driven by a B&K ST2140. Moving to the MF A308 integrated was a huge step for my system, after burn in the sound stage opened up the bottom end was more extended and forcefull. Wish I could go into more detail but that was over a year ago.
Since you can't audition both side by side. This makes your decision that much more difficult. Not to mention we haven't been that much help either.
I've heard the Bryston 3BSST and 4BSST with Paradugn S4 speakers. The 3B was not very good with the speaker it just did not make the speaker come alive. To me the 3B, sounded alot like the Rotel RB-1080. The 4B was much better it made the speaker come alive.
The dealers in my area NYC don't have both, so I have not been able to compare. I've heard the 4B with Paradigm as mentioned above, and I've heard MF with Audio Physic speakers. I've only been able to audition Rotel and B&W.
The Rotel B&W combination is good. I actually had the new RB-1080 amp and the Paradigm S2. I sold them to buy the RB-1090 and B&W N804 but something came up, so I borrowed my cousins two old 120W rotels and purchased the CDM7SE used. Using the two Rotels in a Bi-amp configuratio is wta got me interested into looking at the Bryston and MF. There is more debth to the music when I bi-amp. My next speaker will be the N804 (used) or a Paradigm Studio 100. I have to stay within the 2K range (baby formula and pampers dictate that).
I was even thinking over the last few days, to just forget about Bryston, and MF and get two RB-1080 Rotels and call it a day. The price of the Rotels is great. I can get them for $900 each. What do you think?
Hey Greg - Do you have a chance to go to any shop that has both of these, or alternately, two shops that have the same speakers. Where are you? So far we've got bright, slow, neutral, lacking in detail and detailed. May I suggest you start another thread - B&W CDM7SE - what amps are you using. Maybe some others have already been where you've been.
My assessment, humbly is, that the Bryson sounds, although, I dislike this characterization, slow and lacking in fine detail. Inasmuch as tubes are finely detailed though somethat flawed in the bass region, the Bryston sounds unrefined and slower than I would characterize as being accurate musically. It is the proverbial workhorse versus the thorobred horse. It lacks refinement and detail, but has good bass and other good qualities.
Tvad, How would you compare the Bryston with the VAC Tube Amp. Forget conventional wisdom and all the techno talk, just, how do they compare? Which is better in your humble opinion, why, and so on.
I would also add thet the neww SST versions of the Brystom amps are less birght than the ST counterparts. MGD in Bound for Sound characterized the 4BSST as a warm amp
I have read these posts at somewhat a distance as the only experience I have with Bryston was many years ago, like 15 years ago. But I am compelled to chime in because this thread has seemed to turn into a, mine is better than yours, thread and much of it based on warranty.
There is no denying that Brystons warranty is one of the best, if not the best, in the business, which I commend them for; but this has nothing to do with the sonic performance of their gear, nor the fact that they are in many night clubs, which is a target market for Bryston.
As someone who recently purchased two MF pieces, I will simply state that I am very happy and I could mention many other testimonials/quotes. In like manner you will find many happy Bryston owners and testimonials. But it still boils down to, for the original poster, which of the two amps will work best for them and can anyone with experience with both give their thoughts, I dont have this experience nor has anyone in the above posts.
From things I have read, it is my opinion that you have chosen two fine amps and I can understand your curiosity. Sorry I dont have more to offer between the two but I find some of the comments in these threads to do you a disservice, not that they are not entitled to their opinions. Having my own, I feel MF is generally very good gear for the dollar.
Got to disagree with Tvad. Have used a Bryston/B&W combo for close to 3 years with a tube preamp and the results continue to be magical. Would be weary of using the earlier bryston preamp( the new version has a beefier power supply and sundry other improvements).Started with the 4BST and switched to a 14BST.There are many folks out there with a 14BSST/B&W 802 combos(something I can only dream about). IMHO, the Bryston is leagues ahead of MF in value for money at a given price point.
To me, Musical Fidelity gives meaning to the term ''Flavour of the month'' in Audio. Their ''Limited Edition'' way of putting out products is marketing hype aimed generating a false sense of urgency for overpriced gear. I've had a few MF units over the years. They sound OK at best but do not really engage any magic. I know its a matter of taste, but I do not like their 'Glitzy disco looks'' especially the not-so-old ''Gold and Silver'' looks. How tacky can you get? I feel Bryston is somewhat better,less flashy, but right up there with MF sonically and beats it in a few areas. I'm sure that Bryston is ''easier to live with''. The comparison with hand tools (Craftsmen and Snap-On) is totally ridiculous. Bryston should not be penalized for offering an honest warranty, and this is no judgement on their reliability record, which is excellent - just ask any Bryston owner. Ever seen MF gear in smoky nightclubs as main amplifiers ? This is the land of the fittest on reliability, and it is Brystonland.
Thanks guys. Snofun3: My source is the Rote RCD-1072 CD player, I also have the RC1090 pre-amp. The amps are old 120watt Rotels (I have 2 bi-amping) I get much better sound bi-amping. Cables are: inter connects Audioqwest Jaguar, speaker-Audioqwest Granite. I was also considering the Rotel RB-180 (200W),also in a bi-amp configuration. sigh.. so many choices.
I don't know if going from Rotel to Bryston or MF is going to give you the difference you're looking for.Maybe if the Rotel's are real small. What's your source? Any room treatments yet? I spent $350-400 on room treatments and it would have taken at least 10 times that much in equipment to get anywhere near the difference the treatments made. Also - careful on the "dual mono" stuff - it doesn't mean that much.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
